Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

My final Colts Season Predictions


Recommended Posts

Colts at Jaguars L

Vikings at Colts L

Jets at Colts W

Colts at Bears W

Colts at Browns W

Bengals at Colts L

Colts at Lions W

Ravens at Colts L

Colts at Titans L

Packers at Colts W

Titans at Colts W

Colts at Texans W

Colts at Raiders W

Texans at Colts L

Colts at Steelers L

Jaguars at Colts W

 

9-7

 

Go Colts!

  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

My season predictions:   * When the Colts lose, fingers will be pointed at Ballard, Reich, or whichever coordinators squad didn't produce that day. * There will be another 5+ page threa

22 minutes ago, Horsey said:

If the Colts miss the playoffs again, with this soft schedule, Reich will be on the hot seat. 

No he won't 

7 minutes ago, TheMiz said:

The Jags are obviously tanking...I dont see them winning week 1

Don't count your chickens before they hatch

Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

No he won't 

 

Depending on how the season goes, he very may well be.  If we're competitive and miss the playoffs (say we're 9-7 and moss playoffs on a tiebreaker, I think he's fine).   If we somehow go 6-10 or worse, I think everyone is on the hotseat.

 

41 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

We come out rusty with no preseason imo

 

Every team in the league has no preseason.  We're one of the few that has our head coach and all 3 coordinators returning for the 3rd consecutive year, which helps us tremendously... and we have a lot of returning starters, with the only really notable changes being the addition of a veteran HOF QB in Rivers, an all-pro DT in Buckner who is also a vet, and a former all-pro CB in Rhodes who is also a vet and who has worked with several of our positional coaches previously - so we shouldn't really skip a beat.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, danlhart87 said:

Colts at Jaguars L

Vikings at Colts L

Jets at Colts W

Colts at Bears W

Colts at Browns W

Bengals at Colts L

Colts at Lions W

Ravens at Colts L

Colts at Titans L

Packers at Colts W

Titans at Colts W

Colts at Texans W

Colts at Raiders W

Texans at Colts L

Colts at Steelers L

Jaguars at Colts W

 

9-7

 

Go Colts!

We will beat the Jags on opening day, which would put us 10-6. I predict 10-6.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, CurBeatElite said:

 

Depending on how the season goes, he very may well be.  If we're competitive and miss the playoffs (say we're 9-7 and moss playoffs on a tiebreaker, I think he's fine).   If we somehow go 6-10 or worse, I think everyone is on the hotseat.

 

 

Every team in the league has no preseason.  We're one of the few that has our head coach and all 3 coordinators returning for the 3rd consecutive year, which helps us tremendously... and we have a lot of returning starters, with the only really notable changes being the addition of a veteran HOF QB in Rivers, an all-pro DT in Buckner who is also a vet, and a former all-pro CB in Rhodes who is also a vet and who has worked with several of our positional coaches previously - so we shouldn't really skip a beat.

Agreed

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Agreed

 

I forgot Blankenship -- but our K game was arguably the biggest weakness of this team last year, so that shouldn't negatively impact us (or really change anything in terms of being rusty).  And I forgot Pittman and Patmon, but WR was (along with K) one of our biggest weaknesses last year, so their additions plus the return of Campbell should be a good thing overall anyway. 

 

Also, the fact that Rivers has worked with both Reich and Sirianni in the recent past probably gives him an edge to other vet QBs who relocated, as he came in familiar with the coaching staff, language, scheme, etc... Not that I think Brady, Bridgewater or Newton are going to be 'bad' in their new situations, but they do have new offenses to learn and new coaches/coordinators/etc. to deal with, Rivers is just a few years removed of working with Sirianni and Reich so in some aspects he has an advantage.  

 

In all honesty, if you were to rank teams in terms of who was impacted the least by this weird offseason, I'd say we'd be at or very near the top.  We've got HC and all 3 coordinators entering 3 straight years together.  On D, we'll likely be starting 9 of 11 guy who were starters or regulars in our lineup last year (with Rhodes and Buckner, both veterans who have played at an allpro level recently being the main new additions).  On O, we have our whole OL back, our starting RB back (with a stud rookie to help lessen Mack's load), our #1 WR back and what should be an improvement with our #2 WR (Pittman/healthy Campbell > than whoever was our #2 at different times last year after Funchess went down week 1), in 2 TE sets we'll have Doyle and MAC (maybe later in the year Burton) instead of Ebron (who quit on the team anyway).  So we should really be at 8 of 11 returning to our offense, with the biggest change at QB where we (on paper) have improved the QB position with a savvy vet who has familiarity with our system and coaching staff.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I  see 11-5.  with the bolded games as toss ups 

 

Colts at Jaguars W +12

Vikings at Colts W +3

Jets at Colts W +9

Colts at Bears W +9

Colts at Browns L -3

Bengals at Colts W +9

Colts at Lions W +3

Ravens at Colts L  -3

Colts at Titans L -3

Packers at Colts W +6

Titans at Colts W +3

Colts at Texans L -3

Colts at Raiders L -3

Texans at Colts W +3

Colts at Steelers W +3

Jaguars at Colts W +12

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, WifiGuy said:

I  see 11-5.  with the bolded games as toss ups 

 

Colts at Jaguars W +12

Vikings at Colts W +3

Jets at Colts W +9

Colts at Bears W +9

Colts at Browns L -3

Bengals at Colts W +9

Colts at Lions W +3

Ravens at Colts L  -3

Colts at Titans L -3

Packers at Colts W +6

Titans at Colts W +3

Colts at Texans L -3

Colts at Raiders L -3

Texans at Colts W +3

Colts at Steelers W +3

Jaguars at Colts W +12

That looks pretty accurate, we may lose to the Vikings or maybe the Steelers but other than that I agree with what you have. I have 10-6 but 11-5 is reasonable. The Browns game will be 50/50 because it is there.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

But the other teams are not rusty?

 

Only the Colts?

 

Are you aware they Jags are predicted by pretty much everyone to be bottom-5 and by many to be bottom-3 and By some to be the worst team in the NFL, and you have ya losing to them?

 

Are you sure you’re a Colts fan?   And you having us losing to Cincinnati, at home?   Do you follow the NFL much at all? 
 

This whole post is a mystery....   Sorry.

Jags could still be bottom 3 team even with that win.

 

It's entirely plausible to wanna pick some upsets they happen every year. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Some of you act as if losing a couple supposed guaranteed wins is impossible.

 

But few noticed the upset of Packers

 

 

There are upsets and there are upsets.   Some are greater long shots than others.   Are upsets possible?   Sure.  But are they likely?   No.  Probable?  No. 
 

If we indeed go 9-7 with the losses you predict, unless there are bad injuries to the wrong players to explain it,  Reich will be in trouble.  With Ballard.  And with Irsay.   Let’s hope you’re wrong. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Some of you act as if losing a couple supposed guaranteed wins is impossible.

 

But few noticed the upset of Packers

 

 

I don't think the Packers will be that much of an upset.    I do think we will let a couple slip that we should win.  

1 hour ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

That looks pretty accurate, we may lose to the Vikings or maybe the Steelers but other than that I agree with what you have. I have 10-6 but 11-5 is reasonable. The Browns game will be 50/50 because it is there.

I'm being more optimistic that I probably should be

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

My season predictions:

 

* When the Colts lose, fingers will be pointed at Ballard, Reich, or whichever coordinators squad didn't produce that day.

* There will be another 5+ page thread about Chad Kelly.

* Shakedownstreet will use the word farted. :D

* Most all players who are injured will be described as needing to be "Cut", regardless of how illogical or ineffective it is. 

* Several folks will make passing comments about the return of Andrew Luck

* Thank the universe that there will be at least a few perfectly placed "Dear god" comments from jskinnz. 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WifiGuy said:

I don't think the Packers will be that much of an upset.    I do think we will let a couple slip that we should win.  

I'm being more optimistic that I probably should be

Guess I am pessimistic then

 

9-7 isn't bad but could see 10-6 too

1 minute ago, MarquisJ said:

I stopped at the week 1 lost to Jax

Its not how you start but how you finish.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13-3 / 5-1 AFC 

Red are losses

Bolded are toss ups.

 

Colts at Jaguars W +12

Vikings at Colts W +3

Jets at Colts W +9

Colts at Bears W +9

Colts at Browns W-3

Bengals at Colts W +9

Colts at Lions W +3

Ravens at Colts W -3

Colts at Titans L -3

Packers at Colts W +6

Titans at Colts W +3

Colts at Texans W -3

Colts at Raiders L -3

Texans at Colts W +3

Colts at Steelers L +3

Jaguars at Colts W +12

Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts at Jags W

Vikings at Colts L

Jets at Colts W

Colts at Bears W

Colts at Browns W

Bengals at Colts W

Colts at Lions W

Ravens at Colts L

Colts at Titans L

Packers at Colts W

Titans at Colts W

Colts at Texans L

Colts at Raiders L

Texans at Colts W

Colts at Steelers L

Jags at Colts W

 

10-6 - that last win will give us the tiebreaker in the division over the Titans who will also be 10-6 IMO. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Colts at Jags W

Vikings at Colts L

Jets at Colts W

Colts at Bears W

Colts at Browns W

Bengals at Colts W

Colts at Lions W

Ravens at Colts L

Colts at Titans L

Packers at Colts W

Titans at Colts W

Colts at Texans L

Colts at Raiders L

Texans at Colts W

Colts at Steelers L

Jags at Colts W

 

10-6 - that last win will give us the tiebreaker in the division over the Titans who will also be 10-6 IMO. 

10-6 is my floor, but I split what I see as toss ups.

 

And on the Vikes in game 2, I just don't see them that good early. Two new coordinators. Losing Diggs at WR, two good CBs (Waynes and Alexander, DE Griffen. Picking up Jeffeson (not listed as starting) and Gladney (rook CB) was good, but they have a lot of new parts at key positions, and two new coordinators. Not saying it will be easy for us, I just think we return more consistency, and have added better pieces.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

10-6 is my floor, but I split what I see as toss ups.

 

And on the Vikes in game 2, I just don't see them that good early. Two new coordinators. Losing Diggs at WR, two good CBs (Waynes and Alexander, DE Griffen. Picking up Jeffeson (not listed as starting) and Gladney (rook CB) was good, but they have a lot of new parts at key positions, and two new coordinators. Not saying it will be easy for us, I just think we return more consistency, and have added better pieces.

9-7 is my floor, 11-5 is my ceiling, so I went 10-6. We could very well beat the Vikings but lose to a team like the Browns.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

9-7 is my floor, 11-5 is my ceiling, so I went 10-6. We could very well beat the Vikings but lose to a team like the Browns.

Exactly upsets happen all the time 

Nobody thought we would lose to Dolphins last year but we did 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Exactly upsets happen all the time 

Nobody thought we would lose to Dolphins last year but we did 

Yeah I even thought we would win that game even with Hoyer at QB, I was wrong. I do think had JB played we do win in all probability but you never know in this league.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

9-7 is my floor, 11-5 is my ceiling, so I went 10-6. We could very well beat the Vikings but lose to a team like the Browns.

I looked in detail at each team (adds and losses to personnel, 2019 dvoa, stats, etc.) a few months ago, and really like our chances in a lot of the tougher games. We certainly have our share of IFs, just like other teams, but I really like our adds. So long as we don't crash health/injury wise, I think we exceed expectation. We match up very well with some of the better teams we play.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

Colts at Jaguars L

Vikings at Colts L

Jets at Colts W

Colts at Bears W

Colts at Browns W

Bengals at Colts L

Colts at Lions W

Ravens at Colts L

Colts at Titans L

Packers at Colts W

Titans at Colts W

Colts at Texans W

Colts at Raiders W

Texans at Colts L

Colts at Steelers L

Jaguars at Colts W

 

9-7

 

Go Colts!

Thumbs down

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's so funny seeing people take exception to someone predicting 9-7 season for  the Colts. Like... I don't think we win 9 but is that really THAT much of a shocking outcome? I think it's totally within the range of possible outcomes for this season.

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts at Jaguars W

Vikings at Colts W

Jets at Colts W

Colts at Bears W

Colts at Browns L

Bengals at Colts W

Colts at Lions W

Ravens at Colts W

Colts at Titans L

Packers at Colts W

Titans at Colts W

Colts at Texans L

Colts at Raiders W

Texans at Colts W

Colts at Steelers L

Jaguars at Colts W

---------------------------------

12-4

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, stitches said:

It's so funny seeing people take exception to someone predicting 9-7 season for  the Colts. Like... I don't think we win 9 but is that really THAT much of a shocking outcome? I think it's totally within the range of possible outcomes for this season.

 

Can you imagine if i said 6 -10

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Can you imagine if i said 6 -10

I mean... there were some eyebrow raisers in your predictions(it took a weird path to 9-7), but if at the same time  last year you told Colts fans we will win vs the future champions on the road and lose to the tanking Miami Dolphins at home people would have been surprised too... Stuff happens, surprises happen...

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Week 1 @ JAX: W

Week 2 vs. MIN: W

Week 3 vs. NYJ: W

Week 4 @ CHI W

Week 5 @ CLE W

Week 6 vs. CIN W 

Week 7 BYE 

Week 8 @ DET W

Week 9 vs. BAL L 

Week 10 @ TEN W

Week 11 vs. GB L 

Week 12 vs. TEN W

Week 13 @ HOU L 

Week 14 @ LV W

Week 15 vs. HOU W 

Week 16 @ PIT W

Week 17 vs. JAX W

 

13-3 Record, finally defeating the Steelers and a trip to the AFC Championship. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Like I said months ago, there's 12 teams OVER the cap.  Bills(right at the cap), Titans and Bears and probably the Vikings, all of which are over the cap by less than 8 million can make easy, painless moves to get back under the cap without disruption to their rosters.  Course, that's not figuring on any signings, including the upcoming draft picks so they will have to be a little bit creative.   Chiefs, Texas, Raider, Rams, Packers and Falcons are between 15 million and 33 million over the cap. Expect some more drastic moves here too, especially with some of the starters,  I see some big time movements there.   However, the Steelers only have 35 players signed and are still  31+ million over so I'm not sure how they are going to do it. So really, they're in the next category   Saints, Eagles- Lets face it, very drastic and full rebuild mode. Even if Brees retires and the Eagles move Wentz, it doesn't help them very much. at 99 million and 52 million over the cap respectively, I see a LOT of their quality players moving. Has too. May not be a super star, but they've got some solid depth and starters that will get some money elesewhere.   As for the rest of the league, there's 6 teams sitting at minimal cap space, almost none after draft picks are figured in. I don't see many drastic moves from those 6. Maybe someone likes 49ers if they restructure someone or something.   That leaves 14 teams to fight over the players those first 12 most likely releases/trade. Tampa's effective cap is just 16.8 million, again, without the rookie reserve set aside. Really, the teams in pretty decent positions to sign their own and possibly pick up a really solid starter cast away or two are really the Bengals, Washington, New England, Indy, the Jets and the Jags.    I said a while back that I think we see a record number of 1 year prove it type deals where players who normally would be getting record setting contracts, end up with less than they would in a normal year, simply due to the 30 million reduction in cap. it really narrows what teams are going to be able to get in on the action.  Less bidders, with less money, typically results in lower prices. 
    • We have to stop treating Rivers like he is some young pup who is gonna run every play just as Frank calls it.  I believe that a future HoF like Rivers has the ability to audible any and every play depending on a look he gets from the defense.  Frank will defer to Rivers' judgment more often than not.  Frank even stated after the Steelers game that runs were called and Rivers audibled out of them.    Any wonder why Frank went to Jacoby on 2nd & 11 the following week vs the Jags?  Well he told us.  He "really wanted to run the ball right there and put the game away."  Even if they had to use 2nd, 3rd, and 4th down.  Why couldn't he keep Rivers in and run it?  Because he knew Rivers would audible out of some of those runs.  It was his M.O. this season.  Jags, Ravens and Steelers games were all close games we lead in the 2nd halves.  Why would Frank abandon running the ball in those games?  
    • I thought he had a pretty good season all things considered. If there's someone else out there that's better, so be it. By all means, upgrade if possible. But Rivers did what was expected of him this season, and helped get a 7-9 team to 11-5 and back in the playoffs.    If we don't bring Rivers back, I have a feeling it's more due to cap issues than performance. 
    • You understand rivers isn't the play caller....  right?
    • I've been going over Rivers stats this season and when you really look at them deeply, he just was not very good this season.  He feasted on bad teams and against good teams he was terrible.  I'm going to make a topic that does a full breakdown of Rivers performances this season vs winning and losing teams.  It's just a lot of information and I'm not good at making charts on here but I'm still gonna give it a shot because the numbers are very telling and will prove that Rivers was just not very good this season and when we needed him to play big vs good teams he just coldn't get it done.  I'll leave you guys with just a sample of the numbers that I found:   I'm gonna pick a number that I think most would say isn't too  bad of a pass to run ratio.  60-40.  That basically comes out to 30 passes and 20 runs a game.  Our record for whenever Rivers threw 3 passes to 2 runs was 1-5.  The only win was against the lowly Bengals.  Whenever he was below that 60% pass ratio we were 10-1.   The only loss was against the Steelers where Rivers decided that in a game we held a 24-7 lead in the 2nd half, he needed to finish that game throwing 23 passes to 3 runs...    Let's break it down even more.  Let's make it an even 50/50 run vs pass split.  In those scenarios we were 4-6 in games where we even let Rivers throw it 1 more time than we ran it (Bengals & 2 fortunate Texans wins make up 3 of those wins).  Both teams picking in top 6.  Only win against a good team where we threw it more than we passed it was first Titans game.  That means that we finished 7-0 in games where we ran it more than we passed it.   In other words, Rivers was nothing more than a game manager.  He could beat teams like the Bengals, Texans, and Titans on a short week throwing it more than we ran it.  But when we needed him to carry us and beat a good team he just couldn't do it.  Unfortunately, Rivers couldn't recognize that.  He kept trying to prove that he could go out and win us games but the numbers say that he just couldn't get it done.    Sure he completed 68% of his passes but the guy couldn't put the team on his back against good teams.  If he can't humble himself and accept the fact that he is just a game manager that should never throw more than 60% of the time vs good teams then he should not be brought back.
  • Members

    • Mick12Maher

      Mick12Maher 55

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Patrick Miller

      Patrick Miller 245

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hark

      Hark 335

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DiogoSales

      DiogoSales 56

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 2,307

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • UKColt13

      UKColt13 155

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BillHill

      BillHill 5

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 4,674

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SicWhitted

      SicWhitted 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jbaron04

      jbaron04 76

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...