Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Chloe6124

Chris Ballard on The Herd

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Myles said:

To be fair, many on this forum also predicted it a long time ago.  

 

pats self on back... but honestly, it was an easy prediction based on fit

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:

Annoyed?   Seriously?   Over what?

 

people here get kissed when the media doesn’t ask enough questions, or the right questions.   Now you’re not happy because they asked too many questions.

 

Damned if they do.  Damned if they don’t. 

 

Maybe I shouldn't speak for Ballard, but personally I wanted to hear about the other players too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Myles said:

I agree that the BPA is the most likely to be drafted by a GM.   I'm just saying that it is not set in stone as it depends on the needs of a team.   Had the Colts O-line not been as bad, I don't think Nelson, a guard, would have been taken with the 6th pick.  Same with Smith in the 2nd round.  The need was there and Ballard knew it.

 

I will admit that some of my arguing is coming from a poster who was arguing that the Colts should have drafted Darnold instead of Nelson because he was the better player available.   

If we had just a good guard Ballard still probably would of drafted Nelson. Because like he says Nelson has unique traits most guards don’t have. Now if the guard we had possessed unique traits like Nelson then we wouldn’t of taken Nelson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Coffeedrinker said:

I think I covered that.  But believe what you want.. I will believe Ballard and every other successful GM I've read or listened to... and that is you draft best player available regardless of need (and definitely not based on fan's perceived need).  The two reasons they always give are... because need is temporary and there are other ways to address needs., mainly free agency and trades, or you trade back, so the BPA lines up with the need..  Ballard even said that in the conversation on the Herd.

I agree with this. However, I believe Ballard drafts for need over BPA a lot more than you think. He can say every pick was on top of his board and was BPA and we can't technically prove him wrong, but most picks he's done are need picks even hearing Ballard say he was going after offensive playmakers this draft (which was a need).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

If we had just a good guard Ballard still probably would of drafted Nelson. Because like he says Nelson has unique traits most guards don’t have. Now if the guard we had possessed unique traits like Nelson then we wouldn’t of taken Nelson.

I agree and think that's the correct way to look at things. Don't allow good to become the enemy of great (or however that saying goes)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Myles said:

I look forward to watching/hearing this.   I'm such a Ballard fan.

 

So many GM's say take the best player despite need.   I don't really feel they truly believe that.  We all know that it depends on the desperation of the need.  The Colts desperately needed a D-lineman so they used their 13th pick on Buckner.  Great move to fill a position of need.   Maybe Buckner was also the best player they could get with that pick too.  

I would agree that "best player" is the go to for later round picks.  

They may actually take BPA every time, however, their BPA on the board is likely different than many. Also, is BPA is used and there is a guy that’s just close enough in a position of need, that will no doubt take precedent. Everything is always relevant to the situation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

I think ballard is trying to let fans know Eason isn’t ready. That’s why he says pump the breaks. He doesn’t want fans to think he is going to come in right away and be the savior. It just sounded really harsh the other night. 

 

4 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

He could of just said we like his traits but has a lot of upside. There was no reason to say he still has to make the team and talk down to him by saying he is a 4th rd pick. Just say they like his traits and he has to work hard. 

 

Chloe....

 

You're reading way, WAY too much into Ballard's remarks.    He's not talking down to Eason, or trying to trash the player he just drafted.    He's trying to protect Eason.    He's trying to make sure the media has a bucket of cold water thrown on it to cool off expectations that could be red hot if not tamped down right away.   These kind of comments are said in all sports all the time.    Nothing that Ballard did was out of the ordinary.   Let's call it GM speak.    That's what the good ones do.

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, egg said:

 

Maybe I shouldn't speak for Ballard, but personally I wanted to hear about the other players too.

 

Eventually, Ballard did talk about all his picks.     So, hopefully you got what you were looking for....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

His twitter Friday night before we took Taylor was telling. Right before the pick he goes come on Ballard pick Taylor. 

Yeah I saw that.  He was pretty charged up about it too, said Taylor was the steal of the draft and seemed excited that the Colts had picked him for whatever reason.  Maybe he's becoming a closet Colts fan?  Or just a Ballard fan?  I know he used to pimp Andrew Luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

This is great. Should be up on YouTube later. Here are some highlights. 

 

He laughs at Colin was pumping up Pittman because he was afraid we would lose out on him.

 

Ballard talks again about Eason needing a lot of work. Say they feel good about the situation they are putting him into.

 

Always take the best player despite need.

 

Talks about Rivers. He is going to play to win. Feel the colts can protect him.

 

 

If he says he drafts BPA instead of need, he's lying through his teeth.

 

We drafted Pittman high at 34 because we need a big X to start immediately.

We need a second back and possible #1 RB if Mack leaves, its why we draft a RB high at 41

We need a S as insurance for Hooker's situation, so we draft a S at 85

We need a successor to Rivers, we draft a QB that needs time.

We need oline depth....the G from Ball State

We need DT youth, Windsor

 

Maybe the rest are BPA

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, AZColt11 said:

Yeah I saw that.  He was pretty charged up about it too, said Taylor was the steal of the draft and seemed excited that the Colts had picked him for whatever reason.  Maybe he's becoming a closet Colts fan?  Or just a Ballard fan?  I know he used to pimp Andrew Luck.

I think he has a man crush on ballard lol.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude...   This was THE BEST post I have ever seen from you.  I wish there was a way to use multiple reactions, because I laughed, I cried, I liked, and I thank you for posting this.     Every single sentence was perfect.  ^This^ is the REAL @Jared Cisneros we all know and love!  
    • I don't see him coming back but then again I was sure he wouldn't retire before the 2019 season either. Luck is hard to figure out.
    • I appreciate it Lucky. Nothing wrong with being Dodds, he still has a lot of say and has his voice heard. Decisions can be tough sometimes and it takes someone willing to accept credit and blame for them, especially at an NFL level. Ballard has done that exceptionally, and most of the things he's done deserve a lot of credit, and I'm happy I get a little peek at what the guys do in scouting players every year.    I should give Reich a break though, he's trying to do what's best for the team. I just wish he was more of a risk-taker sometimes. However, I understand with Luck retiring it was tough on everybody. I think this year we can at least compete and with some luck (no pun intended), possibly make or win a SB. Our team has a lot of great talent (starting and depth), and that's something we haven't been able to say since the Polian days!
    • I guess that explains some things.  And I don't mean that as an insult, I just didn't know that about you.  I'm realizing I might have been looking at some of your previous posts over the years in the wrong light.  No judgement.  Sorry if I ever came across as harsh (or a straight-up donkey) in the past.  I just didn't know you as well as I thought I did.    I'll try to be more understanding going forward, even when we disagree about something.   (maybe @coltsfeva feels the same, I don't know.  If I'm not mistaken, there's been some back-and-forth between you two in the past...  I might be thinking of a different member, if so: apologies.  )   I was speaking kinda specifically about Ballard vs Dodds, ie: General Manager vs Assistant General Manager.  If I had a choice, I would choose Assistant General Manager (and not Assistant TO the General Manager for all you Office fans) ev-er-y time.  Being the General Manager is just not my gig.     And hopefully you'll be more understanding going forward of people in Ballards' position where dealing with people is basically the whole premise of their job.  If they didn't draft the guy you wanted or sign the FA you wanted, or even achieve the goals you wanted record-wise, please realize how much else they had to deal with on an inter-personal level that you don't have to deal with on a day-to-day basis.  Because I've been there, and it's beyond stressful trying to get 10-20 people to do their job, much less trying to get 50-100 people to their job better than the the other 50-100 on the other sideline...  
    • Why are you only going by last season?? Of course he was bad last season but he is now 47 years old. In 2006 with us he made 89.3% of his FG's and 100% of his extra points. He was also 5-5 in the playoffs at Baltimore and we won the SB. I am taking that kicker over anyone. Using last season as a gauge makes no sense. Vinny also had a few years in NE where he made over 90% of his FG's and 100% of his extra points. Using last year is nonsense.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...