Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Sign in to follow this  
hambone35

Look at what San Francisco has done in 3 years

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

many of the top 10 QBR and YPG QBs were not thought to be hero QBs when drafted.... 

we don't need a hero, but we do need "good" and "capable".

Improvement at the QB position is something they should look for.   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Myles said:

Improvement at the QB position is something they should look for.   

I wouldn't be shocked if they didn't, but I would be a little surprised.

Several of the mocks are trending to QB for us. IMO drafting WRs or TEs without upgrading at QB won't get us a whole lot. It's like putting new racing tires and spinner rims on an old car with a 4 cylinder engine.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DEFENSE said:

hero qbs rarely come along, the colts need to find a way to win with an average qb, there are no hero qbs in this years draft class

Maybe.  But they don’t have an average QB.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Nickster said:

Maybe.  But they don’t have an average QB.

Comparing QBs...

 

                Jimmy       Jacoby

QBR           12               21

YPG            17               29

Comp%      5                 26

AVG            3                 30

 

To your point, on the 4 top stats, JG's average rank is 9th, while JB's is 27th....

JG is well above average, and JB is well below.

Jimmy can throw to the seam too... 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Freenyfan102 said:

I would not say that he would find talent time to time but when it comes to trading up in the draft he was horrible because the people he stated after the trade up where horrible tongue ugoh and Anthony Gonzalez. He could not also get a great defensive dt to save his life.

He had a few misses, but those were toward the end of his career as a GM. But there are so many that he really nailed--and, let's face it, he got us to the Super Bowl. It's rare to find an NFL team that's truly elite on both sides of the ball. Polian made the decision to invest on the offensive side, and so there just wasn't enough money to throw at the defensive side. But even there, we had the likes of Freeney and Mathis, Sanders, and several good linebackers. 

 

Ballard has managed to find some gems, like Nelson (no-brainer), Leonard (surprising), and Mack. And I wouldn't say he has a BAD eye for talent. But I don't think he's on Polian's level, at least not yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's one of those where you roll the dice and gamble and hoping you picked the right GM and HC.  It just so happen the 49ers got lucky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having the second pick in the draft didn’t hurt either...

 

This is what the NFL is built on.  Being able to turn things around quickly and go from worst to first.  This was like when the Colts were 2-14 and got Luck and went 11-5 the next season.  The problem is getting those types of guys at 13 is hard to do.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, you need a smart GM and HC once you get the #1 pick and surround your price possession with an excellent supporting cast.  Otherwise, early retirement...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UNFAIR comparison.

 

We literally lost our franchise player the week before Game 1 of the season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

Having the second pick in the draft didn’t hurt either...

 

This is what the NFL is built on.  Being able to turn things around quickly and go from worst to first.  This was like when the Colts were 2-14 and got Luck and went 11-5 the next season.  The problem is getting those types of guys at 13 is hard to do.  

 Didn't help the Redskins the year we got Luck, and it didn't help the Chargers the year we got Manning. Sure picking high means you have a higher chance of hitting a homerun, but the Jags and Browns prove that picking high isn't a sure bet no matter what..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, ColtJax said:

 Didn't help the Redskins the year we got Luck, and it didn't help the Chargers the year we got Manning. Sure picking high means you have a higher chance of hitting a homerun, but the Jags and Browns prove that picking high isn't a sure bet no matter what..

Point being is you have to have the talent too.  Talent to make that kind of a jump is normally found at the top of the draft.  Is it a guarantee?  No.  Is it a big time help?  Yes.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, ColtJax said:

 Didn't help the Redskins the year we got Luck

they did make the playoffs with RG3, he was good they basically ruined his career 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, masterlock said:

 

 

Ballard has managed to find some gems, like Nelson (no-brainer), Leonard (surprising), and Mack. And I wouldn't say he has a BAD eye for talent. But I don't think he's on Polian's level, at least not yet.

I disagree.  I think, so far, Ballard is at least on Polians level.  Polian had some bad drafts (2008).  

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Polian's first round draft picks were generally immediate hits and played at a high level for many years, as did the players he inherited, Glenn and Harrison.  Ballard hasn't been around long enough to have that kind of record yet.  Kelly and Luck probably fit into the immediate hit with longevity bucket, provided Luck had the same football drive as PM of course. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m a big fan of Ballard, but I don’t think it’s fair or accurate to make a comparison of a guy 3 years in, with 2 of 3 years forced to play a backup QB, vs a guy that has a HOF resume. 
 

Because it’s more recent, it’s easy to focus more on Polian’s later years and all the misses, but his first 20 years were historic. Built an awful Bills team into Super Bowl team 4 straight years (he was fired before the 4th trip). Took expansion Panthers to Super Bowl in just 3 years. We know his Colts history. 
 

Hopefully, we can compare them 5 years from now. That would be 8 years of Ballard, which will mean he’s had success here. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just doing some reminiscing.  Bill Polian's second first round pick after Manning.  Those were the days.  And PM was deadly accurate in just his second year.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And Polians second second round pick was Mike Peterson who I still don't understand not resigning him after his rookie contract expired. It would have taken a lot of money but Peterson was better than the 3 guys who manned the will position after him(June, Thornton and Session). Peterson in that Dungy defense would have been lights out! Still have my Mike Peterson jersey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/27/2020 at 10:27 AM, Myles said:

I disagree.  I think, so far, Ballard is at least on Polians level.  Polian had some bad drafts (2008).  

You're comparing different sample sizes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, masterlock said:

You're comparing different sample sizes.

I agree.   That's why I said "so far".   It'll be several more years till we can really compare them.  Even then, if Ballard can't find an very good QB, it'll be tough to compare.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comparing anyone to Bill Polian just isn't fair. Polian is a HOF GM who helped build teams that went to 5 Super Bowls. That's pretty impressive. I am a Ballard fan, but let's get a larger sample size before we compare him to one of the greatest GM's in the history of the NFL.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kyle Shanahan is the best move SF ever made. His Dad and he are obviously close and they know what they are doing. This same team roster might not be in the SB if not for him/them despite their apparent talent.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, LockeDown said:

Kyle Shanahan is the best move SF ever made. His Dad and he are obviously close and they know what they are doing. This same team roster might not be in the SB if not for him/them despite their apparent talent.  

I agree mostly, but they wouldn't be in the Super Bowl if they hadn't been a bad team for several years and had great draft positions.   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Eagles need WRs in the worst way   Eagles select Henry Ruggs   Bills are up
    • Jags take Josh Jones OT Eagles turn 
    • Pagano himself disagrees with your post.       Pagano sucked at in game adjustments, motivation and game planning. I wouldn't say he is the worst coach ever but he provided minimal value to the team, although Grigson significantly hampered his ceiling with this team.
    • Yea, no way to predict injuries... with a healthy Funchess, Campbell, and Fountain to compliment TY, that group hypothetically should be pretty solid.   I thought Campbell really showed strides in improving his game throughout the season, though it was unfortunate that every time he showed glimpses of what he may become, he would get re-injured.  And Funchess from pre-season and the little bit we saw of him in game 1 looked to have pretty solid chemistry with Brissett.   From a recent interview, it sounds like Ballard wants Funchess back.  If we can't sign him before the draft, I expect we'll get a big-bodied guy there.  I tend to think we're going to draft one either way.   Jacoby's play definitely declined after week 6 last year (he had 14 of his 18 TDs in the first 6 games).  Obviously, he was a step back from Luck.  However, I still can't pinpoint his decline over the season.  Was it a) he had a lack of targets due to all our injuries? b) Jacoby's knee injury taking some zip off his throws? c) teams figuring out how to game plan against him, or d) Jacoby just not being all that good of a QB?    My guess is, all 4 factored into that... I certainly think he would've been a little better without the injuries and with a better WR corps, but can't say how much.  That said, I don't think the lack of talent at WR last year was due to CB not trying to build that position group anywhere near as much as it was due to unexpected injuries.
    • Give the raiders some pass rush help   Raiders select K'lavon Chaisson   Jags are up
  • Members

    • Hark

      Hark 182

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 2,773

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 22

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 9,385

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shastamasta

      shastamasta 2,243

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ScotColt

      ScotColt 47

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indyfan4life

      Indyfan4life 1,275

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gigc

      Gigc 174

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 7,264

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bertjones7

      bertjones7 114

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...