Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

River to Colts all but done


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Superman said:

We're kind of premature on some of this, right?

 

Realistically, all of this is very premature at this point.  Ballard just started building his 2020 roster, literally, yesterday.

 

Being excited about the addition of Buckner is understandable.  If Ballard signs Rivers, I'm going to wait and see what weapons he has to work with before getting too excited or disappointed in our 2020 offensive roster.  We might struggle to an 8-8 record, or click early and go 13-3 with the #1 seed.  There's just too much up in the air right now.  :dunno:

 

But I do believe our 2020 offense will have a strong defense to rely on, regardless of who the QB is.  :thmup:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 270
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Define success.   All I'm saying is his efficiency went down, he wasn't good late in games, he threw a lot of picks, he can't escape pressure, and he's 38/39 years old this season. The Charg

I dunno, that's a pretty tall order these days. 

Completely agree, we do not need a washed up Rivers.

44 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

 

I agree. I might feel differently if he was coming off his 2nd bad season in a row. But he was a legit Pro Bowler in '17 and '18. IF the Colts got 2018 Rivers...they might be playing in late January next year. It's worth a roll of the dice.

 

Not to mention the connections to the staff are huge in this case...I think they want as seamless of a transition as possible...and Rivers can provide that.

 

He had 3 good years with Reich, top 10 if not top 5 in a lot of stats.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, aaron11 said:

they have the 6th pick to draft one

Because they are going younger at the position and they must think he is done im not convinced now I might agree if he throws 20 int's with our o-line but until that happen this is a good temporary move for the team. Sorry I just wont get behind anybody saying staying the course with bum Brissett is best for this team moving forward.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

With Brisett at QB, the Colts were among the worst passing teams in the league statistically.

 

This will improve with P. Rivers, however, most likely we will go from among the worst to the middle of the league (average). I'm not too excited about an average passing game.

 

I understand the move, (if it's made) but I'm not thrilled about it.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, King Colt said:

You only buy a used vehicle when you cannot afford a new one.

Yes, but I'd rather have a used sports car, than a new minivan. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Two hours ago Matt Miller tweeted the contract was almost done.  Since then Brees agrees to 25M a year.   I wonder if this is less than where the Colts and Rivers were heading?   Maybe it's back to the drawing board.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Rackeen305 said:

THE COLTS WOULD BE 7-0 IF WE HAD A DECENT KICKER! i hope we remember that.

lots of teams can say stuff like that.  titans would have beat us if they switched to RT sooner.  texans would have beat the saints if not for a long fg at the buzzer 

 

chargers would have beat the colts still if hooker didnt catch that

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, richard pallo said:

Two hours ago Matt Miller tweeted the contract was almost done.  Since then Brees agrees to 25M a year.   I wonder if this is less than where the Colts and Rivers were heading?   Maybe it's back to the drawing board.  

Maybe, or it upped Rivers asking price. Either way, there’s no rush on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just saw a repeat segment from earlier this AM where Ian Rapoport said that parties were close, just trying to agree on a final number. That was likely pre- tweet from Miller.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paying rivers anything above 25mil is absurd. Let him walk if that’s the case.  Either way if he signs we’re going to have like 60mil in cap dedicated to our qb position

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Ehh...

 

He was pressured on 223 dropbacks in 2019, with 34 sacks. In 2018, he was pressured on 227 dropbacks, with 35 sacks. The dropoff in production/efficiency in one year isn't just because the OL struggled in 2019.

You don't think that there is a accumulative effect of having no protection the last couple years combining with an aging qb whose physical attributes are waning. I think the real question is does he still have the physical attributes to make the plays in our offense. If yes..I would sign him up. He will have much much better protection (no throwing off backfoot/on the move/guys in his face) and he will be a huge presence in the locker room. If he can't make the plays...move on to one we think can. But imo just because the pressures and sacks are the same and the numbers are worse..to me just shows me a qb that is underseige and can't make the pressured plays he once could..but doesn't tell me he can't make plays in our offense.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Just saw a repeat segment from earlier this AM where Ian Rapoport said that parties were close, just trying to agree on a final number. That was likely pre- tweet from Miller.

 

I also wonder if Ballard isn't trying to make a corresponding JB move at the same time. Not that there would be any QB controversy...but it would be a whole hell of a lot easier at the Rivers press conference if they didn't have to talk about JB.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, boo2202 said:

Paying rivers anything above 25mil is absurd. Let him walk if that’s the case.  Either way if he signs we’re going to have like 60mil in cap dedicated to our qb position

Nope, JB will be cut! 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, boo2202 said:

Paying rivers anything above 25mil is absurd. Let him walk if that’s the case.  Either way if he signs we’re going to have like 60mil in cap dedicated to our qb position

 

It won't be. They will release Hoyer and trade JB to free up ~$20M. If done correctly, Rivers is like a net $10M on the cap...max.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, boo2202 said:

Paying rivers anything above 25mil is absurd. Let him walk if that’s the case.  Either way if he signs we’re going to have like 60mil in cap dedicated to our qb position

If we sign anyone, we’ll end up cutting or trading JB. Or just let him ride out this last year and enter FA. It’s not a long term problem

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, richard pallo said:

Looks like Bridgewater is signing for 20M with the Panthers.  Brees at 25M and Brady approaching 30M.  Where does that put Rivers?

22-26 is my guess

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember in 2018 when Luck had a streak of not being sacked? Does anyone think that Rivers can’t go through his progression as well as Luck whole not being touched?  Luck almost never had to run and his receivers had separation because of Franks play calling . I expect similar results unless we have Oline injuries. JB held the ball too long. Rivers won’t.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not the biggest Rivers fan, but I can’t deny his skill set. I’ve heard a lot of people say he has lost his rifle, but it was on full display at the pro bowl when he won the qb precision challenge, which he has won multiple times. Yes I know it’s just pro bowl and no pressure throws, but I was shocked at the zip he cold still put on it. Yes he throws a lot of interceptions, but so did Manning and Luck and both did great things for this team.

 

Heres my other thought....Rivers is a field general, plays with emotion and will let his players have it if they screw up...and I think that’s exactly what this team needs, more discipline, accountability, etc, just like Manning used to possess. Hopefully Rivers brings that.

 

I am starting to warm up to this idea, even if  he can sometimes be a hothead, like the time he flipped all of us Colts fans off while he ran off the field, lol. He’s got history with our coach, and is definitely capable of doing great things for us.

 

Just glad the Brady talk seems to be diminishing, I want nothing to do with him.
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Superman said:

 

Let's not just scout the stat sheet. He had a rough season last year. Look at his 4th quarter numbers, his play under pressure, etc. Fourth quarter, trailing by less than 8 points, he was 52%, 6 yards/attempt, 3 TDs, 5 INTs, 58.6 passer rating. This is way worse than 2018.

 

He was terrible under pressure, which is concerning because he's the least mobile QB in the NFL. 

 

And I'm not convinced that the guy who was pretty good at 37 years old, then struggled at 38, is suddenly going to be rejuvenated at 39. 

 

http://www.nfl.com/player/philiprivers/2506121/situationalstats

 

It looks like we're signing him, so I hope he's fantastic for us, but I'm skeptical about his ability to get back to playing efficient, winning football. I understand the draw, and I will understand the signing, assuming it happens, but I'm still not sure it's going to be the shot in the arm we all hope it will be... for Rivers or for the Colts.

Rivers if signed will just ball for us!! Any doubts, go watch the 1st game of last year were the Colts lost to SD. He was the reason we lost. when given time he is super accurate, unlike JB. He will be fine if signed, and would be the least of my worries. Lets go get a WR now!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, shastamasta said:

I also wonder if Ballard isn't trying to make a corresponding JB move at the same time. Not that there would be any QB controversy...but it would be a whole hell of a lot easier at the Rivers press conference if they didn't have to talk about JB.

While I think they will try to move JB, I doubt they will exhaust much effort. I'm sure Ballard will have some targets in mind, but doubt the demand is there. I could see him going to a team where we split the cap hit. Either that, or just a simple cut to allow JB to go to whatever team he wants.

Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Ehh...

 

He was pressured on 223 dropbacks in 2019, with 34 sacks. In 2018, he was pressured on 227 dropbacks, with 35 sacks. The dropoff in production/efficiency in one year isn't just because the OL struggled in 2019.

His mobility has been going down for a while and he might have gotten progressively worse at seeing pressure when there was none, which happens when you have to run for your life all the time. He's still pretty good limiting sacks though. I really think he can benefit a lot by having a MUCH more stable OL than he did with the Chargers. 

 

Ultimately I prefer him over Brissett, but I'm also not sure he will be able to return to his franchise QB type of form. Either way, he's not the long-term solution and IMO we should still be looking for that either in this draft or in next. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is unprecedented movement from NFL QBs (iirc). This is a wonderful distraction for NFL fans.

 

I wonder if TEN's success with RT last year has somewhat led to this.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, King Colt said:

You only buy a used vehicle when you cannot afford a new one.

 

If you have space in the garage for both, you can have both. :) 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not saying pay crazy money, but given this teams cap situation.. 20 mill, 25 it's not going to be a big deal, because he's not going to play 4 or 5 years and the team has more then enough flexibility here (arguably too much).

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Nickster said:

 I guarantee it Supe.  JB is one of the very worst starters in the NFL.  He was never any good with the exception of the first Houston game, but that gameplan was marvelous.  

 

You'll see and be very happy with the way this offense goes from a very lethargic one to a very lively one on the first snap of the season.  It will be obvious how bad JB was on opening day.

 

The only reason JB didn't have high INT is the great time to throw he was afforded coupled with the putridly low yards per attempt he had.


Hear me now believe me later Supe.

 

Death and taxes...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not directed at either above comment just a general thought about this...   Do you think Chris Berman, Tony Gonzalez, Jim Nanz, etc watch all 16 NFL games each week or do you think they watch 2 or 3 and someone (an intern) watches the games and provides them summary notes? I wonder if a personality, like Phil Simms, actually does know more about the Colts than a regular fan. Guys like Nate Burelson make me think they watch all or at least most of the games but others I'm not so sure.   Thoughts?  
    • Not really.   The overall talent level right now with Rivers and our IR'd skill players is about the overall same level as when he had a more talented QB, less talent on defense, and Donald Thomas and Gosder Cherilous on IR back then.   The main difference is that back then, we were maxed out at getting over the hump because we spent to the maximum Cap number just to get into the playoffs (but didn't mortgage the future), whereas now we still have room to maintain our talent level while adding more.   So we will resign the good players, and add more rookies who can (hopefully) play.  And then we'll be in position to win just like every other sports league team that wins and is pressed against the cap...they get rookies who are in their 2nd 3rd or 4th years to vastly contribute more to the team than the level of salary they are being compensated at in their rookie contracts.   Its either done that way (like SEA did when they got those young drafted defensive players and Wilson pre-big contract) or you simply load up on FAs to win now and mortgage the future (which doesn't seem to work out well in the NFL)
    • nah after last weeks game Trevor went on twitter thanking all his Clemson fans for his final home game there
    • I'm fine with that.  Not upset at all because we're not disagreeing.  You just continue to misunderstand what I'm talking about.  My original comment wasn't comparing the rosters without the QB.  It was comparing the talent of the team responsible for the play on the field, which includes the QB.  Overall its about the same.  We play well at times, and lay stinkers at times, but for different reasons.  Our defense was worse then, but we now don't give up as many short field interceptions as we did then.  We don't come back as well now as we did back then.  Now we score by probably taking more time off of the clock than we did back then.  Different paths, same results so far.  Neither team was complete, but for different reasons.  Back then, we had a lot of holes at less important positions.  Now we have fewer holes, but at more important positions.   My original comment gathered quite a few Likes.  Consider the possibility that you simply misunderstood what I was saying.  
    • I can agree with Buckner. 32 may be second for me, before Leonard . He seems to make everyone in the secondary better like you see with the top tier free safeties. MAN he was sooooo close to making that play on MVS in the 4th.
  • Members

    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 10,636

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 2,781

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mick12Maher

      Mick12Maher 74

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Clem-Dog

      Clem-Dog 420

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indykmj

      indykmj 64

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtMan

      ColtMan 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pelt

      Pelt 687

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 65

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KelownaColtsFan

      KelownaColtsFan 155

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Rally5

      Rally5 721

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...