Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Look at what San Francisco has done in 3 years


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

many of the top 10 QBR and YPG QBs were not thought to be hero QBs when drafted.... 

we don't need a hero, but we do need "good" and "capable".

Improvement at the QB position is something they should look for.   

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You can't even compare the two.  The stud DL the 49ers have had significant contributions from picks taken before Lynch and Shanahan even got there.  Armstead and Buckner were both drafted before the

Don't you think losing a pro bowl QB before the start of the season might be part of the problem?     

Doesn't hurt when you have five first round picks on your dline

17 minutes ago, Myles said:

Improvement at the QB position is something they should look for.   

I wouldn't be shocked if they didn't, but I would be a little surprised.

Several of the mocks are trending to QB for us. IMO drafting WRs or TEs without upgrading at QB won't get us a whole lot. It's like putting new racing tires and spinner rims on an old car with a 4 cylinder engine.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Nickster said:

Maybe.  But they don’t have an average QB.

Comparing QBs...

 

                Jimmy       Jacoby

QBR           12               21

YPG            17               29

Comp%      5                 26

AVG            3                 30

 

To your point, on the 4 top stats, JG's average rank is 9th, while JB's is 27th....

JG is well above average, and JB is well below.

Jimmy can throw to the seam too... 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Freenyfan102 said:

I would not say that he would find talent time to time but when it comes to trading up in the draft he was horrible because the people he stated after the trade up where horrible tongue ugoh and Anthony Gonzalez. He could not also get a great defensive dt to save his life.

He had a few misses, but those were toward the end of his career as a GM. But there are so many that he really nailed--and, let's face it, he got us to the Super Bowl. It's rare to find an NFL team that's truly elite on both sides of the ball. Polian made the decision to invest on the offensive side, and so there just wasn't enough money to throw at the defensive side. But even there, we had the likes of Freeney and Mathis, Sanders, and several good linebackers. 

 

Ballard has managed to find some gems, like Nelson (no-brainer), Leonard (surprising), and Mack. And I wouldn't say he has a BAD eye for talent. But I don't think he's on Polian's level, at least not yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having the second pick in the draft didn’t hurt either...

 

This is what the NFL is built on.  Being able to turn things around quickly and go from worst to first.  This was like when the Colts were 2-14 and got Luck and went 11-5 the next season.  The problem is getting those types of guys at 13 is hard to do.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

Having the second pick in the draft didn’t hurt either...

 

This is what the NFL is built on.  Being able to turn things around quickly and go from worst to first.  This was like when the Colts were 2-14 and got Luck and went 11-5 the next season.  The problem is getting those types of guys at 13 is hard to do.  

 Didn't help the Redskins the year we got Luck, and it didn't help the Chargers the year we got Manning. Sure picking high means you have a higher chance of hitting a homerun, but the Jags and Browns prove that picking high isn't a sure bet no matter what..

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, ColtJax said:

 Didn't help the Redskins the year we got Luck, and it didn't help the Chargers the year we got Manning. Sure picking high means you have a higher chance of hitting a homerun, but the Jags and Browns prove that picking high isn't a sure bet no matter what..

Point being is you have to have the talent too.  Talent to make that kind of a jump is normally found at the top of the draft.  Is it a guarantee?  No.  Is it a big time help?  Yes.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, masterlock said:

 

 

Ballard has managed to find some gems, like Nelson (no-brainer), Leonard (surprising), and Mack. And I wouldn't say he has a BAD eye for talent. But I don't think he's on Polian's level, at least not yet.

I disagree.  I think, so far, Ballard is at least on Polians level.  Polian had some bad drafts (2008).  

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Polian's first round draft picks were generally immediate hits and played at a high level for many years, as did the players he inherited, Glenn and Harrison.  Ballard hasn't been around long enough to have that kind of record yet.  Kelly and Luck probably fit into the immediate hit with longevity bucket, provided Luck had the same football drive as PM of course. 

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m a big fan of Ballard, but I don’t think it’s fair or accurate to make a comparison of a guy 3 years in, with 2 of 3 years forced to play a backup QB, vs a guy that has a HOF resume. 
 

Because it’s more recent, it’s easy to focus more on Polian’s later years and all the misses, but his first 20 years were historic. Built an awful Bills team into Super Bowl team 4 straight years (he was fired before the 4th trip). Took expansion Panthers to Super Bowl in just 3 years. We know his Colts history. 
 

Hopefully, we can compare them 5 years from now. That would be 8 years of Ballard, which will mean he’s had success here. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

And Polians second second round pick was Mike Peterson who I still don't understand not resigning him after his rookie contract expired. It would have taken a lot of money but Peterson was better than the 3 guys who manned the will position after him(June, Thornton and Session). Peterson in that Dungy defense would have been lights out! Still have my Mike Peterson jersey.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, masterlock said:

You're comparing different sample sizes.

I agree.   That's why I said "so far".   It'll be several more years till we can really compare them.  Even then, if Ballard can't find an very good QB, it'll be tough to compare.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, LockeDown said:

Kyle Shanahan is the best move SF ever made. His Dad and he are obviously close and they know what they are doing. This same team roster might not be in the SB if not for him/them despite their apparent talent.  

I agree mostly, but they wouldn't be in the Super Bowl if they hadn't been a bad team for several years and had great draft positions.   

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I simply love this post.    Specific things I appreciate 1) Young player development. That is such a good point. It strikes me as entirely possible that they did not go for FA edge rusher because they want to see the growth from Turey and Banagu.    2) Free agency is not over with. They will draft next week, assess their roster and add a few players. Houston,Kerrigan and Ingram will still be available next week if they deem their pass rush still needs something. I would think a vet QB is still very possible as well.    3) I believe they will take a OT or DL with their first pick but not because those are the glaring needs but because the likelihood is there will be an available player highly rated on their board at one of those positions. However if a CB for example is the highest rated guy by a long shot, it will surprise me not at all that corner becomes the pick.    Ballard and transparency - you are right on that.  He will hint at what is to come.  One of his core values is to build the lines on both sides of the ball. I will not be shocked if multiple players on the line are taken beyond just OT and DE.    Anyway - well done.     
    • And they haven’t had clear needs in previous drafts?
    • If a player they love falls, regardless of position, they will take him.    I do expect that round 1 will be an Edge and round 2 will be a Tackle, but they won’t reach to far down their board.   For example, if they love Micah Parsons (just using him as an example) and he falls, I could see them taking him. Fill the holes later.
    • Jared...    it’s not that I don’t believe what the Colts put out, but here’s what I don’t do.   I don’t look at the pieces and announce with 100 percent certainty that they’re talking about a specific player — like you did with Liam Eichenberg.    So I don’t jump to conclusions on what the Colts put out.   I don’t say “they’re talking about this player or that player.”      I accept what the Colts put out because they’ve given me no reason not to.  But, frankly,  they’re not putting out as much as you think they are.  You can imply most anything with clever editing.    I jumped the gun in the Jags video.  I didn’t know what it was.  I was reacting to your 100 percent certainty that you knew who they were talking about.   That it was fact.   I was trying to offer some cold water to cool off a highly likely wrong guess.     Believe what you want.  But guessing who a team is talking about based on the edited video is not likely to lead to a correct answer.     
    • If we can get 2 out of 3 from the Brewers I will take it. That would put us a game out of 1st place at the end of the weekend. Brewers swept the Padres which was surprising.
  • Members

    • bravo4460

      bravo4460 564

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 1,889

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MFT5

      MFT5 231

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 8,656

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...