Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts agree to terms with QB Philip Rivers (1 YR Deal)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 409
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Last year was an anomaly year for Philip.  I have watched every game he's played for our team and though I love him as a player I try to watch with a very clear eye.     1.  This year was a

You don't like the length of the player?

Hello everyone, first time here.   I've followed Rivers ever since his freshman year at NC State.  Became a Chargers fan in 04 when he was drafted, and now I'm here.  Hope you all have room

5 minutes ago, stitches said:

No. I've been telling you guys. Stop this. Decisions about the very top of our roster - the starting QB of the Colts, are NOT done with much or any consideration about Chad Kelly. 

 

Cutting/trading BOTH Hoyer and Brissett might show more confidence in Kelly being able to be backup QB. 

Okay, so would you say that the future QB is still not on the roster?  Maybe Kelly is the backup and then we draft a later round QB

Jalen Hurts

James Morgan

Anthony Gordon

 

So the 2021 QB room would be:  Former Draft pick (Morgan/Hurts/Gordon), Kelly as the backup?

 

Is that more of what you are thinking?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, dgambill said:

How. We gave Luck 25 million and he didn't even play...you think giving Rivers 25 million to play is worse than last year. I couldn't even stomach watching the Colts play most of last season....at least with Rivers we will get a qb that knows what he is doing.

 

Because we're giving a washed up over the hill QB 25 mil for a one year rental

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Rackeen305 said:

Per Luis Reddick, 2019 Rivers made mistake after mistake. 

  • - Doesnt think he's gonna make everyone else better.

- His physical abilities has gone done.

I guess Ballard disagrees over the former NFL front office guy who can't get another job in the league. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, stitches said:

No. I've been telling you guys. Stop this. Decisions about the very top of our roster - the starting QB of the Colts, are NOT done with much or any consideration about Chad Kelly. 

 

I don't know what the plan is with Chad Kelly but I will say that keeping him on the roster was odd.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, CR91 said:

 

Because we're giving a washed up over the hill QB 25 mil for a one year rental

As opposed to giving a retired qb 25 million? Rivers is still an upgrade over JB. I can understand if you prefer we go after say Bridgewater or Winston etc but we know Rivers and while there are other qbs out there in the end we are going to draft our future qb this year or next year most likely. Anyone we got was just going to be a place holder...even JB.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BleedBlue4Shoe86 said:

Okay, so would you say that the future QB is still not on the roster?  Maybe Kelly is the backup and then we draft a later round QB

Jalen Hurts

James Morgan

Anthony Gordon

 

So the 2021 QB room would be:  Former Draft pick (Morgan/Hurts/Gordon), Kelly as the backup?

 

Is that more of what you are thinking?

The future franchise QB of the Colts is not on the roster. And he likely won't be on the roster after the draft either. Although there is some(small) chance he might be after the draft. 

 

I don't consider any of Hurts/Morgan/Gordon as likely franchise QBs, so even if we draft any of them I would probably think of them as more of flyers/wild shots than as someone to rely on being our future franchise QB. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dgambill said:

As opposed to giving a retired qb 25 million? Rivers is still an upgrade over JB. I can understand if you prefer we go after say Bridgewater or Winston etc but we know Rivers and while there are other qbs out there in the end we are going to draft our future qb this year or next year most likely. Anyone we got was just going to be a place holder...even JB.

 

No actually I would have preferred we keep our first round pick, but that was out the window. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Indyfan4life said:

And what will you say if he kills it?

 

You're putting way too much faith in a guy that got 6 wins on a charger team that I could argue has similar or better talent then us

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Valpo2004 said:

 

I don't know what the plan is with Chad Kelly but I will say that keeping him on the roster was odd.

It's not odd IMO... he's not horrible. He's shown some good play in pre-season and has kept his nose clean... and he's cheap. Very cheap. And he will be very cheap for a year or two more. If you are going to be paying Luck, Brissett, Rivers and Hoyer money for the next year or two and have only one of them on the roster, having a cheap backup might be a good idea. 

 

If we draft a young QB, who is not ready to play, CK is again - good backup to have so you wouldn't need to crush the young guy before he's ready(if Rivers gets injured for example). 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

No actually I would have preferred we keep our first round pick, but that was out the window. 

Gotcha...well Ballard has a plan...I'd say at least let it play out and see what we do. I think there is a lot that plays into these decisions. I don't think Ballard wanted a rookie starting next year and didn't think starting JB was an option he felt could make us a playoff team. Given we likely will see a very limited offseason program due to the virus he got a qb that can be up to speed with our offense and understands it and come right in and play well for us. I don't think Ballard was ever going to spend to move into the top 10 where the more proven qb commodities were likely to go. He still has plenty of ammo to go after a guy that might be a late first/2nd rd pick. 13 was likely to be a non-qb regardless given his efforts to beef up the DL. I understand what you are saying...but I think writing off Rivers or saying paying him 25 million is going to stop us from achieving our other roster goals. I think Rivers is a big upgrade for us and 25 million is nothing that will inhibit us moving forward.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, King Colt said:

And according to ESPN Brissett will most likely stay put. 

And according to ESPN Brissett will most likely stay put. 

 

Likely shows teams want to give little and also have Colts pay most of the QB's salary.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, stitches said:

IMO Hoyer or Brissett or BOTH are gone. 

 

IMO it's both...and fairly quickly. Of course, given the current atmosphere...it's not like either player is in the building. But the Colts will want to make sure they find JB a home OR he finds one.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

 

 

Probably wont need the Franchise tag. If Rivers does well enough, Colts can sign him for another year for not much more, if necessary.  PR won't desire to move to a 3rd team and new system if possible, methinks.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Adding a mean nasty Buckner to a mean nasty defense makes all the sense in the world. Rivers is a guess to me and maybe his success will depend on Reich. At least Rivers will have time to release the ball with the current OL.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Samu-Rye said:

Call the Pats and see if they want Brissett back, they liked him enough to draft him once.

 

I can easily see this happening.  They received a lot of 3rd round comp picks.  I can see them trading one for JB.  He knows their system which would make the transition very easy just like Rivers to our system. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, shastamasta said:

 

IMO it's both...and fairly quickly. Of course, given the current atmosphere...it's not like either player is in the building. But the Colts will want to make sure they find JB a home OR he finds one.

Get one of Pats compensatory picks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Because we're giving a washed up over the hill QB 25 mil for a one year rental

Washed up and over the hill was still better than Brissett at his best.  

This is no doubt an improvement at QB, so I am happy about that.   

Hines should be very excited.  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

Non of this matters when we go draft the future in the draft. As long as we have the future on the roster that is all that matters.

I think it matter for next season.  The defense will be better.  The passing game will be better.  The kicking game will be better.  10-12 wins is possible.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, stitches said:

Get one of Pats compensatory picks. 

 

That wouldn't be bad...though I can't see NE giving up one AND paying that roster bonus. But that's probably the most JB-friendly scenario (via trade).

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

I can easily see this happening.  They received a lot of 3rd round comp picks.  I can see them trading one for JB.  He knows their system which would make the transition very easy just like Rivers to our system. 

 

I can see Tampa calling before N.E. does. Which means, IMO, neither do.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Myles said:

Washed up and over the hill was still better than Brissett at his best.  

This is no doubt an improvement at QB, so I am happy about that.   

Hines should be very excited.  

He immediately came to mind with the Eckler type player that LA had last year. I do think we have work to do at TE and maybe another WR but this is a deep draft.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First of all, I'd say bad fit for us. He's a 3-4 DE. In our system he'd be a tweener, or maybe even a 3T.  Great against the run, average vs the pass. Very solid 3 down guy overall in a 3-4.   IMO, even if he was a fit, we don't need run D help, and he'd be too expensive. Overall just not the benefit and value we need.    
    • Here's what we did on another board a few years ago. Worked out pretty good. 1 Round per evening 2 windows each night... picks 1-16, and then 17-32 (I think it was 7p-8p and 9-10, but could have been 8-9 and 10-11). That way, guys new pretty much when they needed to be there, and only needed to pay attention for roughly an hour per day. Really not even that long. Also gave the mods some time between windows to tidy up. 3 minute clock hence the "flash" term. If you miss a pick, you drop 5 spots (basically giving them an extra 15 minutes). If they missed it a second time, they get bumped to the end of the round and have up to an hour before the next days round starts. If they miss that, they get best player based on their primary needs.  We had 3 threads going at once, and 3 moderators. One thread for the pick announcements and general comments, one with a constantly updated order and big board, and one to manage trades. The big board management was great in terms of keeping it going and checking off who is gone. We also published team needs, but I can't remember if we tracked it except for using it when folks missed their window. Only trades allowed are pick for pick(s) so very little approval needed. No picks for existing players (We did the mock post FA fury, I think we started about 2 weeks prior to the draft).
    • I didn't say he could be as good as Leonard. I said pretty clearly that if Leonard was 95/100 That I think Oke's ceiling is about 86-90.    By in which I also added that any team would be alright that that level of play. I think you are misunderstanding. Because we both seem to agree that Oke will more than likely be a pretty darn good player. 
    • Again, I don’t doubt one bit he can turn out to be a good player. He has the traits. I watched him often when he was at Stanford... his name was not foreign to me come draft time. I was excited about Ballard loading up at linebacker which is a position we have plugged guys off the street before.    I just simply called out the inconsistency of saying he could be a good as Leonard (again, highly, HIGHLY unlikely) and then turn around saying that he could be “pretty good.”    do you know who didn’t need time to be great? Darius Leonard. THAT is the difference. Give Leonard time and see where he goes. My guess is the Hall of Fame. 
    • When he turns out to be a pretty good ILB everyone will be raving about how they knew it all along, and he just needed a little more time. 
  • Members

    • Mr.NotSoCreative

      Mr.NotSoCreative 265

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 5,331

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dew5150

      dew5150 110

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • That Guy

      That Guy 230

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Fish

      The Fish 1,134

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tvturner

      tvturner 279

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,009

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsSouljah

      ColtsSouljah 239

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Smonroe

      Smonroe 2,272

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 41

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...