Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Should Highly Consider Signing Jadeveon Clowney on a Short-Term Deal


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Dont care what you say, no one does a game plan and says "We aint worried about Clowney". No matter how over rated one thinks he is

On a one year deal?   With money we can afford?      And not have to cut players we really want to keep to do it?   Yes,  I'd do that....     for one year,  I see far more upside t

To me that reads that the Titans want to bring back Ryan if they can’t sign Clowney. Not that Clowney wants them to sign Ryan before he will sign. Am I reading it wrong?

Posted Images

12 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Don't you think Ballard has figured that all out?  That is his job.  I think he has a plan. 

Yes I think he has it covered. 

He shot Clowney a number. It's in Clowneys yard now. 

IMO it would be nice to sign Clowney but will it cost too much. I highly doubt I am the only one who had that thought. I agree it might be time to swing for the fence, who knows? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it takes another week or two of limited contact before Clowney realizes his value is far lower than he thinks. I’m not sure if teams leave it alone but Ballard could sit and wait with a 15mil/year offer. Maybe just a 1 or 2 year deal when it’s all done. I think this is what teams are looking at for him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, DaColts85 said:

I think it takes another week or two of limited contact before Clowney realizes his value is far lower than he thinks. I’m not sure if teams leave it alone but Ballard could sit and wait with a 15mil/year offer. Maybe just a 1 or 2 year deal when it’s all done. I think this is what teams are looking at for him. 

He’s been overrated since he was drafted really. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, krunk said:

Dont care what you say, no one does a game plan and says "We aint worried about Clowney". No matter how over rated one thinks he is

If the Colts didn't have anyone else on the DLine to account for I could see them passing on him. But now they have TWO players that have to be accounted for. This would free things up for Clowney to have many one on ones.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, krunk said:

Dont care what you say, no one does a game plan and says "We aint worried about Clowney". No matter how over rated one thinks he is

 

Well, he IS overrated based on his draft hype, but that doesn't mean he's totally ineffective.

He DOES need to be accounted for, but it seems teams manage to handle it for the most part.

It is also true that, due to our present talent, it could free him up to be more effective, and in turn allows them all to be more effective.

 

I do have to say, thought, that it appears the most effective game plan against Clowney is a hard count on 3rd and 5 or less. He's seemingly quite the sucker for it.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, buccolts said:

 

Well, he IS overrated based on his draft hype, but that doesn't mean he's totally ineffective.

He DOES need to be accounted for, but it seems teams manage to handle it for the most part.

It is also true that, due to our present talent, it could free him up to be more effective, and in turn allows them all to be more effective.

 

I do have to say, thought, that it appears the most effective game plan against Clowney is a hard count on 3rd and 5 or less. He's seemingly quite the sucker for it.

I hate when he jumps offsides. Yes!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, PeterBowman said:

Yeah not sure how legit he is but the moves the Colts have made do point to something brewing.

 

Yea, but you think we would have heard something by now

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the deal is reasonable, in terms of money or us getting rid of him after a bad year I'm all on board. Houston, Buckner and Clowney on the dline would have me SUPER EXCITED. 

Would benefit Okereke and Leonard as well, not to mention the back end.

 

I understand why people don't like Clowney, he hasn't lived up to the massive expectations he came into the league with. Same as Luck, kinda. But make no mistake, Clowney is a really really solid player, probably the best edge player against the run and he does disrupt a lot. I say we give this a chance while we have the cap.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, csmopar said:

He’s been overrated since he was drafted really. 

I completely agree. That being said, on a short reasonably priced deal I would like to see him add to our d-line. Could become scary good. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, CR91 said:

 Not sure how legit it is, but he does have 2000 followers

The Seahawks and Giants are both really up against the cap.  So this is getting interesting.  I also read a report where the Seahawks were also taking a look at Griffin as a fall back.   It certainly looks like the Colts are not making any more moves until they know here he signs.  JMO.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

The Seahawks and Giants are both really up against the cap.  So this is getting interesting.  I also read a report where the Seahawks were also taking a look at Griffin as a fall back.   It certainly looks like the Colts are not making any more moves until they know here he signs.  JMO.

Sounds like it

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, krunk said:

Dont care what you say, no one does a game plan and says "We aint worried about Clowney". No matter how over rated one thinks he is


Exactly...would love to have him at DE.

 

To prove your point...here is a quote from our own Frank Reich before the IND/HOU WC game:

 

"Some teams have a philosophy of stop the run on your way to rushing the quarterback: penetrate, penetrate, penetrate, and then stop the run through causing disruption," Colts coach Frank Reich said. "Players like Clowney can do that. He's very disruptive.

 

"He's a playmaker and can do it from outside, can do it from inside and you have to account for him no matter where he lines up."

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PeterBowman said:

Just saw a blurb on NFL Network with Ian Rapoport. He was saying Clowney won't mind waiting until the right deal. Sounds like this could go on a little bit.

The flip side is the teams he's talking to might lose patience and move on.  Reportedly the Titans have dropped out.  He might not get the deal he wants but he should get a nice deal regardless.  It appears there are only a few teams that want him who can afford to pay him a good contract.  If I were him I would make a decision sooner rather than later before those teams make a decision he won't like.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, shastamasta said:


Exactly...would love to have him at DE.

 

To prove your point...here is a quote from our own Frank Reich before the IND/HOU WC game:

 

"Some teams have a philosophy of stop the run on your way to rushing the quarterback: penetrate, penetrate, penetrate, and then stop the run through causing disruption," Colts coach Frank Reich said. "Players like Clowney can do that. He's very disruptive.

 

"He's a playmaker and can do it from outside, can do it from inside and you have to account for him no matter where he lines up."

I hope it happens as well. I prefer him over Everson Griffin due to age, premium size and length, as well as him being very good against the run. We need somebody who can play the run as well as rush the passer. Our division is full of teams that like to run. Some of the top rushing teams in the league.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, CR91 said:

 Not sure how legit it is, but he does have 2000 followers

Ive followed Dan for awhile. He’s a big Colts fan. Just think speculation here. He doesn’t have inside sources....to my knowledge anyways.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, krunk said:

I hope it happens as well. I prefer him over Everson Griffin due to age, premium size and length, as well as him being very good against the run. We need somebody who can play the run as well as rush the passer. Our division is full of teams that like to run. Some of the top rushing teams in the league.

What about that markus guy from the giants? Believe  he had over 10 sacks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, krunk said:

I dont know if hes a target and havent looked to be honest

Markus golden had ten sacks and is 29. Doesnt  look like giants plan to resign him either. He may be an option  if clowney doesn't  sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the rumors on this link are true, I’d be tempted to put a timeline on my offer

 

Here is the best $ we can offer...... 

 

If we aren’t the fit today....... we aren’t the fit tomorrow 

 

by the end of the week...... let us know....

 

Dial Marcus Golden......

 

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

If the rumors on this link are true, I’d be tempted to put a timeline on my offer

 

Here is the best $ we can offer...... 

 

If we aren’t the fit today....... we aren’t the fit tomorrow 

 

by the end of the week...... let us know....

 

Dial Marcus Golden......

 

 

 

 

For me the end of the week is very generous.  This has been going on for quite some time now.  I would give him until 6PM today or we are done.  Time to settle this once and for all. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, richard pallo said:

For me the end of the week is very generous.  This has been going on for quite some time now.  I would give him until 6PM today or we are done.  Time to settle this once and for all. 

You may be right....  But.... I used to give people time to make a decision if they were moving themselves and family if applicable for employ at companies I worked with....

 

think it through......  be part of the Colts..... or not

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MikeCurtis said:

You may be right....  But.... I used to give people time to make a decision if they were moving themselves and family if applicable for employ at companies I worked with....

 

think it through......  be part of the Colts..... or not

 

 

 

To be fair...it's only been 6 days since the start of FA. Last year, Houston signed on the 8th day of FA.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • IMO the point where you had to have that conversation was last year. And it's now too... and it will be the point until long-term QB is addressed. Just... the moment you don't have a long-term QB is the moment you should start looking for one and not stop until you do have one. Now that doesn't mean that there shouldn't be some room for executive decisions and that's why I have not criticized Ballard for not taking a QB high last year.  Agreed. Again... I give some leeway to Ballard about his QB decisions, he likes whoever he likes and I would rather him draft any other position player that he likes, rather than a QB he doesn't like. But, with every passing FA/trade/draft window, the QB question will continue to become bigger and bigger. If we don't get our long-term QB this off-season it will be 3 years and drafts since Luck's retirement that he will be have the chance to address it. This is not ideal. We are threading water in the meantime. At some point unwillingness to take a shot over a long period of time becomes indecision and inability rather than patience. 
    • Agreed....   at some point.    Where there will be wide disagreement is...   when the point is?    We have a prominent poster who complained back in late November-early December that Ballard had yet to address fixing the long-term QB situation.   And he was exasperated over that.   I noted that Luck had only been retired for roughly 15 months and Ballard has had exactly one free agent window and one draft. That’s it.   I’m re-telling this story not to give that poster a hard time, but simply to say to others here, just be patient.  Hasn’t Ballard earned a high level of trust here?   I think so.   I trust that when Ballard finds a QB he likes, he’ll pull the trigger. 
    • Yeah it is expensive and I'm generally against trading up in the draft, and I'm much more a fan of trading down, but as I've said before there is one exception for that rule. It's the QB. Like with many things QBs tilt the conversation on its head. Just the value if you hit is SO BIG, that you have to do it if you get the chance(and you love the QB sitting there of course). There is practically no bad trade value if you trade up for a QB and he hits.    Also, about the hit rates of QBs. my opinion is that it's not just about the QB and his talent/drive/determination/work ethic. The environment, teammates, coaching, etc. play a big role in whether they succeed or fail. There are very few Andrew Lucks who will succeed no matter what garbage you throw at them(and he was thrown into one of the biggest piles of garbage in the league when it comes to GM-coach combo + the talent around him). For most QBs, even highly drafted, their talent needs to be guided and nurtured in the right direction. And in this line of thoughts - I think some of those QBs could have been successful in another environment and/or with a bit more luck(Darnold/Wentz), while others were probably doomed from the start because of their own failings(Rosen, Trubisky). And here is where I think we actually have somewhat of an advantage. I like our GM and our FO. I like our coach generally(even if I have some playcalling beefs with him). I like our roster and the foundations of our OLine. I think this situation gives better than average chance to a young QB to succeed. It's still no guarantee, but again... at some point you will have to make a move of some sort. We cannot keep rethreading the Rivers' of the world.  At some point Ballard will have to trust his evaluation of a QB he loves and just do what it takes to get him. 
    • Sorry, but no, our window is not closing.   Almost all of Ballard's top players are still on their rookie contracts.   This team is EARLY in it's window.    There is still great opportunity for the Colts.   Your viewpoint is a fan's viewpoint.    It is not the view of how an NFL front office person thinks.   There is still time.   Patience can be your friend.  
  • Members

    • Colt.45

      Colt.45 278

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Architects08

      Architects08 227

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 407

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • WoolMagnet

      WoolMagnet 3,063

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • UKColt13

      UKColt13 155

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Eharv1

      Eharv1 11

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 46

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HungarianColtsFan

      HungarianColtsFan 489

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NannyMcafee

      NannyMcafee 1,622

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 3,942

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...