Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

On 9/16/2020 at 6:44 AM, RollerColt said:

Bengals 23 Browns 21

Giants 10 Bears 17

Rams 28 Eagles 31

Falcons 34 Cowboys 38

Panthers 13 Buccaneers 27

49ers 30 Jets 9

Broncos 12 Steelers 30

Jaguars 16 Titans 18

Lions 24 Packers 54

Bills 28 Dolphins 6

Vikings 23 Colts 24

Washington Football Team 22 Cardinals 27

Ravens 41 Texans 34

Chiefs 34 Chargers 18

Patriots 24 Seahawks 21

Saints 31 Raiders 7

12 - 3 good job

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, AZColt11 said:

Well, I'm undefeated so far........but unfortunately missed the Thursday nighter where I would have UNDOUBTEDLY picked the Browns.  Luckily I did in my picks pool for money.  

Yeah that was the only game I got wrong, I am 14-1. I believe you picked the Browns but you didn't do it here unfortunately but I am ok with whatever Dan decides. That is amazing you may go 16-0 :thmup:

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/20/2020 at 12:46 AM, NFLfan said:

 

If the Colts can run the ball and not force Rivers to be a gunslinger, I think the Colts will win. This is not the same Vikings defense. The DL has no Danielle Hunter, Linval Joseph or Everson Griffen, all starters last year. And all the CBs are new starters. One rookie CB (Danzler) who started last week is out tomorrow. The defense is a mess. We will need the offense to sustain drives but we don't do that well with Cousins.

 

Lol. I was not far off in my prediction.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

We both took the Saints so I guess we share this weeks trophy lol.

 

6 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

Cage fight to the death

I think we have to tally point totals for the tie breaker.  Good thing I have the jets game 99-0. Lol

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, AZColt11 said:

Well, I'm undefeated so far........but unfortunately missed the Thursday nighter where I would have UNDOUBTEDLY picked the Browns.  Luckily I did in my picks pool for money.  

Congratulations Az!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Yeah that was the only game I got wrong, I am 14-1. I believe you picked the Browns but you didn't do it here unfortunately but I am ok with whatever Dan decides. That is amazing you may go 16-0 :thmup:

Nah, I missed getting the pick in, that's on me.  I don't want anything handed to me.  But I could go 15-0, which is still pretty fair.  In my picks league for money, we use confidence points and if you miss the Thursday nighter you automatically get a 16 assigned to that game and you don't get the points, so it pretty much kills your chances when there's 92 other people in it.  This must have been a somewhat easier week to pick because I'm 15-0 so far and there are several other people in the same boat.  Normally, if you go 12-4 or 13-3 you win the week.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, AZColt11 said:

Nah, I missed getting the pick in, that's on me.  I don't want anything handed to me.  But I could go 15-0, which is still pretty fair.  In my picks league for money, we use confidence points and if you miss the Thursday nighter you automatically get a 16 assigned to that game and you don't get the points, so it pretty much kills your chances when there's 92 other people in it.  This must have been a somewhat easier week to pick because I'm 15-0 so far and there are several other people in the same boat.  Normally, if you go 12-4 or 13-3 you win the week.

Don't pull a NE and lose on the final game now 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AZColt11 said:

Nah, I missed getting the pick in, that's on me.  I don't want anything handed to me.  But I could go 15-0, which is still pretty fair.  In my picks league for money, we use confidence points and if you miss the Thursday nighter you automatically get a 16 assigned to that game and you don't get the points, so it pretty much kills your chances when there's 92 other people in it.  This must have been a somewhat easier week to pick because I'm 15-0 so far and there are several other people in the same boat.  Normally, if you go 12-4 or 13-3 you win the week.

Yeah I have been picking games just on my own or with a couple of friends for years and I usually average an 11-5 record each week over the years. I have been a 10-6 to 12-4, etc. guy which is very good. I was only 9-7 last week. This week to me there were a lot of easy picks, but 14-1 for me is above the norm. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I want no part of Cousins for Colts but I could see having luck elsewhere possibly 
    • LOL, just like being a Wisconsin QB is a negative predictor...Hello Russell Wilson.  Your dispassionate analysis fails to consider we were running an Air Coryell system that year, which is hugely beneficial to RBs. It spreads out the entire D, and does not allow for tight fronts or stacked boxes. It's an incredible benefit to RBs. Indy on the other hand, is a dink and dunk, which actually promotes Ds to play up and congest the box.
    • I'll take any QB.   @EastStreet Do you think any team would be willing to trade for Cousins? We may have to offer incentives like a mid-round pick to make the trade happen. I think I would be willing to give even a 2nd.  I thought Dallas for a 8-9 game rental. (Actually, Dalton may be more of a winning QB than Kirk. That was a good signing by Dallas.)   I'm thinking of any place to send Cousins. Any thoughts? Colts maybe? Fans here seem to like him.  
    • Not being emotional. Just calling out silly, which this is. Why is it silly? And why is it silly "right now"?   1) JT is outperforming Mack's first year significantly, and at the same time, being asked to do much more (running and catching). AVG 3.8 vs 4.1 RunYPG 25.6 vs 61.2 RcvYPG 16.1 vs 27.0   2) JT currently has the same AVG as Elliot, and a better AVG than McCaffery, Jacobs, and Mixon all highly regarded. 3) In terms of first years, Taylor is doing better than McCaffery, And is doing better than year 2 of Gurley 4) Our scheme/play calling doesn't help Taylor at all, and actually hurts him. That will change if Reich keeps things open. 5) JT is learning a new system. His vision will come as he learns our zone blocking scheme.   JT isn't getting the Brissett treatment this year. Brissett wasn't a rookie last year, didn't have an amazing and proven track record at a big school, etc., JB performed the way he's always performed since college, so folks defending him didn't really know his past, or have realistic expectations of his ceiling. He was still struggling with the exact same things he struggled with in college.    The case is not the same for JT. JT has a higher ceiling, a proven track record at a big school, just needs time to adjust, and is already outperforming his predecessor while doing more at the same time.
    • Click here for this week’s Colts Mailbag! The bye week has provided plenty of opportunities to take a look back at the first six weeks of the season. Lots of in-depth questions this time around on Quenton Nelson pulling in the run game, three-tight end sets, slant route usage, offensive pace and more.   Thanks again for the thoughtful submissions, and try to enjoy your Sunday without Colts football.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...