Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Should the Colts sign D.J. Fluker


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, ColtJax said:

He was bad with San Diego and average with Seattle. Just a big guy but nothing special..

I disagree. That is guy that allowed  the chargers  running backs to destroy us a few years back A great run blocker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was good his rookie year as the Chargers starting right tackle, but then he got progressively worse every year after that, including after he was moved inside to guard. The primary reasons were that he continually let his weight balloon and got in worse and worse shape, and he's also not, hmmm.... how shall I say this kindly.... not the brightest bulb in the pack. So I don't know if it's because it took him far too long to learn how to play guard for the first time in his life, or what it was, but he became a real disaster before they let him go.

 

I haven't followed him since, so I have no idea what he's like now. But I can just imagine what Philip might think if he suddenly saw Fluke on the practice field with him again one day, "Oh gosh darn dagnabbit, what's HE doing here?!!!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, PrideOfAthens17 said:

He was good his rookie year as the Chargers starting right tackle, but then he got progressively worse every year after that, including after he was moved inside to guard. The primary reasons were that he continually let his weight balloon and got in worse and worse shape, and he's also not, hmmm.... how shall I say this kindly.... not the brightest bulb in the pack. So I don't know if it's because it took him far too long to learn how to play guard for the first time in his life, or what it was, but he became a real disaster before they let him go.

 

I haven't followed him since, so I have no idea what he's like now. But I can just imagine what Philip might think if he suddenly saw Fluke on the practice field with him again one day, "Oh gosh darn dagnabbit, what's HE doing here?!!!"

You do make a great point here. Rivers knows him well; if he has any qualms about the guy he’s already in the “Never Gonna Happen” category.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t understand all the love here for Fluker?

 

Drafted by San Diego in the first round, let go after 4 years.

 

Signed by the Giants, let go after one year.

 

Signed by the Seahawks, a team that lives to run the ball, let go after two years.

 

He’s 0 for 3.   So why do we want him again?   Maybe Glowinski had a poor year because he was hurt?  Maybe?  But we liked him enough after his first season to give him a 3/16.2 mill contract.  So we clearly like him. 

 

Then again, we may have just drafted his future replacement?  Ballard said he loves Pinter and tried to trade UP to make sure we got him.   We did.  So Glow is likely on notice. 
 

So why the Fluker Love here?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

I don’t understand all the love here for Fluker?

 

Drafted by San Diego in the first round, let go after 4 years.

 

Signed by the Giants, let go after one year.

 

Signed by the Seahawks, a team that lives to run the ball, let go after two years.

 

He’s 0 for 3.   So why do we want him again?   Maybe Glowinski had a poor year because he was hurt?  Maybe?  But we liked him enough after his first season to give him a 3/16.2 mill contract.  So we clearly like him. 

 

Then again, we may have just drafted his future replacement?  Ballard said he loves Pinter and tried to trade UP to make sure we got him.   We did.  So Glow is likely on notice. 
 

So why the Fluker Love here?  

I agree. The only way I would think Fluker is at all an option is if Phillip really loves the guy and wants him. Outside if that I'd rather give the roster spot to a young guy with upside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

I don’t understand all the love here for Fluker?

 

Drafted by San Diego in the first round, let go after 4 years.

 

Signed by the Giants, let go after one year.

 

Signed by the Seahawks, a team that lives to run the ball, let go after two years.

 

He’s 0 for 3.   So why do we want him again?   Maybe Glowinski had a poor year because he was hurt?  Maybe?  But we liked him enough after his first season to give him a 3/16.2 mill contract.  So we clearly like him. 

 

Then again, we may have just drafted his future replacement?  Ballard said he loves Pinter and tried to trade UP to make sure we got him.   We did.  So Glow is likely on notice. 
 

So why the Fluker Love here?  

Backup/competition for our current starters, he can play guard or RT and he's only 29 so he still has 4 or 5 good years in him. He wouldn't be an immediate upgrade over our starters but if one (not named Castonzo) went down he would fill in nicely as a swing backup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, jameszeigler834 said:

Good backup if nothing else. He has been better since he switched to guard and more depth at tackle.

The positive insight we have as an organization is Frank and Nick were in San Diego.  If their time overlapped with Fluker's (I believe it did but now 100% sure), we'll know their thoughts of him as a "fit" rather quickly.  No conversation?  Wasn't thought of very highly.  Reach out for interest?  They believe he's worth it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, joecolts said:

The positive insight we have as an organization is Frank and Nick were in San Diego.  If their time overlapped with Fluker's (I believe it did but now 100% sure), we'll know their thoughts of him as a "fit" rather quickly.  No conversation?  Wasn't thought of very highly.  Reach out for interest?  They believe he's worth it.  

 

Reich's first year on the Chargers staff (2013) under first year head coach Mike McCoy was also the first year of your former guy Telesco as Chargers GM, and their first pick as a new "braintrust" was none other than DJ Fluker at pick 11. As I said, he actually played solid his rookie year as their new starting right tackle, but it went nowhere but downhill from there, culminating in them letting him go after just 4 years. And with very good reason, too. Not a good resume item to be dumped so soon when you were the very first draft pick in the career of the guy who then cut you loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’ll have to search for Hicks’ break-down.  I hadn’t seen much tape of Bowers until a couple of weeks ago when I watched a highlight reel, and that was very impressive.  I’m just nervous about how hard it seems to be to predict TE success…
    • I was thinking a bit about what Ballard said in that clip from "Behind the Colts", about "he's not going to get much bigger". No idea if he was talking about Worthy... but if he is... he's right. Whether Worthy ends up playing at 165 or 176... this is still extremely small and light. Whether he's in the 1st percentile or 5th percentile of athlete's in weight in the league, this doesn't change the type of player and type of worries you would have about him with any significance. So... in a way, I kind of find that conversation a bit pointless. IMO the question should be - okay. he is small... and he will always be small. Can we work with that? And can we live with the risk of injury for that small of a player? And the answer can be no here... I'm not saying we necessarily need to take that risk. 
    • You think the Ed Dodds you see in edited clips here is the same as the Ed Dodds who interviews with teams?   I don’t know you or anyone would think that?      He’s very much respected around the NFL which is why multiple teams ask to interview with them most every year. 
    • I was too hahaha  Why’s that
    • Round 1 - #15 A. Xavier Worthy, WR, Texas B. Brian Thomas, WR, LSU C. Brock Bowers, TE, Georgia   Round 2 - #46  A. Edgerrin Cooper, LB, Texas A&M B. Marshall Kneeland, DE, Western Michigan C. Jaden Hicks, S, Washington State   Round 3 - #82 A. Troy Franklin, WR, Oregon B. Darius Robinson, DE/DT, Missouri C. Ben Sinnott, TE, Kansas State   Round 4 - #117 A. Jalyx Hunt, DE, Houston Christian B. Mason McCormick, OG, South Dakota State C. Malik Washington, WR, Virginia   Round 5 - #151 A. Beaux Limmer, OC, Arkansas B. Tanor Bortolini, OC, Wisconsin C. Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville   Round 6 - #191 A. Decamerion Richardson, CB, Mississippi State B. Qwan'tez Stiggers, CB, Toronto C. Nick Gargiulo, OC, South Carolina   Round 7 - #234 A. Millard Bradford, SS, TCU B. Mark Perry, FS, TCU C. Dalton Tucker, OG, Marshall   BONUS: Will the Colts trade the #15 pick this year?  A: Yes, they will trade back.  
  • Members

    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 734

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,150

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 10,792

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dark Superman

      Dark Superman 1,778

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 13,817

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,150

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 1,753

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moe

      Moe 589

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...