Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts resign Marcus Johnson (merge)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Sees 2 of the same topic at the exact same time.   

Absolutely nothing. 

people are going to lose their minds no matter what. We could redo the 1998 draft and 50% of the people on this form would want us to trade back and NOT draft Peyton.

4 minutes ago, James said:


4th... Would be wild if the Colts waited that long.

 

I could see it - Ballard is going by his board and not by need - if he waits until round 4, so be it, but he will add some talent through the draft at WR. And the signing of Marcus Johnson will have 0,00 impact on what's happening during the draft. I like Johnson as a depth signing though. Probably WR 4 right now behind Hilton, Pascal and Campbell - Fountain should be ahead of him talent-wise, but who knows after not being on the field the last 2 years.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

I bet we don't take one til 3rd or 4th and people lose their minds 

people are going to lose their minds no matter what. We could redo the 1998 draft and 50% of the people on this form would want us to trade back and NOT draft Peyton.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, the only decision that Ballard has made this offseason that impacts the draft is the Buckner trade.  We are no longer in the market for an elite IDL. 

 

I'm not sure that even the Rivers signing will impact our QB draft strategy beyond what we would normally do with the 34th pick and beyond.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, jameszeigler834 said:

Nothing cause he isn't that great...

He is pretty good. Another deep threat who is excellent at tracking the ball. The only game where Jacoby actually threw up 50/50 balls was in Tampa and he actually went up and got them. If he makes the team he will be a good 50/50 guy fit Rivers. But it won’t stop us from taking one at 34.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, csmopar said:

people are going to lose their minds no matter what. We could redo the 1998 draft and 50% of the people on this form would want us to trade back and NOT draft Peyton.

yep that's one of life's guarantees. Death, taxes, and people complaining about what's done in the draft. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, csmopar said:

people are going to lose their minds no matter what. We could redo the 1998 draft and 50% of the people on this form would want us to trade back and NOT draft Peyton.

Yeah... I seriously doubt it. Everyone on this forum would be happy to get Burrow at this point, let alone Peyton.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

53 minutes ago, csmopar said:

people are going to lose their minds no matter what. We could redo the 1998 draft and 50% of the people on this form would want us to trade back and NOT draft Peyton.


Trading back, seems to be an obsession for many. 
 

The bulk of the mocks on this forum have trades.

 

100% agreed 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Mr.Debonair said:

Team loves mediocre WR play

 

We've got TY, who when healthy is solid.  Jury's still out on Campbell.

 

I think the team wants better than 'mediocre WR play', but between Pascal, Johnson, Dulin, Fountain we'll probably be cutting 2-3 guys who will wind up playing on another team.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CurBeatElite said:

 

We've got TY, who when healthy is solid.  Jury's still out on Campbell.

 

I think the team wants better than 'mediocre WR play', but between Pascal, Johnson, Dulin, Fountain we'll probably be cutting 2-3 guys who will wind up playing on another team.

I bet Dulin doesn’t make the team. Pascal will go back to KR since he won’t be the number one WR. Johnson is good depth. 

Ty, Campbell, pascal, draft pick, fountain, Johnson. That looks like a good group of six to me.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pgt_rob said:

Good depth signing I suppose. He's an undrafted WR that caught 17 balls for 277 yards last season. 

Looking deeper, he played in 6 games.   Expand the stats and he could have had 45 catches for 736 yards.  With JB as QB.  He's not a stud, but he is a great depth piece.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Chloe6124 said:

He is pretty good. Another deep threat who is excellent at tracking the ball. The only game where Jacoby actually threw up 50/50 balls was in Tampa and he actually went up and got them. If he makes the team he will be a good 50/50 guy fit Rivers. But it won’t stop us from taking one at 34.

 

10 minutes ago, Myles said:

Looking deeper, he played in 6 games.   Expand the stats and he could have had 45 catches for 736 yards.  With JB as QB.  He's not a stud, but he is a great depth piece.

I think we still need to take one or 2.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Superfly said:

 


Trading back, seems to be an obsession for many. 
 

The bulk of the mocks on this forum have trades.

 

100% agreed 

No that year we had to draft him or this team would be the laughing stock of the league for probably the next 15 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jameszeigler834 said:

 

I think we still need to take one or 2.

I think I'd prefer 1 in the 2nd round and a TE.   Late round WR's may have a ceiling of Johnson or Pascal.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pgt_rob said:

Good depth signing I suppose. He's an undrafted WR that caught 17 balls for 277 yards last season. 

Ya Chester Rogers territory.

Just now, Myles said:

I think I'd prefer 1 in the 2nd round and a TE.   Late round WR's may have a ceiling of Johnson or Pascal.  

Pascal has a far higher ceiling than Johnson.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

2 minutes ago, jameszeigler834 said:

Ya Chester Rogers territory.

Pascal has a far higher ceiling than Johnson.

I can't argue that.  I don't think the gap is too big though.   My point is that I don't want to see the Colts draft a WR in the 5th-7th round.   Unless of course someone with great potential is there.  I wouldn't want to see them draft a comparable player to compete with Johnson, Pascal and Fountain.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, DougDew said:

 

I'm not sure that even the Rivers signing will impact our QB draft strategy beyond what we would normally do with the 34th pick and beyond.

I'll go 1 step further...  when you draft a QB in the 1st you expect him to play right away.  We traded out of the 1st...  qb taken in the 2nd and beyond, can learn from a vet for a year or 2.  we signed a vet with a year or 2 left in the tank.  Might be a guy we really like in the 2nd round but my money is on us taking someone like Jalen Hurts in the 3rd to sit behind rivers for a couple years then take over.  

Either rivers is solid and a qb can sit behind him, or he sucks and we tank the year for Lawrence

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...