Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Should Highly Consider Signing Jadeveon Clowney on a Short-Term Deal


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Dont care what you say, no one does a game plan and says "We aint worried about Clowney". No matter how over rated one thinks he is

On a one year deal?   With money we can afford?      And not have to cut players we really want to keep to do it?   Yes,  I'd do that....     for one year,  I see far more upside t

To me that reads that the Titans want to bring back Ryan if they can’t sign Clowney. Not that Clowney wants them to sign Ryan before he will sign. Am I reading it wrong?

Posted Images

On a one year deal?

 

With money we can afford?      And not have to cut players we really want to keep to do it?

 

Yes,  I'd do that....     for one year,  I see far more upside than downside.

 

JC would get to re-establish his market value.     The one year would keep him highly motivated.

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

With no first round pick, the money needed to sign rookies will

be significantly less

 

Hoyer has got to go 

 

Clooney is a great run stopper that gets needed pressures

 

It would be tight to pull off on cash... but the guy would improve our defense

 

put me down as yes

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BigO said:

By making the trade for Buckner and signing Rivers for one year the colts need to be all in going for the super bowl now. Ballard go get Clowney and make this defense great

 

 

Clowney is more of a run stopping DT than he is a pass rusher. He wants to be paid like a pass rusher but in reality he's not a pass rusher. He was next to last in every pass rushing statistic in 2019 but he was graded one of the highest defensive lineman at stopping the run. Plug him next to Buck and he will eat running backs alive. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 year deals eat the cap. If you want him for 2 years you sign him for 4. 4 year 100 million with 40 million guaranteed. The first two years would be 15 million each, fully guaranteed with 10 million left guaranteed..

  • Confused 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at $20M per.  I'd wait it out a little while and see if anybody is that stupid.  If not, then come in at like 2-years and $30M.  Throw in some incentives like 10 sacks, ProBowl, etc. where he could earn 3-5M more.  See if he would accept that.  If so, I'm all in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel this signing would really affect the amount of playtime for Turay and Banogu. I believe this is Turay's year to break out and I think he'll definitely be a better player than Clowney, who to me is evidently one of the most over rated pass rushers in the entire NFL. I don't care how much pressures he got last year(I don't know if he got very much, just saying this in case he did), he only got I think 3 sacks. That is utterly terrible for a guy who wants 20 mil a year. I don't care that he got 2 TDs, when you sign a pass rusher you expect him to get sacks and he hasn't had a year over 10. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm in the minority, but the defense doesn't need Clowney.  Turay is still early in his rookie contract and Houston isn't out of gas yet.  

 

Signing 2 big defender contracts in the same year could also create some cap logistics issues.

 

Now that Rivers is in the house there's another pick that may be spent on a defender instead of a QB in the draft. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, BluHorzhu said:

Maybe I'm in the minority, but the defense doesn't need Clowney.  Turay is still early in his rookie contract and Houston isn't out of gas yet.  

 

Signing 2 big defender contracts in the same year could also create some cap logistics issues.

 

Now that Rivers is in the house there's another pick that may be spent on a defender instead of a QB in the draft. 

 

He would be Sheards replacement. He is a excellent run stopper with more distruptive power then Sheard.  Plus he is four years younger.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

It makes sense because that would mean we let Sheard go. This would be his younger replacement.

If this happens I can see Ballard going after the best CB he can get in the draft, especially after the Desir release.    This D is so close to being elite.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Mr. Irrelevant said:

 

It would be cool, but Ballard seldom get those where a bidding war is going on. I would be highly surprised if he ends here with two other suitors.

We shall see

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Chloe6124 said:

Clowney is only being offered 13m by the seahawks and he is open to a one year deal. If the colts could get him for that it would be worth it.

Where are you getting this?  It is being reported that the Seahawks offer is believed to be at $18.5 million per year.  

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/seahawks-make-offer-to-jadeveon-clowney-also-plan-to-pursue-everson-griffen-per-report/

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

He had like 3 sacks last year....Clowney I mean

 

He was dealing with injuries as well.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

 

If this happens, which I hope it does. 2 things I think.  

 

1. With the Rivers signing and the Bucker signing the Colts believe they can win it all this yr and are going all in.  I think this was the yr if Andrew stayed as well.

 

2. We will not be drafting for the future but for the here and now and it could mean that need will outweigh BPA in this draft.

 

 

We could do what 9ers did last yr and go from bottom to top in one yr.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • McAfee had Rossini on today talking about how it's gonna be a massacre this week. I'm not so sure about that. Some of these guys yeah are gonna get let go but anyone with a bonus they are gonna also be looking at waiting for June 1 so they can spread the hit out away from this year. It's definitely gonna be a bloodbath but I don't think we will see it all this week. Again way too much draft capital being spent and not enough backloaded contracts for proven talent. It's definitely going to be interesting though. 
    • The Eagles pick 9 spots ahead of us as it is and that will obviously be more if Ballard trades back. What the Eagles do will likely have very little influence on what the Colts do and vice versa.
    • First....  I try not to have 100 percent rules.  I try not to use words like “always” and “never”.    Using absolutes will get you into trouble.    That said, if I am going to draft a WR in the first round I’d like him to have rare or special qualities.   Size AND speed.  Hands AND routes.    I’m fine taking smaller receivers, but I personally prefer them outside the top-50.  Hilton was taken late-3rd.  I think 92nd.  Little receivers can be found later in the draft.     I love both Moore’s.   Don’t think I love either enough to take them at 21.  Now, Waddle is small.  But he has rare speed and quickness.  Super acceleration and separation.   Plus he’s got great return ability to boot.  He’s the full package.  I don’t see him as top-10 player, but I’d take him 11-32 all day long in any draft.    There are exceptions to every rule.  But those should only happen few and far between opportunities.  
    • He's not even the best slot receiver in the class either
  • Members

    • superrep1967

      superrep1967 538

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tvturner

      tvturner 289

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shyne7

      Shyne7 1

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jchandler7

      jchandler7 174

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • funktacious2

      funktacious2 401

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tate

      tate 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Bluefire4

      Bluefire4 407

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • FortheWin

      FortheWin 232

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 425

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JoeThornburg

      JoeThornburg 35

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...