Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Jaguars Game Day, September 13, 2020


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 763
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Colts.com provides legal ways to watch and listen to the game. See Watch/listen Colts   Good luck! 

Never take #17 off the field again please...

Minshew won't be able to see DeForest through the trees

Posted Images

Colts looking really good out there on offense. I am happy we got Rivers. I was fully on board with brissett at the start of last season but that dwindled after his injury and inability to get back. Plus the guy didn’t take enough risks.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Valpo2004 said:

I am waiting on our massive investment to make some plays.

it never works out like that .   He worked harder to get paid now its cruise mode time .  we could of got a rookie stud like the 49ers got with our pick at 13 .   Kinlaw will be a stud and much cheaper and younger for more years.

  • Confused 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SteelCityColt said:

No issue with the decision to go for it on 4th down, but curious as to the use of Hines. 

I think they weird trying to have an element of surprise, but I agree. Would of loved tonsee that man-child Taylor get thr play.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, coming on strong said:

it never works out like that .   He worked harder to get paid now its cruise mode time .  we could of got a rookie stud like the 49ers got with our pick at 13 .   Kinlaw will be a stud and much cheaper and younger for more years.

 

That is something I was afraid of, hope I am wrong.

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • NFLfan unpinned, unfeatured and locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not directed at either above comment just a general thought about this...   Do you think Chris Berman, Tony Gonzalez, Jim Nanz, etc watch all 16 NFL games each week or do you think they watch 2 or 3 and someone (an intern) watches the games and provides them summary notes? I wonder if a personality, like Phil Simms, actually does know more about the Colts than a regular fan. Guys like Nate Burelson make me think they watch all or at least most of the games but others I'm not so sure.   Thoughts?  
    • Not really.   The overall talent level right now with Rivers and our IR'd skill players is about the overall same level as when he had a more talented QB, less talent on defense, and Donald Thomas and Gosder Cherilous on IR back then.   The main difference is that back then, we were maxed out at getting over the hump because we spent to the maximum Cap number just to get into the playoffs (but didn't mortgage the future), whereas now we still have room to maintain our talent level while adding more.   So we will resign the good players, and add more rookies who can (hopefully) play.  And then we'll be in position to win just like every other sports league team that wins and is pressed against the cap...they get rookies who are in their 2nd 3rd or 4th years to vastly contribute more to the team than the level of salary they are being compensated at in their rookie contracts.   Its either done that way (like SEA did when they got those young drafted defensive players and Wilson pre-big contract) or you simply load up on FAs to win now and mortgage the future (which doesn't seem to work out well in the NFL)
    • nah after last weeks game Trevor went on twitter thanking all his Clemson fans for his final home game there
    • I'm fine with that.  Not upset at all because we're not disagreeing.  You just continue to misunderstand what I'm talking about.  My original comment wasn't comparing the rosters without the QB.  It was comparing the talent of the team responsible for the play on the field, which includes the QB.  Overall its about the same.  We play well at times, and lay stinkers at times, but for different reasons.  Our defense was worse then, but we now don't give up as many short field interceptions as we did then.  We don't come back as well now as we did back then.  Now we score by probably taking more time off of the clock than we did back then.  Different paths, same results so far.  Neither team was complete, but for different reasons.  Back then, we had a lot of holes at less important positions.  Now we have fewer holes, but at more important positions.   My original comment gathered quite a few Likes.  Consider the possibility that you simply misunderstood what I was saying.  
    • I can agree with Buckner. 32 may be second for me, before Leonard . He seems to make everyone in the secondary better like you see with the top tier free safeties. MAN he was sooooo close to making that play on MVS in the 4th.
  • Members

    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 10,636

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 65

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Clem-Dog

      Clem-Dog 420

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pelt

      Pelt 687

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KelownaColtsFan

      KelownaColtsFan 155

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Rally5

      Rally5 721

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mitch Connors

      Mitch Connors 359

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 445

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 07dleigh

      07dleigh 45

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtMan

      ColtMan 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...