Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Bears Predictions


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

All I’m gonna say, after spending my childhood years in NW Indiana, I’ve had to hear those bears fans chirp. Beating them in the Super Bowl was the single greatest experience I’ve had as a fan.  

I’m more worried that it’s foles than trubinsky but if there is anyone that knows foles it’s reich 

Mitch Trubisky got Chicago to 2-0, and was pulled in favor of Nick Foles after a bad ½ of football that saw the Bears down by 13 with 3 punts, a missed field goal & an interception.  Foles was abl

Mitch Trubisky got Chicago to 2-0, and was pulled in favor of Nick Foles after a bad ½ of football that saw the Bears down by 13 with 3 punts, a missed field goal & an interception.  Foles was able to rally the Bears to victory with 20 fourth quarter points but I don’t see how Matt Nagy can replace Trubisky as the starter without fracturing the locker room – we may be catching them at the perfect time!

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

This will be the first real test for the Colts in this young season. Bears are 3-0 and while they have a QB controversy brewing, they still have looked good in other ways.

 

If the Colts come out and make a statement on the road, this will go a long way towards telling us where this team is heading.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts 23   DAH Bears 17

Rivers 230 yards 1 TD 1 int 

Foles 220 yards  2 int 

 

It was very stupid and puzzling for the bears to punch Foles in as the starter so early this season after Mitch had already gone 2-0. If Mitchell was the starter I would seriously considering a big chance for us to lose. Foles had a lot of bad passes against one of the worst defenses in football and had the luxury of the Falcons not game planning against him all week. We'll have an entire week of planning against a QB Frank Reich is very familiar with. It'll be hard for our offense to get rolling against their defense, but I think we'll be able to shut out Foles 

3 minutes ago, Patrick Miller said:

I think you all are overlooking the bears. I can see us losing this game very easily.

Not with Foles starting 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CaptainColt12 said:

Colts 23   DAH Bears 17

Rivers 230 yards 1 TD 1 int 

Foles 220 yards  2 int 

 

It was very stupid and puzzling for the bears to punch Foles in as the starter so early this season after Mitch had already gone 2-0. If Mitchell was the starter I would seriously considering a big chance for us to lose. Foles had a lot of bad passes against one of the worst defenses in football and had the luxury of the Falcons not game planning against him all week. We'll have an entire week of planning against a QB Frank Reich is very familiar with. It'll be hard for our offense to get rolling against their defense, but I think we'll be able to shut out Foles 

Not with Foles starting 

No Bears QB has passed over 4k yards 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phil should have some opportunities to go deep in this contest.  You know Pagano likes to leave his corners on an island one on one while sending the blitz.   Should be another good Mo Cox game.  We always got killed by Tight Ends under Pagano and that Baltimore scheme. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm leery about this game due to the offense.  They still aren't really clicking IMHO.  3-10 on 3rd downs today vs. a shoddy defense.  The Bears are better there.  I think the offense has been too predictable at times.  The defense will be fine.  But I could see this a struggle for both offenses and penalties and turnovers will likely decide it.  

 

Right now I'm thinking Bears 16-13.  Hope I'm wrong.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AZColt11 said:

I'm leery about this game due to the offense.  They still aren't really clicking IMHO.  3-10 on 3rd downs today vs. a shoddy defense.  The Bears are better there.  I think the offense has been too predictable at times.  The defense will be fine.  But I could see this a struggle for both offenses and penalties and turnovers will likely decide it.  

 

Right now I'm thinking Bears 16-13.  Hope I'm wrong.

half baked boo GIF

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone watched that Bears Falcons game, Foles made a couple fantastic throws but also made several plays that really should have been a turnover if it weren't for the Falcons being the Falcons. I hope we see some of those throws cuz Carrie and Rhodes will be waiting.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, bestQBever said:

If anyone watched that Bears Falcons game, Foles made a couple fantastic throws but also made several plays that really should have been a turnover if it weren't for the Falcons being the Falcons. I hope we see some of those throws cuz Carrie and Rhodes will be waiting.

mr bean waiting GIF

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

All I’m gonna say, after spending my childhood years in NW Indiana, I’ve had to hear those bears fans chirp. Beating them in the Super Bowl was the single greatest experience I’ve had as a fan.

 

Whether we win or lose next week isn’t as much of a big deal, cuz I still have that.

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bears seem like a very brittle 3-0 team, played like crap against the Lions then Trubisky came alive for 2 quarters for a comeback win. Barely limped past the lowly Giants then went down against the Falcons, benched quarterback, and now the Foles vs Trubisky thing has really blown up. They did come back and win but I don't see the success lasting starting next week.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Bears seem like a very brittle 3-0 team, played like crap against the Lions then Trubisky came alive for 2 quarters for a comeback win. Barely limped past the lowly Giants then went down against the Falcons, benched quarterback, and now the Foles vs Trubisky thing has really blown up. They did come back and win but I don't see the success lasting starting next week.

Score wise what do you think 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is going to be a tough game for the Colts playing away, they need to up their game a bit on the defense and get after Foles or Trubisky.....Also need to utitlize Taylor more....Play calling could use some improvement....Granted the Colts played an injury plagued Jets and vying for the Trevor Lawrence sweepstake. can't take dah Bears lightly.....Close one, but Colts prevail 25-23....

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Patrick Miller said:

That and despite the stats our defense is suspect. Especially the pass defense. 

And what are the Bears QBs?  Neither one of them has even done well enough to take a full handle on the offense without the coaches wondering if a change should be made.  Cousins and Darnold are better then the guys the Bears have. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the defense plays well, 28-10 Colts. We control the T.O.P and force them to be one dimensional on offense. If the D struggles, 31-24 Colts. Bears have a good defense, but I see our line holding up against their pass rush. Philip will have enough time to make that one throw to win the game.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, bluebombers87 said:

I think the issue is most people when they think of Foles think of that amazing post season run with the eagles. In reality he’s very inconsistent. The problem is however, he can still play like that for a stretch at a time.

I hope he gets late start lol

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Lancer1 said:

Mitch Trubisky got Chicago to 2-0, and was pulled in favor of Nick Foles after a bad ½ of football that saw the Bears down by 13 with 3 punts, a missed field goal & an interception.  Foles was able to rally the Bears to victory with 20 fourth quarter points but I don’t see how Matt Nagy can replace Trubisky as the starter without fracturing the locker room – we may be catching them at the perfect time!

Tribusky is done and Nagu has seen enough. Pull him at the right time. They are  3 and 0 and sends a message to the team

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He won't be there for us to take him. He was a prospect with insane physical and athletic ability and this year he seemed to have started figuring it out technically too. I doubt he drops out of the top 12-13 or thereabout. Rumor is he ran 6.39 3cone at 6'4 270lbs... which would be the second best 3cone time of all time by ANY position player at the combine. 
    • Here is an updated version of my dream draft for Indy. This would net Indy proven players at positions of high importance on this team.   I didn't include all the re-signings, but I would prefer bringing back Hilton to a team friendly short term deal, along with Muhammed and Walker.    Free agency Ballard signs DE Carl Lawson to a 4 year deal, worth approx. 9 mil per season (Young pass rusher who is still ascending) Ballard signs OT Ty Sambrailo to a 1 year deal, worth about 2 mil (Provides Indy with a better backup swing OT)   Draft Round 1 - Ballard trades 21st overall pick to New Orleans for CB Marshon Lattimore (I could see Rhodes possibly joining Philly and Jonathan Gannon. Ballard won't want to overpay an aging corner imo. Lattimore gives Indy a longterm shut down corner that quite honestly the Saints can't afford with their cap situation.)   Round 2 - Ballard trades 2nd round pick, and 2022 3rd to Detroit for QB Matthew Stafford (If you read the Detroit article below, it states what I believe, in that Stafford may not cost as much as people are thinking. A 1st and 2nd is a lot to give up, and Ballard only did it last year, because he was getting an All-Pro player at only 26 years old. Stafford is no All-Pro player and he is 33.)   https://www.freep.com/story/sports/nfl/lions/2021/01/26/matthew-stafford-detroit-lions-trade-request/4252707001/   Round 3 - Ballard trades 3rd, 5th round picks to move up in the 3rd round to land OT Jackson Carman (He could fall to the early 3rd due to the depth at OT this draft. He could compete and potentially start right away at LT for Indy.)   Round 4 - Ballard drafts best WR available - Options in 4th round include Nico Collins, Amari Rodgers. (Still need more talent at WR with Hilton aging and Pittman the only other guy you can count on.     
    • Really like this one. I too doubt we get Stafford for anything less than a 1st, but hey... if it happens that would be great. Love every single of your first 3 picks. Paulson Adebo was a great prospect, but last year was a down year for him so if we get him in the 3d that would be great. 
    • ESPN has been trying to get Peyton Manning as an analyst-no luck. They won't have any more success with Rivers, as he already has plans to coach HS football.  Maybe people just don't like the way ESPN runs things.    I saw that Greg Olsen is signing with FOX as an analyst. I liked him as guest commentator, so he will do a good job. Maybe he could replace Troy Aikman, who is dry and boring IMO. 
  • Members

    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,036

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pgt_rob

      pgt_rob 674

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 6,278

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • zibby43

      zibby43 1,129

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 21,336

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 1,401

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indeee

      Indeee 314

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 1,277

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chloe6124

      Chloe6124 9,213

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 4,124

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...