Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

AV wants to return, may not be healthy for start of season


Recommended Posts

Why man why, go out on top. Dude will be walking out with a walker still shanking kicks wanting to kick. Love the guy but man, you're hurting the team verse helping

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the minority, but i would love bringing back vinny, bringing him in under pup let him get his 600 and if he keeps kicking well let him keep going, if he sucks give him the option to retire

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

We should move on, no doubt. I can however, see a team, in the middle of a year, if they are having kicker issues, get him for the tail end of the season. He can get his record then, just not as a Colt. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Would love him to retire as a Colt, but at the same time if he want to continue elsewhere and reach another milestone in his HoF career that's great. We just look primed to move on IMO. Chase looked promising last season and Blankenshil offers promise too. Vinny lost us games last year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He deserves the opportunity to compete.  But competing takes all issues into account, including availability.

 

If he's not ready to compete, that's on him.

 

However, we all know that when he's healthy, historically he's been money.   Kicking in the NFL is different than in college.  Just ask the Bucs fans about drafting a kicker in the 2nd round!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewEra said:

Why man why, go out on top. Dude will be walking out with a walker still shanking kicks wanting to kick. Love the guy but man, you're hurting the team verse helping

Last year was horrific for him and that wasn’t who he was his entire career as he has won more games than he has lost for sure. No need in disparaging the man. Having said that, I would not re-sign him for this year regardless. 

41 minutes ago, chad72 said:

We should move on, no doubt. I can however, see a team, in the middle of a year, if they are having kicker issues, get him for the tail end of the season. He can get his record then, just not as a Colt. 

We should move on. I believe if Vinny is healed and in shape for any part of the year, he will be able to kick for someone and get his goals set. I don’t feel it will be with us for the simple reason that we have what appears to be 2 players that can be our long term solutions to the kicking game as opposed to just the season in front of us. I’m pretty sure CB will also look at the long term outlook here as well. That’s my opinion. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

He deserves the opportunity to compete.  But competing takes all issues into account, including availability.

 

If he's not ready to compete, that's on him.

 

However, we all know that when he's healthy, historically he's been money.   Kicking in the NFL is different than in college.  Just ask the Bucs fans about drafting a kicker in the 2nd round!

 

Maybe Arians would love an AV re-union with Brady, like the Expendables. :) 

  • Haha 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Man. As much love as I have for Vinny. And as sad as it is. It’s that time dawg. We gotta move on. We just signed the best K in this draft class as an UDFA. Hot Rod. He’s gonna be our K for the next several years IMO. I’ll always love Adam but it’s time for him to hang it up and I say that with all due respect. He’s the best ever and a Colt for life. It’s just that time. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, COLTS449 said:

Man. As much love as I have for Vinny. And as sad as it is. It’s that time dawg. We gotta move on. We just signed the best K in this draft class as an UDFA. Hot Rod. He’s gonna be our K for the next several years IMO. I’ll always love Adam but it’s time for him to hang it up and I say that with all due respect. He’s the best ever and a Colt for life. It’s just that time. 

 

Actually I think Blankenship brought in to compete with Chase, but IMO it's Chase's job to lose. For me he has shown that he can handle the pressure last season. It will be a tough competition until the end of preseason.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The bottom line is, AV is an unrestricted free agent right now and the Colts have NOT re-signed him. Until I see any news about the Colts offering him a 1 year contract, he is as good as gone. No news is good news. :) 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great Pro, but time to move on.

Father time waits for no man and its caught up with Adam. He was pretty bad last season and it became an embarrassing thing all round for everyone. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, PureLuck said:

 

Actually I think Blankenship was brought in to compete with Chase, but IMO it's Chase's job to lose.

I agree with the first bolded, but I will respectfully disagree with the second bolded. IMO, it's Blankenship's job to lose. I believe he will be doing FG's XP's, and also kickoffs for the Colts when game 1 rolls around. I do think Chase is solid and will land a job somewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly hall of fame guy, best clutch kicker of all time. Would not have won the 06 SB without him.  All of that aside though respectively he can play his last year at 47 somewhere else.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, coltsva said:

 

I agree with the first bolded, but I will respectfully disagree with the second bolded. IMO, it's Blankenship's job to lose. I believe he will be doing FG's XP's, and also kickoffs for the Colts when game 1 rolls around. I do think Chase is solid and will land a job somewhere.

 

We'll see - Sanchez has done pretty good on kickoffs so far, so why would you change that?

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Honestly hall of fame guy, best clutch kicker of all time. Would not have won the 06 SB without him.  All of that aside though respectively he can play his last year at 47 somewhere else.

Yes.

As most have said, this team is built to compete.   Not the time to let a guy hang around for a record mark.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PureLuck said:

 

We'll see - Sanchez has done pretty good on kickoffs so far, so why would you change that?

When was the last time the Colts had a "kickoff specialist".   I recall a few years, maybe in the 2000's.   I can't recall a name though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right after he becomes older than Blanda was, bring him in for one game and a kick. Blanda has had that record long enough. Let Vinny have it.

I honestly think that's all he wants at this point.

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were a General Manger of a NFL football team the chance of me signing a 47 year old placekicker who has statically been on the decline for a number of seasons, just had surgery on his knee, and does not expect to be fully healed and ready to play when the regular season stars is absolutely 0%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m a little surprised you don’t see a difference in dline play between  the two games.  I don’t have access to any of the services but I would suspect that The grades are significantly higher for the dline in Sunday compared to the Jax game.   but Sunday was even more dominant than i thought, and I thought it was dominant.  Between the opening drive during which MN gained 75 and scored a FG and their last meaningless drive for 75 yds and a TD, the Colts gave up a total of 25 other yds.    against Jax, we gave up around 60 yds rushing in the 1st half and the dline looked less than dominant then imo.  Jax had 5 of 8 drives during which they scored if you throw out the kneel downs at the end of each half.   Percentage of  tackles and sacks for linemen were very similar in both games.  You said that colts had more pressures during the mn game and I said probably a function of Jax short passing attack.   buckner had 6 tackles v Jax and 3 v mn.  He had no sacks v Jax but 1.5 tfl.  He had 1.5 sacks v mn but no other tfl.  Statistically counting sacks, tackles, and tfl he was “better” V Jax.  But you probably don’t think He was better Iwould suspect.   i would be shocked if the dline didn’t grade out higher v. Mn than Jax even though the tackles, tfl, and sacks were very similar over all.   im sure teams keep advanced stats that show a clearer pic of when a d lineman wins or loses on each Play that doesn’t necessarily match easier to see stats like tackles, etc.   do you have access to the grades?  I’d really be interested in the units grades in the two games.   i agree there can be other factors like obviously opponent strength and the play of LBs and dbs.  And mn looks like they might suck pretty bad surprisingly to me.  I think the main problem with lasts weeks game imo is the LBs are weak in coverage and Indy is as a result susceptible to short passing attacks.     that being said, rarely do dlines dominate the LOs like the colts did.   i maintain that a guy like Buckner and dts in general could have nit recorded a sack, had only a couple of tackles and be more dominant than In a game where he recorded a few tackles and a couple of sacks.    
    • Let's hire an exorcist!  
    • Didn't Nick Bosa get hurt this week too?
    • This might be helpful.
    • Mahomes vs. Jackson I would not say one is so much better than the other and I know stats, etc. may favor Mahomes but I think we are going to see a banner year for Jackson. Taking nothing away from the rookie Cardinal.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...