Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
GoColts8818

Colts history of WRs

Recommended Posts

I am watching a Peyton’s places marathon on ABC and they are doing one Raymond Berry.  
 

Much has been made about the Colts history of QBs with Johnny U and Peyton Manning leading the way but I think they might have had more great WRs in the history if the NFL than any other team with Berry, Harrison, Wayne, and now Hilton trying to join them.  Either way the Colts history at WR has been over shadow by QBs so I just wanted to shine some light on it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

I am watching a Peyton’s places marathon on ABC and they are doing one Raymond Berry.  
 

Much has been made about the Colts history of QBs with Johnny U and Peyton Manning leading the way but I think they might have had more great WRs in the history if the NFL than any other team with Berry, Harrison, Wayne, and now Hilton trying to join them.  Either way the Colts history at WR has been over shadow by QBs so I just wanted to shine some light on it.

I agree, some darn great TE's too in Mackey and Clark.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I agree, some darn great TE's too in Mackey and Clark.

Parks And Recreation Donna GIF
  Mr. Dilger needs to be mentioned 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, PrincetonTiger said:

Parks And Recreation Donna GIF
  Mr. Dilger needs to be mentioned 

Right after I posted that I thought of you haha . Dilger was great too.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about Dewayne Allen and Coby Fleenor....:peek:

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

One WR that hasn't been mentioned is Bill Brooks, he was good.

Appreciated him and he’s probably number five on that list but that gap between him and the other four is pretty big and that’s not a shot at Bill Brooks as much as it’s a credit to the the four.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget Raymond Chester, Roger Carr, Willie Richardson,  Roy Jefferson and of course Raymond Berry

. Colts had great clutch receivers in Jimmy Orr and Ray Perkins.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/5/2020 at 8:57 PM, GoColts8818 said:

Appreciated him and he’s probably number five on that list but that gap between him and the other four is pretty big and that’s not a shot at Bill Brooks as much as it’s a credit to the the four.

Bill was very good.  He did suffer from some bad passing offenses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/5/2020 at 4:08 PM, GoColts8818 said:


 

Much has been made about the Colts history of QBs with Johnny U and Peyton Manning leading the way but I think they might have had more great WRs in the history if the NFL than any other team with Berry, Harrison, Wayne, and now Hilton trying to join them.  Either way the Colts history at WR has been over shadow by QBs so I just wanted to shine some light on it.

I don't agree.  Now the cream at the top is great, but there is a huge drop off to the next level.  I think most teams have as good or better WR history.  

 

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/clt/career-receiving.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The St. Louis Rams had a couple of great WRs with Holt 1999-2008 and Bruce 1994-2007. Kind of hard to beat those two at the same time. Add Faulk 1999-2005 as he was maybe the best RB receiver in history. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, crazycolt1 said:

The St. Louis Rams had a couple of great WRs with Holt 1999-2008 and Bruce 1994-2007. Kind of hard to beat those two at the same time. Add Faulk 1999-2005 as he was maybe the best RB receiver in history. 

Wayne and Harrison were just as good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Wayne and Harrison were just as good.

Where did I say they were? 

Harrison and Wayne were 9th and 10th in career yards while Bruce was 5th.

Harrison was 5th in TDs while Wayne was 24th. Bruce was 12th. 

So it's debatable. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

Where did I say they were? 

Harrison and Wayne were 9th and 10th in career yards while Bruce was 5th.

Harrison was 5th in TDs while Wayne was 24th. Bruce was 12th. 

So it's debatable. 

 

I didn’t say you did.  I said they were.
 

Marvin is fifth in career catches and Wayne is 10th.  Bruce is 13th and Holt doesn’t make the top 13.  


Holt is 16th in career yards and 36th in TDs.  
 

So Harrison tops Bruce in catches and TDs while Bruce has the edge in yards.  I think TDs and catches are much more important than yards. Wayne tops Holt in everything and tops Bruce in catches.  
 

As a duo give me Harrison and Wayne.

 

Moss and Carter is another good duo although it was short lived and the Steelers had Stallworth and Swann.  Those are the best sets I can come up with.  
 

The Steelers have been good at producing stud WRs as a franchise but I am not sure I would take them over Harrison and Berry who are probably two of the top 10 WRs to ever play the game and Wayne who is also probably going to end up a Hall of Famer.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Duper and Clayton were a pretty good duo that get overlooked. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

I didn’t say you did.  I said they were.
 

Marvin is fifth in career catches and Wayne is 10th.  Bruce is 13th and Holt doesn’t make the top 13.  


Holt is 16th in career yards and 36th in TDs.  
 

So Harrison tops Bruce in catches and TDs while Bruce has the edge in yards.  I think TDs and catches are much more important than yards. Wayne tops Holt in everything and tops Bruce in catches.  
 

As a duo give me Harrison and Wayne.

 

Moss and Carter is another good duo although it was short lived and the Steelers had Stallworth and Swann.  Those are the best sets I can come up with.  
 

The Steelers have been good at producing stud WRs as a franchise but I am not sure I would take them over Harrison and Berry who are probably two of the top 10 WRs to ever play the game and Wayne who is also probably going to end up a Hall of Famer.  

When you take into consideration what Faulk did along with Bruce and Holt those may have been the best three headed combo in history. 

The one receiver that was as good as Rice was Tim Brown. He just didn't play his career with QBs Montana and Young. He was just as talented. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

I didn’t say you did.  I said they were.
 

Marvin is fifth in career catches and Wayne is 10th.  Bruce is 13th and Holt doesn’t make the top 13.  


Holt is 16th in career yards and 36th in TDs.  
 

So Harrison tops Bruce in catches and TDs while Bruce has the edge in yards.  I think TDs and catches are much more important than yards. Wayne tops Holt in everything and tops Bruce in catches.  
 

As a duo give me Harrison and Wayne.

 

Moss and Carter is another good duo although it was short lived and the Steelers had Stallworth and Swann.  Those are the best sets I can come up with.  
 

The Steelers have been good at producing stud WRs as a franchise but I am not sure I would take them over Harrison and Berry who are probably two of the top 10 WRs to ever play the game and Wayne who is also probably going to end up a Hall of Famer.  

I think Wayne and Harrison easily put the Colts into contention for best 2 WR's ever, but as you go down the list, I think the Colts lose ground.  The Steelers would have an argument  for best WR's overall over the Colts.

Hines Ward

Antonio Brown

Lynn Swan

John Stallworth

Heath Miller

Loui Lipps

Plaxico Burress

Mike Wallace and others.   

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

Duper and Clayton were a pretty good duo that get overlooked. 

 

Passing eras were different then and they definitely should be looked at closer and given more credit, IMO. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, crazycolt1 said:

When you take into consideration what Faulk did along with Bruce and Holt those may have been the best three headed combo in history. 

The one receiver that was as good as Rice was Tim Brown. He just didn't play his career with QBs Montana and Young. He was just as talented. 

Faulk wasn’t a WR and if we are talking about WRs he doesn’t factor into that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Faulk wasn’t a WR and if we are talking about WRs he doesn’t factor into that.

So we should remove all RB's and TE's.   That's fair.

I'm still not sure the Colts would be tops, but Marvin and Reggie put them in the discussion.

 

Quote

"they might have had more great WRs in the history if the NFL than any other team"

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a lot of great WRs in the area of Harrison and Wayne and Brooks, etc throughout the NFL, especially if you go back to the Raymond Berry era.  How about Rice and Taylor with the 49ers, just to name others.

 

Colts don't register on the scale compared to some other clubs, IMO.  Outside of Harrison and Wayne, our WRs have been pretty bad.  And don't forget that both Harrison and Wayne were first round draft choices, so there is a reason why they stand out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Myles said:

So we should remove all RB's and TE's.   That's fair.

I'm still not sure the Colts would be tops, but Marvin and Reggie put them in the discussion.

 

 

Maybe but as others have pointed out the Colts have a history of great WRs beyond Marvin and Reggie.  Berry being the most noticeable.  I am not sure if another franchise can say they had two of the top 10 all-time like the Colts had with Berry and Marvin.  Still the Steelers make a very strong argument.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, DougDew said:

There are a lot of great WRs in the area of Harrison and Wayne and Brooks, etc throughout the NFL, especially if you go back to the Raymond Berry era.  How about Rice and Taylor with the 49ers, just to name others.

 

Colts don't register on the scale compared to some other clubs, IMO.  Outside of Harrison and Wayne, our WRs have been pretty bad.  And don't forget that both Harrison and Wayne were first round draft choices, so there is a reason why they stand out.

A lot of first round wrs flopped hard.    Like Phillip Dorestt for example

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/8/2020 at 4:48 PM, landrus13 said:

I haven't seen a mention of Brandon Stokely.

He was a class act.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WR has been pretty stacked for nearly the entire Manning era. Andrew Luck unfortunately didn't have anything close to what PM had, but so far on paper Philip Rivers seems to have lucked out and has himself at least 4 quality WR's this season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There have been a lot of great receiver duos, trios, corps across the league throughout it's history. Pearson, Hill, Johnson and Dupree in Dallas. Branch, Biletnikoff and Casper in Oakland. Swann, Stallworth, Smith, Cunningham and Grossman in Pittsburgh. Joiner, Jefferson, Chandler and Winslow in San Diego. Clark followed immediately by Rice and then Taylor, with Francis followed by Frank at tight end in San Fran. Irvin, Harper, Novacek and others in Dallas. Peyton's "2nd Chance" group of Thomas, Welker, Thomas and Sanders in Denver. Lots of others. Indy certainly ranks with anyone, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Reich intends to pit the two against one another in what many would consider Vinatieri's specialty: high-stress situations. The Colts coach explained that he will do his best to fabricate those situations during and after practice. One can be sure that without the added test of preseason games, the kickers' performance during these high-stress situations will go a long way in determining who wins the competition.   “They'll get all of their normal routines," Reich said. "But as a team, we'll create more team atmosphere, team kicking drills that will be heightened and weighted more heavily in the kicking competition."  Though Reich didn’t submit a “favorite” to win the battle, McLaughlin surely has the leg up in that he’s a somewhat proven NFL commodity. Last season, the undrafted free agent performed admirably in what amounted to a four-game audition with the Colts after Vinatieri succumbed to injury. Arriving in Indianapolis in the high-pressure role of replacing the kicker many consider the greatest of all time, McLaughlin drilled 5-of-6 field goals and all 11 of his extra points in those games. His performance in Vinatieri’s stead earned him a one-year contract with the Colts immediately following the season.    Of course, the man they call “Hot Rod” brings an impressive resume to the battle as well. During four years at SEC powerhouse Georgia, Blankenship was a model of accuracy and consistency. He connected on all 200 of his extra points and finished his Bulldog career an 82.5% field goal kicker and the school’s all-time leading scorer.  For his efforts -- and to keep him away from other teams -- the Colts handed Blankenship a $20,000 signing bonus, a hefty number among undrafted free agents. Despite McLaughlin’s incumbent status, Blankenship’s price tag and Reich comments foretell would should be an equal and open competition for the job.    https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2020/07/29/colts-vinatieri-era-indy-seemingly-over-mclaughlin-blankenship-battle-job/5536851002/
    • Colts have the rights to Luck, so if he played for another team, they would have to trade for him. 
    • Luck is the new Elvis.  Just let the man retire in peace. Sheesh...
    • Pretty sure they will arrive at their conclusion by what they see in practice or they will flip a coin.  
  • Members

    • csmopar

      csmopar 9,870

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts8718

      colts8718 339

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jmac_48

      jmac_48 579

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PrincetonTiger

      PrincetonTiger 11,141

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Black0ut117

      Black0ut117 31

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 5,586

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Myles

      Myles 3,791

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C0LT5

      C0LT5 133

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CheezyColt

      CheezyColt 910

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mel Kiper's Hair

      Mel Kiper's Hair 1,548

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...