Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Its still weird calling Redskins Football Team


Recommended Posts

I really hope they land on a good name next year but I can't help but laugh when I hear:

 

Great win by Football Team!

What a solid effort by Football Team!

1st Down Football Team!

Sack and Football Team has the football!

TOUCHDOWN FOOTBALL TEAM!

 

 

 

  • Haha 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I really hope they land on a good name next year but I can't help but laugh when I hear:   Great win by Football Team! What a solid effort by Football Team! 1st Down Football Team!

Typical hog wash that our society as decided out of the blue that the past is bad no more statues of the founding  fathers, and if it is not presented in a positive past then we should destroy th

Washington Monuments.......just imagine the logo!  Enough to make a Clinton blush......

Posted Images

3 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

I really hope they land on a good name next year but I can't help but laugh when I hear:

 

Great win by Football Team!

What a solid effort by Football Team!

1st Down Football Team!

Sack and Football Team has the football!

TOUCHDOWN FOOTBALL TEAM!

 

 

I just call them Washington, as I would say Green Bay or New England. I don't say the Green Bay team. I just say Green Bay.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/15/2020 at 11:50 PM, ReMeDy said:

I remember reading they may just stick with the name they have now. We'll see.

I hope they do.   This is what I wanted when they first caved to the pressure.  

Could they get away with:

The Skins

The Pigskins

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

In some ways it has grown on me.  Sounds “old-timey.”

”The Washington Football Team.”  

It puts the emphasis on the home location.... Washington.  

There’s actually probably a unique marketing angle that could be inventive, progressive, and refreshing........: thenagain, its Dan Snyder.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, WoolMagnet said:

In some ways it has grown on me.  Sounds “old-timey.”

”The Washington Football Team.”  

It puts the emphasis on the home location.... Washington.  

There’s actually probably a unique marketing angle that could be inventive, progressive, and refreshing........: thenagain, its Dan Snyder.

I actually like it to.

 

 

I do know they will sell a lot of extra merch.

 

Sell remaining on old merch(cause some will want to buy it for nostalgia)

Sell The Football Team merch(season or 2)

Then change to new name and sell that merch, everyone will want to get the Football Team Merch then for nostalgia.

 

Major money making going on.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/19/2020 at 9:15 AM, WoolMagnet said:

In some ways it has grown on me.  Sounds “old-timey.”

”The Washington Football Team.”  

It puts the emphasis on the home location.... Washington.  

There’s actually probably a unique marketing angle that could be inventive, progressive, and refreshing........: thenagain, its Dan Snyder.

 

Honestly in Europe most teams don't have mascots or anything like that.  They just call themselves things like Chelsea FC.  (FC standing for Football Club)

 

I think if Washington just started calling themselves "Washington FC or Washington AFC (for American Football Club) it would be cool.  I am guessing they will come up with a team name though.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

It’s gonna be strange & uncomfortable if and when Washington brings in some of it’s Hall of Fame players or other historical greats like Joe Theismann, Doug Williams or John Riggins for accolades, but expects them to embrace the new team name or deny the one they achieved their fame under.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the false news channel like "CNN and others have created  a must comply with leftest democrat's  view 

on how to comply on peoples right to disagree. They want you to feel that you  have no opinion on the matter. and if you don't agree then you are a bigot

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, horseshoecrabs said:

I think that the false news channel like "CNN and others have created  a must comply with leftest democrat's  view 

on how to comply on peoples right to disagree. They want you to feel that you  have no opinion on the matter. and if you don't agree then you are a bigot

 

Only a long term bigot would insist on keeping the racist name. If he owned a baseball a team in the old Negro Baseball League what would his team be named?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, King Colt said:

Tell that to the American Indian Nation.

Typical hog wash that our society as decided out of the blue that the past is bad no more statues of the founding 

fathers, and if it is not presented in a positive past then we should destroy that past history part. because it's offensive 

I call it selective history to heaven forbid not embarrass anyone about what the past history was.  What's next ?

there was no Roman Empire or Spanish inquisition, or  American revaluation ,  or world war 1 or 2?, because we ended world war 2  by the atomic bomb? Or they were not Hebrews in Mosses time that were slaves' in bondage.  Every race, even the  so called White race  were at some point slaves or in bondage to the society at some point in history . so my point every Race , religious belief, etc.,,, were in bondage at some point in time. So do we just wipe all of this out of history? or do we learn from our mistakes of the past  and move on.   

 

 

'

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, King Colt said:

Only a long term bigot would insist on keeping the racist name. If he owned a baseball a team in the old Negro Baseball League what would his team be named?

King Colt , I resent  your bigot implications because number one you don't know me , and I doubt very much you are of American heritage.  So unless you speak for the  American Indians, that by the way have a much better case for why they are not the  minority , since this is their land  then all races should just give them back that what were there's' I would not have any trouble in complying to them Would You?

 

 

   

Edited by horseshoecrabs
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, horseshoecrabs said:

King Colt , I resent  your bigot implications because number one you don't know me

Pretty sure he was talking about the original Redskins owner and not you.

 

Either way lets clean it up in here. Not even to sure the thread needs to stay open.? It just invites back and forth that is toeing the line.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, horseshoecrabs said:

King Colt , I resent  your bigot implications because number one you don't know me , and I doubt very much you are of American heritage.  So unless you speak for the  American Indians, that by the way have a much better case for why they are not the  minority , since this is their land  then all races should just give them back that what were there's' I would not have any trouble in complying to them Would You?

 

 

   

I don't need a weatherman to tell me it's raining. I don't speak for any race rather against racism.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/15/2020 at 11:39 PM, danlhart87 said:

I think they had a few names in mind I do wonder what they end up being 2021.

 

 

Part of me thinks that Snyder just might be playing a waiting game before he goes back to Redskins.  How long does this really take to find a name? 

 

NBA commissioner said that they will not have any of that social messaging in their unis and games next season.  Sort of addressed the issue when the iron was hot, but now going back to simply playing basketball.

 

I don't think Snyder will do that, but I would not be entirely surprised if it happened.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The only problem is WRs and TEs are not going to come here to die with an unknown with uncertainty at the QB position. You get the trigger man before you get the skill position guys, period, not the other way. Otherwise, you would have to overpay to convince someone to come in here with 2 unknowns at QB, not going to happen with Ballard. That is where I fundamentally disagree.    The window of a dominant OL is not going to last forever, I would say we have 2-3 years at the highest level with this OL as a SB contender, and a few improvements on D to make noise. It does not preclude us from drafting a QB of the future but if that draft capital had to be directed at moving up for a QB OR getting an established one, I think Irsay with his statement has made it clear that it is going to be an established one. Heck, we thought the legion of Boom is going to enjoy a run and it lasted 2-3 good years, I would have to say in its prime at the highest level.   If we were drafting at say No.10-12 after having Rivers as QB, it would be different and we might hit the re-set button for a couple of years. That is not the case here.
    • I think one of the reasons they are actively going after Stafford is because there are no guarantees any of the top 4 QBs fall to 21.   They could miss out on Stafford then top 4 QBs go before 21 then be totally unprepared. I would think from that standpoint Ballard would be aggressive and trade up.   I like Mac Jones who could easily be had in trade down scenario but who knows if Ballard even likes him.   I just don't want to roll out with JB again. I am fine with JB as a backup though.    I would even throw a player in the deal to get Stafford. Even Leonard if that eliminated the threat of losing pick 21.
    • To the best of my knowledge, Romo is the only broadcaster who will see the offense at the line of scrimmage and tell the viewer what the okay is before the play is even run.     That’s been one of his claims to fame.    What do you object to? 
    • Sounds like TY will test the market and colts will look to upgrade the position.   
    • I would love this. I would still love Doyle back for a 1 or 2 year team friendly deal. Burton can go. It would still be up to Frank to utilize the whole enchilada of TEs, IMO, and not underutilize them.
  • Members

    • Balzer40

      Balzer40 0

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts1324

      Colts1324 370

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Sumo63

      Sumo63 525

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 6,297

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • life long

      life long 156

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 2,398

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shive

      Shive 1,750

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shasta519

      shasta519 2,657

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lancer1

      Lancer1 764

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 7,578

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...