-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Popular Now
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
I mean...you could create a narrative like this at any position. We know that Ballard isn’t going to just trade up for a QB just to do it...like some of those teams have. It’s going to be his guy. So we just have to trust the process...and not the percentages. Besides, I am more interested in recent history...where the hit % is much higher. NFL offenses now employ many of the same concepts as college offenses...and therefore the transition will be easier. The alternative is to pick up a vet and hope to have an elite defense...which isn’t a likely scenario. I think it’s much more likely to draft a QB who can lead a top 5 offense than build a balanced team that is good enough to win a SB without a top 5 offense.
-
By TheBlueAndWhite · Posted
It's a game my friend, just enjoy it for what it is, no need for it to put you out of peace... Mistakes happen in life, hindsight is always 20/20, so it's easy for us to say. Not so easy in the moment when everyone's in your ear giving you their opinion. -
This could actually help the colts get Stafford. Other teams will be wanting Watson. SF gets him out of the AFC.
-
By Moosejawcolt · Posted
LT's r usually picked high in the draft. They maybe lucky to find one in the 2nd.. -
By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted
If we do give up our 21st pick for Stafford, i would definitely draft a LT with my 2nd round pick. We can still get a good one there. Our Line is still pretty good with Nelson, Kelly, Smith. I thought the Colts Line played well without AC for the most part.
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now