Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Nickster said:

.  But are you really saying you don't know what people mean when they say Shaq can't make foul shots?

 

 

 

No I'm not trying to say that at all.  But it's one thing when you say something like that to a group of people that know you, your sense of humor and your level of intelligence and something completely different when you say something like that on a message board like this one where you are surrounded by an infinite number of people who...how do I say this nicely...don't really know what they're talking about.  Here, your post gets intermingled with others posts from people who complain about things that never happened.  We have people on here who don't watch the games but rather base their complaints on a stat line.  And I'm just being honest here, but up until your last couple of posts, that's what it seemed like you were doing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 352
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Were we watching the same Taylor?   Because I thought he looked tantalizingly fast, talented, and physical for a rookie RB.   Also looked better catching the ball than I ever expec

Taylor should have gotten the ball on that 4th and 1.

And the history of bad threads from the ol Nickster continues...  

Posted Images

Just now, J@son said:

 

No I'm not trying to say that at all.  But it's one thing when you say something like that to a group of people that know you, your sense of humor and your level of intelligence and something completely different when you say something like that on a message board like this one where you are surrounded by an infinite number of people who...how do I say this nicely...don't really know what they're talking about.  Here, your post gets intermingled with others posts from people who complain about things that never happened.  We have people on here who don't watch the games but rather base their complaints on a stat line.  And I'm just being honest here, but up until your last couple of posts, that's what it seemed like you were doing. 

 

Agree 100% dude.  Well put.  

Like I said, I was very discouraged (as a sports fan) by the performance.  I really like Mack too.  I hope my skepticism is off base about JT man.  That would be great and I would be happy to come on here and say what a argumentative dumbadz I am.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/18/2020 at 1:07 PM, Nickster said:

No one question his speed Jason, but there is more to running on the edges than initial straight line speed.  Equally if not more important is the cut up field, both the power of the cut and knowing when to do it.

 

I'm not trying to be obtuse.  I think JT was unimpressive running and I've said why.  I see your perspective.  

 

I am skeptical.  I hope like every other wisco RB in the last 25 yrs, he's not dependent upon massive obvious holes to be effective in the running game that's all.  I might see something different this week, and I hope to.

 

And to be honest, if he was from any other school but Wisco, I'd probably be less skeptical.  Wisco is kinda like RB Bust U.  Interestingly, James White has been a decent pro but almost all in the passing game.  And Gordon's value came from the passing game.  He's only every had one season when he averaged more than 3.9 ypc.  

Thankfully your first impressions seem to be off base.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Told ya this guy was legit, seen him play 30 plus college games. Leading rusher alll time NCAA per season played. Speed to burn as seen today can drive inside, hands better then most believed.....we have a stud people, just sit back and enjoy

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

JT honestly looked like a pro.  Great protection of the ball.  Great vision to follow behind his blockers.  Clean running.  M

very patient also.  He barely missed a hole today.  Missed a few cutback opportunities but hit pretty much every hole that was opened.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

Yeah, he looked really good. 

 

Wilkins did too, happy to see him get carries. Those two could be a solid tandem this season.

Somebody kept trying to tell me that Hines would continue to get more carries than Wilkins with Mack out. I'm really glad that wasn't true today.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, smittywerb said:

JT honestly looked like a pro.  Great protection of the ball.  Great vision to follow behind his blockers.  Clean running.  M

very patient also.  He barely missed a hole today.  Missed a few cutback opportunities but hit pretty much every hole that was opened.

I hope he keeps learning and improving. Showed lots of potential today.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, James said:

He is very impressive, but I feel like he could he hit the holes way harder than what he does. He has the acceleration to do it.
 

Anyone else seeing that?

 

I feel like Rathman teaches his backs to run with patience. Same with Wilkins and Mack.

 

I was impressed with Taylor today. He looks lethal in the screen game too. 

 

Wilkins impressive in the backup as usual.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

What I loved about JT today:

 

He gets the tough yards after initial contact, could almost guarantee that the first defender to impact him was going backwards

 

What I didnt like: Timing seems off with the O-Line, felt like he was hitting where the crease was drawn up to be, instead of having Mack's patience to allow the blocks to develop a bit more

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

We need another guy gents.  I don’t mean he’s not good enough to play but he creates basically nothing that isn’t clearly blocked.  He will be good short yardage.  That problem of short yardage is in good hands. 
 

he is good when he gets to the second level finishing runs.  He isn’t good At finding holes or cutting.  I think there were way more than 101 yds on those 26 carries.  Still underwhelming running imo.

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Nickster said:

We need another guy gents.  I don’t mean he’s not good enough to play but he creates basically nothing that isn’t clearly blocked.  He will be good short yardage.  That problem of short yardage is in good hands. 
 

he is good when he gets to the second level finishing runs.  He isn’t good At finding holes or cutting.  I think there were way more than 101 yds on those 26 carries.  Still underwhelming running imo.

He is a rookie. Give him time to develop that patience. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Nickster said:

We need another guy gents.  I don’t mean he’s not good enough to play but he creates basically nothing that isn’t clearly blocked.  He will be good short yardage.  That problem of short yardage is in good hands. 
 

he is good when he gets to the second level finishing runs.  He isn’t good At finding holes or cutting.  I think there were way more than 101 yds on those 26 carries.  Still underwhelming running imo.

I don't disagree with there possibly being more yards there that were missed, especially for an "elite" prospect. But I gotta think as his reps increase, he'll learn some patience to hit those cutbacks, much like Mack did. Mack didn't start out nearly as patient as he has become... hopefully JT learns to do the same because he's a bruiser and he's fast. Improved vision could vault him into league leading territory. If that doesn't happen though, we may have a 3.75-4.25 guy on our hands... which isn't great but there are worse things I suppose.

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chloe6124 said:

He is a rookie. Give him time to develop that patience. 

I don’t think that has anything to do with what I’m talking about.  Colts like to run parallel to the line of scrimmage. JT is not suited for that. I think this is fairly obvious.

 

We need another player who can run laterally.  He is food running North south when the hole is where it is supposed to be. 
 

Several times he ran right into the pile when there were yds to the left or right. Just watch the cut ups If you don’t beleive me.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, CheezyColt said:

I don't disagree with there possibly being more yards there that were missed, especially for an "elite" prospect. But I gotta think as his reps increase, he'll learn some patience to hit those cutbacks, much like Mack did. Mack didn't start out nearly as patient as he has become... hopefully JT learns to do the same because he's a bruiser and he's fast. Improved vision could vault him into league leading territory. If that doesn't happen though, we may have a 3.75-4.25 guy on our hands... which isn't great but there are worse things I suppose.

I agree.  He would be better suited in an old fashioned I type of scheme.  I will be surprised if the colts don’t start splitting the carries soon.  Either with Wilkins or with a vet FA.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

As long as Taylor can stay healthy he could be our next Dickerson, with the speed and strength he has. 100 today, we will see.

Come on man.  Dickerson?  You saw ED out  there today?

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, CheezyColt said:

I don't disagree with there possibly being more yards there that were missed, especially for an "elite" prospect. But I gotta think as his reps increase, he'll learn some patience to hit those cutbacks, much like Mack did. Mack didn't start out nearly as patient as he has become... hopefully JT learns to do the same because he's a bruiser and he's fast. Improved vision could vault him into league leading territory. If that doesn't happen though, we may have a 3.75-4.25 guy on our hands... which isn't great but there are worse things I suppose.

I think he’s a pro don’t get me wrong.  He will be great at short yardage, He will break the occasional long one when there are big lanes with that speed, but he’s very uncreative and I think will be disappointing going forward for anyone who thinks he’s going to be elite.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Nickster said:

I think he’s a pro don’t get me wrong.  He will be great at short yardage, He will break the occasional long one when there are big lanes with that speed, but he’s very uncreative and I think will be disappointing going forward for anyone who thinks he’s going to be elite.

I bet he goes for 100 against the Jets next week too. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Nickster said:

I think he’s a pro don’t get me wrong.  He will be great at short yardage, He will break the occasional long one when there are big lanes with that speed, but he’s very uncreative and I think will be disappointing going forward for anyone who thinks he’s going to be elite.

What youre trying to say is hes Frank Gore

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I bet he goes for 100 against the Jets next week too. 

So what?  The Jets?  You get 26 carries you expect at least a hundo.

 

  The Colts averaged 4.5 ypc last season. This year JT is at 3.5.  GB had over 5 ypc  v MN last week.  I am not impressed with this guys star power.

 

 

 

  • Confused 3
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, krunk said:

What youre trying to say is hes Frank Gore.  

 

Gore had great vision and agility though.  Never explosive like JT.  Different types of runners.  JT is more like Hershel Walker IMo.

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

100 yards in his 2nd career game and he didn't even break a long one. Imagine had he broke off a 50 yard run which he is capable of.

That’s kinda my point.  There was maybe a 50 yarder in there somewhere.

 

hes

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

Making a assumption on Taylor after 2 games is kind of funny. Once he learns to be patient and wait for his blocks he is going to be great.

Are you assuming he’s going to be great?  Then what is the difference between what you and I are doing?

 

 I simply maintain that I am still unimpressed by this guys rushing so far.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Nickster said:

So what?  The Jets?  You get 26 carries you expect at least a hundo.

 

  The Colts averaged 4.5 ypc last season. This year JT is at 3.5.  GB had over 5 ypc  v MN last week.  I am not impressed with this guys star power.

 

 

 

14081426.jpg

 

  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Nickster said:

Are you assuming he’s going to be great?  Then what is the difference between what you and I are doing?

 

 I simply maintain that I am still unimpressed by this guys rushing so far.

In Andrew's 1st 3 years we had 1 guy over 100 Yards and in just his 2nd game JT goes over 100. You are looking worse and worse with each post, JMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, John Waylon said:

...
 

And now it’ll be active after every single game of the season. Fail The Simpsons GIF

The thread should be locked, as the topic was in relation to the first game, which is now ancient history.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

In Andrew's 1st 3 years we had 1 guy over 100 Yards and in just his 2nd game JT goes over 100. You are looking worse and worse with each post, JMO.

Yeah dude.  We had the worst interior 3 lineman in the league. Now we have two top 10 draft picks including a transcendent all time LG in there.  

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is funny is my initial post said he could be our next Dickerson because of his speed and strength, some people have a reading comprehension problem. I never said he was Dickerson. Then he gains 100 Yards in his 2nd game and people aren't happy. Comical to me.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Nadine locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No beers for me. I haven't had an alcohol related drink in over 30 years.  Now I may hit the bullet a couple of times? 
    • Nail biter for several reasons. Pre-game beers may be needed for the nerves.
    • If I had to guess, Rivers will be back on the books.
    • Typically to be a HOFer you have to be dominant for ~a decade.  Leonard and Q are ~2.5 years into their careers (about a quarter of the way there).  Leonard has not played 16 games in a season yet, which is somewhat concerning to me.  This year, while he and Q both look very good, I don't think either is deserving of an all-pro award.     So yes, very impressive that Q has been 1st team all-pro 2x and Leonard has a 1st and 2nd team all-pro under his belt.  That is very rare (Gale Sayers and Dick Butkus are the only other 2 teammates who made 1st team all-pro as rookies).  In no way am I knocking Q or Leonard, they're both critical pieces to this team and at the elite level in the NFL at their respective positions.  Labeling them as HOFers this early into their career is a bit of a stretch, though -- let's give them another 3.5-4 years to see if they're still healthy and performing at an all-pro level.  They're certainly off to a good start, but there are a lot of players who have made 2 all-pro teams in their career and are not HOFers (heck, LeRoy Butler was a 4x 1st-team all-pro and has been eligible for HOF induction for ~15 years and isn't in, Steve Wisniewski was 2x 1st team, 6x 2nd team and not in, etc.).  Also, the vast majority of HOFers were not first team all-pro as rookies.  These 2020 rookies are in perhaps the strangest year of the modern era, with limited training camps, no pre-season games, missing games due to COVID (see Taylor), etc.... Pittman, Taylor, Blackmon have all shown flashes of excellence and all have had their own obstacles on top of a weird off-season as rookies (Blackmon coming off injury getting thrown into starting line-up due to HOoker going down, Taylor having Mack go down and now missing a game on the COVID list, and Pittman with compartment syndrome).   No reason to expect any of them to be HOFers, but also no reason why if they stay healthy and continue improving that we don't start talking about them being at the HOF level in 4-5 more years.     In all honesty, it is way too early to tell if this class will stack up to the 2018 class.  We really won't know for another 4-5 years when we see which guys from the 2018 draft are given/not given contract extensions and when the current class is at the same point.      As far as just judging by rookie season alone, it's not unreasonable to think it won't be another >30 years before we see rookie teammates on the first team all-pro squad together (believe Butkus and Sayers was 1965).  That said, aside from Q and Leonard we got solid contributions from Smith and Hines on O, saw solid ST contributions from Franklin and Adams (with Franklin playing a minimal D role as a fill-in starter 2 games and Adams basically invisible on D), got very little from Turay and Lewis and basically nothing from Fountain, Cain.  Wilkins was OK as a 3rd RB and OK as a kick returner and our only UDFA who did anything noteworthy wad Odum as a solid STer and with a couple decent starts when he was needed due to injury.   Overall we had 4 of 11 picks (or 4 of 12 rookies who contributed) who really didn't do much as rookies (33% vs. 66% percent who contributed significantly in some aspect of the game).     So in short, the 2018 class as rookies had 2 studs (Q and Leonard), 2 guys who contributed solidly on O (Hines and Smith), 4 solid ST contributors (Odum, Adams, Franklin, Wilkins), 4 guys who really did nothing (Turay, Lewis, Cain, Fountain).   Three years later, we still have 2 studs (Q and Leonard), 1 very solid RT (Smith),  2 guys who are doing well in a RB rotation (Hines and Wilkins), 2 unknowns on the DL (Lewis and Turay - by far Lewis' best year, but he hasn't really been great), and 3 solid STers (Odum, Franklin, Adams and 4 if you count Hines).   Then we have Cain (gone) and Fountain (still pretty much doing nothing).  Again, about 2/3 of these guys are still contributing solidly in some way on the team, with the other 1/3 still unknown or not doing much (Turay started to come on last year and Lewis is recently coming on this year, so if they both continue, we may see 83% of that class as solid contributors moving forward).     The 2020 class as rookies -- we have 1 borderline stud (Blackmon), 2 very solid  O contributors (Taylor and Pittman), 3 very solid ST contributors (Rodgers, Glasgow, Blankenship), 1 guy who has been OK in a pinch as a backup or extra lineman (Pinter), 1 guy who has made the active roster after mostly being on the PS (Windsor - IMO, he's about as valuable to this year's team as Lewis was at the same point in 2018), 1 guy who has been very solid the past few weeks (Harris) and 2 guys (Eason and Patmon) who have been on the roster but inactive.  That puts us at 7 or 8 guys who have been solid contributors out of 11 as rookies (63% or 72%) and 3 or 4 guys (Eason, Patmon, Windsor, maybe Pinter) for a total of 27-36% of rookies who are not doing much at this point of the season (this could change moving forward if Pinter has to fill in for Kelly for a while and/or if Windsor takes on a bigger role down the stretch, it is not coincidence to me that he was activated the week we cut Day).  So right now, we're looking at 30-40% of our rookies not producing too much, but this could change to 20% (assuming Eason and Patmon don't play this year and Pinter and Windsor see increasing roles).     Overall, Ballard is >60% in both drafts in terms of having productive players as rookies.  It is very unlikely we'll see any team have 2 first team all-pros as rookies again in the near future (or ever).  We may see a DROY from the 2020 draft class like we saw in the 2018 draft class on this team.  Both Leonard and Blackmon have been criticized for being picked too early, etc... Ballard has proven those doubters wrong.     When we look back in a few years, if Eason is a franchise QB and Pittman and Patmon are a solid WR duo (perhaps Harris is still performing well), Taylor is a bellcow >1,200 yard rusher, Blackmon is an all-pro, Pinter is a starter (RG or RT), Rodgers is giving us a TD or more per year as a return guy, Glasgow is a solid STer, Hot Rod is a probowl K, and Windsor is still in the DL rotation and this draft could be better than the 2018 draft.  Again, too early to tell.  If we want to consider Buckner a part of the 2020 draft (the 13th pick), I think there's a good argument that the 2020 draft will exceed the 2018 draft.   Also, something to keep in mind -- our team was in very bad shape when Ballard took over.  In 2017, he was drafting for a team with a coach we pretty much all knew was going to be gone in a year.  In 2018, it was a lot easier to get significant playing time on the roster (at least IMO) because it was so bad.  In a short time, Ballard has put a lot of solid pieces together and this team is a much more difficult team to make the final roster, let alone get significant playing time as a rookie.     I agree with you on your Blackmon assessment.  It'd be cool if he got DROY... and he has made several key plays at critical times (e.g., forced fumble in OT last week)... but he's not perfect.  TBH, I think it was kind of disappointing that the long ball from Rodgers to MVS was not broken up near the end of the 4th quarter.  Blackmon was a step or two behind, but I think most very high end safeties would have broken that play up.     McDaniels dissing Ballard may have actually made Ballard's job easier.  I think Reich was the right guy for this team and after seeing Patricia fired from DET, and looking at stats of Belichick's coordinators who went on to head coaching jobs, they have a pretty poor track record.     Yes, I think Q and Leonard's play has been solid this year, but I don't think either of them deserve to be all-pros (at least not 1st team).  Won't be shocked if Q gets selected though, mainly because of his name and the fact Baldy and other reporters like to really focus on his positive plays.  He's been beaten more this year than I can remember (which is still not a lot) and has more holds than I remember in his first 2 years.     Agree, the most deserving of all-pro on this roster is Buckner (though, I can't see him getting the nod due to lack of stats and the fact that Donald and other interior DL in the league are playing at very high levels).  Second most deserving, IMO, is Hot Rod -- he's likely to be leading the league in points scored after tomorrow's game.  Just hit a big game winner.  Has a solid chance of ending the season >90% FG made and leading the league in points scored -- it'd be hard to vote against him for at least 2nd team K if he finishes the year >90% FG made and leads league in points.
  • Members

    • Happy2BeHere

      Happy2BeHere 813

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltpwr

      Coltpwr 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Peytonator

      The Peytonator 2,732

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crazycolt1

      crazycolt1 14,224

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SicWhitted

      SicWhitted 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tate

      tate 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bravo4460

      bravo4460 1,770

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,814

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Stephen

      Stephen 2,454

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...