Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Who has more up side Brissett or Eason?


Recommended Posts

Eason will actually take a chance. Brissett always goes for the easy throw.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Eason. He makes decisions much quicker and has a pretty fast release. All we have is college but that’s what he showed.

 

Kind of off topic I noticed in some pictures of Jacoby and he looks like he has slimmed down. Even rivers looks like he has some.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Stephen said:

They both have strong  arms, but Eason  is younger. 

I think we’ve seen Brissett at his peak. We haven’t seen Eason at his so I’m gonna go with Eason at this point in time

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

I have no idea and I don’t think anyone else does either.   We all have opinions, but none of us really knows.   
 

 

That's why Eason has more upside.  It's unknown.   Brissett's is already known.  Since the bar isn't set too high, Eason gets the nod.  Eason would also be the choice for most downside.    

Link to post
Share on other sites

Upside is basically untapped potential. 

There's an argument for both, but some of this depends on if Eason can actually do anything at the NFL level. I'm no JB super fan, but he can spot start and that's of some value. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

What is more wet, water or sand/?

 

The question is whether Eason's upside is greater than JB's ceiling of mediocre play?  Personally, I'm not a huge fan of Eason so I'm not ready to proclaim that yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is like asking which fork truck driver has a better chance at management.  Both are probably decent guys but chances are neither of them will be working there in 7 years and one of them won’t be driving a fork truck at all.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, AwesomeAustin said:

This is like asking which fork truck driver has a better chance at management.  Both are probably decent guys but chances are neither of them will be working there in 7 years and one of them won’t be driving a fork truck at all.  

Good analogy.   I would add to it:

Forklift driver "A" had been a supervisor for a couple years and was demoted because he wasn't that good at it.  So he has experience and would make the transition into management a little easier, but his potential is limited to being a mediocre supervisor.   

Forklift driver "B" was recently hired with being a supervisor in mind.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Myles said:

Good analogy.   I would add to it:

Forklift driver "A" had been a supervisor for a couple years and was demoted because he wasn't that good at it.  So he has experience and would make the transition into management a little easier, but his potential is limited to being a mediocre supervisor.   

Forklift driver "B" was recently hired with being a supervisor in mind.  

I honestly don’t think they are counting on Eason to be a franchise QB.  He was drafted bc it was very good value in the 4th round.  I bet the real expectation is for him to be a high quality back up.  I’m sure they would love to catch lightning in a bottle but most likely Eason won’t pan out like the majority of drafted QBs despite pro quality physical talent.  I could be wrong, nfl teams try forcing square pegs into round holes all the time. Look at Malik Hooker...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't answer that question.  IMO, I think we've seen what JB is going to give us.  He's decent when he's not injured.  But I don't think anyone expects much more out of him than that.

 

We know nothing about Eason.  I keep hearing how he didn't play well against good D's in college.  That could be on the coaching staff.  All we know is that he has the right measurables.  Guys like Montana and Brady didn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t think I have enough information at this point to form an opinion.

 

I think Jacoby is caught somewhere between a top-tier backup and a low-tier starter.  But he’s still young and I’d say it’s quite possible he could improve a lot.  He has great arm strength and is one of the NFL’s best at playing through contact.  But he doesn’t have very good field vision, isn’t all that mobile, throws a lot of short, hard to catch bullets, and is generally too cautious.

 

I’ll reserve any judgment on Eason until I have a chance to see him play live against NFL defenses.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, AwesomeAustin said:

I honestly don’t think they are counting on Eason to be a franchise QB.  He was drafted bc it was very good value in the 4th round.  I bet the real expectation is for him to be a high quality back up.  I’m sure they would love to catch lightning in a bottle but most likely Eason won’t pan out like the majority of drafted QBs despite pro quality physical talent.  I could be wrong, nfl teams try forcing square pegs into round holes all the time. Look at Malik Hooker...

I think you are correct.   I'm sure Ballard seen some potential of him making a good starter, but that is just potential.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, luv_pony_express said:

I don’t think I have enough information at this point to form an opinion.

 

I think Jacoby is caught somewhere between a top-tier backup and a low-tier starter.  But he’s still young and I’d say it’s quite possible he could improve a lot.  He has great arm strength and is one of the NFL’s best at playing through contact.  But he doesn’t have very good field vision, isn’t all that mobile, throws a lot of short, hard to catch bullets, and is generally too cautious.

 

I’ll reserve any judgment on Eason until I have a chance to see him play live against NFL defenses.

I disagree with that.   He has the same flaws as when he came out of college.   He hasn't improved those flaws.  he's pretty much a .500 starter which is great for a backup.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, luv_pony_express said:

I don’t think I have enough information at this point to form an opinion.

 

I think Jacoby is caught somewhere between a top-tier backup and a low-tier starter.  But he’s still young and I’d say it’s quite possible he could improve a lot.  He has great arm strength and is one of the NFL’s best at playing through contact.  But he doesn’t have very good field vision, isn’t all that mobile, throws a lot of short, hard to catch bullets, and is generally too cautious.

 

I’ll reserve any judgment on Eason until I have a chance to see him play live against NFL defenses.

I don't consider turning 28 this season to be very young, even for a QB... It's by no means long in the tooth, but you also have to consider that most of his statistical numbers have stayed steady from college, through last year... Eight years of plateaued production, including years playing behind some great QBs, and for great coaches.... Doesn't give any sign of promising trajectory, or hint at untapped potential.  He's what he is at this point, like most 28 yr old QBs.

8 minutes ago, Myles said:

I disagree with that.   He has the same flaws as when he came out of college.   He hasn't improved those flaws.  he's pretty much a .500 starter which is great for a backup.  

Posted at the same time ..lol

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jacoby's 5 years older than Eason.  Not saying he has hit his ceiling quite yet, as I don't think last year was the best year to judge him (injuries to WRs/TEs and drops, plus a nagging injury to Brissett and a fairly vanilla playbook for most of the year didn't help him, too much -- was part of that vanilla play book due to Brissett's limited ability, probably, but I think it could have also be attributed to him losing Funchess for  the year, Ebron for a good chunk of it and TY and Campbell going down or playing with obvious limitations for good chunks of the year).  While I think Jacoby could improve from last year, especially with more talent around him, I don't think he's too far away from his ceiling.  

 

From the age and experience alone, I think Eason is the default for having more upside.  We are pretty sure what Jacoby can do.  Eason has a better arm and they are similar athletically (Eason being slightly faster straight away, Brissett being slightly better in agility drills and leaping, at least according to their combine).  Eason is >2 inches taller than Brissett and (even though he has a smaller sample size) showed to be a bit better in college than Brissett (albeit in a totally different program).  

 

Personally, I think Rivers is just about as good as any QB for Eason to learn from for a year or 2.  I'm not sure how the covid is impacting a rookie QB's ability to learn from a future HOF vet, but I feel almost undoubtedly that Eason has more potential than Brissett, in large part due to the fact that we already have a very good idea of what Brissett can bring to the NFL.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hard to say. Brissett has so much experience....where Eason has zilch. I will say that Eason has more intestinal fortitude to stick a football through a coin slot at 30 yards. I honestly hope that both QB's just ooze potential this season. That would be a best case scenario for the Colts. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eason has more upside than Brissett. Eason is the high risk/high reward guy that has a shot of becoming your franchise QB in a few years. He's like a better Chad Kelly. He can also flop completely though. Still not bad for a 4th round pick. Brissett is the safe guy with a high floor/low ceiling that is a game manager. You might win a game or two with him if Rivers gets hurt. If needed for the season like last year or 2017 though, you will have a losing record.

 

Brissett is a good backup, but pray you don't need him for more than that this year. Eason has a possibility to be a solid starter in this league if he gets good advice from Rivers and Reich, and works hard. Brissett will be on the team as a backup for one more year, and probably go to another team as a backup once FA happens next year. Eason has upside to either be our backup next year, or in his best-case-scenario, start for us if he takes a huge step forward within a years time.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Shafty138 said:

I don't consider turning 28 this season to be very young, even for a QB... It's by no means long in the tooth, but you also have to consider that most of his statistical numbers have stayed steady from college, through last year... Eight years of plateaued production, including years playing behind some great QBs, and for great coaches.... Doesn't give any sign of promising trajectory, or hint at untapped potential.  He's what he is at this point, like most 28 yr old QBs.

Posted at the same time ..lol


Kurt Warner was 28 when he started his first NFL game.  And he ended up in Canton.

 

I’m not necessarily saying that Brissett has the potential to be a top-tier starting QB.  As I said, I think he’s one of those guys caught between being a terrific backup and a mediocre starter.  But (a) most of his positive qualities are unteachable, (b) most of his negative qualities are teachable, and (c) his career to this point has turned a lot — both good and bad — on luck (no pun intended).

 

Let’s not forget that, when he got hurt last year, we were a couple of Vinny shanks away from being 6-1...and this with Brissett having become the starter under tough circumstances.  One of those wins was against the Chiefs...on the road.

 

So it’s not like he’s been awful.  I do think Jacoby still has room and the capability for improvement.  But you can’t compare him to a kid who hasn’t played a snap against NFL defenses.  Eason’s a complete unknown at this time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think JB's biggest negative that may not be fixable is his lack of confidence in making the iffy throw. You just don't get the perfect set up on every pass. Sometimes you just have to take a chance and let her rip. Sometimes it works and sometimes it goes the other way. The best QBs most of the time make it work. You have to trust you're physical abilities which JB has and you receivers, which he didn't have last years to make it work. I'm not sure that can be taught. Every successful QB/PG I've know in my life had that confidence in spades.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reich mentioned this week that Jacoby has got s better grasp of the offense and I think he said he is processing things quicker. Who knows if it’s true. Only way we will find out is if rivers gets hurt or ends up with  Also looks like Jacoby has shed some pounds. He looks much slimmer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Reich mentioned this week that Jacoby has got s better grasp of the offense and I think he said he is processing things quicker. Who knows if it’s true. Only way we will find out is if rivers gets hurt or ends up with  Also looks like Jacoby has shed some pounds. He looks much slimmer.

Why would you say “who knows if it’s true”? 
 

Why would Reich lie?   What’s in it for him?
 

And why would this be hard to believe?   It’s the third year in the system for JB, so he has a huge head start over Eason.  Wouldn’t you expect the veteran to be ahead of the rookie in learning and understanding the system?  Does that seem unreasonable?   It takes most rookies a long time to pick up their first NFL system.

 

Remember...    even the great Patrick Mahomes sat out almost his entire rookie season.   He played one game.   Even Lamar Jackson didn’t play much as a rookie and even when he did they prepared a small limited number of plays for him and that’s all he was allowed to do.   That’s the way it is for MOST rookies.  
 

Guys like Andrew Luck are the exception to the rule. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I strongly disagree. We have plenty of talent on O. Game plan, play calling, and personnel choice in situational downs have been highly questionable. The pass/run mix game 1 was heavy pass, and just didn't make sense vs Jax, and especially in game 1 after no preseason with the RBs we had to start the year. The heavy run in G2 was an overreaction to G1. The heavy run in G3 was just silly given it's the Jet's strength.   Reich has a history of not attacking a teams weakness while going heavy against their strengths (see Miami last year). Play calling in general, has been predictable and conservative. I'll cut him a break there since perhaps he doesn't want to show much this early, but if he doesn't open things up soon, I'll have to scratch my head on that too. Maybe it's partly covid, but other teams look far more dynamic. We had WRs and TEs open all game Sunday, and needed to get some of the young WRs experience. It was a lost opportunity.   And IMO, even JB regressed with Reich from 2017 to 2019. The stats were very similar, but JB in 2019 had a heck of a lot better OL, and was sacked half the amount he was in 2017.    I really like Frank as a person, but it's not like his track record can't be questioned. In his two years in Phily as OC, Pederson called the plays so not much to glean from. In his two years as OC in LA, he had horrible balance both years, and was fired after being last in the league rushing and a 4-12 record. He's not all the much better than Pagano thus far, and has a much better roster.    Not saying at all we need to fire Frank, or anything like that. I am saying though he's not done anything extraordinary thus far though. He's got no excuses this year.   I agree. I can understand him not playing early last year when we had Doyle and Ebron both, but we should absolutely see him get a good snap share this year. Maybe short term a little, but honestly I'm not worried. We did fine when he was out last year. Williams had two 100 games in a row when Mack was out. Taylor will be fine with our OL. Having Taylor and Mack was an embarrassment of riches, but we're just fine with Taylor/Wilkins/Hines.   Again, IMO, goes back to game plan. We didn't run the ball a bunch against a team (Jax) that was 5th worst in the league vs the run last year. Then, we ran the ball a lot vs MN (better than they appear vs the run) and NYJ (who were 2nd best vs the run last year). Sorry, that just doesn't make sense.   Then add in things like using Hines between the tackles in goal line situations. Luck leaving was the only truly big issue. Pagano had to deal with Luck being gone a year too, and gimpy a few other years. Pagano did better (record wise) his first 3 years with a healthy Luck, then Reich did with a healthy Luck in 2018, and had a better roster on both sides, especially OL.  Not really. Rivers did great using a ton of different pass catchers this week, when allowed to throw. And we had guys wide open all game. Mo did fine in Doyle's place. Both Hines and Taylor are catching the ball well and are 22/23 on targets. TY looked better this week. Pascal is still there. Fountain got his feet wet. Taylor's AVG was good running. Our OL has been balling out and Rivers only sacked twice (on track for only 11 total this year).
    • Goodness. This is how the outbreaks start.   The first real test of NFL protocols. Let’s hope they can get a handle on it.
    • But the Vikings also didn't have any trouble moving the ball or scoring on the Packers or those vaunted Titans. So maybe there is something to be said for this defense. Just another way to look at it.
    • Titans vs Steelers Vikings vs Texans   AFCS definitely needs to keep an eye on this. I wonder if they'd plan to keep the game schedule but force the Steelers to work remote until TEN can return, so as not to gain an insurmountable advantage. Same with the Texans if the Vikings ended up getting exposed by TEN as well.   Busy week ahead.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...