Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Malik Hookers 5th year option Declined


Recommended Posts

If they trade Hooker for a pick and decide to go with Odum to start the season they would pick up 2M in cap space.  Maybe Ballard uses it to adjust our offer to Clowney and we sign him after all.  Just a thought. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 471
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You are no doubt the dumbest poster on this board. Maybe dumber than anyone on the internet.   Please do us a favor ... either find a new team or keep your stupid opinions to yourself.

Why is this so hard to fathom? He is a solid player, who has struggled some to stay on the field. By declining the option, he now has to prove that he can be available. If he does, and truly balls out

I definitely would have hit Hooker with the option. I stated all the reasons earlier, but the biggest one is that the value was for half of what top tier safeties are making in FA right now. And it's

Posted Images

Anyone check Hooker's twitter feed, or any other social media?

 

Since we haven't heard anything, do we assume they didn't pick up his option?

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/1/2020 at 11:33 PM, EastStreet said:

 

No, please read what I linked. Unless I've done bad math......

 

Those salaries range (I posted the link to salaries too) range from 6M for the 25th (Bell) to Mathieu at the 3rd spot who makes 14M. The average of those 23 salaries would be 9M and change.

 

The link you shared, basically gives him pay similar to the 25th spot where Bell is... I've checked the NFL.com site as well on logic/rules. What am I missing?

 

On 5/2/2020 at 12:21 AM, CR91 said:

 

I think we're missing a part of the calculation. I did it the same as you and I also got 9 mil, however I have checked 3 different sites and they all say either 6.5 mil to 7

Based on the OTC links @EastStreet posted, it gives you the average salary per year and I don't think the calculation is based on that. You would most likely need to use the specific 2020 salary figures to properly calculate the option salary value.

 

If any of those guys have more back-loaded contracts, they may show a higher avg/year figure than they're actually making this year.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

Reich is doing a presser. This almost sounds like a extension is coming.

 

 

 

I would say about 90% they extend him. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ThinBlueLineColts said:

Probably. But didn’t Reich also give similar coach speak about Quincy last year?

 

I'm mostly going by my feelings that he's a good player and approx. 7 million is not a deal breaker by any means. Also as long as he's not injured they could cut him if Blackmon or a 2021 draft choice looked to be a better 2021 option. Just makes more sense than not taking the option. IMO , the major reason for not taking the 5th year is if Hooker has made it known heather play in a different system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would they want to extend his contract? 

It was reported recently, he was on the trading block... and even if he's not traded, he is under contract for either one or two years (it they exercise option)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to give Ballard credit.  He is not afraid to admit a mistake. Shipping off Hairston and Wilson for picks and declining Hookers fifth year shows he will move on from a player if they don’t preform. Hooker shows flashes but it’s turning out he is closer to the 50% of first round players that are merely average. He isn’t bad but he isn’t great.  I would extend him for 3yrs  11mil with 5mil guaranteed.  That would be a decent price for a four year veteran. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Ballard was going to accept Hooker's option, it would have been done days ago. Not a big surprise it was declined.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After next year, when we bid goodbye to Marlon Mack and keep Jonathan Taylor, that would be pretty much goodbye to the 2017 draft.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And honestly, I think it's more of a durability issue than scheme fit in terms of why it was declined.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, CheezyColt said:

Not a fan of this move.  I think another year at that salary is more than reasonable.  Creating a need we don't have to a year early.  Oh well.

It doesn’t create a need if Hooker balls out and stays healthy. He could still come back. They do like Blackmon though. 

 

I dont get what took so long. Is it possible Hooker asked for it not to be picked up so he could become a free agent and find a better fit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, chad72 said:

After next year, when we bid goodbye to Marlon Mack and keep Jonathan Taylor, that would be pretty much goodbye to the 2017 draft.

I am not convinced Mack won’t be back. His market money wise won’t be what we think. Don’t forget walker also.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see us declining his 5th year option as a sign we're done with him. Hooker is now in a contract year and I can see us working on an extension if he stays healthy and plays well.

 

22 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

He is even more so on the trade block.

He was literally never on the trade block (as far as any public reporting). Teams calling you about a player isn't being on the trade block. Calling other teams making it known that the player is available for the right price is being on the trade block.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of curiosity......in general do players usually always move on when their 5th year is declined after the rookie contract ends or is there ample examples of players working out a contract and staying on? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chloe6124 said:

It doesn’t create a need if Hooker balls out and stays healthy. He could still come back. They do like Blackmon though. 

 

I dont get what took so long. Is it possible Hooker asked for it not to be picked up so he could become a free agent and find a better fit.

So that's IF he balls out and IF he stays healthy in which case we pay him more than he would have got anyway.

 

Or IF Blackmon gets healthy and IF he is as good as or better than Hooker (I don't see how we'll have enough information on that front after this year with his late ACL tear, recovery, and then the additional year or so needed to get back to trusting the knee.  Hooker's 5th year would have been very good in evaluating that). 

 

I stick by it.  I'm not a fan.  It's not a big surprise, but we're back down on the safety depth next season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

I don’t get what took so long. It is the right decision though.

They were looking to move him, I bet.... and no one jumped on it or Colts couldn't get enough in return.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the guy but his health has been a problem and I think he doesn’t really fit the cover 2 scheme. He’s more of a single high safety that’s where he plays his best. I think he’s a FA after this year unless he has an impeccable year. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but this makes no sense to me. I want to hear Ballard talk about this one. Short of serious injury concerns, I cannot imagine he will be able to give me a convincing answer as to why not guarantee his option. This is a cheap option for a player of Hooker's talent. Even if you are not sure he's worth it, chances are there is one of the other 31 teams that would think he is worth and give you compensation for him. Now we are very likely losing him after this year not just as a player, but as an asset too. 

 

Anyone know the CBA well? Will he count toward the compensatory pick formula if he leaves next year? 

  • Like 4
  • Confused 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Colts may have been looking to trade him, but couldn't get enough in return so they gave him a prove it year.  Might be why they waited until the last minute.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, stitches said:

I'm sorry but this makes no sense to me. I want to hear Ballard talk about this one. Short of serious injury concerns, I cannot imagine he will be able to give me a convincing answer as to why not guarantee his option. This is a cheap option for a player of Hooker's talent. Even if you are not sure he's worth it, chances are there is one of the other 31 teams that would think 

he is worth and give you compensation for him. Now we are very likely losing him after this year not just as a player, but as an asset too. 

 

Anyone know the CBA well? Will he count toward the compensatory pick formula if he leaves next year? 

yes, he will.  If they had picked up his option and then released him later it would not have.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The big downfall is if he has a great season he I now going to cost a ton when we could of had him for 6.7 million. 

 

He also could of been really good trade bait if he has a great season.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but this makes no sense to me. I want to hear Ballard talk about this one. Short of serious injury concerns, I cannot imagine he will be able to give me a convincing answer as to why not guarantee his option. This is a cheap option for a player of Hooker's talent. Even if you are not sure he's worth it, chances are there is one of the other 31 teams that would think he is worth and give you compensation for him. Now we are very likely losing him after this year not just as a player, but as an asset too. 

 

Anyone know the CBA well? Will he count toward the compensatory pick formula if he leaves next year? 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had to make sense out of declining his option, I'd say it's either the colts are trying to trade Hooker, looking to extend him to a cheaper per average deal, or have no intention of re-signing and will let him walk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah 6.5 mil isn’t terrible to pay him for his 5th year option. And I would hate simply losing him in free agency and maybe getting a 4th round comp pick back or him. He’s still so talented. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, richard pallo said:

Zero reason?  Why would you pick it up if you don't see the player as a long term asset?  The Cardinals just declined Reddick and he has played in every game since joining the team.  No injuries.  A starting player.  The Colts did not pick it up quickly.  They are taking this to the very last day.  We will find out soon but if it was such an easy decision it would have been made by now and not at the last possible moment.  

I guess the fact they could get a compensatory pick out it this way is one reason, but other than that I find it a mistake.  Now they have to talk about how happy they were with him while he's a lame duck player.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

In essence they are betting that he won't have a good season. 

 

And if he does, it makes it really hard to retain him. Do you think he will be in the mood to give the team a hometeam discount after this? No way in hell... he will milk the Colts for every last penny he thinks he can get if we want him back, or he will just leave...

 

I just don't feel like this is a smart move.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I get they're from one of the biggest TV markets in the country, but you knew that game was going to be a non-competitive snoozefest before it even started. I generally watch every Sunday Night game available, but I can tell you that both Sunday Night games that I largely tuned out of involved Packers-Bears contests (I wanna say there was a game in 2013 or 2014 where the Packers dropped 50+ on the Bears on Sunday Night and you could feel it was going to happen before the game even started).
    • I apologize for today guys. At least you whipped them the first time you played them in Tennessee but lost at home. I have a feeling the Titans are going to whip us when we see them just after Christmas.
    • Question for you and those who LOL with your post. How long have you been following football to ask a juvenile question? Is that even a question to ponder?   I'f I go through the list of South Florida talent, we would need to start a separate website, yes website never mind thread.   Coaches along: Jimmy Johnson, Dave Wanstedt, Pagano, just to name a few. Lets not start with players. On this current team, players not named Marlon Mack or TY Hilton, Anthony Walker, Jacoby Brissett, Al Qudin Muhammad, Xavier Rhodes (Norland High School is less than 20 mins away).   I actually take offense to your question. But to no avail, here is your answer: The Hurricanes hold the record for most players selected in the first round in a single draft (6, in 2004), most first-round draft picks in a two-year period (10, from 2003 to 2004), most first-round draft picks in a three-year period (15, from 2002 through 2004), and most first-round picks in a four-year period (19, from 2001 through 2004). As of the 2015 NFL season, UM has 45 players on NFL rosters, including players on NFL Practice Squads and Injured Reserves and not including current Free Agents, which is the most out of any NCAA program in the nation. As of the 2016 NFL Draft, Miami now has had at least one NFL draft pick in every draft since 1975, each of the last 42 NFL drafts, one of the longest streaks among FBS programs. The Hurricanes once had a streak of 149 consecutive regular season weeks where a former Hurricane scored a touchdown in an NFL game; the streak started in Week 15 of the 2002 NFL regular season and ended in Week 11 of the 2011 season.During the streak, 33 different former Hurricanes scored touchdowns and a total of 661 touchdowns were scored. From the 2001 Miami Hurricanes football team alone, 42 players went on to be drafted into the NFL from (2002-2006), including 17 1st round picks. The Hurricanes have had at least one former player make the Pro Bowl every season since 1985, 31 years in a row.
    • The game wasn't exactly a shock due to the missing players, but some of the themes were not what I expected, how about you guys?    Reason's the game was lost and what's next:  --------------------------------- 1. Rock Ya Sin.  I think Rock is starting to look more like a Draft miss than hit.  They often refer to his wrestling career, and that is never good because it usually comes after a Defensive Hold or Interference.  He really put us in a bind with his first penalty, and drove a stake in our heart when we had them stopped but they got the ball back for a later TD, and arguments could be made it costs us 14 points because it so deflated our team we went into a tailspin and gave up that ridiculous 4th down play setting up the 5th TD.     2. Loss of poise.  I saw several things, but that horrendous punching and disqualification was so deflating to the teams loss of poise in performance that I wouldn't be disappointed to learn they cut him from the team, though I doubt they have the b*lls.  There should be a near zero tolerance for a role player special teamer to lose his cool that egregiously and cost the team at such a critical time.     3. Loss of AC/Poor O-Line Depth may be a fatal blow to any post season success.  We have a long long history of failure without our most important lineman.  Even though he isn't what he once was (and it has been clear to me he's playing hurt as much as simple decline has kicked in) the drop off is so dire after him that I think only with significant shuffling can we keep Rivers upright and healthy and have any chance to run an offense not always in crises.  With a poor LT, Rivers one glaring weakness, immobility is amplified 10X.  I will say his quick release saved as many sacks as Mahommes could have scrambled out of, but the difference is he can't possibly complete meaningful attacks with so little time or free space to launch it to an open receiver.  Frankly his performance under that pressure was the most impressive performance I have seen from him all year.  But heroic sack saving isn't effective offense.  This lack o-line  depth has been something MANY here have been pointing not only all season and pre season, but literally going back to last season as well.  And we had MUCH better depth last year than this.  It was my #1 concern entering the season.  It was obvious.  A brilliant GM keeps making this same error.  He admitted his failure to secure a quality O-Line his first year (after many had begged the previous GM to do the same, and I believe that is truly what cost him his job, or at least deserved to).     Things that were hopeful: ------------------------------ 1.   Hines has proven to be a warrior.  He's our most important and reliable offensive weapon, much like the pass catching RBs of River's SD teams.  We should never see another game without him being a key contributor, no different than TN using their RB to do the same.   Everyone knew Hines was the only thing working, but he kept working nonetheless.  Reich needs to stop abandoning our key offensive weapon.  I even loved when they sent him deep.  I think HE could be used much like TY used to be, leading to...   2. TY Hilton FINALLY utilized by Reich and Rivers.  TY still has tremendous value.  We were reminded of that finally.  He still has moves, he can still contribute.  Sure, he's not 24 years old anymore, but he is likely our second best weapon after Hines still.  But Rivers simply has no chemistry with him.  All game he was forcing throws to Pascal, who I like, but they had Pascal 100% locked down.  The few catches he made were 50-50 balls.     3.  We saw evidence that our TE's are capable.  Why don't we use them, and use them often?  A three headed monster that should be dominating.  I think for us to have success down the stretch, in addition to using Hilton and Hines, our 3 capable TE's need to be all over the place on short to medium routes using their size and capable hands.  We saw late (too late sadly) that they were playing.  It was almost like they weren't through 3 quarters.  Sure, TN had backed up coverage, but dang, those guys have skills and can be hit quickly.     4. Brissett has been used well in short yardage.  I am glad they are building on this.  Even his relative slowness, he looks like a lightning bolt compared to Rivers.  I do think they need to show some short yardage passing so they keep defenses honest helping his future sneaks.     5. Pinter was serviceable compared to LT options.  I hope our center comes back and finishes the season, but Pinter at least showed a little depth at G/C.     What to do in the future now that winning the division is reasonably out of reach; ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. The line woes will continue to be a problem.  Depth is simply unacceptable.  I think if AC is lost for the season that we need to rethink positions, such as whether Smith could move to LT and perhaps use Pinter at RT?  I know he has "short arms" for Pro T play, but he has to be better than the other options.  I think they should strongly alter our game plans to account for lesser line e play.  Rivers didn't have time to let route develop, and with no mobility, they are going to have to improve our tepid screen play and conduct more short routes for multiple TE's in 2 TE sets.  Rivers has to be able to get the ball out quick.  I do think the play calling the past 4 weeks had improved, but something happened this game and we were just too limited until late in the game when they were hitting TEs and TY.   More please.     2. Our D should get back in line with the return of the Covid players.  I like the second half adjustments the D is making but why aren't we making these adjustments in the first half.  35 points is too much and the penalties are devastating.  Is it time to play Carrie instead of Ya Sin?  I think they should seriously consider demoting him for back ups.  He's just too much of a liability.  Perhaps if he came in off the bench we could get off the field more often in the first half.     What did you all think? 
    • I don’t mean to offend, but.....   The population of Buffalo is roughly 255,000.   The population of Chicago is roughly 2.66 million.   Our nation’s third largest city.  Plus, they were playing Green Bay, a team that historically gets good TV ratings even though it is much smaller than Buffalo.  It’s the smallest city to have a major sports franchise.  TV ratings are, in part,  why Indianapolis doesn’t get many National games unless they have someone like Peyton Manning or Andrew Luck.    It’s not just about the win-loss records. 
  • Members

    • Dasteez

      Dasteez 96

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 173

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Arodgers12

      Arodgers12 488

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • nzh201vs

      nzh201vs 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Lancer1

      Lancer1 232

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 7,615

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Rackeen305

      Rackeen305 505

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JPFolks

      JPFolks 1,050

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 1,117

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1USCTrojan

      1USCTrojan 33

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...