Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Would Belichick Tank The Pats To Draft Trevor Lawrence In 2021?


Recommended Posts

Would you question the Pats & Belichick to manipulate their play to get Trevor Lawrence? I know that sounds outlandish but with the history of the Patriots it might not be. Who they choose to fill in for Brady may be an indication. Certainly if they start off losing games you know that question will come up. That's what the media does.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, King Colt said:

Would you question the Pats & Belichick to manipulate their play to get Trevor Lawrence? I know that sounds outlandish but with the history of the Patriots it might not be. Who they choose to fill in for Brady may be an indication. Certainly if they start off losing games you know that question will come up. That's what the media does.

Perhaps! But if Lawrence decides to stay his senior year it would completely screw their plan. Wouldn’t that be interesting...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Belichick will win even with Andy Dalton. His top notch  defense won so many games in the division and outside last year. Just give him an above average QB like Dalton and he can win the AFC East. HFA is another question. 
 

Don’t be surprised if Stidham and the Patriots win the AFC East again, driving a knife into everyone hoping for the Patriots demise.

 

That team is talented enough to win 8 games without Brady, IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under the impression the Pats enjoyed picking late in the 1st, or trading back into the 2nd, since it saves money, and Belichick is a tight wad. Even in his contract negotiations with Brady, from what I read, it came down to money; Belichick wanted Brady to play for less money than last season, so Brady walked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt they would have the #1 pick but anything could happen. Having a top defense is enough to get you to win a few games. Losing Brady and plugging in someone else, they should be okay to win but probably not Super Bowl again.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/20/2020 at 4:19 AM, crazycolt1 said:

Tanking is for losers with loser mentality. 

Like him or not Belichick does not have a loser mentality.

That's subjective and short-sighted. 

 

If you want to win long-term and ensure future success, you tank one year, get the best QB prospect since Luck, and win for another decade....doesn't seem like a loser mentality to me.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's hard to see Belichick tanking.  

 

Somehow I think he's going to trade a 5th round pick for Deshaun Watson.  And Bill O'Brian is going to give it to him because he's Bill O'Brian.

 

Watson will be good for another 4 Belichick SB's minimum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No.   The most competitive coach in NFL history is not going to tank.  
 

They’ll either go with Stidham, who reports say they really like, or they’ll trade for someone like Dalton and keep wining.   They may not win 13 games, but they would likely win 9-10 games. 
 

No tanking in their future....

Link to post
Share on other sites

NFL teams have tanked for QBs

 

if you dont believe that then watch the buccaneers last game of the 2014 season and get back to me.

 

i cant imagine BB doing it now though, hes too old to burn a season like that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No.  Rivers isn't a game manager like Grossman, he's much better than that. Our OL is better than Chicago's 2006 OL was, but we don't really know we're a 'run first' team right now.  We threw 46 times in week 1, and were certainly a pass first team in at least 1/3 of our games so far.   Yes, we do have an old WR (TY) and some young WRs (though our top 2 are hurt in Pittman and Campbell).     Yes, we do have a solid front 7 (Okereke is the only one who has worried me much so far, and I think we'll get even better should Turay come back).  Hopefully our DBs can keep taking the ball away, but we had 0 picks in game 1... so I'm skeptical about saying we're going to be consistent in doing that (especially considering Cousins had a very bad game and the Jets stink).     We're missing the best returner in NFL history (Hester), though I think Dulin/Rodgers/Hines have potential to be good - I highly doubt any of them are going to be close to Hester.     In short, it's way too early in the season to compare us to any other team from the past... our D was awful in week 1, it's looked good since but against the Jets (arguably worst team in NFL) and the Vikes who definitely had an off day.  Frankly, I think we have potential to be significantly better than the 2006 Bears (regardless of if we make the SB or not), but this is a totally different NFL than it was 14 years ago.
    • Yup, like I said, wish we used the speed like they did. Just not that. The way they attack the edges is awesome. It really opens up the middle. 
    • I'd change that to highly coveted UDFA :-) Total project, but yes, very interesting.  I remember a bit about him now from the draft. I need to do some more digging. I know small school, etc., but that's all I can recall. Ah. Makes sense. Thank you my friend.
    • @danlhart87 @EastStreet @stitches@Myles @chad72 @2006Coltsbestever I wish we ran a set like this with TY, Campbell, and Hines stacked up like the Chiefs did. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...