Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Chloe6124

Is Ngakoue about to be free agent-cryptic tweet

Recommended Posts

i mean the Jags have like no money and a lot of players hate it there so not surprised he wants to leave and get paid and paid a lot. 
P.S Colts should take a run at him or Arik Armstead two fast big guys on the edge

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

 

Interesting.  Dave Caldwell their GM said recently that signing him should happen "relatively easily".  They have the franchise tag so this sort of makes no sense. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he somehow doesn't get re-signed or tagged by the Jags, Ballard must get this guy a contract. He is a damn good player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He has some more tweets that indicate he is leaving. One says don’t believe everything you hear. That could be referring to what the GM said. He also has one that says Master of my own fate. Seems he wants to leave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Chloe6124 said:

He has some more tweets that indicate he is leaving. One says don’t believe everything you hear. That could be referring to what the GM said. He also has one that says Master of my own fate. Seems he wants to leave.

Leverage, threats, honest..... who knows.

 

BTW, what is this character's character?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be very un-Ballard like, but I would love to see this guys as a Colt as long as he fits the culture of the team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He wants 20+ million a year, he's not worth it. He only had about 8 sacks this year and was a major liability in the running game. No way would I touch him for 20 million, no way.. If the OT gets their hands on him it's over, so teams started just running right at him and it worked, he's been very ineffective..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They will at the very least franchise tag him so they wouldn't lose him as an asset. If he wants out you will have to trade for him most probably... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would rather have Chris Jones if he somehow becomes available....sign Jones and possibly draft Kinlaw/Brown....D line becomes potentially scary there. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PeterBowman said:

Would rather have Chris Jones if he somehow becomes available....sign Jones and possibly draft Kinlaw/Brown....D line becomes potentially scary there. 

Love this. Our DL would be a terror if that happened. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, PeterBowman said:

Would rather have Chris Jones if he somehow becomes available....sign Jones and possibly draft Kinlaw/Brown....D line becomes potentially scary there. 

 

That would be amazing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PrestonColt said:

i mean the Jags have like no money and a lot of players hate it there so not surprised he wants to leave and get paid and paid a lot. 
P.S Colts should take a run at him or Arik Armstead two fast big guys on the edge

 

Good post. Armistead is 6'7 290 and Nqawhatever is a runt 6'2 246. We already have 2 little ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol.

 

 

2 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

Good post. Armistead is 6'7 290 and Nqawhatever is a runt 6'2 246. We already have 2 little ones.

Turay is like 6’6. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

So what is Robert saying?  If anything. 

He actually responded to that Mathis comment and said next chapter.  Mathis was seen talking to him on the sideline after the colts week 17 game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Big upgrade to replace Sheard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, BleedBlu8792 said:

 

Haha no he's not

Wiki says he is 6’5 253 lbs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, PrestonColt said:

i mean the Jags have like no money and a lot of players hate it there so not surprised he wants to leave and get paid and paid a lot. 
P.S Colts should take a run at him or Arik Armstead two fast big guys on the edge

I don’t get why people on this board seem to be enamored with Armstead... He has 19.5 sacks in his career and 10.5 of them were this year and with studs around him.  Hard pass...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, CR91 said:

Big upgrade to replace Sheard

Personally...   I hope Sheard is brought back, but NOT as a starter.   I think he’d be excellent as a quality backup and clubhouse leader where he excelled.  
 

Ballard likes having 10 dl’s on the roster.  I hope Sheard is one of them.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

Personally...   I hope Sheard is brought back, but NOT as a starter.   I think he’d be excellent as a quality backup and clubhouse leader where he excelled.  
 

Ballard likes having 10 dl’s on the roster.  I hope Sheard is one of them.  

 

Sheard would be too expensive to bring back as a backup especially with the type of contract it would take to sign Yannick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, CR91 said:

 

Sheard would be too expensive to bring back as a backup especially with the type of contract it would take to sign Yannick

 

Well...   a couple of points...    I think Sheard is only going to be offered back-up money,  so it might as well be ours.

 

Second...     there's no saying Yannick is going to be on the Colts,  so I still want Sheard as a backup.....

 

Third....       even if we sign Yannick, Ballard stil believes in 10 DL's,  and some are going to make decent money, so we should still be able to afford to sign Jabaal, no matter what happens.   A 20 mill per year contract still leaves the Colts with lots of money to spend.

 

Fourth....    if Sheard is offered starter money elsewhere,  good for him,  THEN we lose him.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This will be yet another year where we look at all of our cap space and think about grade A free agents only to sign C list players. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It just means that he's free.  So he's able to now sign a multi year deal with the Jags if they meet his demands, rather than being franchised.

 

We just spent 2 second rounders on EDGES to develop, and Houston is under contract.  He would not be a great investment considering how we just invested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Coltsfanforlife12 said:

I don’t get why people on this board seem to be enamored with Armstead... He has 19.5 sacks in his career and 10.5 of them were this year and with studs around him.  Hard pass...

he was one of the best Dline in the league this year

 

some are calling it a breakout year, they might tag him 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

 

Well...   a couple of points...    I think Sheard is only going to be offered back-up money,  so it might as well be ours.

 

Second...     there's no saying Yannick is going to be on the Colts,  so I still want Sheard as a backup.....

 

Third....       even if we sign Yannick, Ballard stil believes in 10 DL's,  and some are going to make decent money, so we should still be able to afford to sign Jabaal, no matter what happens.   A 20 mill per year contract still leaves the Colts with lots of money to spend.

 

Fourth....    if Sheard is offered starter money elsewhere,  good for him,  THEN we lose him.

 

 

Sheard is still a starter in this league. I can't see him taking backup money

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Ballard signs Ngakoue or possibly a Chris Jones or Arik Armstead, and then drafts Javon Kinlaw, this DL would be nasty. If he wants to build his team like a San Fransisco, that would certainly expedite that effort. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CR91 said:

 

Sheard is still a starter in this league. I can't see him taking backup money

You could be entirely correct.    I easily could be misreading his worth to other teams. 
 

I like the guy.   I think he has overall value to the team.   I just think his starting days are past him.  At least I hope so.   I want him back.   But as a backup.   We will find out in March...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

Personally...   I hope Sheard is brought back, but NOT as a starter.   I think he’d be excellent as a quality backup and clubhouse leader where he excelled.  
 

Ballard likes having 10 dl’s on the roster.  I hope Sheard is one of them.  

Plus Sheard is still an elite edge setter. The run D improved greatly when he came back from injury. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jones is who I want...even if it's a franchise and trade.

 

As for DEs...I would look at Clowney. Would step right in and replace Sheard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, aaron11 said:

he was one of the best Dline in the league this year

 

some are calling it a breakout year, they might tag him 

Never fall into the trap of the breakout year, right before it’s time for a contract... it NEVER works out...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt Jones gets out of KC.  I would love to have him, but let's be real.  If he leaves, they have NOBODY to stop the run, and they aren't good at it now.

 

I would echo sentiments here in adding DL both via the draft and in FA.  The foundations of franchises are built along the fronts.  We have built up the OL fairly well.  Now it's time to fix the DL.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm sorry,  I've said this before,  but I see you added more material here and you've completed misunderstood this.   First,  there are no writers for the on-air talent.   None.   The talent writes what they want to say.   I even contacted a friend who works at ESPN for the last 30 years.   He says all on-air talent writes what they say -- period.   And thre is no company position on various issues.   So, for example, on al the debate shows you talked about,  the hosts say what they want.   No writer writes what to say for them.      Here's what your article is talking about.   The company is clearly on the liberal side.   They've hired in the past a bunch of Conservatives who wanted to say whatever they wanted to say.  Mostly about politics in the real world.   The name Curt Schilling might be familiar.   He had been warned repeatedly about talking about real world politics that have nothing to do with sports.   He kept doing it and basically dared the company to do something.   He thought they wouldn't.   They did and eventually he was let go.      ESPN is trying to stay away as best as they can from real world politics.   If oyu want to point to Conservative political views,  fine, you'll get no argument from me.   SPOILER ALERT:  That's going to take a huge hit on Wednesday, 5/27,  in the aftermath of the dead black man in Minneapolis and the black man in New York who a white woman called the politce on and lied about what he was doing (caught lying on tape), as well as the jogger in Georgia who was shot and killed months ago and the video has now surfaced.  Outraged professional athletes are now loudly speaking out.    That means ESPN is going to talk about the real world even thought most of their viewers may not like it.   But you have to cover what the athletes are doing and saying.   Many people here (most?) think ESPN doesn't like Jim Irsay and the Colts.   Do certain anchors, hosts, reporters have issues with us?    Maybe,  possibly.    But there is no corporate position on Irsay or the Colts.  All on-air talent is free to say whatever they want to say.   No one tells on-air talent what to say when it comes to day-to-day sports.   To be clear,  ESPN doesn't want anyone trashing the sports they cover or hurting the professinal relationships.   If you're going to attack the commissiner of a sport,  then you had better have more than just an opionion.   You better have some substance to back it up.    Former NBA Commish David Stern was legendary for calling up the head of ESPN and SCREAMING about things he heard said about the NBA on ESPN that he didn't like.     You wrote that there's plenty of things on the internet to support your view.   Please feel free to take another crack at it,  because the first article doesn't support your position.    It's taking about something different,  how ESPN doesn't want the real world of politics infringing on the day to day coverage of sports.   Some things can't be stopped.   More women in pro sports.   Gays in sports.   How athletes react to real world injustice.    But if Curt Schilling wants to spew hate about Muslims, which he did,  or talk about transgender bathroom laws,  that's going to lead to the unemployment line, which it did. What do those issues have to do with sports?   Last thought:   I try as often as I can to explain the world of the media to people here.   30 years in the business so I should be able to to.   Frankly,  I take no pleasure in strongly opposing your views here.   In fact, no one is more surprised than me.   Because, quite honestly,  I think you've had an incredibly long stretch of really top notch posts for many months here.    I think you've seriously rasied your game and I find myself in agreement with many of your views.    And if I haven't given you a ton of likes then shame on me.   I try to reward good posting.  I find your posts smart and well reasoned.   I enjoy reading your views.    And then we hit this thread.   And I did a double-take when I saw who posted about the media.  So please take this as the compliment that it is intended.   I'm a fan of yours.   Just not here on this particular subject.   If you have other comments, or questions,  I'm happy to continue this discussion....   my apologies for the length of ths post.   Just so much to respond to.   NCF
    • He is allowed his opinion just like the rest of us. Based on where we are, I think he will be way off the mark.    But this will be a very strange season if it happens, so who knows.    We have all been watching this stupid league for many years and we should know not to take anything for granted.   Other team improve as well, you know.   I'm hoping for top 10 though.
    • I agree. Just the maturity of all the Rookies and second year players should make a significant difference. With a couple of exceptions, the Starting D was pretty darn young by the end of the season. 
    • Silly nonsense.   Very disappointing.   USA Today used to be really good.   Even if you knew nothing about the Colts, you could know this.    We spent 7 of 10 2019 draft picks on defense.   It's not unreasaonble to expect most if not all of them to be better.   The question is how much?   But Rock and Okereke and Willis are starters.   Benagu, Tell, should be key reserves.   Speed and Green to ST's.     So, the defense SHOULD be better on that alone.   And I'm almost positive I read something this off-season about a trade for Buckner, and some free agent signing's including Rhodes.   Plus the return of a healthy Turay.   That's a lot of important faces on that side of the ball.   You don't need to be a rocket scientist to be able to predict we should be a better defense.  The only question is.....    now much better?  
    • Barring something completely unexpected,   Blackmon is going to be mostly a non-factor, even if he somehow manages to get on the field.    First, he won't have played for roughly 9-10 months.  Second,  because of injury,  no rookie camps in the spring.    No summer camp, pre-season camp and missing the first part of the season.    So, he'll have a few weeks of practice and you expect him to be a factor right away?    It's among the longest of long shots.   Could it happen?   Long shot.   A one percent chance, maybe two.   Odds are if he plays, he'll be OK but nothing special.    The year to expect Blackmon to show something is 2021.   His rehab and practice time should be back to normal.   Sorry.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...