Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts @ Jaguars Game Day, September 13, 2020


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 763
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Colts.com provides legal ways to watch and listen to the game. See Watch/listen Colts   Good luck! 

Never take #17 off the field again please...

Minshew won't be able to see DeForest through the trees

Posted Images

Just now, bluebombers87 said:

Well just like last years opener was on Vinny, this one is on Rivers. 10 points off his TOs. We brought in a vet to avoid plays like those.

Yes and no..... We brought in a vet to be capable of consistent nfl throws.... We all knew Rivers would throw one or 2 picks a game....

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Wes Heilman said:

 

So did Jacksonville have a pre-season? If they are better prepared with the same time and conditions, that says our coaching staff failed.

 

This colts org. Has had weird games when Injuries force In game changes from key players, ours or the opponents.... We've made backups look like hofers for years....except for our own

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Hmmmmmm. Werent numerous polsters calling me Negative before the season?  I didnt jump on the Rivers bandwagon.  I have zero confidence in this defensive scheme. And remeber,this is Ballards choice of D system and D coach. Minshew has missed 1 pass and has 3 tds. Let that sink in. I said in numerous times this team will no go far with this defensive system. Everyone thought Buckner would complete this D. It is early and win or lose. This is not a good showing

I'm new here, and the defense has been far worse than I was led to believe lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, coming on strong said:

the way ballard and reich get talked about , you would think they both won multiple superbowls and had a decade of winning . both have losing records with the colts and the teams defense looks horrible and the offense cannot finish drives . I just never understood the hype they got . 

The hype who got?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Shafty138 said:

Yes and no..... We brought in a vet to be capable of consistent nfl throws.... We all knew Rivers would throw one or 2 picks a game....

How is throwing three picks something you think we knew would happen? Stinker games happen but not like this. This is not an acceptable level of play.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Hmmmmmm. Werent numerous polsters calling me Negative before the season?  I didnt jump on the Rivers bandwagon.  I have zero confidence in this defensive scheme. And remeber,this is Ballards choice of D system and D coach. Minshew has missed 1 pass and has 3 tds. Let that sink in. I said in numerous times this team will no go far with this defensive system. Everyone thought Buckner would complete this D. It is early and win or lose. This is not a good showing

Quit being negative.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, boo2202 said:

Buckner has had 0 impact 

rivers has had a negative impact

 

our two big adds have not shown up. Get rid of hooker now

Buckner did have a tackle for negative yardage.  But you would expect his name be called more.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • NFLfan unpinned, unfeatured and locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So many on here I agree with, but here's one:  Use the 2014 1st rounder on DeMarcus Lawrence or Davante Adams instead of trading for Trent Richardson. 
    • Yes it sounded very definitive. BUT... he's still not presenting it as sourced information. There is still a lot of "I believe" and none of "Sources are telling me" . This is the thing. I absolutely allow him to have his opinions and to make conjectures based on what he's hearing around the league. I still don't believe it until he says it's source with direct knowledge that's telling him this. Maybe I get proven wrong in 10 days... who knows...     This IMO is a problem with those huge insiders who I think have great sources and great success when actually reporting news - the problem of people parsing their opinions as news. I don't fault people because they are used to hearing news from those reporters, but when they are put in a position where they don't have direct info, I would be doubly careful to make sure people know they are presenting an opinion rather than inside information.    I don't think it serves Schefter or anyone well to present this strong of an opinion as certainty and news. What happens now if 49ers pick someone else? Does Schefter lose credibility? Or does he just weasel out of it by saying - well things changed in those 2 weeks? 
    • Listen to this clip, which starts a few seconds before the one you shared.     I don't remember him sounding as definitive about Herbert/Tua last season. He did say they'd both go high, and ultimately, they did. Tua to Miami was always the favorite pick, but there were some questions. His comment about Mac Jones sounds different to me.   He could be wrong, and again he kind of backed down a few days later. But "it will be Mac Jones" was a definitive sounding statement that he made, and then he went on to state some scenarios that could happen. It was still pretty strong sounding.
    • Just... take a step back and look what you are describing. "Not gonna blow teams away" ... "but it is possible to have success from the pocket". Just around the Senior Bowl I started warming up to Mac Jones and I thought he was the best QB at the Senior Bowl by some margin. I like him. I think he can be a Jimmy G/Kirk Cousins type in the right system. But you don't pay 3 first round picks + for that. You don't blow up your draft for 3 years in the future for "not gonna blow teams away" QB. You do that for a QB who you think has the chance to be special. I don't see Mac Jones in that light.     
    • I was coming back to add this to my other post about the 1999 draft and saw yours and figured I would post it here instead. Had we made that * Mike Ditka think we were going to take Ricky Williams at #4 we could have had all of the Saints 6 picks in the '99 draft and a 1st and 3rd in 2000. The Saints made that trade to Washington instead at #5 and they indeed used several of those picks and moved up to #7 and took Champ Bailey. I imagine we could have done the same thing and still got Edge. If I recall Polian said he wouldn't have done that trade even if offered because he didn't  want to have to pay that many draft picks 
  • Members

    • Rolltide_gocolts

      Rolltide_gocolts 67

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 660

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,424

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TonyBungee

      TonyBungee 181

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 8,488

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 8,633

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Los1sol

      Los1sol 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 112

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 9,403

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CamMo

      CamMo 960

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...