Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

They have Glow as 4th best guard and Nelson as 6th best guard.  It looks like they both have almost elite scores as run blockers and average pass blockers.  Kelly is a good pass blocker, but a very poor run blocker for some reason.  Smith is good at both pass and run.  AC is much like Kelly in that he is good at pass blocking, but poor at run blocking.  If Kelly could work on his run blocking we could gut defenses with Taylor and Wilkins.   

 

Speaking of Wilkins, he has a score of 81 through 2 games.  9 higher than Mack and 16 higher than Taylor.  He needs more touches.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

So happy for Mo.  Loved the way he bounced back from that first target.  And I wonder how many first team reps he possibly could have had with Rivers?  
 

I thought Glowinski was supposed to be the weak link on the OL?  Good to see him doing so well. 
 

As far as Wilkins, Rivers was raving about him after the game. Hope he gets more carries so JT stays fresh. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wilkins is better at making people miss and yards after contact.  JT is a rookie so, hopefully, he will get better.  He only caused 2 defenders to miss last week and averaged 3 yards after contact.  He just needs to be more patient and let holes develop.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, PrNum1 said:

Doyle is a nice player but Big Mo is something special.

 

A young Antonio Gates !!!

MO isn’t really that young. He is 27. But I suppose in football years he would be since he played basketball.

Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, bigt said:

They have Glow as 4th best guard and Nelson as 6th best guard.  It looks like they both have almost elite scores as run blockers and average pass blockers.  Kelly is a good pass blocker, but a very poor run blocker for some reason.  Smith is good at both pass and run.  AC is much like Kelly in that he is good at pass blocking, but poor at run blocking.  If Kelly could work on his run blocking we could gut defenses with Taylor and Wilkins.   

 

Speaking of Wilkins, he has a score of 81 through 2 games.  9 higher than Mack and 16 higher than Taylor.  He needs more touches.  


Wilkins played one game...in garbage time. He will get more touches...but I am it putting much stock into PFF grades for RBs.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Introspect said:

Gotta be proud for my fellow VCU RAM! Show the league how we ball in Virginia!

I'm not a Ram, but I still agree with the 2nd part.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, bigt said:

 Kelly is a good pass blocker, but a very poor run blocker for some reason.  Smith is good at both pass and run.  AC is much like Kelly in that he is good at pass blocking, but poor at run blocking.  If Kelly could work on his run blocking we could gut defenses with Taylor and Wilkins.   

Not sure others see what you're seeing here.... After last year, Kelly was ranked sixth overall center by PFF, fourth best Run blocking center and one of only seven to give up one or less sacks.....

 

As for your call on the guards, even as a rookie Nelson was 2nd among all OG in times he let his man, Within 5ft. Of the QB, again....as a rookie.... He hasn't exactly fallen off here, or anywhere....

 

And the oft-labeled "weak-link" ( aka least of a great unit) Glowinski's pass pro as thought of by others?..... Well, he did give up 42 pressures in some 700 snaps..... So yeah, you got that one pretty accurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Shafty138 said:

Not sure others see what you're seeing here.... After last year, Kelly was ranked sixth overall center by PFF, fourth best Run blocking center and one of only seven to give up one or less sacks.....

 

As for your call on the guards, even as a rookie Nelson was 2nd among all OG in times he let his man, Within 5ft. Of the QB, again....as a rookie.... He hasn't exactly fallen off here, or anywhere....

 

And the oft-labeled "weak-link" ( aka least of a great unit) Glowinski's pass pro as thought of by others?..... Well, he did give up 42 pressures in some 700 snaps..... So yeah, you got that one pretty accurate.

As for the tackles, smith is decent in pass pro, very good run blocking, AC is great in pass pro, and decent in run game.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

All this off season there were those who were talking about how bad Glow was. That he was the weakest link and needed to be replaced. And when Pinter was drafted how he could step in and take Glows spot. 

 

 Y'all are looking kind of uninformed at this point. 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Q is just an average pass blocker? Who says and for what period of time? 

 

Wilkins always has good numbers, not just in garbage time. Guy just can't seem to get any respect for some reason. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, cbear said:

Q is just an average pass blocker? Who says and for what period of time? 

 

Wilkins always has good numbers, not just in garbage time. Guy just can't seem to get any respect for some reason. 


I wonder if he’s poor in pass pro? I’ve thought he looks good in there in the past.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Shafty138 said:

Not sure others see what you're seeing here.... After last year, Kelly was ranked sixth overall center by PFF, fourth best Run blocking center and one of only seven to give up one or less sacks.....

 

As for your call on the guards, even as a rookie Nelson was 2nd among all OG in times he let his man, Within 5ft. Of the QB, again....as a rookie.... He hasn't exactly fallen off here, or anywhere....

 

And the oft-labeled "weak-link" ( aka least of a great unit) Glowinski's pass pro as thought of by others?..... Well, he did give up 42 pressures in some 700 snaps..... So yeah, you got that one pretty accurate.

Just going off PFF numbers through 2 games, not  career stats for offensive linemen.  Not sure what  criteria they use to grade run block vs pass block.  Just saying PFF has Glow and Q rated much higher at run vs pass through 2 games and AC and RK graded the opposite while Braden Smith is in the low 70s for both run and pass which is a good score on both - just through 2 games.  That may all change as season goes on.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, bigt said:

May have been in garbage time, but he has averaged 5.7 yards per carry over his 3 year career.


He’s been efficient his whole career. But for some reason...they don’t like him in a volume role.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am hoping, against the Jets, if we jump out to an early lead, they switch back and forth between Taylor and Wilkins and keep them in for complete drives.  Like they did Taylor last week so each can build an equal amount of familiarity with the Oline and see how each stacks up when the game is still on the line.  Who knows, maybe Wilkins will break out like Mo did last week.

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, bigt said:

If Kelly could work on his run blocking we could gut defenses with Taylor and Wilkins


Go watch 2018 tape and see the difference of the run game with and without Kelly and then come back here with this statement. There’s a reason Ryan Kelly is the highest paid center now... because front offices don’t read into PFF when making their own evaluations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mo needs to become the #1 tight end. He gives us so many mismatches with that huge frame. When Phil threw him that deep ball Mo was just towering over those DBs. Cant wait till Sunday to see what Phil does with him.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/21/2020 at 8:08 PM, Colts_Fan12 said:

Mo is such a beast and one of my favorite colts really hoping this leads to a bigger role for him! 

I mean, he has to have a pretty large role, he's the only TE left with any experience at the time ....

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, AustexColt said:

We are building up a nice stable of TE's.  With MO, Noah and Hentges... its going to be really nice. I think we should let Burton and Doyle sit out for awhile. These players maybe our future. 

I'd pump the brakes a bit on that for the moment. MAC looked fantastic, but we'll need to see if he can do it more than just once. Noah didn't show anything yet aside from costing a timeout because he didn't know where to line-up and missing a block or 2. Hentges is encouraging, but we haven't seen him in a regular season game yet.

 

Definitely some potential there, but the jury is absolutely still out.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/22/2020 at 5:44 AM, crazycolt1 said:

All this off season there were those who were talking about how bad Glow was. That he was the weakest link and needed to be replaced. And when Pinter was drafted how he could step in and take Glows spot. 

 

 Y'all are looking kind of uninformed at this point. 

 

 

 Actually, very informed, based on past performance.
Glow graded well as we were going 1-5 2 years ago, then kinda stunk it up the rest of the season.
And was good for about the first four games last season. Then ended up graded around 44-45 best for the season. Hopefully he has a healthy season, and a better Season than history shows to be expected.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 Actually, very informed, based on past performance.
Glow graded well as we were going 1-5 2 years ago, then kinda stunk it up the rest of the season.
And was good for about the first four games last season. Then ended up graded around 44-45 best for the season. Hopefully he has a healthy season, and a better Season than history shows to be expected.

Yeah well when he was being ragged on he was dealing with injury. 

But lets not that get in the way of pointing a finger and being negative. 

There are examples all over fan forums where the uninformed think they can judge but yet be wrong. 

PFF grading system does not take into account the reality of being a football player. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No idea you are a woman, always thought you were a guy. Learned something today on the forum!
    • so the only Colt impacted is Nelson?   So do I have this right - now teams could release a 5th year option player after year 4 and not be on the hook for the contract unless he got hurt in in that 4th year?   If that is right, seems a minimal impact rule to me.  
    • Using Mahomes as an example is kinda an exercise in futility.  Of course you trade multiple picks for the best QB in the game.  I would give up 3 first round and two 2nds for Mahomes and a third any day of the week. That trade is the exception and not the rule.  The real expectation level should be set at what should we do for a QB like Matt Ryan, D Watson or Matt Stafford.  All three are good solid QBs but not in the conversation as the best.  This is most likely the ceiling of whatever QB we would get.  You can build teams around them and compete in the playoffs but if you miss on other parts of the roster it can make you miss the playoffs.     I would not trade more than two first round picks to move up for a QB of this caliber.  They aren’t good enough to overcome multiple deficiencies on a team.  They are good enough to take an average team and put them in the playoffs tho.  Combine that with a good coaching staff and you have a shot at making a run in the playoffs.  This team has upcoming needs at premium positions: Tackle, DE and corner and we need the draft picks to get replacements to start grooming. Kinda in no mans land right now so something will have to be sacrificed unless we get lucky.  This decision will make or break Ballards career and I’m sure he knows this.  I appreciate his willingness to be patient and search for the right guy.  I hope it pays off and he finds him.  
    • Seriously - who is going to be giving up a 2nd round pick for “an injured tight end on a big contract?”   I mean if he is out 6-8 weeks as suggested, what good would he do a team this year anyway?  And would he not be able to pass the physical until after the trade deadline has passed?   To me the answer to all these questions lie in Philly as in that is where he finishes the season. 
    • I see some talent but nothing that truly blows my dress up.  Nothing that says go ahead and pay the ransoms it will take to get him.    This is really a ridiculous thread anyway - the Giants will not be giving up on Jones just two years in unless they are in position to draft Lawrence or Fields. That won’t happen because they are in the NFC East and will stumble into enough wins to take away that possibility. 
  • Members

    • holeymoley99

      holeymoley99 255

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 5,753

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 1,930

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 2,087

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 5,463

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jbaron04

      jbaron04 636

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tate

      tate 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 27

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tsarquise

      Tsarquise 844

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Rally5

      Rally5 712

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...