-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
I mean, it just says "Round 1 options" so it could easily be someone not in a decision making role with some thoughts that they have or would be presenting to decision makers, or it could belong to a decision maker who just has some options laid out. I don't see this as any indication that this trade would be happening, but it's not unlikely that those conversations have taken place. Teams line up all kinds of potential trade deals for draft day. They don't just start making calls the moment they're on the clock and hope they can find a team that wants to trade with them. A lot of leg work is done ahead of time to gauge interest and potential baseline compensation. Because that trade deal makes a lot of sense, I could see this as being legitimate, although again, just one of a number of options for GB. -
By polk_high_allstar · Posted
Depth at OT is much better then Edge. If we could get Paye or Phillips in the 1st round and grab a OT in the 2nd I would be ecstatic. Still should have one of Eichenberg, Radunz or Little at pick 54. Any of these 3 in the 2nd I would be happy with. If we go the other way around I'm really not sure what Edge player we could target in the 2nd (maybe Ossai, Basham or possibly Tyron). Don't get me wrong if Slater or Darrisaw is sitting at the 21st pick I'm pulling the trigger. Would look at Cosmi in a trade down situation. -
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
PS. Yes our perimeter players r young. However, as of yet I do not see one who I think is legit. I am speaking of WR, CB and DE. -
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
Smith 13 million? He is rated as one of the best young RT's. U think he is going to watch Nelson get say 20 million when he plays a more important position? Look at the salaries for RT's. This Oline is bout to get very expensive. I would say to expensive. -
Eichenberg isn't exciting, but he doesn't worry me either. I'd much rather have Darrisaw, but that's been looking less and less likely.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts