Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

[Rapoport] Malik Hooker is feared to have torn Achilles. MRI tomorrow.


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, EastStreet said:

Not sure I'd call him a bust. More than anything, and injuries aside, I'd call him a bad fit for our scheme.

 

He was a single high C1 lurker in college. Going two high C2, or three high Tampa 2 turned him to a half field or third field hand off manager.

 

If you look at it that way, we kind of wasted a 1st round talent trying to fit him into a C2/T2 zone D. That assumes he would have been a good C1 single high FS of course. He was definitely good at OSU in that role though.


I’ve never been a fan of taking a Safety in the 1st Rd. There kinda of like RBs, being if you select one high, you expect them to be top 5 at their respective position IMO.

 

The Colts had a lot of other needs, but took a Safety who was supposedly a steal in the draft. 
 

I’ll minimize the bust statement and just say he’s been a disappointment for a 15th overall pick. 
 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, lollygagger8 said:

Hate to say it (and I hope he gets better) but the Defense looked better with him out of the lineup. 

 

Yep, Julian Blackmon looked way more agile out there in coverage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah that’s really unfortunate. The way his whole career has turned out has sucked. ACL 4 games into his rookie season, torn meniscus the next season, and now an Achilles. 
 

And while there is clearly some disappointment with him from a production standpoint, I think it’s mostly due to him being a poor scheme fit. He’s a single high in a press man scheme. In our Cover-2 zone, he’s miscast.

 

I wish him well but I was very impressed with Blackmon.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, EastStreet said:

Not sure I'd call him a bust. More than anything, and injuries aside, I'd call him a bad fit for our scheme.

 

He was a single high C1 lurker in college. Going two high C2, or three high Tampa 2 turned him to a half field or third field hand off manager.

 

If you look at it that way, we kind of wasted a 1st round talent trying to fit him into a C2/T2 zone D. That assumes he would have been a good C1 single high FS of course. He was definitely good at OSU in that role though.

 

Didn't he kind of play that role his rookie year and he had 3 picks in 7 games?  

 

I still think a lot of it was because QB's just didn't throw it his direction much.  You didn't see Hooker getting beat in coverage a lot. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is one damn unlucky guy. What a shame... so many serious injuries for such a young player. His career has completely gone off the rails thanks to those constant injuries. :( He was one of my favorite prospects in his draft class and started his career so promising... and then...  :facepalm:

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Well... If we weren't re-signing him before, we definitely aren't now. The 2017 class in their final year are dropping like flies. Luckily we have Blackmon and Taylor.

Why not? It's gonna be cheap as hell if they want to resign both Hooker and Mack now.... I'd think you would definitely take a look, try to bring back two guys with several years in your system, k ow the coaches, locker room etc....and still have potential, let them come back as depth on incentive laden deals tied to health/snaps played..... If anything I think these Injuries make it MORE likely they re sign with Indy ....unless Ballard decides to use some of the now MASSIVE amount of cap room he's going to have to play with on obvious talent upgrades from each....

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Freenyfan102 said:

He is like bob sander except his play style is awful and was drafted in the first round. 

So he's unlike God Sanders in any way that you went on to list? Lol .... Malik is made of glass, Sanders just used the amount of steroids commonly prescribed to an oz, not a 5-8 Human being, no wonder he kept literally ripping his muscles off the bone.....lol

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, MPStack said:


I’ve never been a fan of taking a Safety in the 1st Rd. There kinda of like RBs, being if you select one high, you expect them to be top 5 at their respective position IMO.

 

The Colts had a lot of other needs, but took a Safety who was supposedly a steal in the draft. 
 

I’ll minimize the bust statement and just say he’s been a disappointment for a 15th overall pick. 

Agree 100% on Ss in the 1st round. That is, unless you play a lot of C1. If you play a lot of C1, the FS is critical. If you don't, like us, S is a devalued position requiring a lot less freakish skills. And some S are simply better suited C2 than C1, and vice versa. 

 

I wasn't happy with the pick either, due to other needs. To be honest, with a C2, doubt I'd ever take a S in the first 2 rounds.

 

I'm just very disappointed in the whole situation. Bad fit, bad use of draft capital, etc.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

Didn't he kind of play that role his rookie year and he had 3 picks in 7 games?  

 

I still think a lot of it was because QB's just didn't throw it his direction much.  You didn't see Hooker getting beat in coverage a lot. 

Yes. IIRC (feel free to correct me), we've played more zone, and/or more soft zone the last couple years. 

 

And yes, QBs threw far more at Willis last year, and other DBs when Hooker is out there.

 

In short, shouldn't shock anyone to see INTs go down when targets go down, and when instead of lurking across the whole back end, you've only got half the field, or a 3rd of the field to guard.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, chad72 said:

Parris Campbell and Malik Hooker, what is the one common theme? Buckeyes. Neither of them can stay healthy for long.

 

No more Buckeyes, Mr. Ballard. :thmup:

Should have learned from Polian’s mistake when we drafted Anthony Gonzalez in the 1st rd when we let Stokely walk....then we got literally the same production we were shooting for from like a 4th rd slot man in Austin Collie and replaced Marvin with a 5th rd pick with Garçon although that had mixed results (Marvin would never have dropped that pass in the SB and would have scored on it). Theme...certain positions you rely on your stars to make them better and invest high picks in areas that rely more on individual talent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I liked this draft pick at the time, but other than a few highlight reel plays (Week 1 last season INT) he has been largely a disappointment who can't stay healthy.  Which is causing which, IDK but it's probably time to move on, and I would consider him one of Ballard's biggest misses in the draft.  This Blackmon kid looks decent so far but I'm going to hold off on anointing him the successor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's what I got from his press-conference too. That's what I got from Ballard's presser earlier this month too - he will prefer addressing QB with a vet.    Yep. Ballard said something similar to that effect too - they think they are close. I think they are somewhat close, but I do think several positions(most important ones) need addressing and we will need injury luck. I don't think we are Matt Stafford away. I think we are Matt Stafford, good LT, good WR, good DE and good CB away... and that's assuming good health. In essence, my position right now is - if you are getting Stafford, you better be ready to address all those other positions or you are wasting your resources on a team that will ultimately come short.    That's the thing. I think there is a good option. Not ideal, but good. It's trading up in the draft for one of the top 4 prospects. I think all of them are high level prospects that can be franchise QBs. This is a good draft. This is the type of draft you trade up in for the guy you love. Here comes the less than ideal part - this would mean we probably take a slight step back next year. But again... we have SO MANY high value positions unaddressed that we might take a step back either way unless we are ready to go all in with Stafford. Right at this moment we are a worse team than last year. Our franchise LT just retired. Our QB just retired. We have TY, Houston, Autry, Rhodes, Walker, Carrie, Muhammad, Burton, Alie Cox ... to re-sign. So... our best WR, both our starting DEs, both our starting outside corners(by the end Carrie was getting more snaps than Rock), 2 of 3 TEs, our starting MIKE, our backup DE...   In essence we have 70M cap to address: QB, LT, 2xDE, 2xCB, MIKE, 1 or 2 WRs, possibly TE... I'm not sure we will be able to.    Holy moly, the more I look at our situation the more I don't like where we are and the more I think Stafford won't be enough to even get us to this year's level. I don't know... I have to rethink things... I might do another mock off-season post Senior Bowl to put my thoughts on paper and see how it shakes up if we have to trade up multiple high level picks for Stafford. 
    • Judging by what Irsay had to say at his year ender,  it doesn't look like that Ballard will wait to the draft to pull the trigger, unless he strikes out in a trade for every veteran we've talked about.   From Stafford, to Rodgers, to Ryan,  to Carr,  to Garropolo and so on....   Irsay was saying he, Ballard and Frank all think they're close.  (his words)  So, the quickest and most direct path to future success is a trade for a veteran (my words, but his implication)    Irsay didn't rule out a draft pick in April.     I suspect you're old enough to understand the concept I'm about to address.   I think one of the most interesting concepts adults deal with in all walks of life is that sometimes,  there are no good options.   There are only poor options or bad options.  And the job is to try and figure out which option is the least bad.   I'm not just talking sports,  but all things in life.   Sometimes there just are no good options.   And, I think the Colts are pretty close to being there.   But, you find the best choice there is and chalk it up to the price of doing business in the NFL.     What else can we do?   Sorry if this got preachy....    didn't mean for it to.  
    • You said Jameis Winston like a turn over machine is good for the team. I want a plus 14 turnover rate not negative 56
    • What us with you guys signing and keeping old washed up players......like really I want a football team not a retirement home.
  • Members

    • stitches

      stitches 7,596

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 1,628

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chucklez

      Chucklez 305

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • UKColt13

      UKColt13 161

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BillCoslosky87

      BillCoslosky87 1,133

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Peytonator

      The Peytonator 451

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 410

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 7,588

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indycrazy1287

      Indycrazy1287 21

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jmac_48

      jmac_48 363

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...