Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Another Rivers to the Colts Prediction


Recommended Posts

Just now, krunk said:

Rivers has no fear about driving the football downfield. The offense will definitely open up with him back there. And he loves to utilize the tight ends so maybe we get to see more of what a guy like Mo Cox has.

I think our WRs and TEs would look a lot more 2018ish than 2019ish, that's for sure.

Just having a compitent QB would take stress off the OL, the running games, not to mention the D. I think our D would look more 2018ish than 2019ish too.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I actually am all for Rivers.  To me, he’s one of those all-time warrior type of QBs.  Reminds me of Favre.  Two years of him rejuvenated behind a top notch OL, yeah, I MUCH prefer this as compared to

Peyton threw six interceptions in a game once. Five in the first half.    Not saying I want Rivers, but don’t act like he’s the only player that’s done something like this. 

I would rather have a band-aid than the current open wound. Besides, Rivers is not meant to be the ultimate solution...he is merely a stopgap and mentor for whatever rookie they draft.    Re

No to Cry me a Rivers. I just hate him I’m sorry. There is a chance, but I’d be happy if we didn’t. It stems from 07-08 for my reasoning lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/1/2020 at 10:08 AM, Doc said:

It's very interesting on how this was the focus of your response, a typo.

 

Never the less, Phillip Rivers is not the answer for the Colts.

Jacoby Brissett was not bad. And we did fine until injuries plagued the Colts.

I know everybody is also railing on Adam Vinatieri, for the missed field goals. Maybe he's done, I don't know.  What I do know is EVERYBODY has bad years. 

The thing about Rivers, is according to him it's everybody else on the team that is the problem and he's trying to make the team better. I predict the the Chargers will win more games now that he's gone.

 

As you can guess I am not a fan of Rivers at all.


yeah, I can tell... does not mean you are correct, and you are not.
 

Brissett doesn’t sniff Rivers jock strap as far as checking all the boxes of what a quarterback should be able to do goes. Rivers is the short term answer for the Colts. Even if we draft a Qb like Love at 13, it’s not reasonable to throw him in the fire like so many teams do with rookies. The super bowl champs didn’t even do that with Patrick Mahomes, who is next level talented. Anyone should look at that situation, or the Rodgers/GB situation, and realize it’s the smart thing to do. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


yeah, I can tell... does not mean you are correct, and you are not.
 

Brissett doesn’t sniff Rivers jock strap as far as checking all the boxes of what a quarterback should be able to do goes. Rivers is the short term answer for the Colts. Even if we draft a Qb like Love at 13, it’s not reasonable to throw him in the fire like so many teams do with rookies. The super bowl champs didn’t even do that with Patrick Mahomes, who is next level talented. Anyone should look at that situation, or the Rodgers/GB situation, and realize it’s the smart thing to do. 

I totally agree.   Both Superbowl QB's from last year rode the bench for awhile.  

Rivers would be a perfect 2 year bridge.  Once the 2 years are up, there is no wondering if he should be re-signed.   If we draft a QB this year, maybe he ends up playing in 2021 if Rivers is failing.  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Myles said:

I totally agree.   Both Superbowl QB's from last year rode the bench for awhile.  

Rivers would be a perfect 2 year bridge.  Once the 2 years are up, there is no wondering if he should be re-signed.   If we draft a QB this year, maybe he ends up playing in 2021 if Rivers is failing.  


Rivers likely runs Indy’s offense next year better than anyone we could bring in. He has played under Reich and Sirriani both, and would slide right in understanding their playbook and philosophy. Reich would focus on Rivers strengths and Ballard can continue focusing on building the roster without forcing the issue at QB. I don’t see how forcing quarterback in the first round is the answer, unless they are just absolutely sold on someone. I don’t see it right now. Would I like Love this draft? Yes, but at 13, it’s a risk, let alone moving up for him. I’d rather pick a premium player at 13, which could very well happen this draft, and see who slides at QB. Give them time under a true vet to develop and by then, this roster will be deep and hopefully very talented. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

If Rivers signs, and JB backs him up, they are both Wolfpackers.

If Herbert is drafted and Mariota signs, the Offense is all Ducked up! The backup would be a Sitting Duck....

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rumor is Rivers may end up as an announcer...

 

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/03/05/philip-rivers-could-find-a-home-in-the-espn-booth/

 

Quote

 

...New York Post report that says ESPN would like to pair Al Michaels with Peyton Manning also says that ESPN has shown interest in Rivers...

 

...Rivers could be the fallback option if Manning spurns ESPN...

 

...he’s likely to have suitors — both among NFL teams looking for a starting quarterback, and among television networks looking for a broadcaster.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Im almost certain we are signing a vet QB. Ballard keeps mentioning adding explosion to the offense. Even if he upgrades the WR you still wont have much explosiveness this year if you start a rookie QB.  CB is looking for drastic improvent on last years totals. The ideal thing to do is upgrade the WR and bring in a Vet QB like Carr or Rivers. Draft the young QB to sit for at least this year.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jimmy g said:

If Rivers signs, and JB backs him up, they are both Wolfpackers.

If Herbert is drafted and Mariota signs, the Offense is all Ducked up! The backup would be a Sitting Duck....

Well played!    Bravo!!

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Zoltan said:

With Rivers moving his family to Florida you would think there would be more stories linking him to the Bucs

They moved to the panhandle.  Their like a five or six hour drive from Tampa.... Might as well consider any east of the Rockies team if you have to travel that far.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Shafty138 said:

They moved to the panhandle.  Their like a five or six hour drive from Tampa.... Might as well consider any east of the Rockies team if you have to travel that far.


Good point but still a way shorter flight than flying to Indy. 
I mean he had a driver and commuted from San Diego to LA. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/6/2020 at 12:05 AM, Zoltan said:

With Rivers moving his family to Florida you would think there would be more stories linking him to the Bucs


that’s strictly for tax purposes... He’s looking to cash in for the next few years and then be a retiree in the good old tax safe haven state of Florida. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is looking more and more like Rivers from the latest news. Drafting Anthony Gordon from Washington State is in the rumor mill or even trading up to get one of the highly rated QBs. Tough call for the GM.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/17/2020 at 7:28 AM, RollerColt said:

images mlb playoffs GIF

Peyton almost --- should have --- won that game too! :) 

Adam missed a chippie 25 yard field goal with time running out after Peyton brought us back in the rain against the Chargers.

I was there. really great "almost" comeback.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/17/2020 at 9:45 AM, rockywoj said:

I actually am all for Rivers.  To me, he’s one of those all-time warrior type of QBs.  Reminds me of Favre.  Two years of him rejuvenated behind a top notch OL, yeah, I MUCH prefer this as compared to trading the 1st for Carr or even using the 1st on a QB reach in the draft.

 

Give me Rivers without expending draft capital, get a first round stud D prospect like Kinlaw to further beef up that defence, and bring in another high quality WR weapon in the 2nd round.  I think the “team” will be much better off for it and I think Rivers is a QB that can still lead a good team to the promised land. He should be well motivated for some late, late career heroics.  

The only thing that would be worst than signing rivers would be keeping Brissett.

  • Thanks 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, jameszeigler834 said:

The only thing that would be worst than signing rivers would be keeping Brissett.

I see both of those things happening, in fact I expect it

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/8/2020 at 10:42 AM, Dogg63 said:

Interesting, that rating scale puts JB at 19th passing and 10th rushing.

 

That scale must be broken because according to this forum JB is worse than any QB who ever touched a football. Sigh.

He is awful cant beat zone coverage doesn't throw more than 5 yards past the LOS most of the time you cant win like that if your passing game is 30th or worst in the league especially when your running game still isn't exactly consistent.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/8/2020 at 10:42 AM, Dogg63 said:

Interesting, that rating scale puts JB at 19th passing and 10th rushing.

 

That scale must be broken because according to this forum JB is worse than any QB who ever touched a football. Sigh.

No, he's just close.  lol.  Seriously though, we know what he is here, and I dont think it's good enough.  I think Andy Dalton is talented enough to do above avg. here, if that tells you how good a QB I think we need as a floor.... and that JB is our basement.

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

ESPN's NFL Live spent a decent amount of time talking Rivers-to-Colts today. There's a whole lot of smoke out there. Bet it happens by the end of next week.

...or these are the "smoke signals" that  Irsay mentioned, a few weeks ago, that the Colts would be putting out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's see....predictions of Rivers coming here

 

...of the Colts trading up to the top of the draft to grab Herbert or Love

 

...of the Colts starting Chad Kelly

 

If Jacoby lines up under center game one, I am gonna laugh my donkey off!

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

...or these are the "smoke signals" that  Irsay mentioned, a few weeks ago, that the Colts would be putting out?

Without a 13th pick now to take a QB, I don't think there's a lot of reasons to send smoke signals about Rivers.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Four2itus said:

Let's see....predictions of Rivers coming here

 

...of the Colts trading up to the top of the draft to grab Herbert or Love

 

...of the Colts starting Chad Kelly

 

If Jacoby lines up under center game one, I am gonna laugh my donkey off!

keep-calm-and-aspire-to-mediocrity.png

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Four2itus said:

Let's see....predictions of Rivers coming here

 

...of the Colts trading up to the top of the draft to grab Herbert or Love

 

...of the Colts starting Chad Kelly

 

If Jacoby lines up under center game one, I am gonna laugh my donkey off!

Why is that?  

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the people hyping Rivers to the Colts had ZERO inkling about the Buckner trade. Take this news with a pinch of salt.

 

We'll see but my expectation at the start of the offseason was Brissett goes into training camp as the starter, and he's joined by a day 2 QB who gets to fight for the starting job. Hurts, Gordon, whoever. I still think that's how the cookie crumbles. 

 

No one saw Buckner coming. I doubt Rivers is going to be telegraphed by the Colts. The next few free agents who come in will likely be more guys along the line of Sheard or Autry. Underrated, solid signings.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Colt.45 said:

All the people hyping Rivers to the Colts had ZERO inkling about the Buckner trade. Take this news with a pinch of salt.

 

We'll see but my expectation at the start of the offseason was Brissett goes into training camp as the starter, and he's joined by a day 2 QB who gets to fight for the starting job. Hurts, Gordon, whoever. I still think that's how the cookie crumbles. 

 

No one saw Buckner coming. I doubt Rivers is going to be telegraphed by the Colts. The next few free agents who come in will likely be more guys along the line of Sheard or Autry. Underrated, solid signings.

Nobody saw Buckner specifically, but that's because he was still under contract. Several on the board have suggested we go big in FA for a DT though. A few of us were just chatting a few days ago that we think 2 of the 4 biggest needs (QB, 3T, WR, OT) would be covered in FA.

 

On Rivers, there's a lot of smoke, and it's not just the "xxxx is linked to the Colts because of cap space" kind of smoke. A lot of solid and connected reporters have suggested it. It absolutely may not materialize, but it's seeming more and more possible. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EastStreet said:

Nobody saw Buckner specifically, but that's because he was still under contract. Several on the board have suggested we go big in FA for a DT though. A few of us were just chatting a few days ago that we think 2 of the 4 biggest needs (QB, 3T, WR, OT) would be covered in FA.

 

On Rivers, there's a lot of smoke, and it's not just the "xxxx is linked to the Colts because of cap space" kind of smoke. A lot of solid and connected reporters have suggested it. It absolutely may not materialize, but it's seeming more and more possible. 

We'll see. 

Many were pretty sure Jordan Love was going to be a Colt.

I'm resigned to the notion of Brissett starting another season while hoping an Anthony Gordon or some other rookie can soundly best him in TC.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Colt.45 said:

We'll see. 

Many were pretty sure Jordan Love was going to be a Colt.

I'm resigned to the notion of Brissett starting another season while hoping an Anthony Gordon or some other rookie can soundly best him in TC.

I wouldn't be shocked if Love fell and still ended up with Indy at 34 lol... 

I wouldn't be unhappy if we got Gordon in the mid rounds, but I really only like that with Rivers coming in to mentor.

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

I wouldn't be shocked if Love fell and still ended up with Indy at 34 lol... 

I wouldn't be unhappy if we got Gordon in the mid rounds, but I really only like that with Rivers coming in to mentor.

I think it possibly could happen as well especially if other QB needy teams sign these free agent QBs to start for them. Getting Love at 34 would be great for Indy and would allow him to learn under Rivers for a year or 2. 

 

Then at 44 overall I would hope Ballard would go WR there to give Indy a true #2 WR.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BProland85 said:

I think it possibly could happen as well especially if other QB needy teams sign these free agent QBs to start for them. Getting Love at 34 would be great for Indy and would allow him to learn under Rivers for a year or 2. 

 

Then at 44 overall I would hope Ballard would go WR there to give Indy a true #2 WR.

I'd probably want a TE if Kmet was there at 44, and a WR at 75. 

 

Purely my opinion, but if they bring back Funch, and the injury gods aren't evil to us, having TY, Funch, Campbell, Hines, Doyle, Kmet, and a 3rd round WR...... that's plenty of quality for a guy like Rivers to be successful with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nail biter for several reasons. Pre-game beers may be needed for the nerves.
    • If I had to guess, Rivers will be back on the books.
    • Typically to be a HOFer you have to be dominant for ~a decade.  Leonard and Q are ~2.5 years into their careers (about a quarter of the way there).  Leonard has not played 16 games in a season yet, which is somewhat concerning to me.  This year, while he and Q both look very good, I don't think either is deserving of an all-pro award.     So yes, very impressive that Q has been 1st team all-pro 2x and Leonard has a 1st and 2nd team all-pro under his belt.  That is very rare (Gale Sayers and Dick Butkus are the only other 2 teammates who made 1st team all-pro as rookies).  In no way am I knocking Q or Leonard, they're both critical pieces to this team and at the elite level in the NFL at their respective positions.  Labeling them as HOFers this early into their career is a bit of a stretch, though -- let's give them another 3.5-4 years to see if they're still healthy and performing at an all-pro level.  They're certainly off to a good start, but there are a lot of players who have made 2 all-pro teams in their career and are not HOFers (heck, LeRoy Butler was a 4x 1st-team all-pro and has been eligible for HOF induction for ~15 years and isn't in, Steve Wisniewski was 2x 1st team, 6x 2nd team and not in, etc.).  Also, the vast majority of HOFers were not first team all-pro as rookies.  These 2020 rookies are in perhaps the strangest year of the modern era, with limited training camps, no pre-season games, missing games due to COVID (see Taylor), etc.... Pittman, Taylor, Blackmon have all shown flashes of excellence and all have had their own obstacles on top of a weird off-season as rookies (Blackmon coming off injury getting thrown into starting line-up due to HOoker going down, Taylor having Mack go down and now missing a game on the COVID list, and Pittman with compartment syndrome).   No reason to expect any of them to be HOFers, but also no reason why if they stay healthy and continue improving that we don't start talking about them being at the HOF level in 4-5 more years.     In all honesty, it is way too early to tell if this class will stack up to the 2018 class.  We really won't know for another 4-5 years when we see which guys from the 2018 draft are given/not given contract extensions and when the current class is at the same point.      As far as just judging by rookie season alone, it's not unreasonable to think it won't be another >30 years before we see rookie teammates on the first team all-pro squad together (believe Butkus and Sayers was 1965).  That said, aside from Q and Leonard we got solid contributions from Smith and Hines on O, saw solid ST contributions from Franklin and Adams (with Franklin playing a minimal D role as a fill-in starter 2 games and Adams basically invisible on D), got very little from Turay and Lewis and basically nothing from Fountain, Cain.  Wilkins was OK as a 3rd RB and OK as a kick returner and our only UDFA who did anything noteworthy wad Odum as a solid STer and with a couple decent starts when he was needed due to injury.   Overall we had 4 of 11 picks (or 4 of 12 rookies who contributed) who really didn't do much as rookies (33% vs. 66% percent who contributed significantly in some aspect of the game).     So in short, the 2018 class as rookies had 2 studs (Q and Leonard), 2 guys who contributed solidly on O (Hines and Smith), 4 solid ST contributors (Odum, Adams, Franklin, Wilkins), 4 guys who really did nothing (Turay, Lewis, Cain, Fountain).   Three years later, we still have 2 studs (Q and Leonard), 1 very solid RT (Smith),  2 guys who are doing well in a RB rotation (Hines and Wilkins), 2 unknowns on the DL (Lewis and Turay - by far Lewis' best year, but he hasn't really been great), and 3 solid STers (Odum, Franklin, Adams and 4 if you count Hines).   Then we have Cain (gone) and Fountain (still pretty much doing nothing).  Again, about 2/3 of these guys are still contributing solidly in some way on the team, with the other 1/3 still unknown or not doing much (Turay started to come on last year and Lewis is recently coming on this year, so if they both continue, we may see 83% of that class as solid contributors moving forward).     The 2020 class as rookies -- we have 1 borderline stud (Blackmon), 2 very solid  O contributors (Taylor and Pittman), 3 very solid ST contributors (Rodgers, Glasgow, Blankenship), 1 guy who has been OK in a pinch as a backup or extra lineman (Pinter), 1 guy who has made the active roster after mostly being on the PS (Windsor - IMO, he's about as valuable to this year's team as Lewis was at the same point in 2018), 1 guy who has been very solid the past few weeks (Harris) and 2 guys (Eason and Patmon) who have been on the roster but inactive.  That puts us at 7 or 8 guys who have been solid contributors out of 11 as rookies (63% or 72%) and 3 or 4 guys (Eason, Patmon, Windsor, maybe Pinter) for a total of 27-36% of rookies who are not doing much at this point of the season (this could change moving forward if Pinter has to fill in for Kelly for a while and/or if Windsor takes on a bigger role down the stretch, it is not coincidence to me that he was activated the week we cut Day).  So right now, we're looking at 30-40% of our rookies not producing too much, but this could change to 20% (assuming Eason and Patmon don't play this year and Pinter and Windsor see increasing roles).     Overall, Ballard is >60% in both drafts in terms of having productive players as rookies.  It is very unlikely we'll see any team have 2 first team all-pros as rookies again in the near future (or ever).  We may see a DROY from the 2020 draft class like we saw in the 2018 draft class on this team.  Both Leonard and Blackmon have been criticized for being picked too early, etc... Ballard has proven those doubters wrong.     When we look back in a few years, if Eason is a franchise QB and Pittman and Patmon are a solid WR duo (perhaps Harris is still performing well), Taylor is a bellcow >1,200 yard rusher, Blackmon is an all-pro, Pinter is a starter (RG or RT), Rodgers is giving us a TD or more per year as a return guy, Glasgow is a solid STer, Hot Rod is a probowl K, and Windsor is still in the DL rotation and this draft could be better than the 2018 draft.  Again, too early to tell.  If we want to consider Buckner a part of the 2020 draft (the 13th pick), I think there's a good argument that the 2020 draft will exceed the 2018 draft.   Also, something to keep in mind -- our team was in very bad shape when Ballard took over.  In 2017, he was drafting for a team with a coach we pretty much all knew was going to be gone in a year.  In 2018, it was a lot easier to get significant playing time on the roster (at least IMO) because it was so bad.  In a short time, Ballard has put a lot of solid pieces together and this team is a much more difficult team to make the final roster, let alone get significant playing time as a rookie.     I agree with you on your Blackmon assessment.  It'd be cool if he got DROY... and he has made several key plays at critical times (e.g., forced fumble in OT last week)... but he's not perfect.  TBH, I think it was kind of disappointing that the long ball from Rodgers to MVS was not broken up near the end of the 4th quarter.  Blackmon was a step or two behind, but I think most very high end safeties would have broken that play up.     McDaniels dissing Ballard may have actually made Ballard's job easier.  I think Reich was the right guy for this team and after seeing Patricia fired from DET, and looking at stats of Belichick's coordinators who went on to head coaching jobs, they have a pretty poor track record.     Yes, I think Q and Leonard's play has been solid this year, but I don't think either of them deserve to be all-pros (at least not 1st team).  Won't be shocked if Q gets selected though, mainly because of his name and the fact Baldy and other reporters like to really focus on his positive plays.  He's been beaten more this year than I can remember (which is still not a lot) and has more holds than I remember in his first 2 years.     Agree, the most deserving of all-pro on this roster is Buckner (though, I can't see him getting the nod due to lack of stats and the fact that Donald and other interior DL in the league are playing at very high levels).  Second most deserving, IMO, is Hot Rod -- he's likely to be leading the league in points scored after tomorrow's game.  Just hit a big game winner.  Has a solid chance of ending the season >90% FG made and leading the league in points scored -- it'd be hard to vote against him for at least 2nd team K if he finishes the year >90% FG made and leads league in points.
    • I'm surprised we towards the middle on this (37). Thought we'd be lower.
  • Members

    • The Peytonator

      The Peytonator 2,732

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crazycolt1

      crazycolt1 14,224

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SicWhitted

      SicWhitted 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tate

      tate 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bravo4460

      bravo4460 1,770

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,814

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Stephen

      Stephen 2,454

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JackOLantin

      JackOLantin 12

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ClaytonColt

      ClaytonColt 511

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shasta519

      shasta519 2,960

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...