Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

And with the 34th pick in the 2020 NFL draft, the Indianapolis Colts select...?

FalseStart
 Share Followers 1

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

CantBeStopped

I don't think Cain is the answer any more(considering he plays for Pittsburgh)

boo2202

34th Cole kmet     44th jalen Reagor   both 2nds need to be offensive skill guys.   

Colt Overseas

Tee Higgins WR Clemson.

Wentzszn

Wentzszn 10,028

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, danlhart87 said:

If Love falls (doubt it) to mid 20s trade up.

 

I would be ok with Ezra Cleveland or Josh Jones.

 

WR there's so many options. 

We I’ll have a lot of ammo if he falls or even to trade back into the top ten with both those second rounders. 

 

I like Mimms. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
poilucelt

poilucelt 185

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Orioles22 said:

Wide receiver.

Since we didn't get Hooper, we probably need a tight end also.

I'm just glad we found a defensive tackle.

IMO they need another TE as much or more than WR (unless they feel Campbell and Cain aren't the answer) BUT it's far more likely there will still be some outstanding WR prospects available at #34 (& maybe even #44) than outstanding TE prospects.

 

They can likely still find a decent TE prospect (Hopkins? Parkinson?) at #75, and if someone like Mims or Aiyuk is still there at #34, I think you almost have to take him--and hope maybe Eason or Hurts is there at #44.

Link to post
Share on other sites
CantBeStopped

CantBeStopped 310

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CelticColt said:

IMO they need another TE as much or more than WR (unless they feel Campbell and Cain aren't the answer) but it's far more likely there will still be some outstanding WR prospects available at #34 (& maybe even #44) than outstanding TE prospects.

 

They can likely still find a decent TE prospect (Hopkins? Parkinson?) at #75, and if someone like Mims or Aiyuk is still there at #34, I think you almost have to take him--and hope maybe Eason or Hurts is there at #44.

I don't think Cain is the answer any more(considering he plays for Pittsburghhaha)

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
poilucelt

poilucelt 185

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CantBeStopped said:

I don't think Cain is the answer any more(considering he plays for Pittsburghhaha)

My bad: I was thinking of Fountain but wrote Cain.

 

In any event, I think it really comes down to Campbell's progress...and health

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
poilucelt

poilucelt 185

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Gigc said:

I'll stay QB. Eason if he makes it out of the first round, maybe Hurts.

 

we can go WR at 44

IMO #34 is probably too high for Eason, and definitely too high for Hurts, but I'd be surprised if Eason lasts until #44--his arm is too good for some team to pass up, even if his mechanics still need work. So maybe #34 depends a lot on Ballard's FA signings.

 

Hurts, on the other hand, could last until #44, has good character, and is a lot more mobile than Eason FWIW.

5 minutes ago, CantBeStopped said:

Haha I knew who you meant but I had to do it

did Ballard make an offer (tender) to Fountain today? thought I saw that somewhere

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
CantBeStopped

CantBeStopped 310

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CelticColt said:

IMO #34 is probably too high for Eason, and definitely too high for Hurts, but I'd be surprised if Eason lasts until #44--his arm is too good for some team to pass up, even if his mechanics still need work. So maybe #34 depends a lot on Ballard's FA signings.

 

Hurts, on the other hand, could last until #44, has good character, and is a lot more mobile than Eason FWIW.

did Ballard make an offer (tender) to Fountain today? thought I saw that somewhere

Yes I believe he did

Link to post
Share on other sites
poilucelt

poilucelt 185

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

Will there be someone sitting there CB just can't pass up? Like Kmet.
My odds say no and he trades back. 

#34 is so close to Round 1 that there's a good possibility someone drops down to there that another team really covets and Ballard feels the Colts don't need

Link to post
Share on other sites
Moosejawcolt

Moosejawcolt 1,638

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, danlhart87 said:

If Love falls (doubt it) to mid 20s trade up.

 

I would be ok with Ezra Cleveland or Josh Jones.

 

WR there's so many options. 

Oh brother.  I think by the Colts making this move they were never interested in Love as I predicted

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
DownHillRunner

DownHillRunner 410

Posted
Posted

34. Jordan Love 

 

44. Chase Claypool 

 

75. Adam Trautman 

 

 

 

I'm going to predict Love is going to fall out the first round. Tua, Burrow, and Herbert are going to be the only 3 Quarterbacks selected in the 1st round. Even if he slips to the back of the first Ballard can trade back into the first and get him. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
WifiGuy

WifiGuy 424

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, DownHillRunner said:

34. Jordan Love 

 

44. Chase Claypool 

 

75. Adam Trautman 

 

 

 

I'm going to predict Love is going to fall out the first round. Tua, Burrow, and Herbert are going to be the only 3 Quarterbacks selected in the 1st round. Even if he slips to the back of the first Ballard can trade back into the first and get him. 

 

HAHAHA .  I thought we had to trade up to 3-5 with multiple draft picks to get Love!

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
NewColtsFan

NewColtsFan 9,259

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, Superfly said:

With no 1st Rd pick, the trade 34th chatter is comical.

 

Give it a rest! 

What the Heck are you talking about?

 

First round talent often falls to the top of the second round.    If we don’t trade the pick odds are the player we take at 34 is on the Colts first round board. 
Rock Ya-Sin was last year.   Ballard said as much.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
EastStreet

EastStreet 9,813

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Moosejawcolt said:

Oh brother.  I think by the Colts making this move they were never interested in Love as I predicted

Doubt today's move has anything to do with interest in Love. Buckner was simply a move you can't pass up on, and has been easily one of the teams biggest needs the past 2 years. All Pro / Pro Bowl DT that is arguably in the top 5 of 3Ts in the league. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
MPStack

MPStack 3,491

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

What the Heck are you talking about?

 

First round talent often falls to the top of the second round.    If we don’t trade the pick odds are the player we take at 34 is on the Colts first round board. 
Rock Ya-Sin was last year.   Ballard said as much.  


Let me reiterate, which I should have done. I highly doubt the Colts trade back from 34 to acquire more picks. That pick is almost like having a 1st. 
 

Happy now? Probably not, I’m guessing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
shasta519

shasta519 2,959

Posted
Posted

Should be a WR. But I will just say this...Day Two should be entirely devoted to the offense. I am stubborn...and judging by what I have seen in player rankings...you won't convince me that BPA isn't an offensive player at any of those draft positions (Madabuike probably the lone exception...however...he would be a luxury pick with Buckner locked into the 3T position).

 

Colts passed on a good opp to do this last year...I hope they don't this year.

Link to post
Share on other sites
funktacious2

funktacious2 454

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

I'm praying Justin Jefferson, Jalen Reagor, or Denzel Mims is there. Would love to have JJeff, but he probably just ran his way into the 1st with that combine. I think it's likely a WR or TE, if they're signing Rivers gotta give him some weapons. 

Same, if we're not going QB at 34, then I want one of the 1st round talent WRs who might fall out of it. This may be a deep WR but that doesn't mean there aren't drop offs at certain points and besides a deep draft for a position doesn't mean amazing guy can be had in the later rounds, it more likely means more WRs are going earlier than they normally would. BPA and all that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
funktacious2

funktacious2 454

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, wordofmouth said:

I know everyone wants Offence but any chance AJ Espenesa  falls to 34?

 

I don't really want the guy, but I think we certainly could see some defense in round 2. Verrry few forum mocks seem to want to see us address a CB any time before round 3  but I still think it's a position we could use and upgrade at and there is sure to be some good DB available at 34. I still think we're more likely to go offense, but just saying.

Link to post
Share on other sites
CaptainColt12

CaptainColt12 254

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, DownHillRunner said:

34. Jordan Love 

 

44. Chase Claypool 

 

75. Adam Trautman 

 

 

 

I'm going to predict Love is going to fall out the first round. Tua, Burrow, and Herbert are going to be the only 3 Quarterbacks selected in the 1st round. Even if he slips to the back of the first Ballard can trade back into the first and get him. 

 

I don't think Ballard would take love at 34. Ballard has said that if a player is not on his board he won't take them. If Ballard had love on his board he wouldn't have traded away 13. My guess is that he is not on his board due to either the marijuana incident or maybe just his character, not that I or we know his character is bad but maybe when the colts interviewed him he gave bad and undesirable answers. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Followers 1
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Superman
      Adam Schefter: 49ers will take Mac Jones at 3

      By Superman · Posted

      Listen to this clip, which starts a few seconds before the one you shared.     I don't remember him sounding as definitive about Herbert/Tua last season. He did say they'd both go high, and ultimately, they did. Tua to Miami was always the favorite pick, but there were some questions. His comment about Mac Jones sounds different to me.   He could be wrong, and again he kind of backed down a few days later. But "it will be Mac Jones" was a definitive sounding statement that he made, and then he went on to state some scenarios that could happen. It was still pretty strong sounding.
    • stitches
      Adam Schefter: 49ers will take Mac Jones at 3

      By stitches · Posted

      Just... take a step back and look what you are describing. "Not gonna blow teams away" ... "but it is possible to have success from the pocket". Just around the Senior Bowl I started warming up to Mac Jones and I thought he was the best QB at the Senior Bowl by some margin. I like him. I think he can be a Jimmy G/Kirk Cousins type in the right system. But you don't pay 3 first round picks + for that. You don't blow up your draft for 3 years in the future for "not gonna blow teams away" QB. You do that for a QB who you think has the chance to be special. I don't see Mac Jones in that light.     
    • SC-Coltsfan
      Change 1 thing about Colts history

      By SC-Coltsfan · Posted

      I was coming back to add this to my other post about the 1999 draft and saw yours and figured I would post it here instead. Had we made that * Mike Ditka think we were going to take Ricky Williams at #4 we could have had all of the Saints 6 picks in the '99 draft and a 1st and 3rd in 2000. The Saints made that trade to Washington instead at #5 and they indeed used several of those picks and moved up to #7 and took Champ Bailey. I imagine we could have done the same thing and still got Edge. If I recall Polian said he wouldn't have done that trade even if offered because he didn't  want to have to pay that many draft picks 
    • stitches
      Adam Schefter: 49ers will take Mac Jones at 3

      By stitches · Posted

      That's the thing... even if they absolutely loved Mac Jones. NOONE else seems to love him. Why give up so much to do that trade? If you are worried for the Lions or Panthers... just do the trade that Miami did to no. 6 to secure him.    Also, about Schefter. I want you to go back and look at how he's framing it. He's not presenting it as a sourced information. This is NOT a report from Schefter.    Here's Schefter from April 6th:   "I think... I believe... I believe"... there is no mention of sourced information anywhere.   Here's Schefter last year at about the same time: https://247sports.com/Article/Adam-Schefter-NFL-Draft-2020-no-surprise-Justin-Herbert-ahead-of-Tua-Tagovailoa-Alabama-Crimson-Tide-Oregon-Ducks--146037580/   He thought Miami was going to pick Justin Herbert 2 weeks before the draft. Unless those people have a source with direct information ... I will just choose to not believe them. IMO about a day or two before the draft there is likely to be a true leak(like the Baker Mayfield leak) when the owners get involved in final approvement of the pick and they decide to tell their relatives and someone leaks it. Until then, IMO unless explicitly stated by a reliable reporter(Schefter would count as one... just... right now he's conjecturing, not sourcing his guesses), I would choose to believe they know nothing and are just guessing. 
    • Superman
      Adam Schefter: 49ers will take Mac Jones at 3

      By Superman · Posted

      I can't think of a better example.

  • Members

    • luv_pony_express

      luv_pony_express 645

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsSouljah

      ColtsSouljah 239

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 174

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Tsarquise

      Tsarquise 451

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ztboiler

      ztboiler 306

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 9,403

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Los1sol

      Los1sol 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 2,811

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MPStack

      MPStack 3,491

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 8,424

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...