Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Indeees perfect Colts Offseason 2020


Recommended Posts

I'm not a numbers guy as some of you are so I'm not going to list cap numbers or contract years here as this is just a list

 

Re-Sign Anthony. I think he ultimately plays

Mack gets extension

 

FA's

 

Sign Brandon Schreff if they believe Braden should remain at Tackle

Sign Conklin if they believe Braden should move back to Guard

 

**Either way.. line is now solidified. 

 

Anthony, Quinton, Ryan, Brandon, Braden or Anthony, Quinton, Ryan, Braden, Jack

 

Sign Yannick or Armstead, I would go Yannick here however a bidding war might not favor us in our approach. I only hope that we don't settle and throw money to like Robert Quinn once the smoke clears, as we sort of did for Justin Houston

 

Sign Hooper TE

 

Draft

 

Pick 13... Brown or Kinlaw, most likely Kinlaw

 

Pick 34 Ruggs.. "crossed fingers here in him still being on the board" SPEED WR position filled

 

Pick 44... Jefferson WR 

 

I'm stopping here as the rest to me is fill in fodder

 

As you can see, it might be a pipedream, however I went with what I believe the true needs are for this team in key spots, this to me IF, BIG IF, the cards fell right is doable and would be the best possible scenario here for the Colts

 

O-Line Schreff or Conklin

D-Line Yannick or Armstead and Kinlaw.. I left out Jones as he is 3-4 fluent

TE Hooper

WR Ruggs and Jefferson

 

I would hope most of you would agree this would be one heck of a scenario. I did leave off the QB as I believe with the additions of offensive weapons in this scenario Brissett(maybe)..Ha!! or hopefully Kelly could get the job done

 

Now I'm going to go put on a helmet so all the bashing I'm about to receive doesn't to badly dent my ugly mug any further...:lol:

 

Salute :thmup:

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He could, but I think he's way more athletic than people give him credit for and projects way better as CB. Definitely could be a good safety, but I think if we drafted him, he fits well as a boundary corner for us.
    • I think we need to sign a vet, but Jackson isn't it. Age and his dirty playstyle are non-starters for me.   JuJu definitely flashed pretty well in the limited games we saw him in. If he's healthy, I think he'll be a solid CB for us.   He dominated every WR at the Senior Bowl, specifically in drills that heavily skew towards WRs, often using techniques he was just really learning in the pro-bowl practices (mainly press man techniques). He dominated in the MAC and dominated at Senior Bowl practices, and with his athletic traits, he projects very well to the NFL. I see him being a dominant CB in the near future. I don't necessarily want to take a CB at 15, but I wouldn't be mad if we took Mitchell.
    • There are quite a few articles on the internet that say he may transition to safety in the NFL. Interesting reads
    • He could feel that he needs Paye to develop into a more complete edge rusher. He keeps promoting that he was great as a run defender, but needs to continue improving. He invested a 1st on him, so he could very well want to retain him. My thought on drafting an edge rusher at 15 is that it works as a hedge in the event you don’t retain Paye or if the player shows far more promise than Paye moving forward. My comment about Pierce is that he invested a good draft pick on him- so the argument could be made that had Pittman walked, he would have Pierce (although we all agree that Pierce hasn’t performed like we hoped, nor would he be a wr1 by any means). He would have options this draft had Pittman not worked out.   The idea was more behind longterm planning when Pierce was drafted. Keep them coming in the pipeline so that you have options, and ideally good ones. Remember when Phillip dorsett was drafted? Many thought at the time the idea was to add to the room and hedge in the event TY walked when his contract was up. I’m not opposed to looking at stacking premium position players in the 1st round. That provides depth at the position short term and options longterm. It lessens the burden on a 1st round rookie at those positions, giving them time to develop. 
    • Crazy that the draft is a month away coming up on us quickly.
  • Members

    • colts52761

      colts52761 89

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,236

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,231

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jason_

      Jason_ 2,167

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • pkbrux

      pkbrux 100

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 20,931

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BlackTiger

      BlackTiger 1,110

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 8,828

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,421

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,219

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...