Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Ballard for two guys that will contribute day one.    

By the end of today, Goodell will be reading the picks from his bed

Buckner is a freakin all-pro. Relax.

Posted Images

1 minute ago, Shafty138 said:

It'll have to grow on me, but it seems like we're just replacing guys that don't need shoved out the door yet.....

Its more like CB having vision for the future.

 

I dont think Ballard will pay Hooker his $10m+

 

OR Mack $8-$10m

 

No one is forcing them out the door yet, preparing for their exit.

 

They could be traded still.

 

I just think Ballard will never pay a Safety or RB those kind of cap hits. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We might of got a steal here. If hooker doesn’t show up this year someone is waiting in the wings. If he plays nickel he could be a backup for Moore.

 

Eason must of bombed his interviews. But with all the FA not many teams need QB.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, chad72 said:


3 safety looks, I’m talking about 

Yeah, sounds like Blackmon does at FS what Hooker doesn't and visa versa.

 

Great tackler.  Great man coverage skills.

 

Help for the secondary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol, yeah, this one was very unexpected. He's ranked 193 on ESPN, so a full 100 spots higher than where we nabbed him, but obviously we had to have seen more in him, so we'll have to see. Admittedly we do need safety depth and I think Hooker is one of the more expendable FAs next off-season. So if we luck out and get a guy who can replace him, then this is worth it. Of course the the worst side is if this guy is a bust lol. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, New Zealands #1 Colts Fan said:

Loved his highlight tape. Seems he fell due to tearing his acl

oh, okay, that's not so bad. He's a guy I never looked into so I was puzzled we took a guy who had been ranked so low at 85. This makes me feel a lot better. With Hooker and Willis, he has time to get healthy.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

We might of got a steal here. If hooker doesn’t show up this year someone is waiting in the wings. If he plays nickel he could be a backup for Moore.

 

Eason must of bombed his interviews. But with all the FA not many teams need QB.


After Burrow and Tua, shaky QB class. Plus best FA QB offseason in a while.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Rackeen305 said:

really? i dont know the player.

@BCoop since you want to put confused looks on my post when I asked who is the player, Why dont you explain to me who the player is. His name doesn't ring a bell to me like Shawn Taylor or Ed Reed.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the toughness Blackmon showed in the run game for sure. Not afraid to get involved there at all.

 

I am concerned with the coverage ability however even with the ball production. His instincts are below average at the moment and he moved from cornerback to safety because he was bad in man coverage.

 

I thought he had some upside, but don't think he was worth a day 2 pick especially with the serious injury.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah it is expensive and I'm generally against trading up in the draft, and I'm much more a fan of trading down, but as I've said before there is one exception for that rule. It's the QB. Like with many things QBs tilt the conversation on its head. Just the value if you hit is SO BIG, that you have to do it if you get the chance(and you love the QB sitting there of course). There is practically no bad trade value if you trade up for a QB and he hits.    Also, about the hit rates of QBs. my opinion is that it's not just about the QB and his talent/drive/determination/work ethic. The environment, teammates, coaching, etc. play a big role in whether they succeed or fail. There are very few Andrew Lucks who will succeed no matter what garbage you throw at them(and he was thrown into one of the biggest piles of garbage in the league when it comes to GM-coach combo + the talent around him). For most QBs, even highly drafted, their talent needs to be guided and nurtured in the right direction. And in this line of thoughts - I think some of those QBs could have been successful in another environment and/or with a bit more luck(Darnold/Wentz), while others were probably doomed from the start because of their own failings(Rosen, Trubisky). And here is where I think we actually have somewhat of an advantage. I like our GM and our FO. I like our coach generally(even if I have some playcalling beefs with him). I like our roster and the foundations of our OLine. I think this situation gives better than average chance to a young QB to succeed. It's still no guarantee, but again... at some point you will have to make a move of some sort. We cannot keep rethreading the Rivers' of the world.  A some point Ballard will have to trust his evaluation of a QB he loves and just do what it takes to get him. 
    • Sorry, but no, our window is not closing.   Almost all of Ballard's top players are still on their rookie contracts.   This team is EARLY in it's window.    There is still great opportunity for the Colts.   Your viewpoint is a fan's viewpoint.    It is not the view of how an NFL front office person thinks.   There is still time.   Patience can be your friend.  
    • I can only think of one team that did that....    New Orleans traded their whole draft for Ricky Williams I think in the early 2000's.  And I don't think it's been done since.   Trading up that far is really,  really expensive.    There's good reason why he doesn't like the idea of trading up that far.  First, it's incredibly expensive.    Second,  hitting on the right quarterback in in the first round,  even high in the first round is roughly a 50-50 proposition.   Look at Phily and the Rams.   Both traded a bundle to move to the top of the first...   picks 1 and 2 to take Goff and Wentz.   Both have had a moments.    And as of today,  neither is comfortable in their job.   Both are on the hot seat.   Look at the top of the '18 draft.   Mayfield and Allen are winners.    Darnold and Rosen not so much.    You gotta move down to the bottom of the first to add in Lamar Jackson...    who would've thought he'd work out as well as he did.   Props to Baltimore.   But it's a huge gamble.   It's hit and miss on the most scrutinized position in Pro Sports.  
    • My hope would be a GM is blinded by the volume and the headlines rather than the absolute value. We've seen teams do that trade in the past, where it's bad value-wise but it looks good on paper. Now the question is - are the Jets or MIA this easily fooled? Probably not but yeah... it's a fun hypothetical. 
    • I mean... hopefully we are not trading up Najee Harris or Travis Etienne. Then for SURE I don't want anything to do with it. But if you can get Wilson or Fields? I'd do that any day. I think people are weirded out by the number of picks rather than by the value.    This whole Colts draft past R1 has worse value than an average additional 1st.  https://www.drafttek.com/nfl-trade-value-chart.asp   R2    Pick 54 - 360 pts R3    Pick 84 - 170 R4    Pick 117 - 60 R5    Pick 148 - 31 R6    Pick 180 - 18.2 R7    Pick  211 - 5.8   ----------------------------- The total value is 645, which is the equivalent to the 29th pick of the draft.    My solution here would be to take our future 1st and trade it for late 1st or early 2nd this year.... then trade down a bunch of times to replenish the volume of picks for this year. Seattle has done similar things in recent years when they didn't have tons of picks.   Example: Trade future 1st for no. 33...  Trade 33(580) for 50(400) and 81(185) Trade 50(400) for 58(320) and 100(100) => pick at 58 Trade 81(185) for 92(132) and 124(48) => pick at 92 Trade 100(100) for 107(80) and 169(22.6)  Trade 107(80) for 117(60) and 180(18.2) => pick at 117, pick at 124, pick at 169, pick at 180   So in essense for 21 and 2022 1st rounder you get... no.2 and your pick of a QB after Lawrence, 2nd rounder(58), 3d rounder(92), 2x 4th rounders(117 and 124) and 2x 6th rounders(169 and 180).    That's just an example of what can be done. 
  • Members

    • stitches

      stitches 7,504

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DoubleE Colt

      DoubleE Colt 36

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pilgrim

      Pilgrim 51

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 407

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SteelCityColt

      SteelCityColt 4,437

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • buffalo34

      buffalo34 173

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 7,384

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Stoney

      Stoney 67

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jbaron04

      jbaron04 76

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...