Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts

Recommended Posts

 

Quote

So tell me this, would CB be evaluating QBs for first round consideration early this season?  If so, then he has had questions about JB early on.  And if CB was at USU last year, what does that say?

IMO every team without a clearcut franchise QB(or a prospect that can turn into one) needs to be evaluating all the highly rated QBs in the draft... and maybe even in future drafts. 

 

About JB- of course he had questions. 1 year extension does not tell me "you are my franchise QB"... it tells me "lets see what you can do". 

 

I don't know if Ballard was at USU last year. I have not heard that. I know he was supposed to travel to Logan, Utah to watch Utah State vs Boise State on Nov. 23 2019. This is during the season and to me it means serious interest. It doesn't mean he loves him, but it means he's taken seriously enough to take away serious time from an NFL GMs schedule mid-NFL season. Maybe he evaluates him and ends up not liking him, but IMO at the very least it means they think he's one of the premier QBs of this class and needs to be evaluated one way or another. 

 

 

Quote

 

To me, it says that he probably at least started off by thinking of Love as a small school developmental QB that could be had in the mid rounds as a back up to Luck or JB.  He wouldn't be thinking first round draft choice early in the season, IMO, and certainly not last season. 

 

If so, who knows if CB has changed his opinion or not?

 

Again - no idea where you got that idea that he was into Love last year. The first I heard about him having interest in Love is this September AFTER Luck retired. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/21/2020 at 5:41 PM, Chloe6124 said:

 

 

This doesn't surprise me.  From my understanding the big knock on Easton is that he doesn't handle pressure too well.  Obviously that's a big deal but at the same time, it's an issue that can be corrected and if you managed to ignore that issue or presume that the issue is corrected then he looks really freaking good.

 

And another thing to keep in mind that most people's #2 player Tua's major issues are injury and size and those are issues that CAN NOT be corrected.  

 

Coaches want to coach so they are going to prefer a player who has all the tools and problems that they can fix than a player with those tools but problems they can't do anything about. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, chad72 said:

 

I do think the baseline level of talent is far greater than at the NFL level to make a statement like that because you do not have that huge a disparity in talent from Team No.1 to Team No.32 like between LSU and Utah State. He could have still made better decisions, no doubt but just pointing it out it is apples and oranges.

 

It's not as though they played LSU every game, Chad, so I'm not exactly sure where you were going with it.  I believe they played two ranked opponents each of the past two seasons.  The point is when the talent around him dropped, his play plummeted and the team sank.  If you're looking for an elite, franchise QB, that's not a good sign.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, #12. said:

It's not as though they played LSU every game, Chad, so I'm not exactly sure where you were going with it.  I believe they played two ranked opponents each of the past two seasons.  The point is when the talent around him dropped, his play plummeted and the team sank.  If you're looking for an elite, franchise QB, that's not a good sign.  

 

Where I am going with it is that you cannot extrapolate that reasoning as black and white and apply it to the NFL like apples to apples. If LSU's talent were No.1 worthy, Utah State in 2018 could have been a Top 30 team talent wise but barely a Top 80 team in 2019, talent wise. That level of talent disparity does not exist in the NFL, where even the worst team is somewhat competitive, though not at key moments to make enough plays to win enough.

 

It would be like asking Andrew Luck playing with a new O-line and new WRs made out of CFL squad guys that haven't played together at best the next year, and Luck's play would plummet and he would be forced to take more chances to win thus leading to more mistakes as well, that does not make him a QB with less than elite traits. Every elite QB needs some weapons around him worth something, and unlike the NFL where the elite QB has the luxury of a little more continuity and stability of offensive systems or at least 60-70% of guys returning, that is not a luxury a college team has, let alone Utah State.

 

Besides, even Joe Burrow is not a generational prospect to say he could be elite. You don't get elite overnight even if you are Peyton Manning, who at least got to start several years with continuity at Tennessee. It takes a few years of chemistry and continuity to get to a good floor, and then get to elite, even if it is sitting a year or more like Rodgers and Mahomes. The college game is not the same to say "elite here in college translates to elite here in the NFL". That is flawed thinking and "broad brushing" extrapolation. If you still agree to disagree, be my guest, I think I have explained my point as well as I can.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Coffeedrinker said:

I would expect that to have an effect, but if those changes cause him to go from looking like a really good QB to a below average QB, then I'd say he wasn't a really good QB to begin with.  And when you watch his 2018 games you see his WRs and RBs bailed him out of a lot poor throws.  He was also asked to make decisions based on his reading of the defense.  That factors in as much as working with new players.

Again, I would expect it to have an effect, but I also thing his numbers looked better in 2018 than his skill level because of the type of offense that Utah State ran.

 

Basically, I do not think he is as bad as he looked in 2019, but unlike most people who want the Colts draft Love, I also do not think he is a s good as he looked in 2018.

Just an "effect".. Ok lol. And you didn't answer the question about how JB would look with all new starters along the OL, RB, WR, and TE... How many times did we listen to people saying JB just needed good WRs, while still having a top 5 OL, top 10 running game, and two of the better TEs in the league. We even had to listen to some blame the OL which was the hot take of the year...

 

Out of Love's top 3 WRs, two had zero stars (247 recruiting composite), and the only one to have any stars was the transfer from Utah who couldn't manage to start in 4 years... One of his top 3 WRs ran a 4.96 40 time (Nathan) lol.... Another, Thompkins, ran a 4.71 lol... Both are horribly slow for a WR. And both were small as hell (5-7, and 5-8)... An "effect" lol... Pascal, our slowest WR runs a 4.55.... That alone is huge, and that doesn't even begin to weight the OL, RB, D, coaches, scheme, etc.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, DougDew said:

I don't know if CB is projecting any outward interest towards Love per se.  Its probably common knowledge by now that he/scouts have been to Love's games....I think early in the year or even last year.  So the public chatter is out there.  Its why he was asked the question in the first place, because the questioner knows he's interested, and its public knowledge.

 

So tell me this, would CB be evaluating QBs for first round consideration early this season?  If so, then he has had questions about JB early on.  And if CB was at USU last year, what does that say?

 

To me, it says that he probably at least started off by thinking of Love as a small school developmental QB that could be had in the mid rounds as a back up to Luck or JB.  He wouldn't be thinking first round draft choice early in the season, IMO, and certainly not last season. 

 

If so, who knows if CB has changed his opinion or not?

After the 2018 season, Love was considered a 1st round talent, not a mid rounder.

 

We have guys at all kinds of college games, it's what hey are paid to do. We actually have guys devoted to college scouting, and specific guys devoted to multiple regions. 

 

Matt Terpening Assistant Director of College Scouting

Mike Derice Area Scout

Chad Henry Area Scout

Byron Lusby Area Scout

Chris McGaha Area Scout

Jamie Moore Area Scout

Anthony Coughlan College Scouting Coordinator

Mike Lacy NFS Scout

Tyler Hughes Area Scout

Zerick Rollins Scouting Assistant

Anthony Foyt IV Scouting Assistant

 

I have no doubt that CB wasn't all in on JB early, and was scouting all kinds of QBs. The only difference, is when you go to Utah St, it's pretty obvious who you're there to see. When our scouts go to LSU, Bama, or Oregon for example, there are a bunch of players from their teams and likely from the opposing team, that we "could" be there to see. And scouts are mainstays at those schools so nobody cares of has a second though. Bama and LSU even have suites IIRC dedicated for pro scouts. Utah St however, small, and in the middle of nowhere, it's noticeable and big news.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, #12. said:

 

That's one way to look at it.  Here's the other way.  To win consistently over many years in the NFL you need a QB who can carry you when the talent isn't there.  That's the mark of an elite, franchise QB.  That's what you're looking for in a QB.  You're not going to have a top 10 defense every year.  You're not going to have all 5 O-linemen play every snap every year.   The fact that Love crashed out with diminished talent at that level gives me little faith he could be a true elite QB who could carry a team at the NFL level.  

 

That said,  I'm not anti-Love.  With where we are in the draft, I would be okay with it.  I'm just not quite as excited as others are about Love.  

Every single position crashed out (plus coaches and scheme)..... lol.. the only returning starter was an in-year injury replacement. Tiny and horribly slow no-star WRs (4.7s-4.9s and 5-7 and 5-8)... This wasn't one group crashing. It was every single thing around him. I'm not saying Love will be all that, but not being realistic about what happened in 2019 is, like I said, disingenuous. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t think Jordan Love is a first round talent.  Not #13 quality. Anyone with a whopping 17 interceptions in his senior season has no business going in the 1st round...period.  Ballard says you can’t force it with QBs in the draft. Taking Love at 13 or higher would be doing just that in my opinion.  We get better value taking someone like Eason in the second and either trading back or taking the best player available on our board in the first round.  By the time the Colts first pick comes I doubt that best player available will be Love.  So don’t force it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, stitches said:

IMO if he likes him enough to take him at 13 he probably will like him enough to trade up in front of Oakland in order to secure him and not risk him getting picked by Gruden. This is just how it usually goes. Teams usually don't wait on QBs, they go get the QB they like. Now maybe "go get him" will mean draft BPA at 13 and then trade up from 34 to the 1st to get him if he thinks he will fall a bit because he seems like a developmental prospect. 

There's almost always a line drawn. I have no clue what he's willing to do. 13 may be the absolute most he's willing to go for Love. Could be 34 too, or could be willing to move up or back from 13. It'll be interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Just an "effect".. Ok lol. And you didn't answer the question about how JB would look with all new starters along the OL, RB, WR, and TE... How many times did we listen to people saying JB just needed good WRs, while still having a top 5 OL, top 10 running game, and two of the better TEs in the league. We even had to listen to some blame the OL which was the hot take of the year...

 

Out of Love's top 3 WRs, two had zero stars (247 recruiting composite), and the only one to have any stars was the transfer from Utah who couldn't manage to start in 4 years... One of his top 3 WRs ran a 4.96 40 time (Nathan) lol.... Another, Thompkins, ran a 4.71 lol... Both are horribly slow for a WR. And both were small as hell (5-7, and 5-8)... An "effect" lol... Pascal, our slowest WR runs a 4.55.... That alone is huge, and that doesn't even begin to weight the OL, RB, D, coaches, scheme, etc.. 

Thanks for point out effect, I hate when don't spell check.

 

I did answer your question, I said it was one of the reasons.  Starting with an entire new team probably had as much to do with his poor numbers and being asked to be a QB and read the defense pre snap, make a change at the line and then go through his progressions after the snap rather than having the WR determined before the snap as happens most time in the air raid system that he played in the year before.

 

So to summarize, in 2018 he out up good numbers and played well because he was a good QB it had nothing to do with his receivers bailing him out on numerous plays or an offensive system that gives college QBs huge numbers.

 

But in 2019 he put up poor numbers and didn't play well because of the offensive system and his receivers weren't talented enough to bail him out on numerous plays.  And oh yeah, in 2019 he had a much better running game in 2019 so you think that would have taken some of the pressure off him but he still put up poor numbers.  But like most people who want Love because someone made the comparison to Patrick Mahomes, the blame for his poor play falls on everyone but Love, while his 2018 is ALL because of Love, because that makes perfect sense.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Coffeedrinker said:

Thanks for point out effect, I hate when don't spell check.

 

I did answer your question, I said it was one of the reasons.  Starting with an entire new team probably had as much to do with his poor numbers and being asked to be a QB and read the defense pre snap, make a change at the line and then go through his progressions after the snap rather than having the WR determined before the snap as happens most time in the air raid system that he played in the year before.

 

So to summarize, in 2018 he out up good numbers and played well because he was a good QB it had nothing to do with his receivers bailing him out on numerous plays or an offensive system that gives college QBs huge numbers.

 

But in 2019 he put up poor numbers and didn't play well because of the offensive system and his receivers weren't talented enough to bail him out on numerous plays.  And oh yeah, in 2019 he had a much better running game in 2019 so you think that would have taken some of the pressure off him but he still put up poor numbers.  But like most people who want Love because someone made the comparison to Patrick Mahomes, the blame for his poor play falls on everyone but Love, while his 2018 is ALL because of Love, because that makes perfect sense.

First off, the running game took a huge step back in 2019. Not sure where you got that it was better in 2019, but you're way wrong. His 2018 RB (Thompson) got drafted, and had 1100+ yards in 2018, plus another 900ish from Bright in 2018. With Thompson gone, Bright only had 900ish again in 2019, and their #2 only had 500ish. So to summarize, 2000ish from RB1+RB2 in 2018, and 1500ish in 2019. 

 

Also, not sure if you're familiar with typical WR measurables. but 4.7 and 4.9 is comically horrible. No WR in 2019 over 4.6 was drafted.  And that slow at 5-8 and 5-9 is beyond horrible. 

 

But no, you didn't answer the question so I'll ask again. How would JB perform with all new starters (never started before), and a new scheme and new coaches? What would his record in 2019 have been? Or would he have mastered the new scheme and raised the performance of his OL and skill players LOL...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Coltsman1788 said:

I don’t think Jordan Love is a first round talent.  Not #13 quality. Anyone with a whopping 17 interceptions in his senior season has no business going in the 1st round...period.  Ballard says you can’t force it with QBs in the draft. Taking Love at 13 or higher would be doing just that in my opinion.  We get better value taking someone like Eason in the second and either trading back or taking the best player available on our board in the first round.  By the time the Colts first pick comes I doubt that best player available will be Love.  So don’t force it.

 

Matt Ryan threw 19 picks his senior year at BC and went #3 overall..

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Out of curiosity, who do you think will be starting over Okereke?  I think we'll see a lot of dime/nickel packages which will make him or Walker come out of the game.. but if I had to guess, I'd think the starting LBs this year will be Leonard, Walker and Bobby O (I think he's certainly capable of being an upgrade to Adams or Franklin -- and right now, https://www.colts.com/team/depth-chart#scroll-defense, the depth chart has him listed as our starting SAM).     Rivers has played with Sproles and Ekeler and utilized them both very well... I think Reich said something about Hines having potential to develop into a Sproles-like player when he was first drafted.. I expect Hines and Rivers will form a solid bond and we'll see Hines (and Campbell) as kind of all-purpose guys on this offense.     If he wasn't a pro-athlete and his uncle wasn't a HOFer, nobody would talk about what Kelly did.  Not saying it's right or wrong, but I imagine many posters on this board have gotten drunk and did something stupid or regrettable at least once in their life time.         Not sure how old you are, but I highly doubt you went through the ages of 18-22 without doing something questionable.  You probably weren't a D-1 football player with a HOF Uncle, so nobody probably really cared to judge you on a public forum.   ____________________________________________________   I think we're going to see a lot of breakout players this year.  The thing Reich talks about a lot is that there will be some weeks where guys will play major roles and others where they will be pretty quiet.  Reich and Sirianni seem to be very adaptable with their offense and they stress the fact that we don't have selfish players on the team.  I think we'll see guys like Hines and Campbell play huge roles in some games and in others we'll hardly see them on the field.   Here's my list:   Hines -- not only as an RB/flex type of guy, but as a returner.  He really became impressive late last year as a punt returner.  If he keeps that up, I could see him being a pro-bowler as a return specialist.  I also see Rivers being able to utilize him a lot better than Brissett did on offense.   Campbell -- kid is a freak athlete.  He showed flashes of being able to play a very versatile role in the offense when healthy last year.... he just needs to keep himself on the field instead of in the trainer's office.   Ya-Sin -- he really came on late last year.  With additions of Buckner, development from Banogu and Turay and our LBers, we have (on paper) a better pass rush.  Should make Ya-Sin's life a lot easier.   Tell -- I was mostly impressed by him last year and he made a position change from college.  I think we'll see him on the field a lot more this year, and if I had to guess he'll be covering bigger TEs quite a bit.   Braden Smith -- Big Q gets a lot of media hype and credit (well deserved), but I don't think Smith is too far off from being a pro-bowl caliber OL.  With the addition of Rivers and the rookie RB, I think our whole OL is going to get a lot more credit this year.   TY -- If he stays healthy, I think the improved QB play is really going to benefit him.   Okereke  -- I see him taking a starting role and really improving.  He played very well last year, especially late in the season.  With a better DL in front of him and more experience, I expect him to really blossom.   Walker -- The addition of Buckner should make AW's life a bit easier.. again, Leonard gets a lot of well deserved credit and attention from our LB corps, but Walker quietly had a very solid year last year.   Hooker -- Contract year and an improved pass rush should really help him out.  Also, I expect the development of Ya-Sin and Tell, with a healthy Kenny Moore and the additions of Rhodes and others, Hooker will have more help from his DB unit as a whole.   Willis -- he had a very solid rookie year, I think his athleticism has him near his 'ceiling' early in his career, but again, improved play in front of him should help him out.   EJ Speed -- Ballard says he's as athletic of an LBer that we have, but came from a small school and was raw as a rookie.  I don't know how much time he'll get on D, but I expect him to be on the field more there and also to excel on STs.   Turay -- he was coming on last year... the addition of Buckner drawing attention from OLs should really help our entire DL.  Turay's workout videos look as though he's really putting in work... hopefully he stays healthy. Banogu -- like Turay, the guy is a very solid athlete who was pretty raw coming out of college.  I anticipate he'll make a similar jump in year 2.   Xavier Rhodes -- not sure if I'd call it a breakout year, as he's been an all-pro before.  Even though he was a probowler last year, it was his worst season to date.. I think he'll fit in very well with this D.   Grover Stewart -- He was a project pick and really started to develop last year.  I think having Buckner next to him will really help him step up.   Autry -- Hunt played pretty terrible last year (or at least digressed from his 2018), and I don't think it had positive effects on Autry.. having Buckner and a healthy Turay along with Justin Houston and others should really help him out.   Le'Raven Clark -- I don't know if he'll see the field, but I won't be shocked at all if replaces Glow, or if Smith moves to RG and Clark moves to RT.     Trey Burton -- he's a Reich guy and (if healthy) I think he can be a very good fit on this offense.   Asthon Dulin -- Don't think he'll be on the field much on O, but he was definitely improving last year.  I do, however, think he'll crack our roster and contribute significantly on STs.   Reece Fountain/Pascal -- I think these guys will be in the 4-6 WR roles, but, with improved QB play and with the addition of Pittman and Patmon, and the hopeful healthiness of TY and Pascal, I think when these guys are on the field, they'll have a lot better chance of being put in favorable matchups.  I thought Pascal played well last year, but with JB digressing as the season went on and with him sometimes being utilized as our #1 WR, I don't think he had the best situation.   Marlon Mack -- I don't know that his stats will go up, per se... but I think with the addition of Taylor (both taking workload off Mack and being a different type of back), that when Mack gets his number called, he's going to be very successful.   *I won't be shocked if Fountain and/or Dulin don't make the team, but if they do, I think they'll be all right for us and improved from last year (maybe not 'breakouts', but certainly should be in better positions with improved QB play and supporting cast).
    • Very glad to see how much influence Mathis has had on Turay.  It's always cool to see an ex-Colt great contributing and helping out our young talent.  Seems as though Reggie helps a bit, but I don't recall anyone like Mathis who remained so involved with the horseshoe and helping develop young talent so much.   Also, very cool to hear how appreciative Turay is of Mathis.  He seems like a good dude.
    • Part of what makes a player great over his career is longevity.  The rule of thumb I have always heard for HOF selection is 'a decade of dominance.'  Unless you really change the game, you have to have ~a decade of being an elite player to get in (an exception may be a guy like Megatron, because his combo of size, speed, power, hands, etc. in some ways revolutionized the game of football).   Leonard is certainly off to a good start.. and by a stats comparison, a better start than Lewis.  Lewis was not an all-pro (first or second team) as a rookie.  He was 2nd team in his 2nd and 3rd years, and again in 2010.  He was first team 7 times.   Leonard was a first team all pro as a rookie, which is very rare.  He was 2nd team in year 2, a year in which he missed 3+ games.  Leonard was the defensive rookie of the year (Simeon Rice got that award when Lewis was a rookie).  At the same points in their careers, Leonard has proven to be better at causing turnovers (his INT numbers are outstanding for a LBer)... but, he also plays in a different scheme and a different position (most of the time), so that's hard to really judge.   Lewis was a 2x NFL Defensive Player of the Year.  Leonard has not done that yet.  I don't doubt that he's capable of it, but he hasn't.  Lewis was a 2x Superbowl Champion and a 1x SB MVP, both things which Leonard hasn't accomplished.  Lewis was a 13x pro-bowler.. like Leonard, he missed out his rookie year.  Lewis is also on the 2000's all-decade team as the best at his position during that decade.   In terms of off-field stuff, Leonard seems to have less baggage than Lewis did at a young age.  That said, Lewis did seem to clean up his act after that alleged murder incident.  He also seems to be a pretty solid guy now and has several charities and does a lot for young minority communities.     In terms of on-field leadership, Lewis was outstanding.  I don't know how long that took, as I don't follow Baltimore as intensely as I do Indy (i.e., was he a captain in his second year and a tremendous leader of men as a rookie? I don't know).  Leonard, was named team captain in his 2nd year, and he was a leader right out of the gates.  From all interviews and things I've read, his coaches and teammates view him as the leader of the Indy D and seemingly have after just a few games as a rookie -- that's rare.   In short, Leonard is off to a heckuva start to his career.... but, let's hold off on comparing him to a first-ballot HOFer.  If he keeps it up for another 8-12 years, this thread deserves to be revisited.  
    • I am not calling Barkley a choker because when he went to  Philly they were not the same team that had won the finale in 1983. When he played for Phoenix they were a 50% team. His last 4 years with Houston he only stated 152 games in four years due to injury. He averaged 22.1 pts and 11.7 rebounds in his career. In the playoffs he averaged 23 pts and 12.9 rebounds.  He was the rebound leader in 1987 at 6'5".  He was the MVP in 1993. He also was the team leader for both Gold Medals in the Olympics in 1992 and 1996.  Sorry IMO those are not choker numbers. 
    • I find it very unlikely a team signs Kelly off our practice squad. If we want to run 3 QBs and keep Kelly on the PS we probably can.
  • Members

    • Behle

      Behle 27

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 2,814

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt.45

      Colt.45 117

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Vexed

      Vexed 77

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superfly

      Superfly 4,102

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SteelCityColt

      SteelCityColt 8,447

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JackColt23

      JackColt23 20

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mr. Irrelevant

      Mr. Irrelevant 1,067

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mel Kiper's Hair

      Mel Kiper's Hair 1,304

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dacoltsboi

      Dacoltsboi 31

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...