Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Fantasy team 2020


CR91

Recommended Posts

Just now, Jared Cisneros said:

Wow! Interesting. Good job jumping on that!

 

Ravens have both Hollywood Brown and Miles Boykin on Covid list.

 

In another league, I am glad I have Mark Andrews then, who once was on the Covid list along with Lamar, lol. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, chad72 said:

 

He seems to be their goal line back more so than Dobbins for the most part. He is very efficient with his carries too, you should do good there. Michael Thomas may not be a good play this week, IMO, mainly because of Taysom Hill's accuracy against a good secondary that plays tight coverage. Hopefully he can get a TD to make up for the lack of yards. 

 

The Saints game plan will be to keep Mahomes on the sidelines with their run game primarily, IMO.

 

Brees was activated to return from IR. Not sure now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CR91 said:

 

Brees was activated to return from IR. Not sure now.

 

Yeah, like Tim Patrick got a couple of TDs vs Chiefs, like I said before, the red zone is where you will earn your points with Michael Thomas, IMO and not between the 20s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Yeah, like Tim Patrick got a couple of TDs vs Chiefs, like I said before, the red zone is where you will earn your points with Michael Thomas, IMO and not between the 20s.

 

Heres the problem. One WR gets points and the other doesn't. Samuel had a good day Moore had a bad day. Patrick good Juedy bad. Evans good, Godwin bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CR91 said:

 

Heres the problem. One WR gets points and the other doesn't. Samuel had a good day Moore had a bad day. Patrick good Juedy bad. Evans good, Godwin bad

 

Isn't that the weekly dilemma in fantasy? :) 

 

You have to go with your gut and let it play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

Brees was activated to return from IR. Not sure now.

 

Ack, this makes things even tougher.  I'm in the semi final of a 14 man league.  I picked Trubisky up last week and he did fantastic.

 

I have Ridley, Aiyuk, Kamara, Aaron Jones, Mike Davis, Tonyan, Koo and the Niners D.  QB I currently have Hurts in, but also have Trubisky still and Brees on IR.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/16/2020 at 2:21 PM, chad72 said:

 

Isn't that the weekly dilemma in fantasy? :) 

 

You have to go with your gut and let it play out.

 

Well no Thomas so now I gotta figure out either David Johnson vs the colts or Gus Edwards vs the Jags

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Well no Thomas so now I gotta figure out either David Johnson vs the colts or Gus Edwards vs the Jags


I’m going Gus Edwards based on game script working in Ravens favor by 3rd quarter.

 

Texans-Colts, Colts could get ahead and pin their ears and Watson doesn’t check down much to RBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, chad72 said:


I’m going Gus Edwards based on game script working in Ravens favor by 3rd quarter.

 

Texans-Colts, Colts could get ahead and pin their ears and Watson doesn’t check down much to RBs.

 

I don't know. Johnson will atleast get 10-15 touches. Gus edwards might not even get 10. Also Buckner might not play and even if he does, he won't be 100 percent with his ankle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

I don't know. Johnson will atleast get 10-15 touches. Gus edwards might not even get 10. Also Buckner might not play and even if he does, he won't be 100 percent with his ankle.


Gus with 10 touches is more efficient per touch than DJ with 15, IMO. Mark Ingram has not been a factor lately, so it’s Gus and Dobbins mainly. When the game script is in Ravens favor, Lamar runs less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, chad72 said:


Gus with 10 touches is more efficient per touch than DJ with 15, IMO. Mark Ingram has not been a factor lately, so it’s Gus and Dobbins mainly. When the game script is in Ravens favor, Lamar runs less.

 

Duke johnson is supposed to miss the game though which means more throws to David Johnson. I don't know. For all I know, Ravens decide to give Ingram 10 touches. Not to mention, Jackson will always be the first option in the run game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

Duke johnson is supposed to miss the game though which means more throws to David Johnson. I don't know. For all I know, Ravens decide to give Ingram 10 touches. Not to mention, Jackson will always be the first option in the run game.


1 option is definitely better than 2 or 3 options if Duke were to miss. In that case go with DJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/19/2020 at 6:16 AM, chad72 said:


1 option is definitely better than 2 or 3 options if Duke were to miss. In that case go with DJ.

 

So it's the final week of the championship. I'm currently ahead by 27. I need to choose two out of these three backs. I'm working under the impression Gaskin will not play.

 

Fournette vs the Lions

 

Salon Ahmed vs the Raiders

 

David Johnson vs the Bengals

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

So it's the final week of the championship. I'm currently ahead by 27. I need to choose two out of these three backs. I'm working under the impression Gaskin will not play.

 

Fournette vs the Lions

 

Salon Ahmed vs the Raiders

 

David Johnson vs the Bengals

 

 

David Johnson and Salvon Ahmed, IMO. 

 

Do you guys do a best of 3 weeks or something like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

David Johnson and Salvon Ahmed, IMO. 

 

Do you guys do a best of 3 weeks or something like that?

 

But the lions have the worst run defense.No. It's a two week playoff match where the total of the two weeks wins. We void week 17 to avoid teams resting key players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

But the lions have the worst run defense. No. It's a two week playoff match where the total of the two weeks wins. We void week 17 to avoid teams resting key players

 

Lions have been bad on all fronts like Tannehill showed last week, so have the Raiders, giving up easy TDs for RBs (Lions given up 3 TDs over last 3 games, Raiders 4).

 

Just that the Bucs have far more mouths to feed but the Dolphins - DaVante Parker might miss the game, Gesicki might miss the game, and if both of those happen, more opportunities for the RBs, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Lions have been bad on all fronts like Tannehill showed last week, so have the Raiders, giving up easy TDs for RBs (Lions given up 3 TDs over last 3 games, Raiders 4).

 

Just that the Bucs have far more mouths to feed but the Dolphins - DaVante Parker might miss the game, Gesicki might miss the game, and if both of those happen, more opportunities for the RBs, IMO.

 

I was leading more towards Fournette and Ahmed. I think the touches and the matchup are better. Of course, all this means nothing if Gaskins plays. My only concern playing Ahmed is how well the raiders kept Ekcler in check

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Lions have been bad on all fronts like Tannehill showed last week, so have the Raiders, giving up easy TDs for RBs (Lions given up 3 TDs over last 3 games, Raiders 4).

 

Just that the Bucs have far more mouths to feed but the Dolphins - DaVante Parker might miss the game, Gesicki might miss the game, and if both of those happen, more opportunities for the RBs, IMO.

 

Gaskin is activated so my decision becomes easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

I was leading more towards Fournette and Ahmed. I think the touches and the matchup are better. Of course, all this means nothing if Gaskins plays. My only concern playing Ahmed is how well the raiders kept Ekeler in check

 

 

2 things there. Ever since Ekeler came back, Herbert was asked to dink and dunk for a lower YPA. It benefited Ekeler owners like me in fantasy but hurt Herbert owners because he had been free lancing more, moving out of the pocket more for a higher depth of YPA prior to the Patriots game. This Thursday night, they went back to the old Herbert ways where Ekeler was not the first or second read and completed passes much farther down the field. The goal line opportunities - they used Ballage for 1 and Herbert took the other rushing TD, thus evaporating Ekeler's TD chances. That is what actually happened.

 

They sold out to the run so badly (probably because Gruden fired the previous DC for that) that WRs were running open against the Raiders but at the goal line, they still couldn't come up with the stops even when it was obvious the Chargers were going to run it. Problem was, Ekeler was not the goal line back in that game.  I watched the game agonizingly as those happened. Between Ekeler, Drake and Mike Davis in another league, I did not get a single TD. Won't be the case with Gaskin, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

2 things there. Ever since Ekeler came back, Herbert was asked to dink and dunk for a lower YPA. It benefited Ekeler owners like me in fantasy but hurt Herbert owners because he had been free lancing more, moving out of the pocket more for a higher depth of YPA prior to the Patriots game. This Thursday night, they went back to the old Herbert ways where Ekeler was not the first or second read and completed passes much farther down the field. The goal line opportunities - they used Ballage for 1 and Herbert took the other rushing TD, thus evaporating Ekeler's TD chances. That is what actually happened.

 

They sold out to the run so badly (probably because Gruden fired the previous DC for that) that WRs were running open against the Raiders but at the goal line, they still couldn't come up with the stops even when it was obvious the Chargers were going to run it. Problem was, Ekeler was not the goal line back in that game.  I watched the game agonizingly as those happened. Between Ekeler, Drake and Mike Davis in another league, I did not get a single TD. Won't be the case with Gaskin, IMO.

 

Regardless, it's a moot point. Gaskin is already owned so it's Fournette and Johnson which is fine because their matchups are really good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ohhhhh well that’s that then! 
    • I agree but I'm afraid Ballard and Frank are too chickenpoo to make adjustments to tweak our D. They will bring in a cover 3 guy or promote from with in. Ballard will say we brought DeFo in for 3tech and it's going to stay its coarse...honestly if we change D style it will take two season fto build that personnel... we are in a rebuild and keeping everything the same means we could clean house next year if nothing changes. I personally like Ballard and wish we went with all new coaching...We are looking at a 8-9 season coming up. 
    • Truth is we need a player on every level across the board. We need secondary help, we need DL help, and we need a real Mike. Oke ain't built for it... coaching is part of it. We are vanilla on both sides of the ball too often... he'll we ne OL and Rec help on offense... the Wentz signing was a two year set back...it hurts...
    • Half those turnovers are Leonard's from pure will, has nothing to do with scheme... Eberflus has scheme to limit points not yards... and we don't have a QB to put up points. Time for some adjusents...
    • For what it’s worth….   Allen’s jump from Y2 to Y3 was historic.   As in never been done before.  Ever.   His completion percentage jumped about 10.5 points.   Again, historic.   Did he cool off this year?   Yes, but still very high and he’s throwing much further down the field than CW is.      Who are you comparing JA to?   Who was the flash in the pan who turned out average?  
  • Members

    • IndySouthsider

      IndySouthsider 806

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr.NotSoCreative

      Mr.NotSoCreative 322

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 903

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 335

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chrisaaron1023

      Chrisaaron1023 2,635

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,396

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 2,185

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 8,943

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 905

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SOMDColtsfan

      SOMDColtsfan 160

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...