Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

[Pelissero] Colts re-sign OL Le'Raven Clark


Recommended Posts

So the guy that is always inactive is re-signed over the guy that plays all five positions on the line. I don't get this 

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, CR91 said:

So the guy that is always inactive is re-signed over the guy that plays all five positions on the line. I don't get this 

 

I am thinking Haeg figured that he would never start here and wanted someplace where he had the chance to compete for a starting job.  

 

I think Clark was more happy accepting a backup role.  

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

how much?

 

1 year - 2.3 Mil

 

Something we could easily have afforded.  But I don't think this was a question of Ballard deciding not to offer the contract.  I think it was an issue of Haeg wanting to go someplace and compete to start.  

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

I am thinking Haeg figured that he would never start here and wanted someplace where he had the chance to compete for a starting job.  

 

I think Clark was more happy accepting a backup role.  

 

I get that, but imo we lost a more valuable part to the line to a very cheap deal

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

I get that, but imo we lost a more valuable part to the line to a very cheap deal

 

Yes but nothing you can do if he doesn't want to sign here because his role would always be "backup".

 

Now if Ballard came out and said that he just didn't want Haeg back and liked Clark better I would be wondering what he was thinking.  But Ballard can't promise a starting job that doesn't exist to Haeg.  

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, CR91 said:

So the guy that is always inactive is re-signed over the guy that plays all five positions on the line. I don't get this 

 

 You could only have 2 active OL on game day. Do you Get That? Obviously you don't.
  Haeg was our 3rd string center. And not very good at anything else.
   With the expanded roster i expect 8 will dress most game days now.
   I'm raven for LRaven. He is a better LT than Haeg BTW.
   We still need a solid backup C/G. A good T/G. And the draft will get us a solid T/G. 

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

1 year - 2.3 Mil

 

Something we could easily have afforded.  But I don't think this was a question of Ballard deciding not to offer the contract.  I think it was an issue of Haeg wanting to go someplace and compete to start.  

Thanks, and I agree. I wish him well, just wish he was here. He had a lot of flexibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

I am thinking Haeg figured that he would never start here and wanted someplace where he had the chance to compete for a starting job.  

 

I think Clark was more happy accepting a backup role.  

I believe there is a lot of truth in this.  Haeg is a capable starter.  He'll get that chance in Tampa.  Clark is a good play but, nothing more than a fill in/backup.  I hate losing Haeg but, it's the nature of the beast.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 You could only have 2 active OL on game day. Do you Get That? Obviously you don't.
  With the expanded roster i expect 8 will dress most game days now.
   I'm raven for LRaven.

 

Expanded roster?  Did they increase the roster size in the new CBA?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 You could only have 2 active OL on game day. Do you Get That? Obviously you don't.
  With the expanded roster i expect 8 will dress most game days now.
   I'm raven for LRaven.

 

Might wanna take it easy with the jack there buddy

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GoColts8818 said:

My only question would be why?

Sometimes the devil you know is better than the devil you don't. We know what he gives us...and taking a chance on a backup of his level in FA...very very suspect what you will get.

 

As for why him over Haeg. Haeg took less money on a 1 yr deal for a better chance to start and earn a bigger payday next season. It isn't like we didn't want him back.

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, CR91 said:

So the guy that is always inactive is re-signed over the guy that plays all five positions on the line. I don't get this 

You’re assuming we didn’t make a good enough effort to bring back Haeg.   Remember, not only is Florida without state tax, but Haeg has a good shot at starting there and can add another million in incentives.  Plus, there’s now the whole Brady thing.  
 

Im sure we wanted him back.   TB just a better opportunity. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, dgambill said:

Sometimes the devil you know is better than the devil you don't. We know what he gives us...and taking a chance on a backup of his level in FA...very very suspect what you will get.

 

As for why him over Haeg. Haeg took less money on a 1 yr deal for a better chance to start and earn a bigger payday next season. It isn't like we didn't want him back.

Yeah I get the Haeg situation.  
 

Fair enough Clark.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

You’re assuming we didn’t make a good enough effort to bring back Haeg.   Remember, not only is Florida without state tax, but Haeg has a good shot at starting there and can add another million in incentives.  Plus, there’s now the whole Brady thing.  
 

Im sure we wanted him back.   TB just a better opportunity. 

 

No, there are definitely a lot of good reasons to go to Tampa right now.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

We all wanted Haeg back but there was no way it was happening with him wanting a starting job. There was nothing we could do besides cutting Glow and promoting Haeg to that spot if we wanted to keep him. 
 

Even though Clark didn’t pan out as we’d hoped when we drafted him, he’s still a body, cheap, and has a number of games and seasons under his belt. Plus he does have position flexibility; we have played him at guard. I feel a lot better having him as our backup swing lineman than a bunch of UDFAs and CFL/Arena League no names. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

Yes but nothing you can do if he doesn't want to sign here because his role would always be "backup".

 

Now if Ballard came out and said that he just didn't want Haeg back and liked Clark better I would be wondering what he was thinking.  But Ballard can't promise a starting job that doesn't exist to Haeg.  

 

 

Clark is only better at LT IMO. I also think Ballard likes Haeg better as he has always said he does because of his versatility. I am now a little worried about the guard depth now. Possibility Clark can play some guard? Not sure?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Chaz Green can ever live up to his draft status (91 overall) he can be a help at a Guard spot (he can't play tackle in the NFL), 7 starts over 3 seasons with last year a wasted one. He has been so injury prone but was a stud down here at UF. Patterson should be backup Center if his ACL is healed, dont think any others currently on roster can or will stick. Brandon Hitner is too light in lower body, Andrew Donnel has shown very little,Cedrick Lang the same (At 6'9 just too tall), Travis Vornkahl just too light at under 290.

Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Horse Shoe Heaven said:

Clark is only better at LT IMO. I also think Ballard likes Haeg better as he has always said he does because of his versatility. I am now a little worried about the guard depth now. Possibility Clark can play some guard? Not sure?

I’m glad you pointed out Clark being good at LT. I hope he continues to practice only at that. I’ve said since the start to just keep him there. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CR91 said:

So the guy that is always inactive is re-signed over the guy that plays all five positions on the line. I don't get this 

 

Haeg wants to play, that's obvious.  He's got a shot at being a starter for a team which just got Brady and has a LOT of talent.  The OL coach in Tampa Bay is Joe Gilbert, who was the assistant OL coach in Indy when during Haeg's first two seasons.  Could be plenty of reasons why he found Tampa Bay more attractive than Indy.  

 

1 hour ago, stitches said:

Yep... and not even for tons of money. 

 

Rumor has it (The Pat McAfee Show is my main source) that a lot of FA players right now are letting Tampa Bay know they'd sign there for cheaper than elsewhere since they signed Brady.  $2.3 mil (potentially $3.3 mil) in one year is a ton of money to most people.  A chance to be a starter on a team w/ Brady as QB vs. a bench warmer with Rivers as QB may not be worth an additional $500k if the individual's goal is to play and win a Superbowl in 1 year.

 

1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

I get that, but imo we lost a more valuable part to the line to a very cheap deal

 

The cheap deal (as explained above) could have been Haeg's choosing for a variety of reasons.  I doubt Ballard told him he was not valued for the Colts.

 

Also, Ballard/Reich want to be a top 5 running team.  We've built our line with very powerful guys who are road graders.  While I greatly appreciate the value Haeg had to this team, his biggest knock has always been his lack of ability to develop his strength.  TBH, he's probably a better fit in the O that Arians and Leftwich are running in TB (especially to be counted on as a full-time starter).  IMO, Haeg is a more effective pass protector than run blocker.  We know Arians likes to air it out and I'm sure with the addition of Brady, they'll be a pass-first team.

 

Clark played well when he had to replace Costanzo.  It was well known he was a project pick with good physical tools.  In some ways, he fits more of the philosophy of Reich/Ballard.  I believe Clark can play both T positions and probably G if the team absolutely needed it.  

 

I, personally, think Clark is still a work in progress... but the coaching staff must see that he's making enough progress that they brought him back.  Haeg, I'm pretty sure we saw his ceiling.

 

Granted he's going into his 5th season, so it should be time for him to really be ready as a pro.. but this is from Clark's nfl.com draft profile:

"

SOURCES TELL US

 "He's going to end up being big time in our league. He's got elite foot quickness, he's long and he's smart. He'll keep getting better once he gets to a pro offense and away from that stuff Texas Tech does and he'll become one of the top five tackles in our league." -- NFC personnel director"

 

Here's an excerpt from Haeg's:

"BOTTOM LINE

 While the pedigree and the body type look the part, continued tape study begins to uncover core strength issues that permeate several facets of his game. As a run blocker, his inability to drive and sustain blocks is a concern while his pass protection shows a good, initial pass set that turns into leaning to make up for his lack of anchor. While Haeg has the athletic traits of a zone blocking tackle, it won't matter without better functional power."

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watson started this recent public trade thing by stating that the organization has flawed hiring practices.  And I think he never debunked the idea that the current owner was a lot like his father, simply because he is his son.   Its not really about the next season or even the team's won loss record over the next three years.  Its bigger than that.  I think it would be smarter to not accommodate whiners, and in a legal manner, not set the precedent of accommodating someone who conducts detrimental actions that undermines the new coach and the authority structure of the organization.   If you accommodate Watson, you set the precedent that all whiners need to be accommodated or else you end up singling some out for disparate treatment.  This shows what a cancer players like Watson are to an entire organization.    And, I would think a player like that has limited trade value, despite the rumors.  I would  simply move on from him....forget he even exists...would be the less time consuming and smarter move.  If he wants to sit out, fine, but I'm drafting this spring with the idea that he's going to try to put me at a disadvantage and wait until after FA and the draft before he tells me he wont play next year.   There is some root of the problem that has yet to be revealed.   If its about making bad personnel decisions, resulting in a losing record, I get that....but the HC, OBrien who was responsible for those moves was fired months ago.  Seems like Watson and Watt are still holding some kind of grudge over something, or simply launching their marketing brand by grandstanding.   If I were the GM, I'd just ignore Watson until he apologized for those statements instead of honoring his wishes, and then if the team struggles, show to the whole world what people like that can do to a team, blame the teams failure's over a whiner sitting out the season too arrogant and stubborn to apologize for something he should not have said in the first place.       
    • The 2006 team was the greatest and it is not even a debate. They went 10-0 at home including the playoffs, 16-4 overall, and most importantly won the SB = they finished. The 2005 team during the regular season beat teams by a wider margin but lost in the divisional round. That team did not have Adam Vinatieri either, the 2006 team did. In 2006 we seen the best of Bob Sanders in the playoffs and we went through Ray Lewis/Ed Reed/Steve McNair at Baltimore, and beat Tom Brady and Bill Belichick in the AFC Title Game. Also in respect to the 2009 team, that team didn't have Vinatieri either, nor did it have Marvin Harrison or Bob Sanders, Dungy wasn't the Coach as well. It is 2006 hands down.
    • Probably 2005, that  team was loaded and then played a tragically bad game to the sixth seeded Steelers in the playoffs.    
    • In addition to some of the examples from @stitches:   - Was your offense restricted last season by having a less mobile QB? If so, in what ways? - Your offense was bottom third in play action attempts last season. Can you talk about how play action fits in your offense, and how it might be affected by the physical ability of the QB? - Your defense had some really good stretches, but was less effective against good QBing. (Example, short clock but long TD drives against the Bills/Packers, etc.) What will it take for the defense to take another step forward this season? - What will be Press Taylor's role on the staff? Will that differ from his role in Philly? - You went from a RB coach with decades of experience, to one who hasn't played or directly coached RBs so far. What went into that decision and what kind of impact might it have on the RB group? - At what positions do you think you most need improved playmaking? - How do you think the limited college season, no Combine, and restricted travel might impact prospect evaluation? - To what extent, if any, do you think being the primary play caller impacts your game management and decision making? - Do you still have weekly protection meetings like you did in 2018? How might those be impacted by the changes on the coaching staff?   Just saying, there's a lot of meat out there. Don't have to keep gnawing at the same bone.   Imagine this group trying to cover Gregg Popovich...
    • In your opinion what team was the best Colts team ever?
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...