Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Blankenship beats out Mclaughlin


Recommended Posts

  • CR91 changed the title to Blankenship beats out Mclaughlin
4 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

This is a questionable move IMO. Mclaughlin was a lot better than Blankenship.

 

Maybe, but Blankenship imo has the more potential down the road.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, CR91 said:

 

Maybe, but Blankenship imo has the more potential down the road.

I don't care about potential. It's a kicker. Just give me the accurate one who can hit within 50 yards consistently

Just now, ManningGM said:

......Were you at camp?

Yes I was.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I swear they cut Mclaughlin and kept Blankenship just so they could keep the streak of an undrafted FA making the team every year going. Conspiracy theory here, but I'm going with it. This was a terrible move. The more I think about this, the more it makes me mad.

  • Haha 4
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

This is a questionable move IMO. Mclaughlin was a lot better than Blankenship.

When it comes to assuming that one knows more than the top level professionals in charge of the team, you certainly are consistent. 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

I swear they cut Mclaughlin and kept Blankenship just so they could keep the streak of an undrafted FA making the team every year going. Conspiracy theory here, but I'm going with it. This was a terrible move. The more I think about this, the more it makes me mad.

Yeah, one of the biggest roster moves based off last season's kicking woes and we jeopardize team play by continuing a UDFA streak. Okay. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jared Cisneros said:

I swear they cut Mclaughlin and kept Blankenship just so they could keep the streak of an undrafted FA making the team every year going. Conspiracy theory here, but I'm going with it. This was a terrible move. The more I think about this, the more it makes me mad.

I think that definitely could have had something to do with it. I'm not mad about it, because I think Blankenship has every chance to be good... but if he struggles I know in my mind I'll be thinking they only kept him for the streak (whether that's fair or not, lol). I liked Chase.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Four2itus said:

When it comes to assuming that one knows more than the top level professionals in charge of the team, you certainly are consistent. 

The funny thing is, if the exact opposite happened, and I complained about Blankenship getting cut instead, you would of said the exact same thing. You are a yes man, plain and simple. I'm not even going to bother trying to have a civil talk with you about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, ManningGM said:

Yeah, one of the biggest roster moves based off last season's kicking woes and we jeopardize it by continuing a UDFA streak. Okay. 

In a business sense, Ballard can use it as a selling point after the draft each year when trying to sign UDFAs. So it isn't out of the question that he's doing this on purpose for a purpose.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

When it comes to assuming that one knows more than the top level professionals in charge of the team, you certainly are consistent. 

Consistently mistaken too haha jk

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

This is a questionable move IMO. Mclaughlin was a lot better than Blankenship.

obviously not most things i have read said both were good not surprised they went with the higher upside rookie 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

I swear they cut Mclaughlin and kept Blankenship just so they could keep the streak of an undrafted FA making the team every year going. Conspiracy theory here, but I'm going with it. This was a terrible move. The more I think about this, the more it makes me mad.

did you even see Blankenship kick in college? cause by the way you speak about him it doesn't seem like you did he's one of the best in recent years and was damn near perfect on extra points his entire college career 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah but Sanchez will keep kickoffs for 2020, but would not be surprising if Blakenship assumes them down the line as to focus on punting for Sanchez instead. If he continues to do good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a feeling once Blankenship outplayed him in clutch time the final scrimmage as well as having the better pedigree in college the brass made their mind up.

 

Chase isnt bad could well be one of the best 32 and find a home . I write off his up and down rookie season to nerves somewhat, 50% from 40-49 wont win many fans and the bad miss for 49'ers in ot cost them the game vs Seattle but the bottom end of the league kickers isnt great.

 

This move may win me the roster contest on here as several had Chase (Some had both)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Patriots wanted Chase during waivers last year but we had a higher waiver priority at the time. Now I expect the patriots to go after him. I heard that they just released their drafted kicker.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

I swear they cut Mclaughlin and kept Blankenship just so they could keep the streak of an undrafted FA making the team every year going. Conspiracy theory here, but I'm going with it. This was a terrible move. The more I think about this, the more it makes me mad.

:facepalm:

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, chad72 said:

Patriots wanted Chase during waivers last year but we had a higher waiver priority at the time. Now I expect the patriots to go after him. I heard that they just released their drafted kicker.

Patriots just released a drafted kicker and Nick Folk. They are starting over at kicker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a feeling this rookie is going to be the right choice.  He has the experience of playing in big stadiums and hostile crowds. Because he is a rookie, I think the coaching staff and everyone around him will pick up their game. Furthermore I have a feeling that his compadre, Rigoberto will calm Rodrigo with some calming and wise spanish sayings before his kicks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well congrats to Rodrigo and hopefully he will be our kicker for the next 20 years or so. I already got my Rodrigo style goggles ready to cheer for him .:omg: <- we need new Rodrigo emoticon

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

obviously not most things i have read said both were good not surprised they went with the higher upside rookie 

I keep hearing Specs has all this untapped potential that Chase just doesn't.... It's not like McLaughlin is some grizzled vet.... He was a rookie last yr.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Well, he asked a stupid question, so I gave a stupid answer! hahahaha 

 

Despite your attempt at sarcasm, if you're not at camp and witnessing what's going on, then you have no knowledge on what happened.

 

For all we know, McLaughlin could have missed 200 kicks in a row.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was in 4th grade when this happened,i didn't want to go to school the next day after bragging on the Colts the whole week before.I learned my lesson.
    • Cam Newton can be had for an ashtray overflowing with cigarette butts
    • The whole deal was Taglibue wanted Jack Kent Cooke to have the whole Maryland market, plus the southern PA area which was traditionally a Colts and Orioles market.    I also get Charlotte, but Baltimore has been a proven  football market for two franchises. Really, the only bad attendance years were during the Bob Irsay era, 72-83, and even  some of those years , 74,75,76 had great attendance. When Taglibue told us to use the stadium money to build a museum after jipping us out on expansion, that’s when the Maryland Stadium Authority was forced to carpetbag another NFL team, or have the city permanently out of the NFL. As St Louis and Oakland also know, not a fun prospect.  
    • You think maybe this is Belichick's last year also? Fire sale players, stock up on draft picks, then have the next GM/HC figure out their players. I can't picture Belichick having the patience for building-up a new young roster at his age, especially without Brady instilling discipline into them.
  • Members

    • danlhart87

      danlhart87 4,139

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chucklez

      Chucklez 992

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 2,087

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 2,892

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • OhioColt

      OhioColt 72

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jmac_48

      jmac_48 719

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,701

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crazycolt1

      crazycolt1 13,844

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 582

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...