Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Should Highly Consider Signing Jadeveon Clowney on a Short-Term Deal


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Dont care what you say, no one does a game plan and says "We aint worried about Clowney". No matter how over rated one thinks he is

On a one year deal?   With money we can afford?      And not have to cut players we really want to keep to do it?   Yes,  I'd do that....     for one year,  I see far more upside t

To me that reads that the Titans want to bring back Ryan if they can’t sign Clowney. Not that Clowney wants them to sign Ryan before he will sign. Am I reading it wrong?

Posted Images

12 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

Don't you think Ballard has figured that all out?  That is his job.  I think he has a plan. 

Yes I think he has it covered. 

He shot Clowney a number. It's in Clowneys yard now. 

IMO it would be nice to sign Clowney but will it cost too much. I highly doubt I am the only one who had that thought. I agree it might be time to swing for the fence, who knows? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it takes another week or two of limited contact before Clowney realizes his value is far lower than he thinks. I’m not sure if teams leave it alone but Ballard could sit and wait with a 15mil/year offer. Maybe just a 1 or 2 year deal when it’s all done. I think this is what teams are looking at for him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, DaColts85 said:

I think it takes another week or two of limited contact before Clowney realizes his value is far lower than he thinks. I’m not sure if teams leave it alone but Ballard could sit and wait with a 15mil/year offer. Maybe just a 1 or 2 year deal when it’s all done. I think this is what teams are looking at for him. 

He’s been overrated since he was drafted really. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, krunk said:

Dont care what you say, no one does a game plan and says "We aint worried about Clowney". No matter how over rated one thinks he is

If the Colts didn't have anyone else on the DLine to account for I could see them passing on him. But now they have TWO players that have to be accounted for. This would free things up for Clowney to have many one on ones.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, krunk said:

Dont care what you say, no one does a game plan and says "We aint worried about Clowney". No matter how over rated one thinks he is

 

Well, he IS overrated based on his draft hype, but that doesn't mean he's totally ineffective.

He DOES need to be accounted for, but it seems teams manage to handle it for the most part.

It is also true that, due to our present talent, it could free him up to be more effective, and in turn allows them all to be more effective.

 

I do have to say, thought, that it appears the most effective game plan against Clowney is a hard count on 3rd and 5 or less. He's seemingly quite the sucker for it.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, buccolts said:

 

Well, he IS overrated based on his draft hype, but that doesn't mean he's totally ineffective.

He DOES need to be accounted for, but it seems teams manage to handle it for the most part.

It is also true that, due to our present talent, it could free him up to be more effective, and in turn allows them all to be more effective.

 

I do have to say, thought, that it appears the most effective game plan against Clowney is a hard count on 3rd and 5 or less. He's seemingly quite the sucker for it.

I hate when he jumps offsides. Yes!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, PeterBowman said:

Yeah not sure how legit he is but the moves the Colts have made do point to something brewing.

 

Yea, but you think we would have heard something by now

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the deal is reasonable, in terms of money or us getting rid of him after a bad year I'm all on board. Houston, Buckner and Clowney on the dline would have me SUPER EXCITED. 

Would benefit Okereke and Leonard as well, not to mention the back end.

 

I understand why people don't like Clowney, he hasn't lived up to the massive expectations he came into the league with. Same as Luck, kinda. But make no mistake, Clowney is a really really solid player, probably the best edge player against the run and he does disrupt a lot. I say we give this a chance while we have the cap.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, csmopar said:

He’s been overrated since he was drafted really. 

I completely agree. That being said, on a short reasonably priced deal I would like to see him add to our d-line. Could become scary good. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, CR91 said:

 Not sure how legit it is, but he does have 2000 followers

The Seahawks and Giants are both really up against the cap.  So this is getting interesting.  I also read a report where the Seahawks were also taking a look at Griffin as a fall back.   It certainly looks like the Colts are not making any more moves until they know here he signs.  JMO.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

The Seahawks and Giants are both really up against the cap.  So this is getting interesting.  I also read a report where the Seahawks were also taking a look at Griffin as a fall back.   It certainly looks like the Colts are not making any more moves until they know here he signs.  JMO.

Sounds like it

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, krunk said:

Dont care what you say, no one does a game plan and says "We aint worried about Clowney". No matter how over rated one thinks he is


Exactly...would love to have him at DE.

 

To prove your point...here is a quote from our own Frank Reich before the IND/HOU WC game:

 

"Some teams have a philosophy of stop the run on your way to rushing the quarterback: penetrate, penetrate, penetrate, and then stop the run through causing disruption," Colts coach Frank Reich said. "Players like Clowney can do that. He's very disruptive.

 

"He's a playmaker and can do it from outside, can do it from inside and you have to account for him no matter where he lines up."

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PeterBowman said:

Just saw a blurb on NFL Network with Ian Rapoport. He was saying Clowney won't mind waiting until the right deal. Sounds like this could go on a little bit.

The flip side is the teams he's talking to might lose patience and move on.  Reportedly the Titans have dropped out.  He might not get the deal he wants but he should get a nice deal regardless.  It appears there are only a few teams that want him who can afford to pay him a good contract.  If I were him I would make a decision sooner rather than later before those teams make a decision he won't like.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, shastamasta said:


Exactly...would love to have him at DE.

 

To prove your point...here is a quote from our own Frank Reich before the IND/HOU WC game:

 

"Some teams have a philosophy of stop the run on your way to rushing the quarterback: penetrate, penetrate, penetrate, and then stop the run through causing disruption," Colts coach Frank Reich said. "Players like Clowney can do that. He's very disruptive.

 

"He's a playmaker and can do it from outside, can do it from inside and you have to account for him no matter where he lines up."

I hope it happens as well. I prefer him over Everson Griffin due to age, premium size and length, as well as him being very good against the run. We need somebody who can play the run as well as rush the passer. Our division is full of teams that like to run. Some of the top rushing teams in the league.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, CR91 said:

 Not sure how legit it is, but he does have 2000 followers

Ive followed Dan for awhile. He’s a big Colts fan. Just think speculation here. He doesn’t have inside sources....to my knowledge anyways.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, krunk said:

I hope it happens as well. I prefer him over Everson Griffin due to age, premium size and length, as well as him being very good against the run. We need somebody who can play the run as well as rush the passer. Our division is full of teams that like to run. Some of the top rushing teams in the league.

What about that markus guy from the giants? Believe  he had over 10 sacks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, krunk said:

I dont know if hes a target and havent looked to be honest

Markus golden had ten sacks and is 29. Doesnt  look like giants plan to resign him either. He may be an option  if clowney doesn't  sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the rumors on this link are true, I’d be tempted to put a timeline on my offer

 

Here is the best $ we can offer...... 

 

If we aren’t the fit today....... we aren’t the fit tomorrow 

 

by the end of the week...... let us know....

 

Dial Marcus Golden......

 

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MikeCurtis said:

If the rumors on this link are true, I’d be tempted to put a timeline on my offer

 

Here is the best $ we can offer...... 

 

If we aren’t the fit today....... we aren’t the fit tomorrow 

 

by the end of the week...... let us know....

 

Dial Marcus Golden......

 

 

 

 

For me the end of the week is very generous.  This has been going on for quite some time now.  I would give him until 6PM today or we are done.  Time to settle this once and for all. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, richard pallo said:

For me the end of the week is very generous.  This has been going on for quite some time now.  I would give him until 6PM today or we are done.  Time to settle this once and for all. 

You may be right....  But.... I used to give people time to make a decision if they were moving themselves and family if applicable for employ at companies I worked with....

 

think it through......  be part of the Colts..... or not

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MikeCurtis said:

You may be right....  But.... I used to give people time to make a decision if they were moving themselves and family if applicable for employ at companies I worked with....

 

think it through......  be part of the Colts..... or not

 

 

 

To be fair...it's only been 6 days since the start of FA. Last year, Houston signed on the 8th day of FA.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's got his size going against him, but man is he an athletic freak. I'm hoping he has worked to pack some good weight on himself, while at the same time, not losing speed. He's obviously got high value on STs, I just hope he doesn't lose that value while trying to make himself better suited for CB play. While I know he's a total wildcard, still can't help being excited about his potential. 
    • Godwin has had 1 above average to good season in 4 years. In a year where his yardage was inflated and even Jameis Winston threw for 5000yds in Arians deep attack offense. Everything else has been very middle of the pack.   Thanks for helping prove my point on his drops in the biggest moments though. I didn't even go there, so thanks. He does have usually reliable hands though, I will give you that.   And YOU were the one that brought it here, with your "opinions" and statements after the fact, more on that later.   So PFF said Godwin is "probably" more valuable than Q/DL combined? Or was that you?   So PFF said that we should consider trading Q/ or DL for Godwin? Or was that you?   I'm arguing in bad faith? Or is that you? I have delivered nothing but facts here and the only disputed issues are your opinions, that you are trying to push back on PFF now, as theirs and just your interpretation of them.   Then lets back it up a little bit. I already agreed to disagree, tried to bring the conversation back to the graphs, then YOU made 2 more post with statements of the following:   1. Godwin is really good, some people want to act like he is a scrub.   No one said that at all. Another opinion of yours that was off based.   2. Colts fans are blinded by our own guys and players on TBs super bowl winning team don't compare. (This was the see later part). "Nothing new here"   Haeg almost had a TD catch in the SB, if Miller would of even had 1 catch, then he would of had just as much impact on the Super Bowl as Godwin(who essentially had none). So again you were the one to say stars on TB "super bowl winning team", as if it had any relevance.        I wouldn't mind bringing in Godwin as a FA, no where near what he probably expects to get though, or breaking the bank you talked about.   You mean those premium pass catching weapons that TB defense shut down? They were the real "stars" of the Super Bowl. TB defense was great this season.   I guess Mike Evans, Chris Godwin, Tyreke Hill were more valuable than Brady, Barrett, Pierre Paul, Suh, White, David, Davis, Donovan Smith, Wirfs, Marpet, Cappa and even Mahomes or Chris Jones   And lets also not forget the fact that KCs LT was out.   So there is a list of my most important positions. QB - Brady, Mahomes LT - Smith, lack of Fisher DE/OLB - Barrett, Paul DT/DE - Suh, Jones(arguably 2nd most important player on Chiefs) CB - Davis G - Marpet, Cappa(helping keep Brady clean)   Even threw a couple of those invaluable LBers in there as well. Just for fun. They weren't very valuable though I guess? In actuality they might of been the most valuable pieces in the game.     More bad faith arguments by YOU. Just saying, just cause a team has a premium pass cather doesn't make that guy the most valuable or the reason that team made the Super Bowl.     Hopefully we can get back to the graphs, once again, but I suspect you will feel the need to continually tell me why WRs are still more valuable.
    • I couldn’t find the actual number of drops for TY but there’s some pretty decent receivers with more than him. I think it’s overblown a bit, since he had a couple, early in the year.     He led the team in yards last year. I hope he gets a two year deal here.   https://scores.nbcsports.com/fb/leaders.asp?type=Receiving&range=NFL&rank=232
    • I think I am just bored and getting picky GO COLTS GO BALLARD
    • I am also excited to see Rogers get a chance. 
  • Members

    • MFT5

      MFT5 227

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 196

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dogg63

      Dogg63 2,030

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DiogoSales

      DiogoSales 75

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 1,386

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HoosierHero

      HoosierHero 54

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 9,208

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 5,015

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shafty138

      Shafty138 1,363

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,004

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...