Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, stitches said:

Not a huge fan of drafting RBs high in the draft. Not a huge fan of trading up for a RB... especially since I thought we had good RB stable. To a certain degree this pick is not shocking though - it continues the theme of WIN NOW moves by Ballard. 

 

I cannot quibble with the player himself though. Taylor was quite possibly the best runner in the draft. He runs strong, and he has explosive traits. I've said before that I like Mack but he leaves some yards on the field... I don't think Taylor will leave many yards on the field, he gets what's there and then some more. Greg Cosell compares him to Ezekiel Elliot as a runner and I can see that comparison. He has some fumbling issues but Mack had similar issues coming in, but they largely got fixed by our coaching staff. Taylor has worked on his receiving in the last year and made some improvements there, still not dynamic as a receiver though, IMO.

Love the pick. Taylor may be the best back on roster 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Ballard for two guys that will contribute day one.    

By the end of today, Goodell will be reading the picks from his bed

Buckner is a freakin all-pro. Relax.

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, Zoltan said:


Im thinking Jax was gonna take him, since they are trying to trade Fournette and don’t really have a replacement for him yet

makes sense....man, their D got good again pretty fast

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

Haha...everybody type casted Ballard...and then he calls a massive audible this offseason.

 

As much as I don’t like this saying...you have to “trust the binder”

The problem with the RBs we had last season is that we had to rotate them out depending upon the situation.  That's what happens with a RB by committee approach.  Guys like Taylor and Swift keep defenses more honest because they can be productive no matter what the play.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, il vecchio said:

 

Are we going to carry 4 RB and a FB on the roster?

I have no idea.   Don’t know who will get cut?   At the moment I’d guess Nix.   I think Taylor made him less relevant.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, shastamasta said:

 

RB made a lot of sense...people didn’t see it 

Been saying it all along.    Build trenches, run the ball.   No reason to sign a RB (Mack) to a new contract.  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Bluefire4 said:

I think Jerry Jeudy and KJ Hamler are the two best route runners in this draft. The Broncos have them both to go with Courtland Sutton, Noah Fant, and Melvin Gordon.

 

Drew Lock is a lucky guy.

Has Jefferson  been picked yet

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NewColtsFan said:

I have no idea.   Don’t know who will get cut?   At the moment I’d guess Nix.   I think Taylor made him less relevant.  

Nix might be the lead blocker for Taylor in heavy run packages.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NewColtsFan said:

I have no idea.   Don’t know who will get cut?   At the moment I’d guess Nix.   I think Taylor made him less relevant.  

Wilkins  may be gone

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

You’re not happy only giving up a 5th round pick? 

Not really, not for a few spots, and drafting a RB that high.

I'll get over it. He better catch the ball really well.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Matthew Gilbert said:

You don't think it can be corrected?

Huh?

 

I just wrote coaches think they can coach it out of the player.   And you took that as negative?

 

I’ve said I like the pick.  I’m surprised, but I like the pick.   

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NewColtsFan said:

I have no idea.   Don’t know who will get cut?   At the moment I’d guess Nix.   I think Taylor made him less relevant.  

Keep in mind we will likely be seeing a true full back this year. That could be big in blitz pick ups and add to the idea of running the **** ball!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I look at it this way. If Mack does leave next year he will likely net a 4th rd compensatory pick maybe even 3rd if someone goes crazy with a big contract. I don’t mind the investment for his replacement given how talented and rugged Taylor has been. Give me 4 years and we can do the same finding his replacement.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Van Jefferson.

I respect Van Jefferson, but he's not fast enough to be an effective route runner down the field in the NFL. Love what he did in one-on-ones at the Senior Bowl, but he didn't have that same production in actual games when pass rushers and other receivers were present. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Not really, not for a few spots, and drafting a RB that high.

I'll get over it. He better catch the ball really well.

a reach? Come on say it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I gotta say, the virtual Colts fans are doing a great job of cheering and getting loud. It was noticeable compared to some of these picks.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Huh?

 

I just wrote coaches think they can coach it out of the player.   And you took that as negative?

 

I’ve said I like the pick.  I’m surprised, but I like the pick.   

 

2 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Nix is a special teams ace

I obviously like nix over Wilkins, but that is another reason I like him over wilkins. Wilkins for being productive on limited snaps received just that. Limited snaps. I want players who play. I could be wrong but that's what camp is for...

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, DougDew said:

I think he can.  Has mileage, but has also proven to be durable.  You and me would like a pass catcher, but Taylor is bigger and faster than Mack, so he's still an upgrade regardless, IMO.

 

What do we have left.  75 and 122?  Do we still go O?

OL, TE, or DE with the next two. S or CB wouldn't shock me either. 

 

As far as Taylor, love his production, hate his mileage, and concerned a bit with the fumbles. Not really a power back, but he's closer than Mack. Like I said, hope he can catch.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dgambill said:

I look at it this way. If Mack does leave next year he will likely net a 4th rd compensatory pick maybe even 3rd if someone goes crazy with a big contract. I don’t mind the investment for his replacement given how talented and rugged Taylor has been. Give me 4 years and we can do the same finding his replacement.

That’s how I see it unfolding. We’re gonna run Taylor into the ground over the next 4 years & then let him go too unless he immediately explodes & becomes a top 3-5 back which could be possible with our O Line.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EastStreet said:

OL, TE, or DE with the next two. S or CB wouldn't shock me either. 

 

As far as Taylor, love his production, hate his mileage, and concerned a bit with the fumbles. Not really a power back, but he's closer than Mack. Like I said, hope he can catch.

They can fix the fumbles.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, life long said:

 

I obviously like nix over Wilkins, but that is another reason I like him over wilkins. Wilkins for being productive on limited snaps received just that. Limited snaps. I want players who play. I could be wrong but that's what camp is for...

 At least for me they are in different player pools

 

    Nix is with Doyle, MAC and Burton not MM, JT, NH, JW

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Smoke317 said:

That’s how I see it unfolding. We’re gonna run Taylor into the ground over the next 4 years & then let him go too unless he immediately explodes & becomes a top 3-5 back which could be possible with our O Line.  

Honestly it’s even better if he does establish himself as that...much better trade fodder or net you better compensatory pick value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not really.   The overall talent level right now with Rivers and our IR'd skill players is about the overall same level as when he had a more talented QB, less talent on defense, and Donald Thomas and Gosder Cherilous on IR back then.   The main difference is that back then, we were maxed out at getting over the hump because we spent to the maximum Cap number just to get into the playoffs (but didn't mortgage the future), whereas now we still have room to maintain our talent level while adding more.   So we will resign the good players, and add more rookies who can (hopefully) play.  And then we'll be in position to win just like every other team that wins and is pressed against the cap...they get rookies who are in their 2nd 3rd or 4th years to vastly contribute more to the team than the level of salary they are being compensated at in their rookie contracts.   Its either done that way (like SEA did when they got those young drafted defensive players and Wilson pre-big contract) or you simply load up on FAs to win now and mortgage the future.
    • nah after last weeks game Trevor went on twitter thanking all his Clemson fans for his final home game there
    • I'm fine with that.  Not upset at all because we're not disagreeing.  You just continue to misunderstand what I'm talking about.  My original comment wasn't comparing the rosters without the QB.  It was comparing the talent of the team responsible for the play on the field, which includes the QB.  Overall its about the same.  We play well at times, and lay stinkers at times, but for different reasons.  Our defense was worse then, but we now don't give up as many short field interceptions as we did then.  We don't come back as well now as we did back then.  Now we score by probably taking more time off of the clock than we did back then.  Different paths, same results so far.  Neither team was complete, but for different reasons.  Back then, we had a lot of holes at less important positions.  Now we have fewer holes, but at more important positions.   My original comment gathered quite a few Likes.  Consider the possibility that you simply misunderstood what I was saying.  
    • I can agree with Buckner. 32 may be second for me, before Leonard . He seems to make everyone in the secondary better like you see with the top tier free safeties. MAN he was sooooo close to making that play on MVS in the 4th.
    • Ha... Have you seen JJ? I think we'd end up being the ones tied up!
  • Members

    • KelownaColtsFan

      KelownaColtsFan 155

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Rally5

      Rally5 721

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mitch Connors

      Mitch Connors 359

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 445

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 07dleigh

      07dleigh 45

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtMan

      ColtMan 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • holeymoley99

      holeymoley99 291

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 2,904

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DaColts85

      DaColts85 1,259

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mick12Maher

      Mick12Maher 74

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...