Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

Even if the team loses Sunday, they have as soft a schedule as your could ask for after that.  Jets, Bears, Browns, Bengals, Lions.

 

I was thinking 5-2 after the first 7 would be probable, maybe 6-1 or possibly all 7.  

 

After this, the non con schedule is just brutal and looks even worse with how good Pitt looked this weekend.  In division, Texans don't look as formidiable, and I am not sold on Tennesse either, but the Colts were far from impressive.

 

If the Colts are not significantly better against the run going forward then they were last season, this is going to be pretty much a lost season IMO.  

 

If we can't go 4-1 v. those 5 teams IMO, we are far from what I thought we were.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Until we see this team put it all together...I don't feel safe predicting any type of stretch like that.

 

This season has a lot of parity...more than I recall seeing in recent years. Of those teams you listed...only the NYJ appear to be a dumpster fire. CIN maybe...but they are still figuring things out with Burrow. I think CHI and DET are decent opponents...and CLE has talent. 

 

Going to have to take it one game at a time.

 

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's too early to judge, but I don't know why anyone thinks the Browns, Bears, Lions, or even the Bengals games are going to be easier than the second part of the season.  And historically, we haven't had much luck with the Jets.

 

I agree with @shasta519 , the lack of OTAs and the preseason resulted in a lot of parity. 

 

I think as the season goes on, the wheat will start separating from the chaff.  I just hope we're wheat.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

It's too early to judge, but I don't know why anyone thinks the Browns, Bears, Lions, or even the Bengals games are going to be easier than the second part of the season.  And historically, we haven't had much luck with the Jets.

 

I agree with @shasta519 , the lack of OTAs and the preseason resulted in a lot of parity. 

 

I think as the season goes on, the wheat will start separating from the chaff.  I just hope we're wheat.

Agreed. And some of the teams that looked good in game 1 may not look so good come week 6 and vice Versa. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Weve got an explosive group on offense. We need the D to step up starting Sunday to really get some solid results. The problems we had last week were not due to being outmatched in any way. The film shows technique and execution issues which are fixable

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Well yeah theoretically it's to early to "judge" but I think we can predict with mountains of evidence and just common sense that 

 

wks 3-7 Jets, Bears, Browns, Bengals, Lions  

 

are going to be a much lighter schedule that

 

wks. 8-12   Ravens, Titans, Packers, Titans, Houston

 

I'm not a gambling man but I would be willing to bet a a pretty hefty percentage of my meager assets that the SOS for wks. 8-12 is going to prove to me much greater than wks. 3-7

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Nickster said:

 

 

If the Colts are not significantly better against the run going forward then they were last season, this is going to be pretty much a lost season IMO.  

 

 

Well the second half they were doing better it seemed. The big question will be the passing

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Nickster said:

Even if the team loses Sunday, they have as soft a schedule as your could ask for after that.  Jets, Bears, Browns, Bengals, Lions.

 

I was thinking 5-2 after the first 7 would be probable, maybe 6-1 or possibly all 7.  

 

After this, the non con schedule is just brutal and looks even worse with how good Pitt looked this weekend.  In division, Texans don't look as formidiable, and I am not sold on Tennesse either, but the Colts were far from impressive.

 

If the Colts are not significantly better against the run going forward then they were last season, this is going to be pretty much a lost season IMO.  

 

If we can't go 4-1 v. those 5 teams IMO, we are far from what I thought we were.  

Hmmmmm....so u think we could run thr table if we lose this weekend? We just lost to the Jags. They were predicted to be in play for the  #1 pick

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Hmmmmm....so u think we could run thr table if we lose this weekend? We just lost to the Jags. They were predicted to be in play for the  #1 pick

Just who predicted the Jags would be in play for the #1 pick? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Hmmmmm....so u think we could run thr table if we lose this weekend? We just lost to the Jags. They were predicted to be in play for the  #1 pick

Maybe the Colts are in play for the #1 pick?

 

Endeavor for Trevor!

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Nah not our goal, we are in it to win it all. After this Sunday I think that will show. Last week was a fluke IMO. 

I dunno.... maybe it was a fluke for Jax, but our defense was so bad and Rivers' propensity to throw to the other team continued to be something to be wary of. I wouldnt be overly shocked if Dalvin Cook torches our run D and Thielen eats. We couldnt handle DJ Chark, how we gonna manage with him?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My two cents...

 

I’ve never understood how applying last year’s SOS has any bearing on this year’s outcomes. Good teams last season turn out to be bad this year and vice versa. It happens every year. 
 

I never bought the hype that the Jags were tanking and an automatic win for Indy. 
 

I don’t think the season is over should the Colts lose on Sunday nor do I think it salvaged should they win.  And declaring it either way is pure folly. 
 

Hope they win on Sunday. Then I will start to think about the Jets game. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, jskinnz said:

My two cents...

 

I’ve never understood how applying last year’s SOS has any bearing on this year’s outcomes. Good teams last season turn out to be bad this year and vice versa. It happens every year. 
 

I never bought the hype that the Jags were tanking and an automatic win for Indy. 
 

I don’t think the season is over should the Colts lose on Sunday nor do I think it salvaged should they win.  And declaring it either way is pure folly. 
 

Hope they win on Sunday. Then I will start to think about the Jets game. 

 

 

While true, the statistics and history of teams that start 0-2 and their season prospects are not promising (I believe it's like 12% make they playoffs from that position). Just numbers i know, but still something to think about.

If the defense looks like a dumpster fire again, I think it would be fair to start worrying about how the rest of the season will fare.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chucklez said:

While true, the statistics and history of teams that start 0-2 and their season prospects are not promising (I believe it's like 12% make they playoffs from that position). Just numbers i know, but still something to think about.

If the defense looks like a dumpster fire again, I think it would be fair to start worrying about how the rest of the season will fare.


Great and correct use of fair and fare in your last sentence. 
 

Dis not say it would not be an uphill climb should they lose on Sunday just that the season is not over. 
 

Plus there is an extra playoff spot this year as well. 
 

All I am saying is that I won’t panic or get completely relieved with either outcome on Sunday. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, jskinnz said:


Great and correct use of fair and fare in your last sentence. 
 

Dis not say it would not be an uphill climb should they lose on Sunday just that the season is not over. 
 

Plus there is an extra playoff spot this year as well. 
 

All I am saying is that I won’t panic or get completely relieved with either outcome on Sunday. 

The bolded is a key bit of info, when discussing the percentages of teams making the playoffs after 0-2 start. That extra slot is a game changer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Sumo63 said:

I wont feel confident vs any opponent until Eberflus fields a D that is competitive.

There was an article earlier this week showing some evidence that it wasn't all on Flus. Our guys played really poorly. The % and easy TDs was alarming and poor field position due to TO kept yardage totals down. Blame goes to the whole D unit. Just hope it doesn't take weeks to get it goin. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, jskinnz said:


Great and correct use of fair and fare in your last sentence. 
 

Dis not say it would not be an uphill climb should they lose on Sunday just that the season is not over. 
 

Plus there is an extra playoff spot this year as well. 
 

All I am saying is that I won’t panic or get completely relieved with either outcome on Sunday. 

First bolded sentence, a true and good point which should help bump that 12% number up a bit higher.

 

Second bolded point, if we lose and go 0-2, my reaction will be based on HOW we lose. If the defense looks completely and utterly inept again, I'll be heavily in panic mode for the season's prospects. If it is a close fought battle and we lose, but we showed up (especially on D), that is a totally different looking 0-2 and I wouldn't be as worried.

I also need to see Rivers make those plays still but not throw those bewildering more like 30-70 balls (30% our guy gets it - 70% their guy does. His picks last week definitely weren't 50-50 balls). 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Hmmmmm....so u think we could run thr table if we lose this weekend? We just lost to the Jags. They were predicted to be in play for the  #1 pick

No.  I meant I was thinking that before Sunday.  Can’t go 7 and 0 when you’ve already lost Moose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ^This^   Another way to look at it is this:  considering the production that Ballard is getting out of his draft picks while they're still on their rookie contracts... why over-spend on re-signing anybody?   If Ballard can continue hitting on draft picks the way he has, then it's almost better to just keep accumulating draft picks, draft well, and let the young guys go out and make plays.   Let other teams over-spend on proven talent while Indy keeps providing an opportunity for young hungry players to prove their talent.   Save the money for slam-dunk moves like Buckner.
    • I bet you are 1000% wrong.   Nelson is the biggest name in the league at G, and it's not even close.  A "bad" Nelson (that gets called for ticky-tack holds that happen on every single NFL play) is still better than 90% of the guards in the NFL.   Your hot-take posts are getting very tiresome.  
    • They have contributed as much their rookie year as the entire group maybe by end of the season, but I doubt there's even a tiny chance of 2 all pros. Even 1 is a major stretch.  I am not sure we have any all pro's on the team since the most deserving one is Buckner (who I count as our first round pick in every way) has impact but no stats to wow anyone not intimately aware of his impact. If he misses this game we may painfully see how valuable.  But their collective impact has certainly added up. 4 starters and 2 solid special teamers in a so far playoff level team is quite a haul for any draft pick class in history.  It is at least adjacent to 2018, unless you don't count Buckner in any way.
    • Nothing against you and I like you as a poster but counting Ballard's 2017 season is a stretch. I realize he was the GM that year (1st year) but he didn't have the Coach he wanted and Luck was out for the year. We went 4-12 that year so his record is a bit skewed because of that. Others have posted the same thing about Ballard's record so you are not the only one and I just don't see how anyone can count that season legitimately. I pretty much go by 2018-this year when he hired Frank and his record would be 25-19 counting the playoffs. Is he the best GM in the league, probably not but he is good. He is responsible for drafting Nelson, Leonard, Mack, signing Houston, signing Rivers and trading for Buckner = great work there. Luck just retiring on the team and McDaniels dissing him even made his job that much harder. 
    • I am late to the party but it doesn't matter because I would've been 1-1 anyway. I had the Lions and Washington so it offsets     Here are my Sunday picks/Monday pick: Ravens 17 Steelers 24 Chargers 19 Bills 27 Titans 27 Colts 30 Panthers 20 Vikings 21 Browns 27 Jags 17 Giants 24 Bengals 10 Cards 27 Pats 23 Dolphins 99 Jets 0 (Fluke's original quote) Saints 24 Broncos 13 49ers 17 Rams 30 Chiefs 34 Bucs 24 Bears 17 Packers 27 Seahawks 31 Eagles 17
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...