Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Mailbag — Need Your Questions!

Recommended Posts

Several questions.

Are the colts planning on doing much in the form of social media on the practices? In years prior members of the media would tweet and give us updates as practices went along, We would see more videos of training camp.


Will members of the media eventually be able to watch from a far?


Hows the WR competition looking especially on the back end of it because it seems like there some deep competition there.


Whats the chances we see Eric Berry or Jadeveon Clowney in a colts uniform this year?


Where do you think the colts are going to utilize the extra 2 positions on the 55 man roster QB or OL?


Do you think Chad Kelly stands a chance to still be on this roster 2021?

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, AWalkerColts said:

Hey everybody, Andrew Walker of Colts.com here.

I’m just looking to expand our reach in the quest for the best questions for our Colts.com Mailbag.

I’ll check back here towards the end of the week for any submissions you may have, or feel free to send them on our site here.

That's awesome, I was just thinking 2 days ago about writing to you to suggest you join this forum. I hadn't gotten around to it yet. Welcome!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

   Something I’ve been wondering since the kickoff rule changes: why not just move the kicking team up 1 or 2 yards (in front of the kicker), to make it more of a possibility to recover?

    I can understand the “4th and 15” option but it seems just moving the players closer would be a safe but exciting option as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always wanted to know why there's a game day roster limit.  With player safety being of such importance it's crazy that you could have a healthy player on the bench who's not eligible to play.  Especially if your starter and backup are injured.


The owners are paying them, so they can't be against it, right?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Crush22 said:

Will the '*Rumor* Andrew Luck' thread ever go away?


Not until 1 of 2 things happens: 1. Andrew Luck returns  2. The Colts find a long term replacement as the franchise quarterback. Until one of those things happens there will always be an Andrew Luck Returns thread. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Crush22 said:

Will the '*Rumor* Andrew Luck' thread ever go away?


Wait.  It's just a rumor?  Darn, I was just getting my Luck jersey out of the closet again...

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sup Andrew!

Easy question for you.

Which players would you prioritize for extension before the end of the year?

T.Y., Hooker, Walker Jr., Mack, Houston, Autry, Stewart, Pascal, Alie-Cox, Muhammad?

Those are all contracts that end after this season.

I think it is obvious that Rivers is a 'wait and see' situation.

(Only a portion of the 37 players on the 80 man roster, that contract's end after 2020)

Link to post
Share on other sites

How concerned are the Colts' decision makers, and the NFL's as a whole, about the possibility of players developing present and future heart ailments like Myocarditis from the Corona virus, like the B1G obviously was in canceling its season?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andrew! Thanks for reaching out to all of us!


My question: How is Xavier Rhodes looking in the Colt’s defensive schemes? How is his leadership in the locker room as the elder statesmen with the young guns? 


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's several.


At WR...

1. With the addition of Pittman, will we see Pascal running more out of the slot?

2. Who's the most likely to be the heir apparent to TY, and the #2 Z WR this year? Campbell, Fountain, or another?

3. Assuming we keep 6 WRs on the roster, what's your prediction? My way-to-early guess is TY, Pittman, Campbell, Pascal, Fountain, and Dulin.



1. Hines and Dulin looked great last year when returning, are they the two early favorites? Is Rodgers in the running?



1. Is this the year we see MAC break out?

2. Now that we have Pittman and Patmon, will that increased size at WR decrease 2 TE sets, and/or the utilization of TE in general?



1. Will Autry end up being an every-down "flex" player, lining up at DT on passing downs, and DE on running downs?

2. Will we see more blitzing this year? Our pressure %s last year were pretty disappointing. I know Buckner will improve that number by just being on the field, but would love to see more blitzing combined with more man coverage.

3. What's your way too early prediction for DL line ups? My guess is 

Passing downs - Houston-Autry-Buckner-Turay

Running downs - Houston-Buckner-Stewart OR Day-Autry

4. When Turay was drafted, many saw him as better run stopper than rush DE. Did the experts totally have it wrong, or is he just a late bloomer vs the pass. And... will he become that every down DE this year?

5. Did Banogu train this off season with anyone to hone his rush skills, like Turay has done in the past?



1. With the addition of Glasgow, who many see as more of a STs add, do you see a 3 man competition for 2 spots with Glasgow, Zaire, and Franklin?

2. With Oke taking over starting SAM later in the year in 2019, do you think we'll see less Nickel and more 3 LB sets to keep Leonard, Walker, and Oke on the field?



1. Flus hinted that we'd see more "man" last year, but aside from the KC game (who's passing game was a bit crippled due to injury) it seemed like we were running mostly a soft C2. With the addition of Buckner, and assumed improved pass rush, will we see more man coverage?

2. Where do you project Blackmon once he returns to form? We've heard a lot of FS talk, but I see him more as a well rounded SS in our C2 defense. He comes from a "man" system, struggled at CB (before the conversion), and also struggled at FS when asked to "roam". He was a beast though tackling (that first hit vs Oregon - oh my), and covering closer to the LOS. I think he's got a higher upside than Willis at SS, but not sold on the FS talk.

3. How do the coaches view Rodgers, especially his build (HT/WT). Dynamic player, but very slight build. Do they have him on any specific S&C program to help add some good weight? I'd love to him get a shot at returns, but I'd also like to see his athleticism translate as a DB.


  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Contreras had a bat flip that went 40ft in the air on his first HR. Got hit later in the game, White Sox pitcher Manager and Pitching coach got ejected. He also flipped bat after getting hit. He hit another HR too. Javy also hit a double LH 
    • The covid IR rules are helping this team a ton. Imagine if they were the old IR rules. We would of had to cut some players because guys like Burton would not of went on IR. I hope they keep some of these rules because teams can keep more of their players instead of having to cut them.
    • Yep. He was loved by every analyst too as a single high FS, and looked good his first year with the Colts. He'll be a bargain for someone IMO if he can stay healthy.    What's also weird though, is that Flus hinted that he wanted to play more man last year. Aside from the KC game, didn't seem like it happened much. And we drafted both Rock and Blackmon from heavy man systems. I think Willis was too. I just don't understand to be honest what Flus is really all about yes. Was he waiting to get a 3T and pressure up front to go more man? He has that now. And if not, not sure I understand Ballard's draft choices as they seem to be converse to Flus's scheme.
    • With his injury history, I doubt there are going to be many teams out there offering to dish out money like he'd be a guaranteed starter, and I would doubt many teams are going to be throwing long-term deals at him.  He has to prove he can stay healthy for a 16 game season, something he hasn't done in 4 years (7 games, 14 games, 13 games, <2 games).     So, it wouldn't be too surprising (IMO) if Ballard offered him a 1 year deal with a low guarantee and some incentives built in... but he probably knows he's a better fit in a different scheme and can get a similar deal elsewhere where he's more suited to play.     It will be interesting... if JT/Wilkins/Hines prove they're a formidable trio, where would Mack fit in the puzzle if he came back to Indy next year... I'd think he'd be able to go elsewhere, get offered more $ and have a better chance to get more carries.  I could be wrong, but my sense is that JT is going to establish himself a true #1 RB in this league before this year ends.  I understand his wear may be an issue considering how many miles he put on in college, but so far (in limited time) Wilkins has shown he can be a solid supplement to him.  Mack has already shown the league he can be an upper-level back in the NFL, so I don't think he'll have too much trouble finding $ if he is passing all his physicals and looking good in his workouts.     TJ Green or Laron Landry... I don't think Hooker is even close to either of those guys.  Hooker produced in college, he was producing very well (being talked about DROY) as a rookie before he got hurt.  He hasn't been a bad football player here.  He doesn't get thrown at much.  He's playing a scheme that isn't entirely suited to his skill set... but he has shown he can play.  TJ Green was a raw guy who didn't produce near the level as Hooker did in college and never showed anything in the NFL (another Grigs bust) and Landry was a roided out freak who was shown the door by the league because he couldn't pass PED tests.   Hooker, if he can stay healthy, can play in this league.  That is his major concern, is his health... he is an above average football player who could be very good if he's in the right system.     Yes, that was a weird scenario all around.  Ballard, keep in mind, didn't get to choose his coach.  He was basically stuck with Pagano.  Ballard knew what scheme he wanted to run on D, which was different than Pagano.  Pagano was talking about Hooker as 'the next Ed Reed' (who played under Pagano when he was a DC in Baltimore).  Hooker really fit the Pagano mold.  I would not be shocked, if Pagano is still in a defensive coordinator position going into next year that Hooker went to whatever team Pagano was affiliated with, TBH.  
    • Agreed.  He came to the Colts to play with Luck, make a lot of stats, win a lot of games, and make a lot of money.  When Luck quit, and he had to play with Brissett, none of those things were going to happen anymore, and he knew it.  The light just went out of his eyes, and he didn't really care to be here anymore.
  • Members

  • Create New...