Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

For the sake of argument (and discussion) which of the following and the rounds they are "projected" to go in fit the mold of a Colts QB?

 

2nd Round - Jacob Eason, Washington

 

3rd Round - Jalen Hurts, Oklahoma

                      Jake Fromm, Georgia

 

4th Round - Anthony Gordon, Washington State

                      James Morgan, FIU

 

I see merits for all of them, and warts for all of them as well. The question is, which one would 'fit' the accurate, semi-mobile, quick release, fearless QB that can also stretch the field with his arm kind of QB?

 

Eason and Morgan provide the best arm strength and more prototypical size

 

Gordan the quickest release

 

Hurts and Fromm the most mobile

 

Fromm and Gordon the most accurate but also can't make all the throws

 

All in all in order to ensure they got their QB it would almost seem like it would have to be Eason at 34 since it's the 2nd pick of Day 2 and he is probably the best clay for the coaching staff and Rivers to mold.

 

Then WR at 44?

 

Who the heck knows anyways????? LOL

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EastStreet said:

I think Gordon goes before Fromm. I also think Love may drop to the 2nd depending on some of the FA landing spots.

I hope Love is gone before the Colts pick...can't stand the pothead.

Fromm is just another game manager...mediocre in the NFL.

 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Scott Pennock said:

For the sake of argument (and discussion) which of the following and the rounds they are "projected" to go in fit the mold of a Colts QB?

 

2nd Round - Jacob Eason, Washington

 

3rd Round - Jalen Hurts, Oklahoma

                      Jake Fromm, Georgia

 

4th Round - Anthony Gordon, Washington State

                      James Morgan, FIU

 

I see merits for all of them, and warts for all of them as well. The question is, which one would 'fit' the accurate, semi-mobile, quick release, fearless QB that can also stretch the field with his arm kind of QB?

 

Eason and Morgan provide the best arm strength and more prototypical size

 

Gordan the quickest release

 

Hurts and Fromm the most mobile

 

Fromm and Gordon the most accurate but also can't make all the throws

 

All in all in order to ensure they got their QB it would almost seem like it would have to be Eason at 34 since it's the 2nd pick of Day 2 and he is probably the best clay for the coaching staff and Rivers to mold.

 

Then WR at 44?

 

Who the heck knows anyways????? LOL

 

 

 

This is exactly what I want.  Eason at 34, then WR at 44.  Maybe a tight end in round 3.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the Eason at 34 and WR at 44 scenario.  If not that, I'd also be ok with passing on QB and trying to obtain more draft leverage for next year for a trade up to secure one then.  I have to trust Ballard's play and vision.   

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember when Lawrence Taylor would play games beyond high on Cocaine? The potheads in pro sports. I chuckled. 

 

I haven't watched much tape on the later round guys, but if 4 guys go round one and there's 4 or 5 guys who people still like enough to not let drop terribly far, teams either have to be comfortable with the lottery ticket nature of picking these guys or they're going to get burned. It's a numbers game.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I really like Anthony Gordon.  I drove up to WSU to scout him because a family member goes there. Got a chance to talk to him.  Very smart, well spoken guy.  Football junkie.  Has a lightening release and great accuracy and touch.  Gordon and Fromm are my favorites from this class.  

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but Morgan is not a 4th round QB, he's a 6th round to Priority free agent at best.

 

I've been talking up Gordon for a while now and I think he will be the Colts pick on the 3rd round.  2nd round will be another DT to rotate with Stewart or Buckner and a TE/WR whomever is available.  3rd round Gordon and 4th round will be on a RB, IMO.

 

Although, if the Colts went Fromm, I would not be upset, but I do like Gordon better.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Gordon’s quick release would fit this offense really well. Just don’t know much about his arm strength. 

 

Fromm has all the tools above the shoulders but can he make all the throws. I think he would hold this offense back.

 

Eason has the big arm but doesn’t handle pressure well. I do think that is something that can be coached. Rumor awhile back he is the colts target. Which would make sense once they got rid of that 13th pick. The rumor said they thought they could get him in the 17 to 20 range. So that could be where they trade up to. 

 

Morgans accuracy is bad. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, EastStreet said:

If you dislike him simply because he smoked weed, there's a lot of players on the Colts you don't like then. 

Weed is not the problem...I just call him "Pothead Love" because it fits.

He has a lot of flaws that may not be correctable in the NFL.

 

"Needs to improve his field vision and awareness. Often fails to recognize or completely disregards coverage rotations and it doesn’t have a great enough impact on his decision making. He throws some careless, YOLO balls that need to be reduced. While there is a lot to like about his willingness to be patient and stay in the pocket, his internal clock is often tardy. Can be aggressive vertically to fault. Has to find more consistency with timing and progressions. Has general accuracy with plenty of misfires."

 

I just don't want us to spend years on a younger version of Jacoby Brissett.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, CanuckColt said:

Weed is not the problem...I just call him "Pothead Love" because it fits.

He has a lot of flaws that may not be correctable in the NFL.

 

"Needs to improve his field vision and awareness. Often fails to recognize or completely disregards coverage rotations and it doesn’t have a great enough impact on his decision making. He throws some careless, YOLO balls that need to be reduced. While there is a lot to like about his willingness to be patient and stay in the pocket, his internal clock is often tardy. Can be aggressive vertically to fault. Has to find more consistency with timing and progressions. Has general accuracy with plenty of misfires."

Willing to bet this review of Love is based on 2019 and not his wildly successful 2018 season when his TD/INT ratio was 32/6. 
 

I think there is a ton of misinformation and misinterpretation on this kid.   I hope he does well wherever he gets picked. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Willing to bet this review of Love is based on 2019 and not his wildly successful 2018 season when his TD/INT ratio was 32/6. 
 

I think there is a ton of misinformation and misinterpretation on this kid.   I hope he does well wherever he gets picked. 

From watching a lot of his games (the abbreviated versions that show all throws and runs from the QB), I think a lot of the misinformation comes from his 2018 season.  in 2018 he played in an Air Raid system throwing a lot to a predetermined receiver.  And when you look at his numbers compared to other QBs in an air-raid system the 32/6 are actually average numbers.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Coffeedrinker said:

I'm sorry but Morgan is not a 4th round QB, he's a 6th round to Priority free agent at best.

 

I've been talking up Gordon for a while now and I think he will be the Colts pick on the 3rd round.  2nd round will be another DT to rotate with Stewart or Buckner and a TE/WR whomever is available.  3rd round Gordon and 4th round will be on a RB, IMO.

 

Although, if the Colts went Fromm, I would not be upset, but I do like Gordon better.

dont see us reaching for any qb in this draft class

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, CanuckColt said:

Weed is not the problem...I just call him "Pothead Love" because it fits.

He has a lot of flaws that may not be correctable in the NFL.

 

"Needs to improve his field vision and awareness. Often fails to recognize or completely disregards coverage rotations and it doesn’t have a great enough impact on his decision making. He throws some careless, YOLO balls that need to be reduced. While there is a lot to like about his willingness to be patient and stay in the pocket, his internal clock is often tardy. Can be aggressive vertically to fault. Has to find more consistency with timing and progressions. Has general accuracy with plenty of misfires."

 

I just don't want us to spend years on a younger version of Jacoby Brissett.

If you saw JB play in college and compare it to Love, there are huge differences. And you have to look at the last two years, just not the last. A lot of what reviews say about Love, are the same concerns they had with Mahomes, who they compared to some bad QBs, and thought has a late 1st to mid 2nd. It's all relative.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/17/2020 at 4:41 PM, EastStreet said:

If you dislike him simply because he smoked weed, there's a lot of players on the Colts you don't like then. 

Major difference. Love getting caught 2 days after announcing for the NFL draft  a week before a bowl game.  Yeah...big difference. If he was a running back....who cares. But a possible leader of your franchise making that type of decision. Big red flag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a few scouts say that same word about Love. Predetermined. That’s not what we need. Those guys are the hardest to fix. 
And this thread gets derailed by Lovebirds again. He was not listed by the OP to choose from.

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Major difference. Love getting caught 2 days after announcing for the NFL draft  a week before a bowl game.  Yeah...big difference. If he was a running back....who cares. But a possible leader of your franchise making that type of decision. Big red flag.

I'll put it this way. I have friends in Knoxville that spent time on the board at UT, as well as some pretty big boosters (I had season tix for many years), and some people you think are exemplary have made plenty of mistakes. I also was around a lot of Colts players in the mid 80s as a kid, hung with some in the early and mid 90s before moving, and I'll just say your assumptions of what a lot of players do and how they act, are probably a bit off. I'll leave it at that. 

 

Things certainly might be different these days, but I doubt it's too far off. You also need to consider attitudes on weed in general these days. In a lot of states (I've traveled and lived in a lot of different places domestically and internationally) weed is as common as booze, and there is much less stigma with it, especially with the sub 40 generation. It's why states are one by one legalizing (likely will be a national flip in the next 5 years), and why the new CBA won't even suspend anymore for a positive test. 

 

But I do agree, it was a poor decision. At the same time, I don't know about you, but I made plenty of stupid decisions as a kid, many in college lol... Show me a kid that doesn't, and I'll show you a unicorn. 

 

One last thing.. From the reports I read, his blood level was tested and was said to be from past use, not that night, which means it may have not been the timing your suggest. No drugs or other stuff found. Doesn't really matter IMO. Poor decision, and you either trust that he learned form it, or you don't. Given he has one or two cops as parents, I'm sure he heard enough. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fromm may be a lot of things, but "mobile" is not one of them. Hurts, yes; the others, not so much.

 

Eason IMO has the highest ceiling--he's kind of a "discount Justin Herbert" with just as strong an arm. Personally I feel #34 is too high for him, especially given some of the WRs, TEs and even DLs who are likely to be available at that spot.

 

If Eason fell to #44, on the other hand, I'd definitely think long and hard about picking him--first round arm talent on a second round rookie contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, DEFENSE said:

a lot of us old men smoked weed in the sixties, pot is not a new thing son.

That's awesome. Why you acting so weird about a kid smoking weed then and referring to him as a "pothead" ? You realize a majority of the league smokes weed, right? Way better for them to do than to shovel down pain pills that team DRs love to throw at them.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/17/2020 at 6:20 PM, Scott Pennock said:

For the sake of argument (and discussion) which of the following and the rounds they are "projected" to go in fit the mold of a Colts QB?

 

2nd Round - Jacob Eason, Washington

 

3rd Round - Jalen Hurts, Oklahoma

                      Jake Fromm, Georgia

 

4th Round - Anthony Gordon, Washington State

                      James Morgan, FIU

 

I see merits for all of them, and warts for all of them as well. The question is, which one would 'fit' the accurate, semi-mobile, quick release, fearless QB that can also stretch the field with his arm kind of QB?

 

Eason and Morgan provide the best arm strength and more prototypical size

 

Gordan the quickest release

 

Hurts and Fromm the most mobile

 

Fromm and Gordon the most accurate but also can't make all the throws

 

All in all in order to ensure they got their QB it would almost seem like it would have to be Eason at 34 since it's the 2nd pick of Day 2 and he is probably the best clay for the coaching staff and Rivers to mold.

 

Then WR at 44?

 

Who the heck knows anyways????? LOL

 

 

 

 

Fromm isn't very moble.  But he's probably the most ready to play out of the gate.  Problem is that his ceiling seems low.  It's questionable if he will have enough zip on the ball to beat defenders on things like out routes.

 

I would be kind of a fan of Easton actually.  Not that Love is completely off the table but Easton while he doesn't have the ceiling that Love has seems to have a fairly high ceiling and his flaws seem less extensive than Love's.  

 

Love is swinging for the fences.  Huge physical talent but so many flaws his game that could kill him at this level that it's questionable if he will be able to overcome them.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Stoney said:

That's awesome. Why you acting so weird about a kid smoking weed then and referring to him as a "pothead" ? You realize a majority of the league smokes weed, right? Way better for them to do than to shovel down pain pills that team DRs love to throw at them.

i did not say anyone was a pothead you have me mixed up with someone else check my posts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TRADE 9:   Steelers get pick No.111 from Jaguars via Bengals Jaguars get pick No.128 and No.140   @EastStreet @NFLfan
    • Hey everyone.  I wasn't able to commit to participating in this, but have read through all the rounds of the draft you've done.  I don't follow college football overall that closely, mainly watch IU games and other big games I'm able to watch.   Just wanted to thank you all for educating me on this year's draft prospects so I'll be able to watch the Draft with a bit of knowledge on some of these players.   It's really helpful when I see names in the draft that I've read about on these mock drafts.   Again, thanks to all of you!  GO COLTS!!!
    • Honestly?    I have no idea?   I think this may be unprecedented...   a QB dealing with epilepsy?    I think it’s unknown.   My fear, is that teams don’t like Big Question marks at that position.   I wouldn’t begin to know.   I hope for the best...  (but I fear the worst — draft wise).  
    • I don't understand the bolded one.   Why do this.     https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/31303703/nfl-owners-approve-replay-change-other-new-rules-2021-season Approved a relaxation of rules for the numbers that players of certain positions can wear because of expanded practice squads. Running backs, wide receivers, tight ends, defensive backs and linebackers can all wear numbers in the single digits now if they choose. Based on preexisting NFL rules, players who want to change their numbers this season will have to buy out the inventory of the NFL's manufacturing partners. This wouldn't apply to players who give notice in 2021 that they want to change numbers in 2022.   Approved a one-year experiment in an attempt to make it easier to recover onside kicks. In 2021, the receiving team on kickoffs will be limited to nine players within 25 yards of the ball. Last season, NFL teams recovered only three of 67 onside kicks, the lowest total and recovery rate since at least 2001. As a result, the Philadelphia Eagles proposed that teams be given an option to gain 15 yards on one offensive play from their own 25-yard line to retain possession after a score. Tabled a rule that would have expanded the area where players are prohibited from blocking below the waist. McKay said that there is enough support to pass the rule now but that several teams had questions that will take some time to address. It could be revisited next month. Eliminated overtime in preseason games.   Changed a rule that will now force a loss of down if two passes are completed behind the line of scrimmage.   Approved a rule change that ensures the enforcement of all accepted penalties during successive try attempts, defined as an opportunity for a team to score one or two additional points during one scrimmage down.   Did not act on a "spot or choose" proposal from the Ravens for the winner of the overtime coin toss. In that scenario, the team would have the option to choose either which team will have the first possession of overtime or where the ball would be spotted.   Decided to include taunting among its points of emphasis for 2021. McKay clarified that the emphasis would be directed not at celebrations but toward acrimonious interaction among players.   Tabled a proposal from the Buffalo Bills that would have pushed back interviews for general manager and head-coaching positions until after the championship round of the playoffs and would have prevented hires until after the Super Bowl. It will be further studied.   Completed a study of the sharp drop in offensive holding during the 2020 season. McKay said that Walt Anderson, the NFL's senior vice president of training and development, would clarify the standard and put together a video for teams to consume before the 2021 season.
    • Need to edit something: the only restriction I had was driving. I couldn't get a license until I went at least 6 months with no problems. Then I had to get a doctor's permission to try for a driver's license. 
  • Members

    • #12.

      #12. 1,095

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 3,916

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DaColts85

      DaColts85 512

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • polk_high_allstar

      polk_high_allstar 16

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JoeThornburg

      JoeThornburg 150

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Archer

      Archer 684

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Myles

      Myles 4,200

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 546

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 7,544

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 2,676

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...