-
Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
By MikeCurtis · Posted
Thanks for posting The board up to 21, could very well play out like that IMHO, I think Cosmi may be a little early, but he is one of the few that could start day one at LT I think with the top LTs off the board, per your draft list , CB trades the pick to someone later in round 1 or early round 2 (Cosmi may still be on the board) Thanks again -
Because he doesn't have to actually commit a crime in order to execute the same hostage-taking criminal mentality. Trying to acquire a trendy weapon by claiming HOU had flawed hiring practices because they did not interview Eric Bienemy. Its slander. Its the same person at the soul, whether its a multimillionaire or a common street criminal. Using more sophisticated weapons doesn't change the mind of a low life. His defenders are trying to make his stupid statement disappear by bringing up stuff he never talked about. Because they know it was stupid and a huge overreach.....but they can't admit that directly. LOL.
-
The more I watch players in this draft the more I like the players in that range. Darrisaw, Paye, Rousseau, Bateman. Jaycee Horn is my new favorite and I would absolutely take him at 21 if he's there. I think he will be a steal there. I'm always up for a trade down too... I think we are in a good position overall.
-
By MikeCurtis · Posted
IMHO, they have a player or 2 that they think may fall to 21 My hope is (and maybe the Colts) Darrisaw is there parked at 21, if not then Paye DE from Michigan Both are day 1 starters and may just be BPA (or close) at 21 My belief is that both will be gone by 21. I just dont see Ballard using that pick to trade up. (Maybe I will be wrong) If the player in mind is gone, (whether its my pick or not) I see a trade happening A trade to an early 2nd round (or later 1st) pick may still yield a starting OT -
By EastStreet · Posted
Well, if he believed it then, he's probably back down to reality now. Not saying Pittman is bad at all, but he has a lot to work on. I really like him and think he'll take a big step forward. Even so though, just not sure I want an X as a #1. Not sure it would be pretty if Pittman was drawing the doubles. I prefer a more dynamic #1. Campbell, if he can stay healthy, might be that guy. If not, need a new Z or Z/slot type.
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now