Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
John Hammonds

Castonzo to return - per CB

Recommended Posts

On 2/25/2020 at 9:41 PM, EastStreet said:

We really don't know the situation or terms, but it does appear from the extraneous circumstances that we may have got "took" a bit.

 

If you look at his snaps, he played the majority of snaps in 2 early games (two 90+%) then benched, then mid season plays the majority of snaps in two games (one 80%, on 100%), then benched, then played the majority of snaps in two games late in the season, then benched the last two games.

 

In short, it looks and smells fishy, and a lot like snap manipulation. He had the 4th most snaps of CBs, and only 3 snaps behind the 3rd most. So really he was at minimum a #2 on the depth chart who started 6 games. Not getting 6th for that is pretty confusing. Whatever terms were set to enact the "condition", were weak as hell, and too weak for a guy who was a starter the year before.

 

Intelligent, like one filled with stats and facts, instead of anecdotal stuff..  like the one above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, jimmy g said:

Iowa's  Triston Wirtz!!!

I apologize for spelling this fine young man's name wrong. Its Wirfs, not Wirtz. Plays both Tackle positions. Close to the Iowa College record for weightlifting. A Wrestler, shot-putter, and discus thrower. Fantastic Athlete.  6'5"/ 322 lbs.  A Q clone of a Road Grader.  Put him at RT, Move Braden to RG and Run, Run, Run!!!!  He plays LT best, so he can move over when AC is done.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/26/2020 at 9:56 PM, EastStreet said:

It's all hypothetical right lol. Unless I missed something, we don't know if it there was a hypothetical guaranteed 7th on the table vs conditional 6th. 

 

IMO, whatever it was, it was bad. Call it a bad decision, bad gamble (trying to get a 6th over a 7th), or just getting taken advantage of with conditions. Either way we lost lost. This whole narrative that Ballard can do no wrong or doesn't make mistakes is pretty silly. Folks act like he's been a GM for 10+ years with an unquestionable history. I really like him, but this whole worship thing is funny.

every single thing you and Jared are saying is hypothetical...  you are both assuming there was another option...maybe there wasn't.  none of us know 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kyle said:

every single thing you and Jared are saying is hypothetical...  you are both assuming there was another option...maybe there wasn't.  none of us know 

Yes, all hypothetical. But what is not hypothetical is getting nothing for someone who turned out to be a part time starter and at minimum a #2 CB on the depth chart. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...