-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
By EastStreet · Posted
we can't afford Robinson. We have too many high $ needs IMO to spend that on a WR. Unless we want to go back to great O, bad D. I guess it depends on how things unfold, but I just can't see us keeping TY and getting a big name WR. I could see us drafting one in the 2nd or 3rd though, or taking a medium guy in FA. -
By Boilermaker · Posted
Where did I say that? I never said Watson wouldn’t be successful wherever he goes. If you’re going to make an argument, you need to stay on topic in order for your argument to be credible. Running away from my counterpoint with another statement I never made makes you look foolish. Your take your Stafford being a “stat qb” is a bad take as mentioned. You’re telling me you place Watson on the lions team starting in 09, he’s going to have significantly more success than Stafford? The answer is unlikely. -
If Stafford can give us four years it gives us time to see what Eason can do. He can develop. Then maybe you can just transfer right to him in a few years. We are all going to be devastated if this doesn’t happen.
-
I would definitely trade our #21 pick for Stafford. Do it Ballard! Otherwise, may take 2-3 first round picks to move within the top 8 of the draft to draft a rookie QB. Our options are slim unless you’re happy with Brissett under center again.
-
By EastStreet · Posted
He was always going to be kept on the 53. They're not taking a chance of their potential next QB getting poached off the PS. What is going to happen before the April 29th draft that would allow Ballard to change his opinion?
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now