Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts sign Trey Burton


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Interesting that Burton has the same agent Johnson does and both deals got done today.

Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) Tweeted: Free agent TE Trey Burton has agreed to terms with the #Colts, per @EnterSportsMgmt. Back together with coach Frank Reich. He gets a 1-year deal worth the minimum..

40 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Wonder if this takes tight end off the draft board.  It’s only vet minimum.

Doubtful tbh. He had under 100 yards last season due to injuries. This one of those low risk, high reward kind of signings. I do think we won't take a TE early, but I could still see us taking on at some point.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, James said:

Signed for vet minimum. 
 

Now let’s get Kmet.


Doyle, MAC, Burton and Kmet would be more than solid.

Don't they usually just dress three tight ends? Maybe they draft someone like Claypool, who might be able to play receiver and tight end

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, stitches said:

Great signing! I love it. We remove one more immediate and urgent need to address in the draft. Won't get boxed in - only draft TE if he's BPA. Nice. This made too much sense not to happen. 

 

Now lets see if we trade a late round pick for Alshon Jeffery. Another one that makes tons of sense.

Wouldn’t be happy with Jeffrey. He was a bit of a locker room malcontent.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Orioles22 said:

Don't they usually just dress three tight ends? Maybe they draft someone like Claypool, who might be able to play receiver and tight end

This is what I am thinking. We could still draft a WR at 34 and Claypool at 44. Maybe with thinking Claypool will eventually play TE. Rivers just needs some more weapons.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Stephen said:

Burton can be good when healthy. Now if we draft claypool  and use him as a te and another  wr the offense will be  good


Claypool will not play as a TE in the NFL. He will most definitely get drafted to play WR. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

Id still draft a TE late like Dalton Keene 

 

I also like Colby Parkinson from Stanford. He was a High School teammate with Michael Pittman, Jr. Would love to get both!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Burton is very much like the Johnson signing. He's not a starting TE, but will make some plays and provides solid depth. I think he got a much later contract than his play dictated when he was signed by the Bears.

 

I like the signing, but I don't think it precludes us for taking a TE in the draft if they're BPA or even trade for a player like Howard at the right price.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just hope he can get back to being productive after last year's groin and calf injuries. One Chicago reporter noted:

"The Bears’ offense — like the Eagles and Chiefs — needs good tight end play, and Burton didn’t offer that at all in 2019. He was hampered by a sports hernia that locked up his groin just before the Bears’ wild card loss to the Eagles and was never the same, finally going on IR with a calf injury then undergoing hip surgery the Bears hoped would get him back to his 2018 self. But seeing as they know his medicals better than any team and desperately need good tight ends, it’s hard to see Burton resurrecting his career somewhere else."

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, ProblChld32 said:


Claypool will not play as a TE in the NFL. He will most definitely get drafted to play WR. 

I agree 100%, but I'll also point out that whenever he runs out of the slot, he's more or less in a traditional TE alignment, and likely running a route similar or identical to a TE.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I really hope these cheap 1 year deals don't come back to bite us in the * lol if these players all ball out we will either have tons of contracts to give out or tons of holes to fill next year 

  • Confused 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I really hope these cheap 1 year deals don't come back to bite us in the * lol if these players all ball out we will either have tons of contracts to give out or tons of holes to fill next year 

 

Seriously?

 

In the GM world,  the scenario you described as better known as.....     WIN!-WIN!!

 

That's why GM's mostly love 1-year prove it deals.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NewColtsFan said:

 

Seriously?

 

In the GM world,  the scenario you described as better known as.....     WIN!-WIN!!

 

That's why GM's mostly love 1-year prove it deals.

 

It would be great for this year but with our really great young players coming up for big extensions it will be sad to lose other players after they play great after a 1 year deal and we can't afford all of them thus creating possibly many holes thats a worry for me 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

It would be great for this year but with our really great young players coming up for big extensions it will be sad to lose other players after they play great after a 1 year deal and we can't afford all of them thus creating possibly many holes thats a worry for me 

 

GM's deal with that scenario ever year.   That's how good players get let go and become free agents every year.     It's not that they're not good,  it's that the team is up against the salary cap and GM's have to make hard decisions.    Happens on most every team, ever year.

 

Life of a General Manager.....       Honestly,  not kidding....

 

They'd rather have too much talent and make tough choices than not enough talent and make easy choices.      Remember Ballard saying he'll know when things are changing when other teams are picking players off our roster.     That's happening.  Deon Cain, for example.

 

Ballard will take this situation every day, all day.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

It would be great for this year but with our really great young players coming up for big extensions it will be sad to lose other players after they play great after a 1 year deal and we can't afford all of them thus creating possibly many holes thats a worry for me 


You can never afford all of them so that doesn’t matter. What matters is drafting well.  It’s not a worry at all if you draft well. These other players brought in through FA are replaceable even if they do well. And if they do play well they could net the Colts more draft picks, which Ballard will continue to use well to fill the roster.
 

You pay your young, talented, drafted players (Nelson, Leonard, Kelly etc) who project to be long term core players.

These one year deals are perfect, because Burton, Rhodes, Carrie, Johnson are replaceable when you draft well like Ballard does. The holes won’t be there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This it from the colts ? Sign guys with a total of 14 catches ? And a Wr who would be lucky to start in XFL ? Rivers will not do well with this group not at all .Either they draft a stud like Kmet or just pay Rivers to hold the clipboard ,Very dissapointing now .I don’t expect anything but 7 wins if this is the path .

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, LockeDown said:

The Indy Special will be called this year. Calling it now. 

 

Can Rivers catch?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Riversrun said:

This it from the colts ? Sign guys with a total of 14 catches ? And a Wr who would be lucky to start in XFL ? Rivers will not do well with this group not at all .Either they draft a stud like Kmet or just pay Rivers to hold the clipboard ,Very dissapointing now .I don’t expect anything but 7 wins if this is the path .

So you are going to lose sleep over the signing of two players? 

Just is case you didn't know the Colts roster will have 90 players on it come training camp. (whenever that does happen)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Riversrun said:

This it from the colts ? Sign guys with a total of 14 catches ? And a Wr who would be lucky to start in XFL ? Rivers will not do well with this group not at all .Either they draft a stud like Kmet or just pay Rivers to hold the clipboard ,Very dissapointing now .I don’t expect anything but 7 wins if this is the path .

 

Definitely 7 wins AT THE MOST. I wouldn’t bother watching the draft, or the rest of the offseason. Probably should pack in the season all together.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Riversrun said:

This it from the colts ? Sign guys with a total of 14 catches ? And a Wr who would be lucky to start in XFL ? Rivers will not do well with this group not at all .Either they draft a stud like Kmet or just pay Rivers to hold the clipboard ,Very dissapointing now .I don’t expect anything but 7 wins if this is the path .

He signed for the vet minimum. No guarantee he will end up making the team.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MarquisJ said:

You get a veteran who should already know his way around this playbook for the veteran minimum. Could also mean Ballard wasn’t in love with the tightends in this draft or could be looking in the later rounds maybe Thaddeus Moss perhaps?

I’d say that this signing has absolutely zero bearing on what CB does with the TE position in the draft. He has guys now he is good with and if Moss were to fall to him late, or any of the TE’s we like fall, he can pick them up and it’s a camp duel, nothing lost. If they still choose a KMet at say 44, now they have the option to take him there or Claypool or whatever receiving type kid that’s available, no need to trade up for anyone imho. Good flexibility for this draft and this years offense if we miss out on a targeted player. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CheezyColt said:

If these guys have good years and we let them walk, we're going to be swimming in 2022 comp picks haha

Exactly!! It’s a cheap way to add picks. Doesn’t often work out but even if 2 hit, that’s a positive gain. 

2 hours ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

pretty decent signing would have rather traded a 4th or 5th for OJ Howard but this is an extremely cheap deal so can't be upset about that at all lol

It’s quite possible that TB wanted more than a 4th or CB wasn’t willing to part with a 4th? We don’t know. It’s quite possible, CB didn’t like all of Howard’s game too. 

1 hour ago, Lucky Wolf said:

 

I also like Colby Parkinson from Stanford. He was a High School teammate with Michael Pittman, Jr. Would love to get both!

I tell you what, I’d take a Pittman jr and Claypool back to back picks if an OT if worth isn’t there at 34. If we had to grab one of these two and hope the other guy falls to 3rd round pick, which player stands the best chance of being there for our 3rd round spot? 

1 hour ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I really hope these cheap 1 year deals don't come back to bite us in the * lol if these players all ball out we will either have tons of contracts to give out or tons of holes to fill next year 

I absolutely hope this is what happens. I hope they all ball out because 1. We will do well in 2020 and 2. We have cap space to pick and choose who we want to sign and 3. We gain comp picks galore if they all sign big contracts elsewhere for 2021 and we can start packaging to move into a high 1st rd pick (franchise QB???)

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Orioles22 said:

Don't they usually just dress three tight ends? Maybe they draft someone like Claypool, who might be able to play receiver and tight end

I'd have to check the new rules. 

 

Rosters have been expanded to 55, specifically to include more OL.  Maybe game day activation has been expanded too and sneaky HCs like BB. and hopefully Reich, can figure a way to dress more TEs.

 

It might be a nuance of the rule change that makes TE more valuable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I strongly disagree. We have plenty of talent on O. Game plan, play calling, and personnel choice in situational downs have been highly questionable. The pass/run mix game 1 was heavy pass, and just didn't make sense vs Jax, and especially in game 1 after no preseason with the RBs we had to start the year. The heavy run in G2 was an overreaction to G1. The heavy run in G3 was just silly given it's the Jet's strength.   Reich has a history of not attacking a teams weakness while going heavy against their strengths (see Miami last year). Play calling in general, has been predictable and conservative. I'll cut him a break there since perhaps he doesn't want to show much this early, but if he doesn't open things up soon, I'll have to scratch my head on that too. Maybe it's partly covid, but other teams look far more dynamic. We had WRs and TEs open all game Sunday, and needed to get some of the young WRs experience. It was a lost opportunity.   And IMO, even JB regressed with Reich from 2017 to 2019. The stats were very similar, but JB in 2019 had a heck of a lot better OL, and was sacked half the amount he was in 2017.    I really like Frank as a person, but it's not like his track record can't be questioned. In his two years in Phily as OC, Pederson called the plays so not much to glean from. In his two years as OC in LA, he had horrible balance both years, and was fired after being last in the league rushing and a 4-12 record. He's not all the much better than Pagano thus far, and has a much better roster.    Not saying at all we need to fire Frank, or anything like that. I am saying though he's not done anything extraordinary thus far though. He's got no excuses this year.   I agree. I can understand him not playing early last year when we had Doyle and Ebron both, but we should absolutely see him get a good snap share this year. Maybe short term a little, but honestly I'm not worried. We did fine when he was out last year. Williams had two 100 games in a row when Mack was out. Taylor will be fine with our OL. Having Taylor and Mack was an embarrassment of riches, but we're just fine with Taylor/Wilkins/Hines.   Again, IMO, goes back to game plan. We didn't run the ball a bunch against a team (Jax) that was 5th worst in the league vs the run last year. Then, we ran the ball a lot vs MN (better than they appear vs the run) and NYJ (who were 2nd best vs the run last year). Sorry, that just doesn't make sense.   Then add in things like using Hines between the tackles in goal line situations. Luck leaving was the only truly big issue. Pagano had to deal with Luck being gone a year too, and gimpy a few other years. Pagano did better (record wise) his first 3 years with a healthy Luck, then Reich did with a healthy Luck in 2018, and had a better roster on both sides, especially OL.  Not really. Rivers did great using a ton of different pass catchers this week, when allowed to throw. And we had guys wide open all game. Mo did fine in Doyle's place. Both Hines and Taylor are catching the ball well and are 22/23 on targets. TY looked better this week. Pascal is still there. Fountain got his feet wet. Taylor's AVG was good running. Our OL has been balling out and Rivers only sacked twice (on track for only 11 total this year).
    • Goodness. This is how the outbreaks start.   The first real test of NFL protocols. Let’s hope they can get a handle on it.
    • But the Vikings also didn't have any trouble moving the ball or scoring on the Packers or those vaunted Titans. So maybe there is something to be said for this defense. Just another way to look at it.
    • Titans vs Steelers Vikings vs Texans   AFCS definitely needs to keep an eye on this. I wonder if they'd plan to keep the game schedule but force the Steelers to work remote until TEN can return, so as not to gain an insurmountable advantage. Same with the Texans if the Vikings ended up getting exposed by TEN as well.   Busy week ahead.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...