Predictions after the 1st round is over

[DougDew 2,268]

34 is too high for Hurts, IMO.

 

I'm thinking the WR talent is so deep that we should go OT if we stay at 34 and get the WR or Kmet at 44. 

 

[DougDew 2,268]

1 hour ago, NewColtsFan said:

And THAT is Ballard’s worst nightmare!   
 

You keep doing that....

What, expressing her feelings?  Shame on her.

[coltsfan40 55]

4 hours ago, ColtJax said:

Fulton, CB LSU wouldn't be bad, neither would Delpit, S for LSU. Blacklock, DT from TCU is the best available. Jonathan Taylor, Cam Achers, Swift or Dobbins are all available, if one falls to #44 I'd really think about them as well.

It could be Blacklock !

[Defjamz26 1,897]

4 hours ago, krunk said:

Im sticking with my Tee Higgins prediction.  He does much of the same stuff Ballard was looking for out of Devin Funchess.  Same big body style Rivers is used to.  Higgins scores a lot in the red zone and has played all 3 positions.

You don’t like Pittman?

[krunk 3,995]

2 hours ago, Defjamz26 said:

You don’t like Pittman?

I like him but kind of boring to me. I wont trip if we take him

[Chloe6124 8,983]

Looks like the lions might be looking at Hurts. 

 

 

[krunk 3,995]

3 hours ago, Defjamz26 said:

You don’t like Pittman?

He's a safe player who I think will definitely produce.  He just doesn't get my fire going all the way.  I like some of the other guys a little bit better for different reasons. 

[Chloe6124 8,983]

Was just thinking what if Ballard has Love and Eason graded the same. They both need to sit and develop. So why give up a extra pick for Love when you can get Eason with a second pick. This happens all the time. Eason fits this oline a little better and plays more similar to Rivers and might fit our oline better.

[DougDew 2,268]

28 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Was just thinking what if Ballard has Love and Eason graded the same. They both need to sit and develop. So why give up a extra pick for Love when you can get Eason with a second pick. This happens all the time. Eason fits this oline a little better and plays more similar to Rivers and might fit our oline better.

Nothing wrong with having a pocket passer behind our oline.  Moving is better, but its not a necessity.

[Chloe6124 8,983]

1 minute ago, DougDew said:

Nothing wrong with having a pocket passer behind our oline.  Moving is better, but its not a necessity.

It makes sense as to why he didn’t move up. He was ok losing love because he had Eason graded the same and didn’t see a huge difference. Eason might even be there at 44. Guess we will find out soon.

[DougDew 2,268]

6 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

It makes sense as to why he didn’t move up. He was ok losing love because he had Eason graded the same and didn’t see a huge difference. Eason might even be there at 44. Guess we will find out soon.

I don't think we know that he has Eason graded the same.  But your point about Eason being a pocket passer shouldn't really hurt his stock with us because we've had nothing but pocket passers for 20 years.  Our oline can handle it.  

[Chloe6124 8,983]

1 minute ago, DougDew said:

I don't think we know that he has Eason graded the same.  But your point about Eason being a pocket passer shouldn't really hurt his stock with us because we've had nothing but pocket passers for 20 years.  Our oline can handle it.  

Sorry I could of worded that better. If we do take Eason the reason he might of passed on Love was because he had them graded similar. I don’t know if he does or we will take Eason. If we do that might be why he was ok not moving up and losing a pick.

[Chloe6124 8,983]

Who knows if this is true but this fan base would be happy.

 

 

[richard pallo 2,308]

3 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Who knows if this is true but this fan base would be happy.

 

 

Speculate means a wild * guess. 

[danlhart87 5,959]

7 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Who knows if this is true but this fan base would be happy.

 

 

Hope not 

[Chloe6124 8,983]

Eason would make sense for the lions as he is very similar to Stafford.