Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Why We Ought To Afford Jim Some Trust


schwamm
 Share

Recommended Posts

From the time Bob Irsay bought the franchise in 1972, until Jim Irsay took 100% ownership of the Colts in 1997, the Colts had two 10 win seasons (’75 and ’77), one 11 win season (’76), and only six playoff appearances in 25 years. Bob's teams' record was 151-229, or roughly 40%.

After Jim officially took over ownership, the team has had at least 10 wins and has made the playoffs in all but 4 years. The regular season record under JI has been 146-94, or roughly 61%, and that includes his first 2 years with 3 wins apiece, and last year. Even if you want to credit Polian, Dungy or Manning for the sudden success, Irsay deserves acknowledgement for assembling that group, and spending money to bring quality football to Indianapolis, where his dad had been too cheap to try.

I’m inclined to trust his vision and plan for this next chapter of Colts Football, in part because I don’t think people recognize just how challenging it was to take a perennial bottom feeder squad, and turn it into one of the classiest and best teams in the league. I get that people are afraid because so much is changing. I have no idea what I’ll get to see on the field this next season (although I like the moves I’m seeing so far), or in seasons after that. However, I am inclined to give Irsay credit because he’s handled what I believe was a much tougher challenge 15 years ago.

I hear people say free agents won’t want to come to Indy now because Irsay has allowed Grigson to clean house. I don’t agree, but if you think that to be the case now, how do imagine Irsay convinced players, coaches, staffers, and a great GM to come to this small market team with a long and awful history of losing and tight pockets back in 1997?

In my opinion, Jim Irsay wants this team to win more than any fan on this forum, and has consistently put his money to task to achieve that goal. I don't understand every decision he makes, but he doesn't owe me any explanation, either. Until the team reverts to some pre-1998 state of continual crappiness, I'm inclined to trust that Irsay is doing what he thinks is best for the success of the club, and to trust that he knows better than me (and the rest of you on this forum too).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

From the time Bob Irsay bought the franchise in 1972, until Jim Irsay took 100% ownership of the Colts in 1997, the Colts had two 10 win seasons (’75 and ’77), one 11 win season (’76), and only six playoff appearances in 25 years. Bob's teams' record was 151-229, or roughly 40%.

After Jim officially took over ownership, the team has had at least 10 wins and has made the playoffs in all but 4 years. The regular season record under JI has been 146-94, or roughly 61%, and that includes his first 2 years with 3 wins apiece, and last year. Even if you want to credit Polian, Dungy or Manning for the sudden success, Irsay deserves acknowledgement for assembling that group, and spending money to bring quality football to Indianapolis, where his dad had been too cheap to try.

I’m inclined to trust his vision and plan for this next chapter of Colts Football, in part because I don’t think people recognize just how challenging it was to take a perennial bottom feeder squad, and turn it into one of the classiest and best teams in the league. I get that people are afraid because so much is changing. I have no idea what I’ll get to see on the field this next season (although I like the moves I’m seeing so far), or in seasons after that. However, I am inclined to give Irsay credit because he’s handled what I believe was a much tougher challenge 15 years ago.

I hear people say free agents won’t want to come to Indy now because Irsay has allowed Grigson to clean house. I don’t agree, but if you think that to be the case now, how do imagine Irsay convinced players, coaches, staffers, and a great GM to come to this small market team with a long and awful history of losing and tight pockets back in 1997?

In my opinion, Jim Irsay wants this team to win more than any fan on this forum, and has consistently put his money to task to achieve that goal. I don't understand every decision he makes, but he doesn't owe me any explanation, either. Until the team reverts to some pre-1998 state of continual crappiness, I'm inclined to trust that Irsay is doing what he thinks is best for the success of the club, and to trust that he knows better than me (and the rest of you on this forum too).

He has yet to show he can win without Peyton. Until then, I will not trust

Edited by Maureen
personal shot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Initial Post = Great Post.

I admit, well written and well thought out. I should have included that. That being said, anyone could win with Peyton, including myself. Do you not think that Peyton, Harrison, Faulk and James had alot to do with FA's being attracted here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a strong word. But it is not handed out lightly. He lied to us all." If he's healthy, he'll be a Colt"....that's a lie. Nevermind my emotions, it infuriates me that he lied to Peyton.

Edited by Maureen
personal shot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Irsay was a liar. He told as many to the fans, as many he can, some parts of this mutual decision is obviously confidential, however they would put some more light on this situation and its background.

Irsay is running a successful organization, and he wants to keep it successful too...

I would be happier if Manning was staying at the team, but real life and necessities led to an other decision.

We will see, if he's decided right or no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One can have an opinion on whether Manning would/could or offered to restructure.

One can have an opinion on whether Irsay would/could or offered to restructure.

One thing is not debatable. Peyton Manning was under contract with the Indianapolis Colts. Jim Irsay and the Indianapolis Colts terminated that contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a strong word. But it is not handed out lightly. He lied to us all." If he's healthy, he'll be a Colt"....that's a lie. Nevermind my emotions, it infuriates me that he lied to Peyton.

While Peyton and his Docs said he was good to play, the Colts medical team never cleared him. How is that Irsay's lie?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he's not healthy......yet. Said so by the great man himself....

That's kinda semantical. I only know what I see and hear, and what I've seen is three teams working him out. Three teams doctors evaluated him, he passed a team physical and was offered a 5 year $96 mm contract. I understand there are provisions in place for "what-if's" in the contract, but that's still a heckuva vote of confidence toward his health..

He's fine. He's healthy. He can play. We're going to suffer because of this while another team runs wild with success using our QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's kinda semantical. I only know what I see and hear, and what I've seen is three teams working him out. Three teams doctors evaluated him, he passed a team physical and was offered a 5 year $96 mm contract. I understand there are provisions in place for "what-if's" in the contract.

He's fine. He's healthy. He can play. We're going to suffer because of this while another team runs wild with success using our QB.

I think the Colts medical standards changed dramatically after the whole Simon debacle. My guess is other teams don't have as high a standard right now. I also don't think Irsay wanted to risk a possible severe injury to Peyton, where other teams are so anxious to have him, they'll risk more and overlook more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's kinda semantical. I only know what I see and hear, and what I've seen is three teams working him out. Three teams doctors evaluated him, he passed a team physical and was offered a 5 year $96 mm contract. I understand there are provisions in place for "what-if's" in the contract, but that's still a heckuva vote of confidence toward his health..

He's fine. He's healthy. He can play. We're going to suffer because of this while another team runs wild with success using our QB.

Conjecture Mr Sak. All the way. Manning admitted he's got a bit to go. Why are you choosing to ignore that? Why do they have a get out clause in the contract? Why will he not finish the season? (sorry, just joining in with your predictions game)....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 50% chance at being right. Even the deaf, dumb and blind would have a good chance for success given those odds.

His money, his wager, his winnings. Neither of us placed anything resembling that large a bet on the Leaf/Manning choice, did we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it wasn't. Could you explain how Peyton had any choice?

He had the choice: to stay with a rebuilding team, or to choose a PO and SB aspirant team, that needs a QB, and play for a SB. If he had stayed, he would be cut to free some cap space, now he has an even larger contract that he had at Colts. It was so simply...

Besides, that whole health thing is a little confusing for me... there was never an official announcement, that he is ready to play, only sources told that...and that video...it was released only a week after a journalist sugeested Peyton should have released a tape about him practicing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he's not healthy......yet. Said so by the great man himself....

You are correct Manning himself claims he is not himself yet. I believe the Dr' also claimed the nerve regeneration could stop at anytime. Manning is a risk and Irsay was not willing to take that risk at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's kinda semantical. I only know what I see and hear, and what I've seen is three teams working him out. Three teams doctors evaluated him, he passed a team physical and was offered a 5 year $96 mm contract. I understand there are provisions in place for "what-if's" in the contract, but that's still a heckuva vote of confidence toward his health..

He's fine. He's healthy. He can play. We're going to suffer because of this while another team runs wild with success using our QB.

The Broncos contract with PM is a pay as you go contract. If his neck/nerve/arm issue resurfaces, the team can cut him without paying him anything more than what has already been paid. I do not consider that a vote of confidence at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One can have an opinion on whether Manning would/could or offered to restructure.

One can have an opinion on whether Irsay would/could or offered to restructure.

One thing is not debatable. Peyton Manning was under contract with the Indianapolis Colts. Jim Irsay and the Indianapolis Colts terminated that contract.

Most CEO's would of done the same thing. Risk vs reward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by Nadine, March 21, 2012 - inflammatory
Hidden by Nadine, March 21, 2012 - inflammatory

That's kinda semantical. I only know what I see and hear, and what I've seen is three teams working him out. Three teams doctors evaluated him, he passed a team physical and was offered a 5 year $96 mm contract. I understand there are provisions in place for "what-if's" in the contract, but that's still a heckuva vote of confidence toward his health..

He's fine. He's healthy. He can play. We're going to suffer because of this while another team runs wild with success using our QB.

Get over it. I hope you never go thru a divorce.

Link to comment

Conjecture Mr Sak. All the way. Manning admitted he's got a bit to go. Why are you choosing to ignore that? Why do they have a get out clause in the contract? Why will he not finish the season? (sorry, just joining in with your predictions game)....

They have a "get -out" clause because it is prudent to do so for a 36 year old who is recovering, when you add to it the unusually large amount of cash this player commands. I'm not ignoring that he has a way to go. I'm understanding that he is an overachiever and is likely embellishing how much he has yet to go.

Peyton has never given me a reason to doubt him. If he says he could play Sunday, I believe him. You don't think Peyton is a liar, do you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by Nadine, March 21, 2012 - response to deleted post
Hidden by Nadine, March 21, 2012 - response to deleted post

Get over it. I hope you never go thru a divorce.

Already have. Not that it's any of your business or at all pertinent to the conversation at hand. I bet you'll get over it while we struggle to win games for the next 6 years, won't ya buddy?

Link to comment

He has yet to show he can win without Peyton. Until then, I will not trust the liar.

I don't see the logic here. Owners rely on players to win. He's moving from 1 great to potentially another. If he kept Manning only he would be just relying on Peyton again to win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If any of you watched Bill today he said Jim wanted Luck from day one. I think you can assume where Jim's intentions laid. On the other hand when your franchise QB said he thought he was the QB up until he was told otherwise I think there has to be some fibbing going around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have a "get -out" clause because it is prudent to do so for a 36 year old who is recovering, when you add to it the unusually large amount of cash this player commands. I'm not ignoring that he has a way to go. I'm understanding that he is an overachiever and is likely embellishing how much he has yet to go.

Peyton has never given me a reason to doubt him. If he says he could play Sunday, I believe him. You don't think Peyton is a liar, do you?

No more or less than I think Irsay is a liar, regardless of how many times you insist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have a "get -out" clause because it is prudent to do so for a 36 year old who is recovering, when you add to it the unusually large amount of cash this player commands. I'm not ignoring that he has a way to go. I'm understanding that he is an overachiever and is likely embellishing how much he has yet to go.

Peyton has never given me a reason to doubt him. If he says he could play Sunday, I believe him. You don't think Peyton is a liar, do you?

I cannot even comprehend that Mr Manning could ever be untruthful. I'm sure he has already told his twins that there is no Santa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see the logic here. Owners rely on players to win. He's moving from 1 great to potentially another. If he kept Manning only he would be just relying on Peyton again to win

He could have made the choice to build around him and win NOW. Instead we may not win for some time.

Do not take my harsh words as wishful of fruition. I do not want my Colts to lose. I fear they will, harshly, in the confusion abound.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot even comprehend that Mr Manning could ever be untruthful. I'm sure he has already told his twins that there is no Santa.

CAn you imagine that talk. Listen Marshall I know it's impossible to remember things before the age of three, but there is no Santa Claus. You don't even know who he is yet, but don't believe it when you hear it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No more or less than I think Irsay is a liar, regardless of how many times you insist

I can't blame you. You were just following orders. Your leader is law. His word is law. Commands have been given, get in line and keep your lips sealed while firing indiscriminately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I admit, well written and well thought out. I should have included that. That being said, anyone could win with Peyton, including myself. Do you not think that Peyton, Harrison, Faulk and James had alot to do with FA's being attracted here?

You should write a book about how you could win with Peyton. Automatic best seller there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Greetings y'all.   Titans vs. Colts 2: Electric Boogaloo. One thing that everyone can agree on is that both teams are better than Week 3 when Wentz was basically a scarecrow back in the pocket waiting for someone to hit him. But as a visitor to these pages, I can fill in some details from the Nashville sports market on what people are saying down here and some of the mentioned issues of our previous games.   First, the Buffalo game. The final drive which ended up in the failed sneak was discussed ad infinitum in these parts. The most interesting comments came from Jeffrey Simmons who on the Titans D-line made the play against Allen. If you don't know about Simmons yet, you should. He's very good and at three years into the league is getting better every game. He sniffed out that the play was going to be a sneak based on the formation and at that point, he knew he just had to beat his man to the gap and meet Allen head on. And despite Allen's size, I'm giving that one on one matchup to Simmons. Allen slipped because it became obvious in that split second that going low to get the extra foot wasn't going to work, changed his mind and ended up falling to the ground where Simmons wrapped him up. Game over.   As for the Chiefs game, we all knew that they had flaws, but as long as they had Mahomes they could blow you out in any game. So we as fans were just as surprised as anyone to see an honest-to-goodness beat down. But I do not think we did anything different than other teams in approaching KC in recent games. Rush 4, blitz rarely and keep everything in front of you and wait for Mahomes or the team to make mistakes. Score when you get the ball since the defense is suspect. And that's it.    Now for this game. Indy is a much better team than week 3 and Wentz has been efficient and takes care of the football. Jonathan Taylor is well on his way to a 1000+ yard season. And Indy has the usual suspects in the offense who always seem to play the Titans extremely well. After a wretched 0-3 start, the Colts have rebounded winning the last 3 out of 4 games.   The problem is that the only win of those 3 that could be considered "quality" is the 49'ers game on Sunday that was a sloppy slip'n'slide fest. This game is a must win for the Colts for many reasons.  First, it's a measurement of how far the Colts have come from the first three games. But most importantly, a loss would put the Colts 3 games back in the division and even though JAX and the Texans aren't competition this year, a loss would have the Titans win any tie breaker for the title. So it's really a playoff game.   Normally I hate games like this since it's against Indy and on the road with something important on the line, recipes for poor play from our side. But we have the bitter reminder of the Jets loss to remind everyone that we can't just walk in and expect Indy to lie down. It's going to be a physical fight since both teams are built around the running game.   As for the Titans, we now have both A.J. Brown and Julio Jones as targets on the field at the same time. We didn't have that in the Jets loss and while Henry got his yards, we had very little from the passing game. And then there is Henry who is on pace for a consecutive 2000 yard season. If he gets to the second level, anything is possible. the Chiefs sold out to stop the run, often putting 9 in the box AND having everyone within 10 yards of the line of scrimmage. The result was A.J. Brown running all over the field 27 points by the half. Lastly, Tannehill is getting better protection from the O-line surrendering only 1 sack in 2 games, versus 20 sacks in the first 5. This is important considering the O-line is always banged up and has rarely played our starters together this year. Last week we played a left tackle 4 days off the street since Lewan was still in concussion protocol.   And our defense has begun to come to life, with the front getting healthy for the first time all year. Harold Landry has 7.5 sacks out of 17 total for the team. Last year the entire team had only 19 for the season. The combination is Landry, Simmons, Bud Dupree and Denico Autry are getting the job done now. The safeties are quality with Hooker back from injury and Byard playing back to his pro-bowl self. The soft underbelly is the corners, but their play has been better in the last couple of weeks, helped out by pressure from the front 4.   The Titans mission is to get a stranglehold on the AFC South in the middle of the most competitive games of the season (Bills, then Chiefs, then Colts and finally the Rams). I think Titans fans would have been happy with 2-2 in this stretch as long as one of them was Indy. We now have the possibility to really take control, but this team still has weaknesses to exploit and the Colts are built to exploit them.
    • If you would even make it out of the stadium with the ball
    • Well, see, here’s the thing:   No.   
    • Yeah I don't want to jinx it but I feel the same way.  They're playing well and hope that continues.  Titans have a good front though so we'll see.
    • True.  But even with the mobile ones getting them to move that first time due to a rusher's influence tilts the play in the defense's favor.  From there your chances of either an incompletion or maybe even a mistake leading to a turnover is higher.
  • Members

    • CanuckColtsFan

      CanuckColtsFan 397

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 4,972

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 49

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Timo1

      Timo1 15

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Sevenfeet

      Sevenfeet 65

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C_Lew

      C_Lew 68

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JlynRN

      JlynRN 377

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 6,557

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr.NotSoCreative

      Mr.NotSoCreative 305

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Misty_B

      Misty_B 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...