Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

JT Unimpressive

Nickster

By Nickster,
in Colts Football

 Share Followers 5

Recommended Posts

Nickster

Nickster 767

Posted
Posted

Looked awful.  Can’t make the edge.  Looked dancy up the middle.  Had the one good gain in the pass where he ran over the CB 20 yds downfield.  Wisco RBs are like Japanese receivers to me. I’ll believe it when I see it. That KC kid looks way better than Taylor.  RBs should be able to come in and produce right away in many cases.  I hope I eat crow but I’m not seeing it.  Was definitely the 3rd option.  
 

Nothing  was encouraging today.  Except Campbell.  Dline was terrible.  When Mack went we could not run.  Boy oh boy we looked bad.  Rivers looked awful in decision making.  I was a big fan of the signing.

  • Haha 3
  • Confused 4
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 352
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

zibby43

Were we watching the same Taylor?   Because I thought he looked tantalizingly fast, talented, and physical for a rookie RB.   Also looked better catching the ball than I ever expec

Jaredfor3

Taylor should have gotten the ball on that 4th and 1.

Lucky Colts Fan

And the history of bad threads from the ol Nickster continues...  

Posted Images

  • Popular Post
zibby43

zibby43 1,044

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Were we watching the same Taylor?

 

Because I thought he looked tantalizingly fast, talented, and physical for a rookie RB.

 

Also looked better catching the ball than I ever expected, given he didn't do it much at Wisconsin. 

  • Like 13
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
holeymoley99

holeymoley99 475

Posted
Posted

I thought he looked electric, the O line was producing many holes at all today. He showed much better hands that was given credit for, world class speed the 1-2 Taylor and Hines combo will have a huge season. Depending who Colts bring up to replace Mack (Bruce Anderson or an outside back) the injury could put Taylor at top of ROY race

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
AZColt11

AZColt11 1,266

Posted
Posted

I thought he looked a little tentative on a few runs, probably zigged when he should have zagged on a couple of plays.  Other than that, I have no complaints.  He went from rookie who would spell the starter in Mack to becoming the co-starter with Hines in his first NFL game (remember no preseason either) in one quarter.  Losing Mack hurt BIG.  JT I'm not worried about.  I think he'll be fine.  Same for Pittman.  Remember, no preseason is going to hurt some of these rookies.  When these two guys figure things out and get a little more experience I think they'll be weapons for us.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nickster

Nickster 767

Posted
  • Author
Posted

He had 22 yds on 9 carries. 

Just now, NannyMcafee said:

9 carries with rivers throwing it 41+ times. 

 

Colts decided that the running game isn't their strength. 

 

Today's loss is on Frank. 

I thought the play calling was horrible.  Mack was rolling and they run a 185 lb guy on 4th and 1.  Then you put JB one of the literally slowest QBs in the league on in a option.  Cute Frank. 
 

I am pretty sure the staff do not think JT is ready.

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
MPStack

MPStack 3,233

Posted
Posted

will ferrell chill GIF

32 minutes ago, Nickster said:

Looked awful.  Can’t make the edge.  Looked dancy up the middle.  Had the one good gain in the pass where he ran over the CB 20 yds downfield.  Wisco RBs are like Japanese receivers to me. I’ll believe it when I see it. That KC kid looks way better than Taylor.  RBs should be able to come in and produce right away in many cases.  I hope I eat crow but I’m not seeing it.  Was definitely the 3rd option.  
 

Nothing  was encouraging today.  Except Campbell.  Dline was terrible.  When Mack went we could not run.  Boy oh boy we looked bad.  Rivers looked awful in decision making.  I was a big fan of the signing.

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Nickster

Nickster 767

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, Malakai432 said:

Taylor looked pretty explosive and had 89 yards from scrimmage, running game was pretty rough but they abandoned it late.  He definitely was not the problem lol. 

I think they realize Taylor is not ready between the tackles.  
 

hope I’m wrong boys but he did not look good running it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
NannyMcafee

NannyMcafee 1,618

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Mr.Debonair said:

Today’s loss is on Rivers and that awful defense

 

Frank knows what rivers is. The way he played was rivers football. The point in having rivers was to get a guy who can be quick with his reads and checkdowns to intermediate throws. 

 

The run game was supposed to be priorty number 1. Who cares if they know we are gonna run it? Just run the damn ball. 

 

The defense didn't help. They were quiet. But the game was winnable. Very winnable... 

 

I liked signing rivers because I thought they werent going to rely solely on his arm to win games. Apparently that isn't so. 

 

Frank continues to say we have great players and then he never uses them. 

 

Rivers was supposed to compliment the running game. Even with Mack going down, they acted like they have zero faith in the other RBs on this team. Run the damn ball!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Malakai432

Malakai432 1,009

Posted
Posted
Just now, Nickster said:

I think they realize Taylor is the ready between the tackles.  
 

hope I’m wrong boys but he did not look good running it.

 

No not today in the run game, but he looked fantastic in the passing game.  I thought he looked explosive when he was out in the open and he did barrel people over.  We'll see how he does next week because if what they say about Mack is true, Taylor's production just went up significantly.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nickster

Nickster 767

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, AllLivesMatter said:

will ferrell chill GIF

 

I’m cool.  I’ve had several glasses of Jameson and both of my fantasy teams are rolling.
 

I’m telling you right now we are in trouble at RB with Mack probably out for the year.  This performance was against an org tanking for Lawrence.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Colt Overseas

Colt Overseas 501

Posted
Posted
Just now, Nickster said:

I’m cool.  I’ve had several glasses of Jameson and both of my fantasy teams are rolling.
 

I’m telling you right now we are in trouble at RB with Mack probably out for the year.  This performance was against an org tanking for Lawrence.  

 

I wouldn't be too critical of him in his first game, especially with no pre-season. Lets wait until a few games in and see how he goes. And 89 yards from scrimmage is a good days work when your not the starter for half the game. He should be ok.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Nickster

Nickster 767

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Colt Overseas said:

 

I wouldn't be too critical of him in his first game, especially with no pre-season. Lets wait until a few games in and see how he goes. And 89 yards from scrimmage is a good days work when your not the starter for half the game. He should be ok.

 Like I said in the first post, the 35 yd initial reception was fine but they had the d completely fooled and he didn’t get touched until he trucked a corner at the 5.  And Reich was reluctant to play him even after Macks injury. 
 

we shall see.  This was s loss to Jax.

Link to post
Share on other sites
il vecchio

il vecchio 107

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Nickster said:

I’m cool.  I’ve had several glasses of Jameson and both of my fantasy teams are rolling.
 

I’m telling you right now we are in trouble at RB with Mack probably out for the year.  This performance was against an org tanking for Lawrence.  

 

Looks like they didn't get your memo to tank.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
NFLfan

NFLfan 7,954

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, ColtOriolePrime said:

JT was better in  the passing game than I expected, but I did not see a fluid and instinctive runner. 

 

Compare for example Kamara with the Saints hitting the whole with what we saw from JT today.  Not saying JT cannot get much better, it is like comparing a pro with a high school rb. 

 

Lol. This is a player in his first game. Kamara is in his 4th year. You can't compare the two. Give the rookie time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
coltsfeva

coltsfeva 1,091

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, holeymoley99 said:

I thought he looked electric, the O line was producing many holes at all today. He showed much better hands that was given credit for, world class speed the 1-2 Taylor and Hines combo will have a huge season. Depending who Colts bring up to replace Mack (Bruce Anderson or an outside back) the injury could put Taylor at top of ROY race

Wilkins?

Link to post
Share on other sites
csmopar

csmopar 6,679

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Nickster said:

Looked awful.  Can’t make the edge.  Looked dancy up the middle.  Had the one good gain in the pass where he ran over the CB 20 yds downfield.  Wisco RBs are like Japanese receivers to me. I’ll believe it when I see it. That KC kid looks way better than Taylor.  RBs should be able to come in and produce right away in many cases.  I hope I eat crow but I’m not seeing it.  Was definitely the 3rd option.  
 

Nothing  was encouraging today.  Except Campbell.  Dline was terrible.  When Mack went we could not run.  Boy oh boy we looked bad.  Rivers looked awful in decision making.  I was a big fan of the signing.

You obviously didn’t watch very much of the game. Taylor was churning when he was in. Made play after play. For some stupid reason the coaches kept going back to Hines in short yardage situations. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
csmopar

csmopar 6,679

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Nickster said:

The other 2 backs had 54 yds on 11 carries.  JT had 22 on 9.  
 

This guy is supposed to b explosive between the tackles and he looked like Ron Dayne or Trent Richardson to me between the tackles.

He also had several big gains called back for nonsense penalties like that one on Jack Doyle 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nickster

Nickster 767

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The other 2 backs had 54 yds on 11 carries.  JT had 22 on 9.  
 

This guy is supposed to b explosive between the tackles and he looked like Ron Dayne or Trent Richardson to me between the tackles.

 

 

he had 22 yds on 9 carries.  I suspect she cAnt pass protect yet which is not surprising coming from Wisco and the cornfield game, he may learn to be ok at pass pro.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nickster

Nickster 767

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, holeymoley99 said:

What hole was opened that taylor missed ? I sure didnt see it and I like many watched the entire game. Comparing just carrys and yards gained without watching when holes were created doesnt make much sense to me .

I’m guessing on film study, his carries won’t look good bud.

 

i remember a couple times wondering why he didn’t hit it Up in there as advertised.  Very Dane, Richardson looking 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Nadine locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Followers 5
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • New Zealands #1 Colts Fan
      Armchair GM Game

      By New Zealands #1 Colts Fan · Posted

      Stafford golladay williams basham
    • stitches
      2021 Stitches' Colts Mock Off-season (ver. 1.0)

      By stitches · Posted

      Thanks for the feedback   I hear both your concerns and they are definitely valid. About Lance starting year 1 - the moment we draft a 1st round QB, getting him ready to start as soon as humanly possible becomes priority no.1 for our coaching staff(the offensive side at least). It's very possible even with that attention he might not get ready if we have another weird off-season, so I have accounted for that with bringing back Brissett. I think he's a very good backup who can start if Lance is not ready.   The LT question and whether he will be ready is another one to take into account. My thought process here is - create multiple avenues for filling that spot. For me those would be - 1. Nelson(try him... you never know and you lose nothing if it doesn't work ... just get him back inside if he can't handle the LT spot), 2. FA - I'm bringing Ty Nsekhe to compete for the spot. He's been solid in spot duties for the Bills and has the profile to do the job... and is still young... and 3. the draft - Taven Jenkins is one of the players that I think can be a long-term solution at the position. Again .... no idea if he will be ready, but he will be part of the competition for the spot.   My hope here is that at least one of them will step up and be reasonable starter. 
    • jvan1973
      Armchair GM Game

      By jvan1973 · Posted

      Lance would be far cheaper than the vets
    • MikeCurtis
      CR91 1.5 Mock off-season with draft

      By MikeCurtis · Posted

      I like it, but have some comments / questions   1) Are you counting on Eason to be the QB of the future in this mock offseason?   2) I love the JJ Watt Pick up, he is probably 75% of what he was a few years ago, but he could be very versatile and would improve this defense   3) Counting on a late 2nd round to start at OT day one is a bit dangerous in my opinion - FA?   4) Unless the guy is an amazing talent that slipped, I would probably NOT add a RB as early in the draft as you did. (I like our top 3 RBs as they are)  Mack is going to want much $$$$ that we dont have.   Thanks again  
    • LJpalmbeacher2
      Chris Ballard end of season presser tomorrow 1 pm

      By LJpalmbeacher2 · Posted

      If Rivers comes back you for sure need a QB for '22, probably a youngster.    If you trade for Stafford,  his replacement doesn't have to be addressed for a few years. This is why I think Ballard may go for Stafford. Wentz would also be in the equation but the Eagles probably fired Pederson for him to stay.

  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...