Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Brett Favre accused of taking $1.1M payment in welfare fraud


FortheWin

Recommended Posts

On 5/18/2020 at 1:35 AM, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

It seems he would have appeared but his severe back pain prevented that. Those Copper Fit back braces, knee braces he promotes let him down. Lol :D

Yeah well Brett lied to me when he said Copper Fit would make you feel younger and help with the pain. Wrong, Copper Fit let me down too. haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously Nadine? 
 

I posted that to prove csmopar’s earlier point, and to give merit to if not also flat out prove earlier points that celebrities aren’t as hands on in certain situations that have their old handprints on them. 
 

I doubt Tom Brady believes in Snake Oil and I doubt he just shared that Tweet after he took some and it cured him of something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BloodyChamp said:

Seriously Nadine? 
 

I posted that to prove csmopar’s earlier point, and to give merit to if not also flat out prove earlier points that celebrities aren’t as hands on in certain situations that have their old handprints on them. 
 

I doubt Tom Brady believes in Snake Oil and I doubt he just shared that Tweet after he took some and it cured him of something.

When any celebrity uses their notoriety it's their responsibility to know what it is used for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BloodyChamp said:

I posted that to prove csmopar’s earlier point, and to give merit to if not also flat out prove earlier points that celebrities aren’t as hands on in certain situations that have their old handprints on them.

 

Methinks you were trying to use Tom Brady selling a product to try and deflect some of the negativity from your boy Brett...  :thinking:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

When any celebrity uses their notoriety it's their responsibility to know what it is used for. 

 

Have you finished building the hanging platform?

 

10 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Methinks you were trying to use Tom Brady selling a product to try and deflect some of the negativity from your boy Brett...  :thinking:

 

I proved an earlier point made in this thread. By extension that deflected some negativity from a place where it wasn’t warranted, which I’m all for my boy or not. Methinks it would have went over better had Tom Brady not have been the example:thinking:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BloodyChamp said:

Ok Jim Mora

 

@csmopar and @NFLfan were discussing non-for-profits and government agencies using marketing budgets to pay for celebrity appearances/campaigns.

 

You brought up a private (for-profit) company that Tom Brady uses to make money.  They aren't the same thing, and neither has to with the following that you posted as your "point":  

 

32 minutes ago, BloodyChamp said:

I posted that to prove csmopar’s earlier point, and to give merit to if not also flat out prove earlier points that celebrities aren’t as hands on in certain situations that have their old handprints on them.

 

You were throwing apples into an oranges comparison, and you didn't even "prove" that Tom Brady isn't "as hands on" as you seem to think.  You just posted a random tweet and ghosted...  :funny:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it was deleted. Careful though calling it random might give merit to some of the stuff I said. The 2 things weren’t the same, but the concept in which they are applied is which leaves plenty of dots to connect between the 2 things. Insert emoticon for dramatic effect 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, BloodyChamp said:

Seriously Nadine? 
 

I posted that to prove csmopar’s earlier point, and to give merit to if not also flat out prove earlier points that celebrities aren’t as hands on in certain situations that have their old handprints on them. 
 

I doubt Tom Brady believes in Snake Oil and I doubt he just shared that Tweet after he took some and it cured him of something.

hey, I asked and your answer didn't clarify

Now that you've clarified, it still doesn't make sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, BloodyChamp said:

 

Have you finished building the hanging platform?

 

 

I proved an earlier point made in this thread. By extension that deflected some negativity from a place where it wasn’t warranted, which I’m all for my boy or not. Methinks it would have went over better had Tom Brady not have been the example:thinking:

A hanging platform?

The only point I made was when a celebrity uses their notoriety for something (anything) they have to be in control of how it is used. If not then it falls on them. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.   You weren’t.   If you were the least bit sincere, we’d be having these conversations in private.  But you’ve repeatedly ignored my efforts to do that.  Your call.      Then you avoid me until I’m in an uncomfortable conversation with another poster.   You use that awkward moment as an excuse for you to come in with some sincere friendly advice.   The problem is, you’re neither sincere, nor friendly.  And you’ve been doing this for months now.  This is not new.   The pattern is clear and obvious.     And the shame of it all is that even with our different views on Ballard we have enough in common that we should be friendly.  Maybe not friends, but friendly.  You wouldn’t need to address me as “Sir.”    “Good deed going unpunished”.  You flatter yourself.     But your actions speak much louder than your words.   There’s no reason for me to trust you.  And here we are.  A real shame.      
    • In a year when the Colts were in serious need of a QB and in position to draft one, Ballard came up in front of the media 3 days before the draft and straight up said something to the effect of "That guy everybody in media is talking about(Levis), we are not taking him". I don't know why you think the Colts are trying to throw us off the scent this year specifically. They are not trying to give us away the pick(thus the vagueness), but I also don't really think they are trying to mislead anybody. This usually becomes specifically apparent in retrospect after the draft when you look back at a lot of those quotes in the videos they release pre-draft... and they were talking precisely about players we ended up drafting, which they reveal in the post-draft video by extending some of those quotes(they did that with AR last year for example).    And about why people are doing it(guessing who they are talking about) - because it is fun. Nobody has the illusion that we will be right in our guesses 100% of the time... or anywhere close really... but it's still fun. And it's part of why the Colts release those videos with those quotes - to create engagement with the fanbase... part of which, and the entirety of which that 70 pages thread and whole board is about in the offseason. is to guess who the Colts might take and how they might feel about specific prospects.
    • Sir, I was just trying to help you out. No good deed goes unpunished! 
    • Not the least bit surprised to hear from you at this moment.   You see me in an uncomfortable conversation (with a moderator no less) and you seize the moment to take a shot at me.  And you try to act like you’re giving me a sincere explanation of what you’re doing.   Like you have an ounce of credibility with me.      This is not the first time you’ve done this.  While I may not be surprised, I’m certainly disappointed.   
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...