Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

[J. T. O'Sullivan] Justin Herbert Film Session


Recommended Posts

I actually just watched this.  Love when guys do these films.  Half the time I dont' even listen to them and I just watch the play for myself.  Though I came to a lot of similar conclusions.  He is hesitant on his throws to the sideline a lot of times.  Like you can visually see him being tempted to throw it and he just doesn't.  I think Sullivan is right on the money when he says that ball flip caused the incompletion in the dirt on the swing pass.

 

My biggest worry is, I don't know how you know a passer is going through multiple progressions or, it's coaches taking the progressions out of your hands and predetermining your look one, look two throw.  But I get the sense that Herbert's reads are very rigid.  I don't know how to explain it.  There was a play or two where I felt it was like that near touch down at the end, no swing pass, then throw screen.  I guess what I'm saying is, is Herbert reading the field like he would in the NFL, or just looking and throwing where the coach tells him.  I don't know how to decipher that, but I get the sense that he doesn't scan the field like he would be in the NFL.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

I actually just watched this.  Love when guys do these films.  Half the time I dont' even listen to them and I just watch the play for myself.  Though I came to a lot of similar conclusions.  He is hesitant on his throws to the sideline a lot of times.  Like you can visually see him being tempted to throw it and he just doesn't.  I think Sullivan is right on the money when he says that ball flip caused the incompletion in the dirt on the swing pass.

 

My biggest worry is, I don't know how you know a passer is going through multiple progressions or, it's coaches taking the progressions out of your hands and predetermining your look one, look two throw.  But I get the sense that Herbert's reads are very rigid.  I don't know how to explain it.  There was a play or two where I felt it was like that near touch down at the end, no swing pass, then throw screen.  I guess what I'm saying is, is Herbert reading the field like he would in the NFL, or just looking and throwing where the coach tells him.  I don't know how to decipher that, but I get the sense that he doesn't scan the field like he would be in the NFL.

 

Yeah, I have to be very upfront here and say that my understanding of QBs progression reads is not anywhere close to the level of people who have played the position(like O'Sullivan) or coaches, etc. I guess it's coached in a specific way for different route concepts and he probably recognizes the route concepts and knows what the QB is doing(or supposed to be doing) in those situations and that's why he's pin pointing situations in which it looks like he's doing the reads. 

 

Unfortunately, I'm a very late fan of football and never grew up playing so my understanding suffers a lot in regards to the details of schemes and Xs and Os. This is part of the reason I enjoy  following analysts that are very in on those things and explain Xs and Os and schematics well(Greg Cosell, O'Sullivan, etc). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stitches said:

 

Yeah, I have to be very upfront here and say that my understanding of QBs progression reads is not anywhere close to the level of people who have played the position(like O'Sullivan) or coaches, etc. I guess it's coached in a specific way for different route concepts and he probably recognizes the route concepts and knows what the QB is doing(or supposed to be doing) in those situations and that's why he's pin pointing situations in which it looks like he's doing the reads. 

 

Unfortunately, I'm a very late fan of football and never grew up playing so my understanding suffers a lot in regards to the details of schemes and Xs and Os. This is part of the reason I enjoy  following analysts that are very in on those things and explain Xs and Os and schematics well(Greg Cosell, O'Sullivan, etc). 

I played since a child and up into college (walk-on at IU for a year as a TE and then done).  I understood routes and all that, tempo and the like, but not necessarily from a QB perspective (for instance, I didn't understand what throwing receivers open meant or looked like until several years after I played). 

 

I think this is one of those things that you just don't come to know until you spent so much time working with people in the industry.  Even then, it takes an intimate knowledge of the plays called and responsibilities of each player on a give ndown to really break down accurately.  Something us common folk will never really understand since we don't have the time or expertise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think odunze, Harrison,  and nabors are all better than pittman that's for sure and there there are several  wrs better than pierce as well as well as many corners that are better  than what we have.
    • Sure alot can get a 1000 yards, but what makes wrs elite are the ones who score alot and catch first downs. Colts don't have a wr on the roster that scores alot. Pittman is a wr 2 in my opinion. Pierce a wr 4 with wr 2 potential. Downs wr 2/3. Neither one of those guys are marvin Harrison  or Reggie Wayne. None of our safeties are Bob sanders. None of our edge rushers are freeney or Mathis. No Nick harpers, Kelvin Hayden, marlin Jackson, or vontaome Davis at cb So we can stand to improve  at wr, s, pass rush,and cb. We have alot of solid  guys sprinkled across the roster but very few I'd consider  elite. Buckner, Nelson, and a healthy Taylor  are among the elite. That is why I'm hoping for a game changing player in the first round. Most rookie corners aren't  that.
    • Two relevant points.   Regarding the team ALWAYS going to be run first team, RB shelf life is short and JT has already played a lot of years compared to average peak time for RBs, so there aren't many years in him into the future unless he goes on like Adrian Peterson. This team was run first because QBs weren't good, was it run first with Andrew Luck? I don't think this team is going to be run-first offense ALWAYS, especially after drafting AR, while expecting him to grow to be a franchise QB-level passer.   Yes, it's all true that Jefferson got drafted at 22,Ceedee went 17, Juedy went 15 , Aiyuk 25 and Higgins 33 but GM has gotta pick the right guy at right time and other teams shouldn't get to the right guy before Colts do.   For every Jefferson at #22 example, there's a Jalen Reagor at #21. The toughest part in picking Jefferson at #22 is not picking a bust like Reagor and missing out on Jefferson. As you go away from the top of the Draft, hitting on busts is more likely than exactly drafting the perfect right guy. Drafting isn't that easy, without the help of hindsight.    Right now, We can't name which of the WRs in upcoming draft will be a good value, good return pick, even though this draft class is super, super deep on WRs. Of course, 4 years later in 2028, everyone can point out Jefferson or Higgins or Lamb or Aiyuk of 2024 WR Draft Class. 
    • No idea why you can't PM me. I did pm u a week or two ago. No idea if u received it.
    • Replace Arnold with Brian thomas jr  and I'll agree
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...