Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
w87r

Robert Mathis ROH

Recommended Posts

I am not sure who benefited from the other but I think it is a bit of both Freeney and Mathis benefiting by playing with each other, IMO. Well deserved recognition for Mathis!!

 

My regret was, we could have played more man coverage knowing there was only so long QBs could hold the ball, no matter what the score, with such potential HOF DEs. That would have led to games being changed better on the defensive side against better teams.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was looking forward to Irsey's HOF induction speech for Edgerrin James. The DVR will be waiting.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well deserved. He was awesome. Bob Sanders should be next. Mr. Irsay or whatever media see's this, get Bob in. Without Bob we don't win the SB in 2006 and he won the DPOY in 2007. This is about Mathis though and this is just expected because he was that great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember being very nervous about Freeney and Mathis as a Chargers fan.  I wonder if Rivers looks forward to seeing him in November. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Bolts2Colts said:

I remember being very nervous about Freeney and Mathis as a Chargers fan.  I wonder if Rivers looks forward to seeing him in November. 

The Chargers blitz always made me nervous when Peyton went against them. The LB's they had were fast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats Mathis.   Great player and great guy.  

I'd take him over Freeney if given the choice.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well deserved! Figured it would happen sooner or later.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Myles said:

Congrats Mathis.   Great player and great guy.  

I'd take him over Freeney if given the choice.  

He was definitely much better against the run than Freeney.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, w87r said:

He was definitely much better against the run than Freeney.

Yeah, that is most of my reasoning.  Freeney was great at what he did, but many times he needed Manning to set him up.   Manning would get the offense clicking early and teams would abandon their running game (which was great because the Colts run D wasn't great).   Freeney would then pin his ears back and away he went.      

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Myles said:

Congrats Mathis.   Great player and great guy.  

I'd take him over Freeney if given the choice.  

It is another topic but I would take Freeney over Mathis, barely but I would. I am glad to see Mathis get into the ring, pretty cool stuff. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Myles said:

Yeah, that is most of my reasoning.  Freeney was great at what he did, but many times he needed Manning to set him up.   Manning would get the offense clicking early and teams would abandon their running game (which was great because the Colts run D wasn't great).   Freeney would then pin his ears back and away he went.      

I used to call Freeney the closer haha . If we had a lead, he would end the game.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

It is another topic but I would take Freeney over Mathis, barely 

No wrong answer with those 2.   

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does a sack also count as a tackle?

Just curious.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Myles said:

Does a sack also count as a tackle?

Just curious.  

I am not sure, I think it does. That is a good question haha . I have never thought of that one.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Myles said:

Does a sack also count as a tackle?

Just curious.  

 

I think it would depend on whether the QB wants to run or to pass, to differentiate an open field tackle based on QB's intentions.

 

If the QB tucks it and runs, and has no intention of passing, it is a tackle for loss. But if the QB decides to start his throwing motion, and gets hit and sacked, it is just a sack.

 

It is like an extension of the tackle for loss but varies based on QB's intention, I think. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I am not sure, I think it does. That is a good question haha . I have never thought of that one.

I just ask because Freeney had many seasons with so few tackles.   13.5 sacks and 24 tackles.   

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Myles said:

Congrats Mathis.   Great player and great guy.  

I'd take him over Freeney if given the choice.  

Hes great but no way should you take him over freeney.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Myles said:

Yeah, that is most of my reasoning.  Freeney was great at what he did, but many times he needed Manning to set him up.   Manning would get the offense clicking early and teams would abandon their running game (which was great because the Colts run D wasn't great).   Freeney would then pin his ears back and away he went.      

ok that's a fair point!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Fluke_33 said:

Hes great but no way should you take him over freeney.

Yeah when I look at Indianapolis players since 1984 to me Freeney is top 4. I would only have ahead of him:

1. Manning

2. Marvin

3. Reggie

4. I would put Freeney here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Myles said:

Does a sack also count as a tackle?

Just curious.  

Yes, a sack also counts as a tackle

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, w87r said:

Yes, a sack also counts as a tackle

 

Yep. It is always a tackle but not always a tackle for a loss. It depends on who is tracking it - Pro Football Reference or ESPN

 

https://sports.stackexchange.com/questions/20525/does-a-sack-count-as-a-tackle-for-loss-and-or-a-tackle

 

https://www.steelers.com/news/asked-and-answered-dec-11-x0091

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mathis taught me what pass rushing "bend" is...he could almost horizontal to the ground.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, shasta519 said:

Mathis taught me what pass rushing "bend" is...he could almost horizontal to the ground.

And now he is teaching Turay.

 

Sky's the limit, just stay on the field.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Myles said:

I just ask because Freeney had many seasons with so few tackles.   13.5 sacks and 24 tackles.   

 

This is one of the reasons I'm taking Mathis if I had to choose. 10 tackles on the season outside of sacks, just doesn't do it.

 

Freeney was just to one dimensional. Still HoF and one the best pass rushers ever though.

 

Teams would screen/draw underneath him for big chunks.

 

He did draw his share of false starts and holding penalties.

 

Mathis is just the more rounded player, imo.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I used to call Freeney the closer haha . If we had a lead, he would end the game.

If only his ankle was good for our NO Super Bowl.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Side by side stats:

 

Mathis:

192 games

123 sacks(colts record)

538 tackles

54 FF

17 FR

3 TDs

 

Freeney:

218 games

125.5 sacks

350 tackles

46 FF

4 FR

1 TD

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, w87r said:

Side by side stats:

 

Mathis:

192 games

123 sacks(colts record)

538 tackles

54 FF

17 FR

3 TDs

 

Freeney:

218 games

125.5 sacks

350 tackles

46 FF

4 FR

1 TD

That is telling but in a lot of those years Freeney was the one being doubled teamed. Mathis wasn't, Freeney opened it up for guys like Mathis.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is there a hall of fame argument for Robert?  i think he might come up short but 120 sacks is a lot and i believe he hast the most forced fumbles ever in the league

 

i guess we can call that a record and a pretty cool one 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

is there a hall of fame argument for Robert?  i think he might come up short but 120 sacks is a lot and i believe he hast the most forced fumbles ever in the league

 

i guess we can call that a record and a pretty cool one 

Be a close call for Mathis and Freeney.

 

There is some guys in front of them that have better sack numbers.

 

Those FF's and strip sacks have to help his cause though.

 

Jared Allen

Leslie O'Neal

John Abraham

 

All those guys have more sacks. Borderline HoF above?

 

There is couple other guys not in the HoF yet above them in sacks that will be.

Peppers

Suggs

Ware

 

Currently 18 and 19 in career sacks(Freeney and Mathis)

Will be a close call. Seems pass rushers are left out a little bit.

 

Von Miller os closest active player to them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, aaron11 said:

is there a hall of fame argument for Robert?  i think he might come up short but 120 sacks is a lot and i believe he hast the most forced fumbles ever in the league

 

i guess we can call that a record and a pretty cool one 

He does, and I dont think that will ever be broken. No one is close at all, active player wise.(Suggs, 37)

 

Freeney is 4th. Abraham is 3rd Peppers is 2nd.

 

I imagine Abraham has to get in before Mathis or Freeney. Peppers is a shoe in.

 

Peanut Tillman has 44 FF though, that is impressive.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

That is telling but in a lot of those years Freeney was the one being doubled teamed. Mathis wasn't, Freeney opened it up for guys like Mathis.

Why is Mathis's sack record a Colts record when Freeney has more? Is it average by game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, braveheartcolt said:

Why is Mathis's sack record a Colts record when Freeney has more? Is it average by game?

He had like 2 more than Freeney as a Colt. Freeney has more sacks because when he left Indy he had a few more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

He had like 2 more than Freeney as a Colt. Freeney has more sacks because when he left Indy he had a few more. 

15.5 more

 

Freeney had 107.5 as a Colt.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crazy that Freeney played 5yrs after he left Indy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, w87r said:

15.5 more

 

Freeney had 107.5 as a Colt.

I didn't realize it was that much more. Thanks for the info. I was thinking it was only like 2-5. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, w87r said:

15.5 more

 

Freeney had 107.5 as a Colt.

The only thing we lacked was a huge NT, we always struggled against the run. Booger was here in 2006 and we won the SB. The years we lost in the playoffs was because teams could run on us and control TOP. Peyton could only do so much.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct.   i don’t think Luck is EVER coming back. Nor do I want him back nor should the team want him back. He left this team high and dry less than10 days before the start of the regular season. If I was an owner or a coach, I wouldn’t want him back unless there were some major stipulations added to his contract. Such as 100 percent reimbursement for all salaries paid from the time he was drafted if he were to retire again too close to the season. Put a cut off date around March 30th. Anything after that, he has to reimburse as stated above. Then and only then would I take him back
    • He's got plenty of money.   I think the only way he would come back is if he had the itch to play and thought he could win.   Maybe if Rivers and the Colts have a good season the chance at winning would be there.   Very doubtful that he ever plays again.   I'd give it a 10% chance.
    • You are reading it incorrectly.  He is saying that he said he was the first to say that Luck's injury (shoulder) was due to a snowboarding accident and everyone laughed at him.  He then says that he said, 3 weeks before Luck retired, that Luck was going to retire.  
    • Snowboarding is an expensive recreational activity - weed is costly.
    • Reich intends to pit the two against one another in what many would consider Vinatieri's specialty: high-stress situations. The Colts coach explained that he will do his best to fabricate those situations during and after practice. One can be sure that without the added test of preseason games, the kickers' performance during these high-stress situations will go a long way in determining who wins the competition.   “They'll get all of their normal routines," Reich said. "But as a team, we'll create more team atmosphere, team kicking drills that will be heightened and weighted more heavily in the kicking competition."  Though Reich didn’t submit a “favorite” to win the battle, McLaughlin surely has the leg up in that he’s a somewhat proven NFL commodity. Last season, the undrafted free agent performed admirably in what amounted to a four-game audition with the Colts after Vinatieri succumbed to injury. Arriving in Indianapolis in the high-pressure role of replacing the kicker many consider the greatest of all time, McLaughlin drilled 5-of-6 field goals and all 11 of his extra points in those games. His performance in Vinatieri’s stead earned him a one-year contract with the Colts immediately following the season.    Of course, the man they call “Hot Rod” brings an impressive resume to the battle as well. During four years at SEC powerhouse Georgia, Blankenship was a model of accuracy and consistency. He connected on all 200 of his extra points and finished his Bulldog career an 82.5% field goal kicker and the school’s all-time leading scorer.  For his efforts -- and to keep him away from other teams -- the Colts handed Blankenship a $20,000 signing bonus, a hefty number among undrafted free agents. Despite McLaughlin’s incumbent status, Blankenship’s price tag and Reich comments foretell would should be an equal and open competition for the job.    https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2020/07/29/colts-vinatieri-era-indy-seemingly-over-mclaughlin-blankenship-battle-job/5536851002/
  • Members

    • Black0ut117

      Black0ut117 31

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PrincetonTiger

      PrincetonTiger 11,141

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • csmopar

      csmopar 9,870

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 1,699

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 9,704

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 502

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Myles

      Myles 3,791

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bravo4460

      bravo4460 1,754

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Melancholie

      Melancholie 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 598

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...