Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

I was going through scouting today, looking at names and watching some tape, and I had a crazy idea. We just traded for Deforest Buckner, a massive DT who puts fear into the opposing offense. He is coming in to fill our void at 3-tech, but we still have a need at the 1-tech, a guy who can stuff the run as well as anyone while also capable of generating some pressure. One name came to me:

 

Raekwon Davis

 

Just imagine it, two 6'7", 300+ lb monsters staring down the QB on every single possession at the line. Though underdeveloped as a pass rusher, Davis is a dominant force in the ground game and has the tools to generate pressure when asked. He should be available with one of our second round picks, and would solidify our front for the foreseeable future. 

 

Just think about how terrified the opposing O-line would be when these two freaks of nature lined up next to each other on the field. I'm salivating just with the thought of it...

 

What say you, Colts Nation??? Would you like to pair these towering monsters together?? Or is it a no go??

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, WarGhost21 said:

I was going through scouting today, looking at names and watching some tape, and I had a crazy idea. We just traded for Deforest Buckner, a massive DT who puts fear into the opposing offense. He is coming in to fill our void at 3-tech, but we still have a need at the 1-tech, a guy who can stuff the run as well as anyone while also capable of generating some pressure. One name came to me:

 

Raekwon Davis

 

Just imagine it, two 6'7", 300+ lb monsters staring down the QB on every single possession at the line. Though underdeveloped as a pass rusher, Davis is a dominant force in the ground game and has the tools to generate pressure when asked. He should be available with one of our second round picks, and would solidify our front for the foreseeable future. 

 

Just think about how terrified the opposing O-line would be when these two freaks of nature lined up next to each other on the field. I'm salivating just with the thought of it...

 

What say you, Colts Nation??? Would you like to pair these towering monsters together?? Or is it a no go??

 

 And yet he is not good against the run correct? And Buckner graded just above average. The height Problem for leverage?
So NO.

Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, WarGhost21 said:

I was going through scouting today, looking at names and watching some tape, and I had a crazy idea. We just traded for Deforest Buckner, a massive DT who puts fear into the opposing offense. He is coming in to fill our void at 3-tech, but we still have a need at the 1-tech, a guy who can stuff the run as well as anyone while also capable of generating some pressure. One name came to me:

 

Raekwon Davis

 

Just imagine it, two 6'7", 300+ lb monsters staring down the QB on every single possession at the line. Though underdeveloped as a pass rusher, Davis is a dominant force in the ground game and has the tools to generate pressure when asked. He should be available with one of our second round picks, and would solidify our front for the foreseeable future. 

 

Just think about how terrified the opposing O-line would be when these two freaks of nature lined up next to each other on the field. I'm salivating just with the thought of it...

 

What say you, Colts Nation??? Would you like to pair these towering monsters together?? Or is it a no go??

 

Stewart is our 1-tech. For depth, I like Rashard Lawrence of LSU for our 4-3 NT, should be there in Round 4.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the quality of this draft works against Davis.  If you're sitting there at 44 and considering him over some of the players who will be in that group it's hard to choose him.  It will surprise me if he doesn't fall quite a bit, maybe to end of round 2.

 

But I like his measurables too.  They'll keep him from falling too far.

Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 And yet he is not good against the run correct? And Buckner graded just above average. The height Problem for leverage?
So NO.

On the contrary, Davis is a beast against the run. His huge wingspan helps him to plug up gaps, and his hands are very strong when he does get a hold on the runner. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, chad72 said:

Damon Snacks Harrison is still available. If he is there after week 1 of free agency, see if we can get him on a 1 or 2 yr. deal. 

Snacks and Buckner would be great.


For prospects, I like Davon Hamilton out of Ohio State too.... I mocked him to us in Round 4.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pacolts56 said:

Snacks and Buckner would be great.


For prospects, I like Davon Hamilton out of Ohio State too.... I mocked him to us in Round 4.

I've mocked Hamilton to a us a few times too. He's insane in the run game and add some solid pass rush ability as he develops.

 

I also like Benito Jones for that 1T role. Dude is a fire hydrant and a great run defender, but not much pass rush ability.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, pacolts56 said:

Snacks and Buckner would be great.


For prospects, I like Davon Hamilton out of Ohio State too.... I mocked him to us in Round 4.

Absolutely  not. Iur track record  with ohio state players  and injuries  is bad

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, WarGhost21 said:

I was going through scouting today, looking at names and watching some tape, and I had a crazy idea. We just traded for Deforest Buckner, a massive DT who puts fear into the opposing offense. He is coming in to fill our void at 3-tech, but we still have a need at the 1-tech, a guy who can stuff the run as well as anyone while also capable of generating some pressure. One name came to me:

 

Raekwon Davis

 

Just imagine it, two 6'7", 300+ lb monsters staring down the QB on every single possession at the line. Though underdeveloped as a pass rusher, Davis is a dominant force in the ground game and has the tools to generate pressure when asked. He should be available with one of our second round picks, and would solidify our front for the foreseeable future. 

 

Just think about how terrified the opposing O-line would be when these two freaks of nature lined up next to each other on the field. I'm salivating just with the thought of it...

 

What say you, Colts Nation??? Would you like to pair these towering monsters together?? Or is it a no go??

Pass we still have Grover Stewart and Denico Autry. Those second round picks IMO need to go to a WR and CB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thought of another 6'6 DT is intriguing but there is a reason why Raekwon Davis is a projected day 2 pick instead of day 1.

 

He is a senior, played for a top program in the top conference, has all of the measurable you could want. 

 

However, as already brought up in this thread, there are maturity/work ethic concerns.

 

I'm not going to say that measurable don't matter because they certainly do. I wouldn't allow the unusual measurable of Raekwon to make me ignore his flaws though. Lots of good defensive line prospects in this draft. Might not be as big as Raekwon but they are big enough and likely better prospects.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, ar7 said:

The thought of another 6'6 DT is intriguing but there is a reason why Raekwon Davis is a projected day 2 pick instead of day 1.

 

He is a senior, played for a top program in the top conference, has all of the measurable you could want. 

 

However, as already brought up in this thread, there are maturity/work ethic concerns.

 

I'm not going to say that measurable don't matter because they certainly do. I wouldn't allow the unusual measurable of Raekwon to make me ignore his flaws though. Lots of good defensive line prospects in this draft. Might not be as big as Raekwon but they are big enough and likely better prospects.

I don't understand, the team should only draft projected 1st rounders in all rounds?

 

Of course there is a reason why he is projected as a day 2 pick but that is where the OP is suggesting the Colts pick him.  If he was a project first round pick then nobody would be talking about picking him up in the 2nd or 3rd round.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, WifiGuy said:

Suh is available too I believe

I agree. Look at the year AD had with the rams when Suh was there. TB was a top Rush D with Suh. Nice short term move. We could get him with the money we save by cutting JB maybe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see the appeal of Stewart as anything other than a rotational or injury backup.  He may have stood out as the best player on the interior dline, but that simply speaks to how bad the other players are, IMO.  Ballard targeted the dline for comments, and IIRC, he never singled out any player for being particularly bad....or good...in even a subtle way.  He would never throw anybody under the bus, but I don't recall him ever mentioning a DT in any press conference when he was talking about positives on the team.

 

Raekwon Davis would be an upgrade to our current 1T, IMO, and should be considered wherever value that would be.  We need him as much as any team does, so if he grades out at pick 44, that should be a good value pick for us as much as any team.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Coffeedrinker said:

I don't understand, the team should only draft projected 1st rounders in all rounds?

 

Of course there is a reason why he is projected as a day 2 pick but that is where the OP is suggesting the Colts pick him.  If he was a project first round pick then nobody would be talking about picking him up in the 2nd or 3rd round.

 

If a player's work ethic/character prevents the Colts from wanting to draft them in the first round then it's unlikely they draft them later on. Ballard has said something along these lines in the past.

 

Guys with maturity/character concerns still go in the first round. Yet, Davis isn't projected as a first round pick despite his background (playing in the SEC, at Alabama) and measurable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked it a lot, but I found that baseball purists did not like it as much. Even though the Yankees beat the Mets most of the time, most of the games were competitive and the games the Mets won brought good memories.   I recall where I was when this happened. (I get chills. ) I remember walking in the street and I jumped up when utility man Matt Franco got this walk-off hit off Mariano Rivera at the bottom of the 9th. My eyes glanced at a man sitting in his car, who screamed at the same time. It was rare for Mariano to blow a save. This was around 1996 or so.     Listen to that great call. I love it!   That was one of my favorite Mets teams.   
    • Again in terms of projecting values out, this all depends on how we see Braden Smith valued.    I said to go high at $10M a year based on a few things:   1) If you asked many people is Braden Smith a top-5 RT, most would say no. I think he is. either way a top-5 RT slots in at an AAV of $10M a year right now   2) Most of the guys getting top $ at RT got that top dollar by getting it on the open market. Lane Johnson is the exception. However, the Eagles gave him that extension when there was originally talk about him moving to LT as Peters aged. The guys that signed extensions with their current teams got $10M a year or less.    3) This is to say I think Smith can totally get over $10M a year if he hits the open market and wants to test the waters. However, if the Colts looked to extend him now and give him financial security as a 2nd round pick that has not made much money yet in his career and did so in a year where the cap came down and a lot of players are going to take less money if they are not a superstar, I think him signing a deal averaging $10M a year would be a win for him and the Colts     At the end of the day, my entire point of this thread was to simply point out that us investing $50-$55M in a starting OL out of a future cap of around $200-$220M is very, very doable and arguably reasonable in terms of how Ballard likes to build through the trenches. Having an OL tie up 25% of your cap and a combined OL and QB tie up less than 40% of your cap for the next 3-4 years is actually very, very reasonable.   I have admittedly been a big advocate for Trent Williams. He is aging, sure. But he has shown no signs at all of slipping. And he even has one less year of wear and tear on his body from sitting out a year with the whole tumor fiasco where Washington really didn't do right by him with their medical team. So would I throw a 4 year deal at him with big money where the only guaranteed money was paid out in the first two years and then there were salaries on the back end that can easily allow a cut if the performance dips? Absolutely.   Either way, this was really to just get our base chatting about all this since the canned narrative everyone is spitting out is the same narrative that is being fed to fans from the media that says "they'll have too much tied up in their OL with the extension for Kelly and the upcoming extensions for Nelson and Smith." I'm just saying if we managed things the way guys like Mike Bluem have been, then we can comfortably invest in a top FA  LT if we wanted to without it being overly painful downstream. 
    • I personally do not like the idea of trying to come up with a stop gap or developmental guy at the most inportant position on the OL. Solidify that position with a dependable proven LT whether it  Villanueva or someone else. Same with DE. Find a proven pass rusher and pay him. Use the draft or WR, CB and solidifying other positions including OL. I think we are very close to being in  SB contention and 3 to 4 good players may push us over the top. We can't foolishly throw money at these guys but if we are prudent we have plenty of money to carry us.
    • Yeah, my little voice partly thinks the same (perhaps contract year type of performance). I just hate saying it out loud, as he was considered very very raw when drafted. He was used all over the place at USC, and relied way too much on his natural gifts instead of technique. Maybe he was a bit lazy, but it's also possible he was just raw, wasn't able to focus, and things are just now clicking. Or maybe he was lazy a bit, and finally grew up or matured enough to commit to his craft.    He's an interesting guy to follow. I could see it falling either way. I remember his recruiting out of HS (think he was out of Mainland) Thought for sure he'd end up at FSU, UF, or Auburn. My FSU and Auburn buds thought he was a lock lol. One of my FSU buds swore USC bought him a car lol. I was hoping ND would offer, but rumor was, he didn't have close to the grades needed.    
    • Hmmm I watched the show on  prime (all episodes) And Although I haven't seen many of the games from last year I found him to be pretty damn good and a very nice guy. I mean I wasn't a huge fan before but I think we got a winner at Qb and im looking forward to watching all year. Watch the show on prime  its worth the watch
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...