Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts' greatest need after the draft?


Recommended Posts

Eason will be signed for several years.

We have a quarterback with a history of success. We don't have a defensive end opposite Houston.

I'm surprised how many people believe a backup offensive tackle who may never play is more important than an edge rusher.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Nickster said:

INDY has 0 QBs signed after this season. 
 

QB is 1a through 1z.

Philip Rivers has said he wants to play for a maximum of two more years. There is no way he would play for a third team in three years. If he still has it and the Colts offer him another one year contract he'll play here again.

 

Chad Kelly becomes an Exclusive Rights Free Agent. He must sign a one year deal at the league minimum if offered by the Colts.

 

Jacob Eason was drafted in the fourth round and will sign a four year contract according the the rookie wage scale.

 

For all intents and purposes the Colts have three quarterbacks after this season.

 

Jacoby Brissett is the odd man out. He will become a Unrestricted Free Agent and will explore his options. He will find out what the Colts or another team believes he is worth.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

QB.

 

it is the most important position in sports and we don't have one. Without top QB play we'll just win enough to get a #15 to 25 draft pick every year to trade away for multiple 2nd & 3rd round picks. A good team with no real shot at a super bowl is what we are and will continue to be. 

 

We have 2 average QBS making $40,000,000 combined, that's horrible and will haunt the future of this team. Plus what ever we sign that head case Eason to. So $45,000,000 +/- tied up in QB's who have no history of winning. 

 

Its a horrible cycle we've been on. Our good established top level players now will be on the down slide of their career when our current development players are good enough to contribute at a top level. 

 

We're averaging a super bowl win every 26 1/2 years so there cant be very many good arguments for this formula being very successful.  Unless Super Bowls are not our goal. 

 

sad a christmas story GIF

Link to post
Share on other sites

TE, OT, DL.

 

TE:  Looks good on the surface with Doyle, Burton, and MAC; but the first two are often dinged up.

 

OT:  Le'Raven Clark is okay as a backup, but we need at least a swing G/OT on the bench for in-game injury if Clark is starting.

 

DL:  I'm not a big fan of Autry or Sheard or Lewis.  After Buckner, I think we need a better option than either of those three (assuming Sheard and Lewis get reps inside during rush packages).  Windsor looks interesting.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, fahlman said:

Philip Rivers has said he wants to play for a maximum of two more years. There is no way he would play for a third team in three years. If he still has it and the Colts offer him another one year contract he'll play here again.

 

Chad Kelly becomes an Exclusive Rights Free Agent. He must sign a one year deal at the league minimum if offered by the Colts.

 

Jacob Eason was drafted in the fourth round and will sign a four year contract according the the rookie wage scale.

 

For all intents and purposes the Colts have three quarterbacks after this season.

 

Jacoby Brissett is the odd man out. He will become a Unrestricted Free Agent and will explore his options. He will find out what the Colts or another team believes he is worth.


A 39 year old, a UDFA with a record, and a 4th round flyer.  
 

As of right now with technically no QB signed past this season.  Our QB situation is the club’s biggest concern.

 

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Nickster said:


A 39 year old, a UDFA with a record, and a 4th round flyer.  
 

As of right now with technically no QB signed past this season.  Our QB situation is the club’s biggest concern.

 

An experienced quarterback playing for a head coach, offensive coordinator and in a system in which he is familiar.

 

Incorrect, Chad Kelly was drafted by the Denver Broncos. His record has little to do with his ability to play football. I could fill an all-star team with players who have records.

 

A "flyer" who many thought possessed first round talent, so we'll see how he works out.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, fahlman said:

An experienced quarterback playing for a head coach, offensive coordinator and in a system in which he is familiar.

 

Incorrect, Chad Kelly was drafted by the Denver Broncos. His record has little to do with his ability to play football. I could fill an all-star team with players who have records.

 

A "flyer" who many thought possessed first round talent, so we'll see how he works out.

 

Sorry you are right Chad Kelley was the last pick in the draft I think.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

We have to see how our young pass rushers do. You don't draft three DEs in two years for no reason.

I'd rather see how they do as second-teamers this year and then perhaps move up.

The reason for me is clear - trying to win a championship.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, fahlman said:

An experienced quarterback playing for a head coach, offensive coordinator and in a system in which he is familiar.

 

Incorrect, Chad Kelly was drafted by the Denver Broncos. His record has little to do with his ability to play football. I could fill an all-star team with players who have records.

 

A "flyer" who many thought possessed first round talent, so we'll see how he works out.

Honestly  can't  say qb until we see how Eason does or if kelly has improved.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well at least we know it wasn’t from snowboarding 
    • That's the point of the cap.  Or at least what happens when markets drive the prices.  Teams will always push the price, which means you don't really win consistently unless you're near the top of the cap.   There is no way around that.  When it matters for a team, the space will always be tight. (unless you catch lightning in a bottle one year)   To maximize that...and I'm sounding like a johnny-one note lately....a team has to deploy its capital to the positions on the team that create the most wins.  Pay positions that have less impact, and that prevents you from compensating talented players at the other positions.    Also a team is going to have to get several young draft picks to contribute to the teams success at a level that is much greater than the level they are counting against the cap (like their 3rd or 4th year of their rookie contracts...a near pro bowler).   Essentially the cap forces teams to get more value from some players than the level they are being compensated.  The young players that are good enough to earn that fat second contract.  Those are the players that matter and that drive your championships, because the market forces every team to pay the same price for players with the same talent as players on other teams.
    • Yep.   When you convert the base salary to essentially a signing bonus it gives cao relief for that upcoming season, but spreads it over the rest of contract, up to 5 years.     So an example:   Ryan Kelly:   Has a base of $10m next season and 4 years left of deal.   The base can only drop to vet minimum. We will use $1m for this example, so:   Ryan Kelly current contract: 2021 - $10m base, $4.65m roster bonus(which is guaranteed next year) = $14.65m cap hit. 2022 - $7.5m base, = $7.5m cap hit 2023 - $9.125m base, $1m roster bonus(not guaranteed) = $10.125m cap hit 2024 - $11.375m base, $1m roster bonus(not guaranteed) = $12.375m cap hit.   So right now, Kelly has no guaranteed money after 2021.   Ryan Kelly restructured contract: 2021 - $1m base, $4.65m roster bonus, $2.25m signing bonus = $7.9m cap hit(savings of $6.75m in 2021) 2022 - $7.5m base, $2.25m signing bonus = $9.75m cap hit 2023 - $9.125m base, , $1m roster bonus, $2.25m signing bonus = $12.375m cap hit 2024 - $11.375m base, $1m roster bonus, $2.25m signing bonus = $14.625m cap hit.     This would give Kelly 6.75m guaranteed money after 2021.     He would receive a $9m check when he restructures but for cap purposes it would br spread over those 4 years.
    • A hurt Rivers is still better than a healthy Brissett.
    • correct. That's been the idea i keep hearing about on all the talk radio and tv talking heads when they bring it up. Converting salary to a bonus. But I wasn't clear if that was a dollar for dollar deal or if there was any penalties or if it spread it out. So the Saints, they, in theory, could convert part of that 93 million over into bonuses for each respective player, but it'd just kick the problem down the road, not fix it. do i have that right?
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...