Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

And with the 34th pick in the 2020 NFL draft, the Indianapolis Colts select...?

FalseStart
 Share Followers 1

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

CantBeStopped

I don't think Cain is the answer any more(considering he plays for Pittsburgh)

boo2202

34th Cole kmet     44th jalen Reagor   both 2nds need to be offensive skill guys.   

Colt Overseas

Tee Higgins WR Clemson.

Wentzszn

Wentzszn 10,036

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

If Love falls (doubt it) to mid 20s trade up.

 

I would be ok with Ezra Cleveland or Josh Jones.

 

WR there's so many options. 

We I’ll have a lot of ammo if he falls or even to trade back into the top ten with both those second rounders. 

 

I like Mimms. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
poilucelt

poilucelt 185

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Orioles22 said:

Wide receiver.

Since we didn't get Hooper, we probably need a tight end also.

I'm just glad we found a defensive tackle.

IMO they need another TE as much or more than WR (unless they feel Campbell and Cain aren't the answer) BUT it's far more likely there will still be some outstanding WR prospects available at #34 (& maybe even #44) than outstanding TE prospects.

 

They can likely still find a decent TE prospect (Hopkins? Parkinson?) at #75, and if someone like Mims or Aiyuk is still there at #34, I think you almost have to take him--and hope maybe Eason or Hurts is there at #44.

Link to post
Share on other sites
CantBeStopped

CantBeStopped 310

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CelticColt said:

IMO they need another TE as much or more than WR (unless they feel Campbell and Cain aren't the answer) but it's far more likely there will still be some outstanding WR prospects available at #34 (& maybe even #44) than outstanding TE prospects.

 

They can likely still find a decent TE prospect (Hopkins? Parkinson?) at #75, and if someone like Mims or Aiyuk is still there at #34, I think you almost have to take him--and hope maybe Eason or Hurts is there at #44.

I don't think Cain is the answer any more(considering he plays for Pittsburghhaha)

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
poilucelt

poilucelt 185

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CantBeStopped said:

I don't think Cain is the answer any more(considering he plays for Pittsburghhaha)

My bad: I was thinking of Fountain but wrote Cain.

 

In any event, I think it really comes down to Campbell's progress...and health

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
poilucelt

poilucelt 185

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Gigc said:

I'll stay QB. Eason if he makes it out of the first round, maybe Hurts.

 

we can go WR at 44

IMO #34 is probably too high for Eason, and definitely too high for Hurts, but I'd be surprised if Eason lasts until #44--his arm is too good for some team to pass up, even if his mechanics still need work. So maybe #34 depends a lot on Ballard's FA signings.

 

Hurts, on the other hand, could last until #44, has good character, and is a lot more mobile than Eason FWIW.

5 minutes ago, CantBeStopped said:

Haha I knew who you meant but I had to do it

did Ballard make an offer (tender) to Fountain today? thought I saw that somewhere

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
CantBeStopped

CantBeStopped 310

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CelticColt said:

IMO #34 is probably too high for Eason, and definitely too high for Hurts, but I'd be surprised if Eason lasts until #44--his arm is too good for some team to pass up, even if his mechanics still need work. So maybe #34 depends a lot on Ballard's FA signings.

 

Hurts, on the other hand, could last until #44, has good character, and is a lot more mobile than Eason FWIW.

did Ballard make an offer (tender) to Fountain today? thought I saw that somewhere

Yes I believe he did

Link to post
Share on other sites
poilucelt

poilucelt 185

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

Will there be someone sitting there CB just can't pass up? Like Kmet.
My odds say no and he trades back. 

#34 is so close to Round 1 that there's a good possibility someone drops down to there that another team really covets and Ballard feels the Colts don't need

Link to post
Share on other sites
Moosejawcolt

Moosejawcolt 1,659

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, danlhart87 said:

If Love falls (doubt it) to mid 20s trade up.

 

I would be ok with Ezra Cleveland or Josh Jones.

 

WR there's so many options. 

Oh brother.  I think by the Colts making this move they were never interested in Love as I predicted

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
DownHillRunner

DownHillRunner 410

Posted
Posted

34. Jordan Love 

 

44. Chase Claypool 

 

75. Adam Trautman 

 

 

 

I'm going to predict Love is going to fall out the first round. Tua, Burrow, and Herbert are going to be the only 3 Quarterbacks selected in the 1st round. Even if he slips to the back of the first Ballard can trade back into the first and get him. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
WifiGuy

WifiGuy 424

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, DownHillRunner said:

34. Jordan Love 

 

44. Chase Claypool 

 

75. Adam Trautman 

 

 

 

I'm going to predict Love is going to fall out the first round. Tua, Burrow, and Herbert are going to be the only 3 Quarterbacks selected in the 1st round. Even if he slips to the back of the first Ballard can trade back into the first and get him. 

 

HAHAHA .  I thought we had to trade up to 3-5 with multiple draft picks to get Love!

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
NewColtsFan

NewColtsFan 9,319

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Superfly said:

With no 1st Rd pick, the trade 34th chatter is comical.

 

Give it a rest! 

What the Heck are you talking about?

 

First round talent often falls to the top of the second round.    If we don’t trade the pick odds are the player we take at 34 is on the Colts first round board. 
Rock Ya-Sin was last year.   Ballard said as much.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
EastStreet

EastStreet 10,052

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Oh brother.  I think by the Colts making this move they were never interested in Love as I predicted

Doubt today's move has anything to do with interest in Love. Buckner was simply a move you can't pass up on, and has been easily one of the teams biggest needs the past 2 years. All Pro / Pro Bowl DT that is arguably in the top 5 of 3Ts in the league. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
MPStack

MPStack 3,520

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

What the Heck are you talking about?

 

First round talent often falls to the top of the second round.    If we don’t trade the pick odds are the player we take at 34 is on the Colts first round board. 
Rock Ya-Sin was last year.   Ballard said as much.  


Let me reiterate, which I should have done. I highly doubt the Colts trade back from 34 to acquire more picks. That pick is almost like having a 1st. 
 

Happy now? Probably not, I’m guessing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
shasta519

shasta519 2,961

Posted
Posted

Should be a WR. But I will just say this...Day Two should be entirely devoted to the offense. I am stubborn...and judging by what I have seen in player rankings...you won't convince me that BPA isn't an offensive player at any of those draft positions (Madabuike probably the lone exception...however...he would be a luxury pick with Buckner locked into the 3T position).

 

Colts passed on a good opp to do this last year...I hope they don't this year.

Link to post
Share on other sites
funktacious2

funktacious2 454

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

I'm praying Justin Jefferson, Jalen Reagor, or Denzel Mims is there. Would love to have JJeff, but he probably just ran his way into the 1st with that combine. I think it's likely a WR or TE, if they're signing Rivers gotta give him some weapons. 

Same, if we're not going QB at 34, then I want one of the 1st round talent WRs who might fall out of it. This may be a deep WR but that doesn't mean there aren't drop offs at certain points and besides a deep draft for a position doesn't mean amazing guy can be had in the later rounds, it more likely means more WRs are going earlier than they normally would. BPA and all that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
funktacious2

funktacious2 454

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, wordofmouth said:

I know everyone wants Offence but any chance AJ Espenesa  falls to 34?

 

I don't really want the guy, but I think we certainly could see some defense in round 2. Verrry few forum mocks seem to want to see us address a CB any time before round 3  but I still think it's a position we could use and upgrade at and there is sure to be some good DB available at 34. I still think we're more likely to go offense, but just saying.

Link to post
Share on other sites
CaptainColt12

CaptainColt12 254

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, DownHillRunner said:

34. Jordan Love 

 

44. Chase Claypool 

 

75. Adam Trautman 

 

 

 

I'm going to predict Love is going to fall out the first round. Tua, Burrow, and Herbert are going to be the only 3 Quarterbacks selected in the 1st round. Even if he slips to the back of the first Ballard can trade back into the first and get him. 

 

I don't think Ballard would take love at 34. Ballard has said that if a player is not on his board he won't take them. If Ballard had love on his board he wouldn't have traded away 13. My guess is that he is not on his board due to either the marijuana incident or maybe just his character, not that I or we know his character is bad but maybe when the colts interviewed him he gave bad and undesirable answers. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Followers 1
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • krunk
      What if Houston doesn’t return to the Colts?

      By krunk · Posted

      Wouldnt be the first time weve played with young and rookie edge rushers. Just sit back and see what Ballard does. Im sure theyve thought this through. Theres more good edge rush candidates in this draft that fit our scheme than you think. Could be better but its not horrible. I think our O may do enough this year to aid the young D.
    • stitches
      Post your PFN Mock

      By stitches · Posted

      I've been watching some more players lately and I have new favorites... In this mock - Benjamin St-Juste, Josh Palmer, Derrick Barnes. St-Juste and Derrick Barnes fit Ballard's mold to a tee. Especially St-Juste. Go watch him, guys. LONG(32" arms), good fluid athlete(really nice change of direction), physical in the run game, great zone instincts... Senior Bowl standout.    Derrick Barnes is a long(33 3/8" arms), athletic LB who is raw and honestly... not all that good when it comes to reading the game, but might develop well in our system where you are not required to make complex reads, but rather just see, chase and tackle. Potential depth replacement for the class that's graduating from their rookie contracts(Franklin, Adams...)
    • danlhart87
      Change 1 thing about Colts history

      By danlhart87 · Posted

      Picture it   The year is 2167 (notice im using same year) your new mission is doozy. you must call nick harper about a secret team meeting make sure he has zero communication between him and his wife.    He runs it back and we win SB against Seahawks 
    • iuswingman
      Change 1 thing about Colts history

      By iuswingman · Posted

      '95 AFC Championship - Bailey catches hail mary '05 Playoffs - Nick Harper doesn't get stabbed in the leg by his wife and takes the fumble to the house.
    • SSFiero
      New NFL rules

      By SSFiero · Posted

      Edit to add, I think the rule is 2 passes attempted from behind the line of scrimmage AND completed. Obviously, if its passed the LOS, it's a penalty, or if it's incomplete, it's dead. End edit.    The 2 forward pass was because of something Tom Brady did last year. A pass was thrown, batted back to Brady, and Thrown again for a gain of 8. It was 3rd and 10.  It was an illegal forward pass. 5 yard penalty, repeat the down. 3rd and 15.  Or decline and it's 4th and 2. Either way, the Offense gets another opportunity with 4th and short or 3rd and long.    The rule is like intentional grounding. Loss of down and yards.    link to the play referenced    

  • Members

    • Nesjan3

      Nesjan3 679

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CrazyHorse

      CrazyHorse 2

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,442

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MPStack

      MPStack 3,520

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KelownaColtsFan

      KelownaColtsFan 132

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Barry Sears

      Barry Sears 1,327

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • J@son

      J@son 912

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Crush22

      Crush22 257

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Thebrashandthebold

      Thebrashandthebold 124

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 4,283

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...